Outflow forces of low-mass embedded objects in Ophiuchus: a quantitative comparison of analysis methods

Context. The outflow force of molecular bipolar outflows is a key parameter in theories of young stellar feedback on their surroundings. The focus of many outflow studies is the correlation between the outflow force, bolometric luminosity, and envelope mass. However, it is difficult to combine the r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2013-08, Vol.556, p.1-23
Hauptverfasser: van der Marel, N., Kristensen, L. E., Visser, R., Mottram, J. C., Yıldız, U. A., van Dishoeck, E. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)
container_volume 556
creator van der Marel, N.
Kristensen, L. E.
Visser, R.
Mottram, J. C.
Yıldız, U. A.
van Dishoeck, E. F.
description Context. The outflow force of molecular bipolar outflows is a key parameter in theories of young stellar feedback on their surroundings. The focus of many outflow studies is the correlation between the outflow force, bolometric luminosity, and envelope mass. However, it is difficult to combine the results of different studies in large evolutionary plots over many orders of magnitude due to the range of data quality, analysis methods, and corrections for observational effects, such as opacity and inclination. Aims. We aim to determine the outflow force for a sample of low-luminosity embedded sources. We quantify the influence of the analysis method and the assumptions entering the calculation of the outflow force. Methods. We used the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope to map 12CO J = 3–2 over 2′× 2′ regions around 16 Class I sources of a well-defined sample in Ophiuchus at 15″ resolution. The outflow force was then calculated using seven different methods differing, e.g., in the use of intensity-weighted emission and correction factors for inclination. Two well studied outflows (HH 46 and NGC1 333 IRAS4A) are added to the sample and included in the comparison. Results. The results from the analysis methods differ from each other by up to a factor of 6, whereas observational properties and choices in the analysis procedure affect the outflow force by up to a factor of 4. Subtraction of cloud emission and integrating over the remaining profile increases the outflow force at most by a factor of 4 compared to line wing integration. For the sample of Class I objects, bipolar outflows are detected around 13 sources including 5 new detections, where the three nondetections are confused by nearby outflows from other sources. New outflow structures without a clear powering source are discovered at the corners of some of the maps. Conclusions. When combining outflow forces from different studies, a scatter by up to a factor of 5 can be expected. Although the true outflow force remains unknown, the separation method (separate calculation of dynamical time and momentum) is least affected by the uncertain observational parameters. The correlations between outflow force, bolometric luminosity, and envelope mass are further confirmed down to low-luminosity sources.
doi_str_mv 10.1051/0004-6361/201220717
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677963991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1677963991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-ff911d3441e9daf99e1b929c0d28a6630e96f71cac0ab9b19918e2ca943f44603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EEkvhF3DxkUtaT-y1496gLbRVpb0U9Wg5zph1m8TbjEPpvyerRXvlNHrS973DG8Y-gzgFsYYzIYSqtNRwVguoa2HAvGErULKuhFH6LVsdiffsA9HjEmto5Ir92swl9vmFxzwFJJ4jX1I1eCKOQ4tdhx3P7SOGQjyNfLPbpjlsZzrnnj_Pfiyp-JJ-Iw952PkpUR73JX70_Ssl4gOWbe7oI3sXfU_46d89YT-_X91fXFd3mx83F1_vqqC0KlWMFqCTSgHazkdrEVpb2yC6uvFaS4FWRwPBB-Fb24K10GAdvFUyKqWFPGFfDr27KT_PSMUNiQL2vR8xz-RAG2O1XLz_o2stQJpGqQWVBzRMmWjC6HZTGvz06kC4_Qfcfl-339cdP7BY1cFKVPDPUfHTk9NGmrVrxIN7uNX30FwK903-BUCEiDk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560137844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outflow forces of low-mass embedded objects in Ophiuchus: a quantitative comparison of analysis methods</title><source>Bacon EDP Sciences France Licence nationale-ISTEX-PS-Journals-PFISTEX</source><source>EDP Sciences</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>van der Marel, N. ; Kristensen, L. E. ; Visser, R. ; Mottram, J. C. ; Yıldız, U. A. ; van Dishoeck, E. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Marel, N. ; Kristensen, L. E. ; Visser, R. ; Mottram, J. C. ; Yıldız, U. A. ; van Dishoeck, E. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Context. The outflow force of molecular bipolar outflows is a key parameter in theories of young stellar feedback on their surroundings. The focus of many outflow studies is the correlation between the outflow force, bolometric luminosity, and envelope mass. However, it is difficult to combine the results of different studies in large evolutionary plots over many orders of magnitude due to the range of data quality, analysis methods, and corrections for observational effects, such as opacity and inclination. Aims. We aim to determine the outflow force for a sample of low-luminosity embedded sources. We quantify the influence of the analysis method and the assumptions entering the calculation of the outflow force. Methods. We used the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope to map 12CO J = 3–2 over 2′× 2′ regions around 16 Class I sources of a well-defined sample in Ophiuchus at 15″ resolution. The outflow force was then calculated using seven different methods differing, e.g., in the use of intensity-weighted emission and correction factors for inclination. Two well studied outflows (HH 46 and NGC1 333 IRAS4A) are added to the sample and included in the comparison. Results. The results from the analysis methods differ from each other by up to a factor of 6, whereas observational properties and choices in the analysis procedure affect the outflow force by up to a factor of 4. Subtraction of cloud emission and integrating over the remaining profile increases the outflow force at most by a factor of 4 compared to line wing integration. For the sample of Class I objects, bipolar outflows are detected around 13 sources including 5 new detections, where the three nondetections are confused by nearby outflows from other sources. New outflow structures without a clear powering source are discovered at the corners of some of the maps. Conclusions. When combining outflow forces from different studies, a scatter by up to a factor of 5 can be expected. Although the true outflow force remains unknown, the separation method (separate calculation of dynamical time and momentum) is least affected by the uncertain observational parameters. The correlations between outflow force, bolometric luminosity, and envelope mass are further confirmed down to low-luminosity sources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-6361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Astronomy ; Bolometers ; circumstellar matter ; Correlation ; Envelopes ; ISM: jets and outflows ; ISM: molecules ; Luminosity ; Mathematical analysis ; Outflow ; stars: low-mass ; stars: protostars ; submillimeter: ISM ; Telescopes</subject><ispartof>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2013-08, Vol.556, p.1-23</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-ff911d3441e9daf99e1b929c0d28a6630e96f71cac0ab9b19918e2ca943f44603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-ff911d3441e9daf99e1b929c0d28a6630e96f71cac0ab9b19918e2ca943f44603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3714,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Marel, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristensen, L. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottram, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, U. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dishoeck, E. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Outflow forces of low-mass embedded objects in Ophiuchus: a quantitative comparison of analysis methods</title><title>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</title><description>Context. The outflow force of molecular bipolar outflows is a key parameter in theories of young stellar feedback on their surroundings. The focus of many outflow studies is the correlation between the outflow force, bolometric luminosity, and envelope mass. However, it is difficult to combine the results of different studies in large evolutionary plots over many orders of magnitude due to the range of data quality, analysis methods, and corrections for observational effects, such as opacity and inclination. Aims. We aim to determine the outflow force for a sample of low-luminosity embedded sources. We quantify the influence of the analysis method and the assumptions entering the calculation of the outflow force. Methods. We used the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope to map 12CO J = 3–2 over 2′× 2′ regions around 16 Class I sources of a well-defined sample in Ophiuchus at 15″ resolution. The outflow force was then calculated using seven different methods differing, e.g., in the use of intensity-weighted emission and correction factors for inclination. Two well studied outflows (HH 46 and NGC1 333 IRAS4A) are added to the sample and included in the comparison. Results. The results from the analysis methods differ from each other by up to a factor of 6, whereas observational properties and choices in the analysis procedure affect the outflow force by up to a factor of 4. Subtraction of cloud emission and integrating over the remaining profile increases the outflow force at most by a factor of 4 compared to line wing integration. For the sample of Class I objects, bipolar outflows are detected around 13 sources including 5 new detections, where the three nondetections are confused by nearby outflows from other sources. New outflow structures without a clear powering source are discovered at the corners of some of the maps. Conclusions. When combining outflow forces from different studies, a scatter by up to a factor of 5 can be expected. Although the true outflow force remains unknown, the separation method (separate calculation of dynamical time and momentum) is least affected by the uncertain observational parameters. The correlations between outflow force, bolometric luminosity, and envelope mass are further confirmed down to low-luminosity sources.</description><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Bolometers</subject><subject>circumstellar matter</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Envelopes</subject><subject>ISM: jets and outflows</subject><subject>ISM: molecules</subject><subject>Luminosity</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Outflow</subject><subject>stars: low-mass</subject><subject>stars: protostars</subject><subject>submillimeter: ISM</subject><subject>Telescopes</subject><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EEkvhF3DxkUtaT-y1496gLbRVpb0U9Wg5zph1m8TbjEPpvyerRXvlNHrS973DG8Y-gzgFsYYzIYSqtNRwVguoa2HAvGErULKuhFH6LVsdiffsA9HjEmto5Ir92swl9vmFxzwFJJ4jX1I1eCKOQ4tdhx3P7SOGQjyNfLPbpjlsZzrnnj_Pfiyp-JJ-Iw952PkpUR73JX70_Ssl4gOWbe7oI3sXfU_46d89YT-_X91fXFd3mx83F1_vqqC0KlWMFqCTSgHazkdrEVpb2yC6uvFaS4FWRwPBB-Fb24K10GAdvFUyKqWFPGFfDr27KT_PSMUNiQL2vR8xz-RAG2O1XLz_o2stQJpGqQWVBzRMmWjC6HZTGvz06kC4_Qfcfl-339cdP7BY1cFKVPDPUfHTk9NGmrVrxIN7uNX30FwK903-BUCEiDk</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>van der Marel, N.</creator><creator>Kristensen, L. E.</creator><creator>Visser, R.</creator><creator>Mottram, J. C.</creator><creator>Yıldız, U. A.</creator><creator>van Dishoeck, E. F.</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Outflow forces of low-mass embedded objects in Ophiuchus: a quantitative comparison of analysis methods</title><author>van der Marel, N. ; Kristensen, L. E. ; Visser, R. ; Mottram, J. C. ; Yıldız, U. A. ; van Dishoeck, E. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-ff911d3441e9daf99e1b929c0d28a6630e96f71cac0ab9b19918e2ca943f44603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Bolometers</topic><topic>circumstellar matter</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Envelopes</topic><topic>ISM: jets and outflows</topic><topic>ISM: molecules</topic><topic>Luminosity</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Outflow</topic><topic>stars: low-mass</topic><topic>stars: protostars</topic><topic>submillimeter: ISM</topic><topic>Telescopes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Marel, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristensen, L. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottram, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, U. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dishoeck, E. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Marel, N.</au><au>Kristensen, L. E.</au><au>Visser, R.</au><au>Mottram, J. C.</au><au>Yıldız, U. A.</au><au>van Dishoeck, E. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outflow forces of low-mass embedded objects in Ophiuchus: a quantitative comparison of analysis methods</atitle><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>556</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>0004-6361</issn><eissn>1432-0746</eissn><abstract>Context. The outflow force of molecular bipolar outflows is a key parameter in theories of young stellar feedback on their surroundings. The focus of many outflow studies is the correlation between the outflow force, bolometric luminosity, and envelope mass. However, it is difficult to combine the results of different studies in large evolutionary plots over many orders of magnitude due to the range of data quality, analysis methods, and corrections for observational effects, such as opacity and inclination. Aims. We aim to determine the outflow force for a sample of low-luminosity embedded sources. We quantify the influence of the analysis method and the assumptions entering the calculation of the outflow force. Methods. We used the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope to map 12CO J = 3–2 over 2′× 2′ regions around 16 Class I sources of a well-defined sample in Ophiuchus at 15″ resolution. The outflow force was then calculated using seven different methods differing, e.g., in the use of intensity-weighted emission and correction factors for inclination. Two well studied outflows (HH 46 and NGC1 333 IRAS4A) are added to the sample and included in the comparison. Results. The results from the analysis methods differ from each other by up to a factor of 6, whereas observational properties and choices in the analysis procedure affect the outflow force by up to a factor of 4. Subtraction of cloud emission and integrating over the remaining profile increases the outflow force at most by a factor of 4 compared to line wing integration. For the sample of Class I objects, bipolar outflows are detected around 13 sources including 5 new detections, where the three nondetections are confused by nearby outflows from other sources. New outflow structures without a clear powering source are discovered at the corners of some of the maps. Conclusions. When combining outflow forces from different studies, a scatter by up to a factor of 5 can be expected. Although the true outflow force remains unknown, the separation method (separate calculation of dynamical time and momentum) is least affected by the uncertain observational parameters. The correlations between outflow force, bolometric luminosity, and envelope mass are further confirmed down to low-luminosity sources.</abstract><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/0004-6361/201220717</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-6361
ispartof Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2013-08, Vol.556, p.1-23
issn 0004-6361
1432-0746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677963991
source Bacon EDP Sciences France Licence nationale-ISTEX-PS-Journals-PFISTEX; EDP Sciences; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Astronomy
Bolometers
circumstellar matter
Correlation
Envelopes
ISM: jets and outflows
ISM: molecules
Luminosity
Mathematical analysis
Outflow
stars: low-mass
stars: protostars
submillimeter: ISM
Telescopes
title Outflow forces of low-mass embedded objects in Ophiuchus: a quantitative comparison of analysis methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T22%3A41%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outflow%20forces%20of%20low-mass%20embedded%20objects%20in%20Ophiuchus:%20a%20quantitative%20comparison%20of%20analysis%20methods&rft.jtitle=Astronomy%20and%20astrophysics%20(Berlin)&rft.au=van%20der%20Marel,%20N.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=556&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=0004-6361&rft.eissn=1432-0746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/0004-6361/201220717&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677963991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560137844&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true