Esterification pretreatment of free fatty acid in biodiesel production, from laboratory to industry
In the US, biodiesel producers usually follow the 19.8:1 methanol-to-FFA molar ratio for free fatty add (FFA) esterification, as suggested by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) without optimization studies. In this paper, both laboratory studies and industrial practices of the esterific...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fuel processing technology 2014-09, Vol.125, p.106-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 106 |
container_title | Fuel processing technology |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | MING CHAI QINGSHI TU MINGMING LU JEFFREY YANG, Y |
description | In the US, biodiesel producers usually follow the 19.8:1 methanol-to-FFA molar ratio for free fatty add (FFA) esterification, as suggested by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) without optimization studies. In this paper, both laboratory studies and industrial practices of the esterification process were compared, and an optimization study of a used vegetable oil with 5% FFA was conducted. The optimal conditions of this oil, i.e., methanol-to-FFA molar ratio of 40:1, and sulfuric acid usage of 10%, fell out of the suggested range of 19.8:1. The activation energy of the esterification reaction is 20.7 kJ/mol at the optimized condition and 45.9 kJ/mol at the 19.8:1 methanol to FFA ratio. It was found that the 19.8:1 methanol-to-FFA molar ratio worked well only within the FFA range of 15-25% while the suggested 5% sulfuric acid worked well only within the FFA range of 15-35%. Outside these ranges, especially at FFA levels less than 15%, optimization study is necessary. Regression models of methanol and arid dosing have been utilized in two industrial scale biodiesel producing facilities and have successfully reduced the FFA level to less than 0.5%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.03.025 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677963106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1677963106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-9882eddd1a15d1548c1f0e9ab9b4b1bc8f5f644883679da56133a6310b59b7243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOwzAUQC0EEqXwBwxekBhI8CN-ZERVeUiVWGC2HD8kV2lcbGfI35OoFSvTXc659-oAcI9RjRHmz_vaj8cUTU0QbmpEa0TYBVhhKWglsJSXYIWokBWVBF2Dm5z3CCHGWrECZpuLS8EHo0uIAzwmV5LT5eCGAqOHPjkHvS5lgtoEC8MAuxBtcNn1MxztaBbvaQbjAfa6i0mXmCZY4szaMZc03YIrr_vs7s5zDb5ft1-b92r3-faxedlVpmFtqVopibPWYo2ZxayRBnvkWt21XdPhzkjPPG8aKSkXrdWMY0o1pxh1rO0EaegaPJ72zn_9jC4XdQjZuL7Xg4tjVpgL0S4C_x9lnHBBOF7Q5oSaFHNOzqtjCgedJoWRWvKrvTrlV0t-haia88_aw_mCzkb3PunBhPznEskoQ5zQXxuKiL0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562672616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Esterification pretreatment of free fatty acid in biodiesel production, from laboratory to industry</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>MING CHAI ; QINGSHI TU ; MINGMING LU ; JEFFREY YANG, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>MING CHAI ; QINGSHI TU ; MINGMING LU ; JEFFREY YANG, Y</creatorcontrib><description>In the US, biodiesel producers usually follow the 19.8:1 methanol-to-FFA molar ratio for free fatty add (FFA) esterification, as suggested by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) without optimization studies. In this paper, both laboratory studies and industrial practices of the esterification process were compared, and an optimization study of a used vegetable oil with 5% FFA was conducted. The optimal conditions of this oil, i.e., methanol-to-FFA molar ratio of 40:1, and sulfuric acid usage of 10%, fell out of the suggested range of 19.8:1. The activation energy of the esterification reaction is 20.7 kJ/mol at the optimized condition and 45.9 kJ/mol at the 19.8:1 methanol to FFA ratio. It was found that the 19.8:1 methanol-to-FFA molar ratio worked well only within the FFA range of 15-25% while the suggested 5% sulfuric acid worked well only within the FFA range of 15-35%. Outside these ranges, especially at FFA levels less than 15%, optimization study is necessary. Regression models of methanol and arid dosing have been utilized in two industrial scale biodiesel producing facilities and have successfully reduced the FFA level to less than 0.5%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-3820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7188</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.03.025</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FPTEDY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Alternative fuels. Production and utilization ; Applied sciences ; Biodiesel ; Dosing ; Energy ; Esterification ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fatty acids ; Fuels ; Methyl alcohol ; Miscellaneous ; Optimization ; Other wastes and particular components of wastes ; Pollution ; Regression ; Sulfuric acid ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Fuel processing technology, 2014-09, Vol.125, p.106-113</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-9882eddd1a15d1548c1f0e9ab9b4b1bc8f5f644883679da56133a6310b59b7243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-9882eddd1a15d1548c1f0e9ab9b4b1bc8f5f644883679da56133a6310b59b7243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28535062$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MING CHAI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QINGSHI TU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MINGMING LU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JEFFREY YANG, Y</creatorcontrib><title>Esterification pretreatment of free fatty acid in biodiesel production, from laboratory to industry</title><title>Fuel processing technology</title><description>In the US, biodiesel producers usually follow the 19.8:1 methanol-to-FFA molar ratio for free fatty add (FFA) esterification, as suggested by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) without optimization studies. In this paper, both laboratory studies and industrial practices of the esterification process were compared, and an optimization study of a used vegetable oil with 5% FFA was conducted. The optimal conditions of this oil, i.e., methanol-to-FFA molar ratio of 40:1, and sulfuric acid usage of 10%, fell out of the suggested range of 19.8:1. The activation energy of the esterification reaction is 20.7 kJ/mol at the optimized condition and 45.9 kJ/mol at the 19.8:1 methanol to FFA ratio. It was found that the 19.8:1 methanol-to-FFA molar ratio worked well only within the FFA range of 15-25% while the suggested 5% sulfuric acid worked well only within the FFA range of 15-35%. Outside these ranges, especially at FFA levels less than 15%, optimization study is necessary. Regression models of methanol and arid dosing have been utilized in two industrial scale biodiesel producing facilities and have successfully reduced the FFA level to less than 0.5%.</description><subject>Alternative fuels. Production and utilization</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biodiesel</subject><subject>Dosing</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Esterification</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Methyl alcohol</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Sulfuric acid</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0378-3820</issn><issn>1873-7188</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkLtOwzAUQC0EEqXwBwxekBhI8CN-ZERVeUiVWGC2HD8kV2lcbGfI35OoFSvTXc659-oAcI9RjRHmz_vaj8cUTU0QbmpEa0TYBVhhKWglsJSXYIWokBWVBF2Dm5z3CCHGWrECZpuLS8EHo0uIAzwmV5LT5eCGAqOHPjkHvS5lgtoEC8MAuxBtcNn1MxztaBbvaQbjAfa6i0mXmCZY4szaMZc03YIrr_vs7s5zDb5ft1-b92r3-faxedlVpmFtqVopibPWYo2ZxayRBnvkWt21XdPhzkjPPG8aKSkXrdWMY0o1pxh1rO0EaegaPJ72zn_9jC4XdQjZuL7Xg4tjVpgL0S4C_x9lnHBBOF7Q5oSaFHNOzqtjCgedJoWRWvKrvTrlV0t-haia88_aw_mCzkb3PunBhPznEskoQ5zQXxuKiL0</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>MING CHAI</creator><creator>QINGSHI TU</creator><creator>MINGMING LU</creator><creator>JEFFREY YANG, Y</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Esterification pretreatment of free fatty acid in biodiesel production, from laboratory to industry</title><author>MING CHAI ; QINGSHI TU ; MINGMING LU ; JEFFREY YANG, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-9882eddd1a15d1548c1f0e9ab9b4b1bc8f5f644883679da56133a6310b59b7243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alternative fuels. Production and utilization</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biodiesel</topic><topic>Dosing</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Esterification</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Methyl alcohol</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Sulfuric acid</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MING CHAI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QINGSHI TU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MINGMING LU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JEFFREY YANG, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Fuel processing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MING CHAI</au><au>QINGSHI TU</au><au>MINGMING LU</au><au>JEFFREY YANG, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Esterification pretreatment of free fatty acid in biodiesel production, from laboratory to industry</atitle><jtitle>Fuel processing technology</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>125</volume><spage>106</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>106-113</pages><issn>0378-3820</issn><eissn>1873-7188</eissn><coden>FPTEDY</coden><abstract>In the US, biodiesel producers usually follow the 19.8:1 methanol-to-FFA molar ratio for free fatty add (FFA) esterification, as suggested by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) without optimization studies. In this paper, both laboratory studies and industrial practices of the esterification process were compared, and an optimization study of a used vegetable oil with 5% FFA was conducted. The optimal conditions of this oil, i.e., methanol-to-FFA molar ratio of 40:1, and sulfuric acid usage of 10%, fell out of the suggested range of 19.8:1. The activation energy of the esterification reaction is 20.7 kJ/mol at the optimized condition and 45.9 kJ/mol at the 19.8:1 methanol to FFA ratio. It was found that the 19.8:1 methanol-to-FFA molar ratio worked well only within the FFA range of 15-25% while the suggested 5% sulfuric acid worked well only within the FFA range of 15-35%. Outside these ranges, especially at FFA levels less than 15%, optimization study is necessary. Regression models of methanol and arid dosing have been utilized in two industrial scale biodiesel producing facilities and have successfully reduced the FFA level to less than 0.5%.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.03.025</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-3820 |
ispartof | Fuel processing technology, 2014-09, Vol.125, p.106-113 |
issn | 0378-3820 1873-7188 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677963106 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Alternative fuels. Production and utilization Applied sciences Biodiesel Dosing Energy Esterification Exact sciences and technology Fatty acids Fuels Methyl alcohol Miscellaneous Optimization Other wastes and particular components of wastes Pollution Regression Sulfuric acid Wastes |
title | Esterification pretreatment of free fatty acid in biodiesel production, from laboratory to industry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T03%3A44%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Esterification%20pretreatment%20of%20free%20fatty%20acid%20in%20biodiesel%20production,%20from%20laboratory%20to%20industry&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20processing%20technology&rft.au=MING%20CHAI&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=125&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=106-113&rft.issn=0378-3820&rft.eissn=1873-7188&rft.coden=FPTEDY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.03.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677963106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562672616&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |