The Value of Preparation in a Systems Engineering Masters Module: A Longitudinal Case Study

ABSTRACT This research emanates from a systems‐oriented process of investigation into the educational approach of masters in engineering management programmes in order to find ways to improve student through‐put rate and the quality of learning. The document describes the educational process, with s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Systems engineering 2015-03, Vol.18 (2), p.131-145
Hauptverfasser: Benade, Siebert, Callaghan, Ronel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 145
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title Systems engineering
container_volume 18
creator Benade, Siebert
Callaghan, Ronel
description ABSTRACT This research emanates from a systems‐oriented process of investigation into the educational approach of masters in engineering management programmes in order to find ways to improve student through‐put rate and the quality of learning. The document describes the educational process, with specific emphasis on student preparedness, including the value and impact of a pivotal preparation test. This process is guided by constructive alignment; learning cycles through interactive blended teaching; and a focus on student learning. A longitudinal descriptive case study of the programmes was undertaken, focusing on a systems engineering module, which is integral to all masters programmes. The case is described with regard to its context; the educational process and teaching approach; and an educational and statistical analysis of the preparation test. The main contribution of the paper is the resulting structured, holistic, and integrated education process, designed to address the challenges, including a specific focus on student preparation and the pivotal preparation test. A clear link was established between student preparedness and the subsequent levels of teaching and learning. The preparation test was found to be on the relevant cognitive level; a predictor of course success; influencing positively the motivation of students; as well as impacting on the adaptation of the educational process. The use of the adapted Bloom's taxonomy to evaluate cognitive levels of an intervention; the application of learning cycles and constructive alignment; as well as the impact of a preparation test, can significantly enhance the quality of the education process and consequently, student through‐put rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sys.21292
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677946089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1677946089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4732-2d85ba3312f28928e0ed2cb941962b2a6a93de7c2c5abeca13124ff902fb866d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9P2zAYBvAIbRJdx2HfwNIucEixXyeOzQ1VXWEqUK1lMO1gOckbMKRJZyfa8u3nrhsHpJ387_e8sp4o-sDohFEKp37wE2Cg4CAasRRoLGQq34Q9VTJmkLDD6J33T5QyyhgdRd_Xj0i-mrpH0lZk6XBrnOls2xDbEENWg-9w48msebANorPNA7ky4c55ctWWfY1n5Jws2vDc9aVtTE2mxiNZhdPwPnpbmdrj0d91HN1-mq2nF_HiZn45PV_ERZJxiKGUaW44Z1CBVCCRYglFrhKmBORghFG8xKyAIjU5FoYFmVSVolDlUoiSj6Pj_dyta3_06Du9sb7AujYNtr3XTGSZSgSVKtCPr-hT27vw7Z0SwGWW8p062avCtd47rPTW2Y1xg2ZU72rWoWb9p-ZgT_f2p61x-D_Uq2-rf4l4n7Chx18vCeOetch4luq767n-Mv0slku41vf8N1YyjQc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1662387539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Value of Preparation in a Systems Engineering Masters Module: A Longitudinal Case Study</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Benade, Siebert ; Callaghan, Ronel</creator><creatorcontrib>Benade, Siebert ; Callaghan, Ronel</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT This research emanates from a systems‐oriented process of investigation into the educational approach of masters in engineering management programmes in order to find ways to improve student through‐put rate and the quality of learning. The document describes the educational process, with specific emphasis on student preparedness, including the value and impact of a pivotal preparation test. This process is guided by constructive alignment; learning cycles through interactive blended teaching; and a focus on student learning. A longitudinal descriptive case study of the programmes was undertaken, focusing on a systems engineering module, which is integral to all masters programmes. The case is described with regard to its context; the educational process and teaching approach; and an educational and statistical analysis of the preparation test. The main contribution of the paper is the resulting structured, holistic, and integrated education process, designed to address the challenges, including a specific focus on student preparation and the pivotal preparation test. A clear link was established between student preparedness and the subsequent levels of teaching and learning. The preparation test was found to be on the relevant cognitive level; a predictor of course success; influencing positively the motivation of students; as well as impacting on the adaptation of the educational process. The use of the adapted Bloom's taxonomy to evaluate cognitive levels of an intervention; the application of learning cycles and constructive alignment; as well as the impact of a preparation test, can significantly enhance the quality of the education process and consequently, student through‐put rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-1241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6858</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sys.21292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alignment ; blended learning ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Construction ; Education ; Learning ; learning cycles ; levels of learning ; Modules ; postgraduate engineering education ; Students ; Systems engineering ; systems engineering education ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>Systems engineering, 2015-03, Vol.18 (2), p.131-145</ispartof><rights>2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4732-2d85ba3312f28928e0ed2cb941962b2a6a93de7c2c5abeca13124ff902fb866d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4732-2d85ba3312f28928e0ed2cb941962b2a6a93de7c2c5abeca13124ff902fb866d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7168-3895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsys.21292$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsys.21292$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benade, Siebert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callaghan, Ronel</creatorcontrib><title>The Value of Preparation in a Systems Engineering Masters Module: A Longitudinal Case Study</title><title>Systems engineering</title><addtitle>Syst. Engin</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT This research emanates from a systems‐oriented process of investigation into the educational approach of masters in engineering management programmes in order to find ways to improve student through‐put rate and the quality of learning. The document describes the educational process, with specific emphasis on student preparedness, including the value and impact of a pivotal preparation test. This process is guided by constructive alignment; learning cycles through interactive blended teaching; and a focus on student learning. A longitudinal descriptive case study of the programmes was undertaken, focusing on a systems engineering module, which is integral to all masters programmes. The case is described with regard to its context; the educational process and teaching approach; and an educational and statistical analysis of the preparation test. The main contribution of the paper is the resulting structured, holistic, and integrated education process, designed to address the challenges, including a specific focus on student preparation and the pivotal preparation test. A clear link was established between student preparedness and the subsequent levels of teaching and learning. The preparation test was found to be on the relevant cognitive level; a predictor of course success; influencing positively the motivation of students; as well as impacting on the adaptation of the educational process. The use of the adapted Bloom's taxonomy to evaluate cognitive levels of an intervention; the application of learning cycles and constructive alignment; as well as the impact of a preparation test, can significantly enhance the quality of the education process and consequently, student through‐put rates.</description><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>blended learning</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>learning cycles</subject><subject>levels of learning</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>postgraduate engineering education</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Systems engineering</subject><subject>systems engineering education</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>1098-1241</issn><issn>1520-6858</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E9P2zAYBvAIbRJdx2HfwNIucEixXyeOzQ1VXWEqUK1lMO1gOckbMKRJZyfa8u3nrhsHpJ387_e8sp4o-sDohFEKp37wE2Cg4CAasRRoLGQq34Q9VTJmkLDD6J33T5QyyhgdRd_Xj0i-mrpH0lZk6XBrnOls2xDbEENWg-9w48msebANorPNA7ky4c55ctWWfY1n5Jws2vDc9aVtTE2mxiNZhdPwPnpbmdrj0d91HN1-mq2nF_HiZn45PV_ERZJxiKGUaW44Z1CBVCCRYglFrhKmBORghFG8xKyAIjU5FoYFmVSVolDlUoiSj6Pj_dyta3_06Du9sb7AujYNtr3XTGSZSgSVKtCPr-hT27vw7Z0SwGWW8p062avCtd47rPTW2Y1xg2ZU72rWoWb9p-ZgT_f2p61x-D_Uq2-rf4l4n7Chx18vCeOetch4luq767n-Mv0slku41vf8N1YyjQc</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Benade, Siebert</creator><creator>Callaghan, Ronel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7168-3895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>The Value of Preparation in a Systems Engineering Masters Module: A Longitudinal Case Study</title><author>Benade, Siebert ; Callaghan, Ronel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4732-2d85ba3312f28928e0ed2cb941962b2a6a93de7c2c5abeca13124ff902fb866d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>blended learning</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>learning cycles</topic><topic>levels of learning</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>postgraduate engineering education</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Systems engineering</topic><topic>systems engineering education</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benade, Siebert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callaghan, Ronel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Systems engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benade, Siebert</au><au>Callaghan, Ronel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Value of Preparation in a Systems Engineering Masters Module: A Longitudinal Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Systems engineering</jtitle><addtitle>Syst. Engin</addtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>131-145</pages><issn>1098-1241</issn><eissn>1520-6858</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT This research emanates from a systems‐oriented process of investigation into the educational approach of masters in engineering management programmes in order to find ways to improve student through‐put rate and the quality of learning. The document describes the educational process, with specific emphasis on student preparedness, including the value and impact of a pivotal preparation test. This process is guided by constructive alignment; learning cycles through interactive blended teaching; and a focus on student learning. A longitudinal descriptive case study of the programmes was undertaken, focusing on a systems engineering module, which is integral to all masters programmes. The case is described with regard to its context; the educational process and teaching approach; and an educational and statistical analysis of the preparation test. The main contribution of the paper is the resulting structured, holistic, and integrated education process, designed to address the challenges, including a specific focus on student preparation and the pivotal preparation test. A clear link was established between student preparedness and the subsequent levels of teaching and learning. The preparation test was found to be on the relevant cognitive level; a predictor of course success; influencing positively the motivation of students; as well as impacting on the adaptation of the educational process. The use of the adapted Bloom's taxonomy to evaluate cognitive levels of an intervention; the application of learning cycles and constructive alignment; as well as the impact of a preparation test, can significantly enhance the quality of the education process and consequently, student through‐put rates.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/sys.21292</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7168-3895</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-1241
ispartof Systems engineering, 2015-03, Vol.18 (2), p.131-145
issn 1098-1241
1520-6858
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677946089
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Alignment
blended learning
Colleges & universities
Construction
Education
Learning
learning cycles
levels of learning
Modules
postgraduate engineering education
Students
Systems engineering
systems engineering education
Teaching
title The Value of Preparation in a Systems Engineering Masters Module: A Longitudinal Case Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A21%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Value%20of%20Preparation%20in%20a%20Systems%20Engineering%20Masters%20Module:%20A%20Longitudinal%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Systems%20engineering&rft.au=Benade,%20Siebert&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=131-145&rft.issn=1098-1241&rft.eissn=1520-6858&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sys.21292&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677946089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1662387539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true