Tuning of Lecitase features via solid-phase chemical modification: Effect of the immobilization protocol

•Lecitase Ultra has been immobilized via covalent attachment and interfacial activation.•Both immobilized preparations have been submitted to different chemical modifications.•The activity and stability under different conditions of the different preparations were greatly altered.•Immobilization pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Process biochemistry (1991) 2014-04, Vol.49 (4), p.604-616
Hauptverfasser: Garcia-Galan, Cristina, dos Santos, José C.S., Barbosa, Oveimar, Torres, Rodrigo, Pereira, Ernandes B., Corberan, Vicente Cortes, Gonçalves, Luciana R.B., Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 616
container_issue 4
container_start_page 604
container_title Process biochemistry (1991)
container_volume 49
creator Garcia-Galan, Cristina
dos Santos, José C.S.
Barbosa, Oveimar
Torres, Rodrigo
Pereira, Ernandes B.
Corberan, Vicente Cortes
Gonçalves, Luciana R.B.
Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto
description •Lecitase Ultra has been immobilized via covalent attachment and interfacial activation.•Both immobilized preparations have been submitted to different chemical modifications.•The activity and stability under different conditions of the different preparations were greatly altered.•Immobilization protocol alters the effect of the chemical modification on Lecitase properties. Lecitase Ultra (a quimeric fosfolipase commercialized by Novozymes) has been immobilized via two different strategies: mild covalent attachment on cyanogen bromide agarose beads and interfacial activation on octyl-agarose beads. Both immobilized preparations have been submitted to different individual or cascade chemical modifications (amination, glutaraldehyde or 2,4,6-trinitrobenzensulfonic acid (TNBS) modification) in order to check the effect of these modifications on the catalytic features of the immobilized enzymes (including stability and substrate specificity under different conditions). The first point to be remarked is that the immobilization strongly affects the enzyme catalytic features: octyl-Lecitase was more active versus p-nitrophenylbutyrate but less active versus methyl phenylacetate than the covalent preparations. Moreover, the effects of the chemical modifications strongly depend on the immobilization strategy used. For example, using one immobilization protocol a modification improves activity, while for the other immobiled enzyme is even negative. Most of the modifications presented a positive effect on some enzyme properties under certain conditions, although in certain cases that modification presented a negative effect under other conditions. For example, glutaraldehyde modification of immobilized or modified and aminated enzyme permitted to improve enzyme stability of both immobilized enzymes at pH 7 and 9 (around a 10-fold), but only the aminated enzyme improved the enzyme stability at pH 5 by glutaraldehyde treatment. This occurred even though some intermolecular crosslinking could be detected via SDS-PAGE. Amination improved the stability of octyl-Lecitase, while it reduced the stability of the covalent preparation. Modification with TNBS only improved enzyme stability of the covalent preparation at pH 9 (by a 10-fold factor).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.01.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677941387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359511314000695</els_id><sourcerecordid>1677941387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cd854403c91f2a59a9a2f76610c8b361c12b3d15fc824345d0ab5431581a9c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1r3DAQNaWBpkl-QkHHXuxo9GHLvZQS8gULuWzOQh5L2Vlsa2vZgfbXV9vNfU8z8N68mXmvKL4Br4BDfbuvDnPEjmIlOKiKQ8WF-VRcgmlkKUVrPude6rbUAPJL8TWlPecSAPhlsduuE01vLAa28UiLS54F75Z19om9k2MpDtSXh90RwJ0fCd3AxthTyN1CcfrB7kPwuBwllp1nNI6xo4H-_kdZPm2JGIfr4iK4Ifmbj3pVvD7cb--eys3L4_Pdr02JCsRSGuyNVopLbCEIp1vXOhGaugaOppM1IIhO9qADGqGk0j13nVYStAHXopRXxfeTbl78e_VpsSMl9MPgJh_XZKFumlaBzN6cpWrVGC1aDZmqT1ScY0qzD_Yw0-jmPxa4PYZg9_YjBHsMwXKwOYQ89_M05_PL7-Rnm5D8hL6nOXtm-0hnFP4Bh8-TEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547852951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tuning of Lecitase features via solid-phase chemical modification: Effect of the immobilization protocol</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Garcia-Galan, Cristina ; dos Santos, José C.S. ; Barbosa, Oveimar ; Torres, Rodrigo ; Pereira, Ernandes B. ; Corberan, Vicente Cortes ; Gonçalves, Luciana R.B. ; Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Galan, Cristina ; dos Santos, José C.S. ; Barbosa, Oveimar ; Torres, Rodrigo ; Pereira, Ernandes B. ; Corberan, Vicente Cortes ; Gonçalves, Luciana R.B. ; Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto</creatorcontrib><description>•Lecitase Ultra has been immobilized via covalent attachment and interfacial activation.•Both immobilized preparations have been submitted to different chemical modifications.•The activity and stability under different conditions of the different preparations were greatly altered.•Immobilization protocol alters the effect of the chemical modification on Lecitase properties. Lecitase Ultra (a quimeric fosfolipase commercialized by Novozymes) has been immobilized via two different strategies: mild covalent attachment on cyanogen bromide agarose beads and interfacial activation on octyl-agarose beads. Both immobilized preparations have been submitted to different individual or cascade chemical modifications (amination, glutaraldehyde or 2,4,6-trinitrobenzensulfonic acid (TNBS) modification) in order to check the effect of these modifications on the catalytic features of the immobilized enzymes (including stability and substrate specificity under different conditions). The first point to be remarked is that the immobilization strongly affects the enzyme catalytic features: octyl-Lecitase was more active versus p-nitrophenylbutyrate but less active versus methyl phenylacetate than the covalent preparations. Moreover, the effects of the chemical modifications strongly depend on the immobilization strategy used. For example, using one immobilization protocol a modification improves activity, while for the other immobiled enzyme is even negative. Most of the modifications presented a positive effect on some enzyme properties under certain conditions, although in certain cases that modification presented a negative effect under other conditions. For example, glutaraldehyde modification of immobilized or modified and aminated enzyme permitted to improve enzyme stability of both immobilized enzymes at pH 7 and 9 (around a 10-fold), but only the aminated enzyme improved the enzyme stability at pH 5 by glutaraldehyde treatment. This occurred even though some intermolecular crosslinking could be detected via SDS-PAGE. Amination improved the stability of octyl-Lecitase, while it reduced the stability of the covalent preparation. Modification with TNBS only improved enzyme stability of the covalent preparation at pH 9 (by a 10-fold factor).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-5113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.01.028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>2,4,6-Trinitrobenzensulfonic acid ; Beads ; Catalysts ; Covalence ; Enzyme chemical modification ; Enzyme hyperactivation ; Enzyme immobilization ; Enzyme stabilization ; Enzymes ; Glutaraldehyde ; Immobilization ; Stability</subject><ispartof>Process biochemistry (1991), 2014-04, Vol.49 (4), p.604-616</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cd854403c91f2a59a9a2f76610c8b361c12b3d15fc824345d0ab5431581a9c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cd854403c91f2a59a9a2f76610c8b361c12b3d15fc824345d0ab5431581a9c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0012-8971</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2014.01.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Galan, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, José C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Oveimar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Ernandes B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corberan, Vicente Cortes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Luciana R.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto</creatorcontrib><title>Tuning of Lecitase features via solid-phase chemical modification: Effect of the immobilization protocol</title><title>Process biochemistry (1991)</title><description>•Lecitase Ultra has been immobilized via covalent attachment and interfacial activation.•Both immobilized preparations have been submitted to different chemical modifications.•The activity and stability under different conditions of the different preparations were greatly altered.•Immobilization protocol alters the effect of the chemical modification on Lecitase properties. Lecitase Ultra (a quimeric fosfolipase commercialized by Novozymes) has been immobilized via two different strategies: mild covalent attachment on cyanogen bromide agarose beads and interfacial activation on octyl-agarose beads. Both immobilized preparations have been submitted to different individual or cascade chemical modifications (amination, glutaraldehyde or 2,4,6-trinitrobenzensulfonic acid (TNBS) modification) in order to check the effect of these modifications on the catalytic features of the immobilized enzymes (including stability and substrate specificity under different conditions). The first point to be remarked is that the immobilization strongly affects the enzyme catalytic features: octyl-Lecitase was more active versus p-nitrophenylbutyrate but less active versus methyl phenylacetate than the covalent preparations. Moreover, the effects of the chemical modifications strongly depend on the immobilization strategy used. For example, using one immobilization protocol a modification improves activity, while for the other immobiled enzyme is even negative. Most of the modifications presented a positive effect on some enzyme properties under certain conditions, although in certain cases that modification presented a negative effect under other conditions. For example, glutaraldehyde modification of immobilized or modified and aminated enzyme permitted to improve enzyme stability of both immobilized enzymes at pH 7 and 9 (around a 10-fold), but only the aminated enzyme improved the enzyme stability at pH 5 by glutaraldehyde treatment. This occurred even though some intermolecular crosslinking could be detected via SDS-PAGE. Amination improved the stability of octyl-Lecitase, while it reduced the stability of the covalent preparation. Modification with TNBS only improved enzyme stability of the covalent preparation at pH 9 (by a 10-fold factor).</description><subject>2,4,6-Trinitrobenzensulfonic acid</subject><subject>Beads</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Covalence</subject><subject>Enzyme chemical modification</subject><subject>Enzyme hyperactivation</subject><subject>Enzyme immobilization</subject><subject>Enzyme stabilization</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Glutaraldehyde</subject><subject>Immobilization</subject><subject>Stability</subject><issn>1359-5113</issn><issn>1873-3298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1r3DAQNaWBpkl-QkHHXuxo9GHLvZQS8gULuWzOQh5L2Vlsa2vZgfbXV9vNfU8z8N68mXmvKL4Br4BDfbuvDnPEjmIlOKiKQ8WF-VRcgmlkKUVrPude6rbUAPJL8TWlPecSAPhlsduuE01vLAa28UiLS54F75Z19om9k2MpDtSXh90RwJ0fCd3AxthTyN1CcfrB7kPwuBwllp1nNI6xo4H-_kdZPm2JGIfr4iK4Ifmbj3pVvD7cb--eys3L4_Pdr02JCsRSGuyNVopLbCEIp1vXOhGaugaOppM1IIhO9qADGqGk0j13nVYStAHXopRXxfeTbl78e_VpsSMl9MPgJh_XZKFumlaBzN6cpWrVGC1aDZmqT1ScY0qzD_Yw0-jmPxa4PYZg9_YjBHsMwXKwOYQ89_M05_PL7-Rnm5D8hL6nOXtm-0hnFP4Bh8-TEw</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Garcia-Galan, Cristina</creator><creator>dos Santos, José C.S.</creator><creator>Barbosa, Oveimar</creator><creator>Torres, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Pereira, Ernandes B.</creator><creator>Corberan, Vicente Cortes</creator><creator>Gonçalves, Luciana R.B.</creator><creator>Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0012-8971</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Tuning of Lecitase features via solid-phase chemical modification: Effect of the immobilization protocol</title><author>Garcia-Galan, Cristina ; dos Santos, José C.S. ; Barbosa, Oveimar ; Torres, Rodrigo ; Pereira, Ernandes B. ; Corberan, Vicente Cortes ; Gonçalves, Luciana R.B. ; Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cd854403c91f2a59a9a2f76610c8b361c12b3d15fc824345d0ab5431581a9c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>2,4,6-Trinitrobenzensulfonic acid</topic><topic>Beads</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Covalence</topic><topic>Enzyme chemical modification</topic><topic>Enzyme hyperactivation</topic><topic>Enzyme immobilization</topic><topic>Enzyme stabilization</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Glutaraldehyde</topic><topic>Immobilization</topic><topic>Stability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Galan, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, José C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Oveimar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Ernandes B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corberan, Vicente Cortes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Luciana R.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Process biochemistry (1991)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia-Galan, Cristina</au><au>dos Santos, José C.S.</au><au>Barbosa, Oveimar</au><au>Torres, Rodrigo</au><au>Pereira, Ernandes B.</au><au>Corberan, Vicente Cortes</au><au>Gonçalves, Luciana R.B.</au><au>Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tuning of Lecitase features via solid-phase chemical modification: Effect of the immobilization protocol</atitle><jtitle>Process biochemistry (1991)</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>616</epage><pages>604-616</pages><issn>1359-5113</issn><eissn>1873-3298</eissn><abstract>•Lecitase Ultra has been immobilized via covalent attachment and interfacial activation.•Both immobilized preparations have been submitted to different chemical modifications.•The activity and stability under different conditions of the different preparations were greatly altered.•Immobilization protocol alters the effect of the chemical modification on Lecitase properties. Lecitase Ultra (a quimeric fosfolipase commercialized by Novozymes) has been immobilized via two different strategies: mild covalent attachment on cyanogen bromide agarose beads and interfacial activation on octyl-agarose beads. Both immobilized preparations have been submitted to different individual or cascade chemical modifications (amination, glutaraldehyde or 2,4,6-trinitrobenzensulfonic acid (TNBS) modification) in order to check the effect of these modifications on the catalytic features of the immobilized enzymes (including stability and substrate specificity under different conditions). The first point to be remarked is that the immobilization strongly affects the enzyme catalytic features: octyl-Lecitase was more active versus p-nitrophenylbutyrate but less active versus methyl phenylacetate than the covalent preparations. Moreover, the effects of the chemical modifications strongly depend on the immobilization strategy used. For example, using one immobilization protocol a modification improves activity, while for the other immobiled enzyme is even negative. Most of the modifications presented a positive effect on some enzyme properties under certain conditions, although in certain cases that modification presented a negative effect under other conditions. For example, glutaraldehyde modification of immobilized or modified and aminated enzyme permitted to improve enzyme stability of both immobilized enzymes at pH 7 and 9 (around a 10-fold), but only the aminated enzyme improved the enzyme stability at pH 5 by glutaraldehyde treatment. This occurred even though some intermolecular crosslinking could be detected via SDS-PAGE. Amination improved the stability of octyl-Lecitase, while it reduced the stability of the covalent preparation. Modification with TNBS only improved enzyme stability of the covalent preparation at pH 9 (by a 10-fold factor).</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.procbio.2014.01.028</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0012-8971</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-5113
ispartof Process biochemistry (1991), 2014-04, Vol.49 (4), p.604-616
issn 1359-5113
1873-3298
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677941387
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects 2,4,6-Trinitrobenzensulfonic acid
Beads
Catalysts
Covalence
Enzyme chemical modification
Enzyme hyperactivation
Enzyme immobilization
Enzyme stabilization
Enzymes
Glutaraldehyde
Immobilization
Stability
title Tuning of Lecitase features via solid-phase chemical modification: Effect of the immobilization protocol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A36%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tuning%20of%20Lecitase%20features%20via%20solid-phase%20chemical%20modification:%20Effect%20of%20the%20immobilization%20protocol&rft.jtitle=Process%20biochemistry%20(1991)&rft.au=Garcia-Galan,%20Cristina&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=616&rft.pages=604-616&rft.issn=1359-5113&rft.eissn=1873-3298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.procbio.2014.01.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677941387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547852951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1359511314000695&rfr_iscdi=true