EUnetHTA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: DEVELOPMENT AND LESSONS LEARNED
Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the techniques used in achieving consensus on common standards to be implemented in the EUnetHTA Information Management System (IMS); and to describe how interoperability between tools was explored. Methods: Three face to face meetings were organized...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of technology assessment in health care 2014-11, Vol.30 (5), p.514-520 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 520 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 514 |
| container_title | International journal of technology assessment in health care |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Chalon, Patrice X. Kraemer, Peter |
| description | Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the techniques used in achieving consensus on common standards to be implemented in the EUnetHTA Information Management System (IMS); and to describe how interoperability between tools was explored.
Methods: Three face to face meetings were organized to identify and agree on common standards to the development of online tools. Two tools were created to demonstrate the added value of implementing interoperability standards at local levels. Developers of tools outside EUnetHTA were identified and contacted.
Results: Four common standards have been agreed on by consensus; and consequently all EUnetHTA tools have been modified or designed accordingly. RDF Site Summary (RSS) has demonstrated a good potential to support rapid dissemination of HTA information. Contacts outside EUnetHTA resulted in direct collaboration (HTA glossary, HTAi Vortal), evaluation of options for interoperability between tools (CRD HTA database) or a formal framework to prepare cooperation on concrete projects (INAHTA projects database).
Conclusions: While being entitled a project on IT infrastructure, the work program was also about people. When having to agree on complex topics, fostering a cohesive group dynamic and hosting face to face meetings brings added value and enhances understanding between partners. The adoption of widespread standards enhanced the homogeneity of the EUnetHTA tools and should thus contribute to their wider use, therefore, to the general objective of EUnetHTA. The initiatives on interoperability of systems need to be developed further to support a general interoperable information system that could benefit the whole HTA community. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0266462314000579 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677927653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462314000579</cupid><sourcerecordid>3630359281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ca795b562982c6adb8f2e0d6a9c992507e63c8fa23addd38d3087eb327357e5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ADcScOMmemcmM5O4C-30AXlIkwquwiQzlUpfJs3Cf29iq4giuLpwz3fO5XIQusRwiwGLuwQI5w4nFDsAwIR3hLrYEdjm1HGPUbeV7VbvoLOqegHAFDw4RR3ChCMYx100krO12Y1T35pEw3ga-ukkjqzQj_yRDGWUWslTksrw3hrIRxnEDx87PxpYgUySOEqa6U8jOThHJ3O1rMzFYfbQbCjT_tgO4tGk7wd24QDf2YUSHssZJ55LCq507s6JAc2VV3geYSAMp4U7V4QqrTV1NQVXmJwSQZkwTNMeutnnbsvNa22qXbZaVIVZLtXabOoqw1wIjwjO6D9QTgAoxaxBr3-gL5u6XDePtJTjUuIQ3lB4TxXlpqpKM8-25WKlyrcMQ9YWkv0qpPFcHZLrfGX0l-OzgQagh1C1ysuFfjbfbv8Z-w58rIyL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1664832426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EUnetHTA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: DEVELOPMENT AND LESSONS LEARNED</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Chalon, Patrice X. ; Kraemer, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Chalon, Patrice X. ; Kraemer, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the techniques used in achieving consensus on common standards to be implemented in the EUnetHTA Information Management System (IMS); and to describe how interoperability between tools was explored.
Methods: Three face to face meetings were organized to identify and agree on common standards to the development of online tools. Two tools were created to demonstrate the added value of implementing interoperability standards at local levels. Developers of tools outside EUnetHTA were identified and contacted.
Results: Four common standards have been agreed on by consensus; and consequently all EUnetHTA tools have been modified or designed accordingly. RDF Site Summary (RSS) has demonstrated a good potential to support rapid dissemination of HTA information. Contacts outside EUnetHTA resulted in direct collaboration (HTA glossary, HTAi Vortal), evaluation of options for interoperability between tools (CRD HTA database) or a formal framework to prepare cooperation on concrete projects (INAHTA projects database).
Conclusions: While being entitled a project on IT infrastructure, the work program was also about people. When having to agree on complex topics, fostering a cohesive group dynamic and hosting face to face meetings brings added value and enhances understanding between partners. The adoption of widespread standards enhanced the homogeneity of the EUnetHTA tools and should thus contribute to their wider use, therefore, to the general objective of EUnetHTA. The initiatives on interoperability of systems need to be developed further to support a general interoperable information system that could benefit the whole HTA community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462314000579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25747561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Added value ; Agreements ; Archives & records ; Classification ; Collaboration ; Data base management systems ; Databases, Factual - standards ; Dynamical systems ; Europe ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Information management ; Information Management - standards ; Institutional repositories ; International Cooperation ; Internet ; Interoperability ; Meetings ; Metadata ; Program Development ; Program Evaluation ; Public access ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical - organization & administration ; Theme Submissions ; Websites</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2014-11, Vol.30 (5), p.514-520</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ca795b562982c6adb8f2e0d6a9c992507e63c8fa23addd38d3087eb327357e5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ca795b562982c6adb8f2e0d6a9c992507e63c8fa23addd38d3087eb327357e5d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9737-8880</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266462314000579/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,310,311,315,781,785,790,791,23934,23935,25144,27928,27929,55632</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25747561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chalon, Patrice X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraemer, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>EUnetHTA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: DEVELOPMENT AND LESSONS LEARNED</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the techniques used in achieving consensus on common standards to be implemented in the EUnetHTA Information Management System (IMS); and to describe how interoperability between tools was explored.
Methods: Three face to face meetings were organized to identify and agree on common standards to the development of online tools. Two tools were created to demonstrate the added value of implementing interoperability standards at local levels. Developers of tools outside EUnetHTA were identified and contacted.
Results: Four common standards have been agreed on by consensus; and consequently all EUnetHTA tools have been modified or designed accordingly. RDF Site Summary (RSS) has demonstrated a good potential to support rapid dissemination of HTA information. Contacts outside EUnetHTA resulted in direct collaboration (HTA glossary, HTAi Vortal), evaluation of options for interoperability between tools (CRD HTA database) or a formal framework to prepare cooperation on concrete projects (INAHTA projects database).
Conclusions: While being entitled a project on IT infrastructure, the work program was also about people. When having to agree on complex topics, fostering a cohesive group dynamic and hosting face to face meetings brings added value and enhances understanding between partners. The adoption of widespread standards enhanced the homogeneity of the EUnetHTA tools and should thus contribute to their wider use, therefore, to the general objective of EUnetHTA. The initiatives on interoperability of systems need to be developed further to support a general interoperable information system that could benefit the whole HTA community.</description><subject>Added value</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Archives & records</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Data base management systems</subject><subject>Databases, Factual - standards</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Information Management - standards</subject><subject>Institutional repositories</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Interoperability</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Metadata</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Public access</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - organization & administration</subject><subject>Theme Submissions</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ADcScOMmemcmM5O4C-30AXlIkwquwiQzlUpfJs3Cf29iq4giuLpwz3fO5XIQusRwiwGLuwQI5w4nFDsAwIR3hLrYEdjm1HGPUbeV7VbvoLOqegHAFDw4RR3ChCMYx100krO12Y1T35pEw3ga-ukkjqzQj_yRDGWUWslTksrw3hrIRxnEDx87PxpYgUySOEqa6U8jOThHJ3O1rMzFYfbQbCjT_tgO4tGk7wd24QDf2YUSHssZJ55LCq507s6JAc2VV3geYSAMp4U7V4QqrTV1NQVXmJwSQZkwTNMeutnnbsvNa22qXbZaVIVZLtXabOoqw1wIjwjO6D9QTgAoxaxBr3-gL5u6XDePtJTjUuIQ3lB4TxXlpqpKM8-25WKlyrcMQ9YWkv0qpPFcHZLrfGX0l-OzgQagh1C1ysuFfjbfbv8Z-w58rIyL</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Chalon, Patrice X.</creator><creator>Kraemer, Peter</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9737-8880</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>EUnetHTA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: DEVELOPMENT AND LESSONS LEARNED</title><author>Chalon, Patrice X. ; Kraemer, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-ca795b562982c6adb8f2e0d6a9c992507e63c8fa23addd38d3087eb327357e5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Added value</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Archives & records</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Data base management systems</topic><topic>Databases, Factual - standards</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Information Management - standards</topic><topic>Institutional repositories</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Interoperability</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Metadata</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Public access</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - organization & administration</topic><topic>Theme Submissions</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chalon, Patrice X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraemer, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chalon, Patrice X.</au><au>Kraemer, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EUnetHTA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: DEVELOPMENT AND LESSONS LEARNED</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>514</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>514-520</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the techniques used in achieving consensus on common standards to be implemented in the EUnetHTA Information Management System (IMS); and to describe how interoperability between tools was explored.
Methods: Three face to face meetings were organized to identify and agree on common standards to the development of online tools. Two tools were created to demonstrate the added value of implementing interoperability standards at local levels. Developers of tools outside EUnetHTA were identified and contacted.
Results: Four common standards have been agreed on by consensus; and consequently all EUnetHTA tools have been modified or designed accordingly. RDF Site Summary (RSS) has demonstrated a good potential to support rapid dissemination of HTA information. Contacts outside EUnetHTA resulted in direct collaboration (HTA glossary, HTAi Vortal), evaluation of options for interoperability between tools (CRD HTA database) or a formal framework to prepare cooperation on concrete projects (INAHTA projects database).
Conclusions: While being entitled a project on IT infrastructure, the work program was also about people. When having to agree on complex topics, fostering a cohesive group dynamic and hosting face to face meetings brings added value and enhances understanding between partners. The adoption of widespread standards enhanced the homogeneity of the EUnetHTA tools and should thus contribute to their wider use, therefore, to the general objective of EUnetHTA. The initiatives on interoperability of systems need to be developed further to support a general interoperable information system that could benefit the whole HTA community.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>25747561</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0266462314000579</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9737-8880</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0266-4623 |
| ispartof | International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2014-11, Vol.30 (5), p.514-520 |
| issn | 0266-4623 1471-6348 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677927653 |
| source | MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Added value Agreements Archives & records Classification Collaboration Data base management systems Databases, Factual - standards Dynamical systems Europe Health technology assessment Humans Information management Information Management - standards Institutional repositories International Cooperation Internet Interoperability Meetings Metadata Program Development Program Evaluation Public access Technology Assessment, Biomedical - organization & administration Theme Submissions Websites |
| title | EUnetHTA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: DEVELOPMENT AND LESSONS LEARNED |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T06%3A12%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EUnetHTA%20INFORMATION%20MANAGEMENT%20SYSTEM:%20DEVELOPMENT%20AND%20LESSONS%20LEARNED&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Chalon,%20Patrice%20X.&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=514&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=514-520&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462314000579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3630359281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1664832426&rft_id=info:pmid/25747561&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462314000579&rfr_iscdi=true |