How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states
How safe is ‘safe’? During the design phase of floating structures, specifications such as range of application, warranty of economical efficiency and reliability are integral parts of the evaluation process. The key decision is the choice of environmental design conditions to be considered for oper...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ocean engineering 2013-11, Vol.72, p.87-97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 97 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | Ocean engineering |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Clauss, G.F. Klein, M. |
description | How safe is ‘safe’? During the design phase of floating structures, specifications such as range of application, warranty of economical efficiency and reliability are integral parts of the evaluation process. The key decision is the choice of environmental design conditions to be considered for operation and survival: this issue cannot be solved globally, i.e. different operating conditions (transit, operation, survival) and criteria (body motions, local and global loads) will lead to individual results. In this paper a procedure for the systematic identification of critical (design) wave sequences for offshore structures is presented—a response based identification tool for critical wave sequence detection. The basic principle of this procedure is characterized by tailoring of short wave sequences to obtain a certain maximum response. The fully automated procedure combines wave/structure interaction analysis programs with an optimization algorithm. The objective is to find a critical wave sequence with respect to the predefined maximum responses. By means of this procedure, the identification and evaluation of critical design conditions can be conducted more systematically, accurately and thus efficiently. To demonstrate the broad scope of this procedure, a typical example is presented. The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods. The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.
•We present a tool for systematic identification of critical wave–structure scenarios.•The identification of critical design conditions can be conducted more efficiently.•The tool is demonstrated on a multi-body offshore problem.•The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods.•The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677918988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029801813002679</els_id><sourcerecordid>1668260717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6e5b54c303f0318b052d415f86494f7b71088075e916839a33269fc98a893dff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKBDEQRYMoOD5-QbIR3HRbSbrzAEFFfIHgQl2HTDrRDDPdY6pV3PkZ-nt-iT2MutVV1eLcutQhZIdByYDJ_UnZ-eDa0N6XHJgoQZbA2QoZMa1EUfNar5IRADeFBqbXyQbiBACkBDEiBxfdC0UXA01IP9_eF-vn28chvXlIc9q8tm6WPNLUUp9Tn7ybUgyOYu_6gFtkLbophu3vuUnuzk5vTy6Kq-vzy5Pjq8JXoPtChnpcV16AiCCYHkPNm4rVUcvKVFGNFQOtQdXBMKmFcUJwaaI32mkjmhjFJtlb3p3n7vEpYG9nCX2YToevuye0TCplmDZa_wOVmktQTA2oXKI-d4g5RDvPaebyq2VgF2btxP6YtQuzFqQdzA7B3e8Oh4OQmF3rE_6muVKV4TUM3NGSC4Ob5xSyRZ9C60OTcvC9bbr0V9UXhVOQsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1668260717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Clauss, G.F. ; Klein, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clauss, G.F. ; Klein, M.</creatorcontrib><description>How safe is ‘safe’? During the design phase of floating structures, specifications such as range of application, warranty of economical efficiency and reliability are integral parts of the evaluation process. The key decision is the choice of environmental design conditions to be considered for operation and survival: this issue cannot be solved globally, i.e. different operating conditions (transit, operation, survival) and criteria (body motions, local and global loads) will lead to individual results. In this paper a procedure for the systematic identification of critical (design) wave sequences for offshore structures is presented—a response based identification tool for critical wave sequence detection. The basic principle of this procedure is characterized by tailoring of short wave sequences to obtain a certain maximum response. The fully automated procedure combines wave/structure interaction analysis programs with an optimization algorithm. The objective is to find a critical wave sequence with respect to the predefined maximum responses. By means of this procedure, the identification and evaluation of critical design conditions can be conducted more systematically, accurately and thus efficiently. To demonstrate the broad scope of this procedure, a typical example is presented. The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods. The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.
•We present a tool for systematic identification of critical wave–structure scenarios.•The identification of critical design conditions can be conducted more efficiently.•The tool is demonstrated on a multi-body offshore problem.•The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods.•The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.021</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OCENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Applied sciences ; Critical wave sequences ; Design engineering ; Deterministic time domain analysis ; Economics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Floating structures ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Marine construction ; Mathematical models ; Response based optimization ; Stochastic frequency domain analysis ; Survival ; Transit ; Warranties ; Wave–structure interaction</subject><ispartof>Ocean engineering, 2013-11, Vol.72, p.87-97</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6e5b54c303f0318b052d415f86494f7b71088075e916839a33269fc98a893dff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6e5b54c303f0318b052d415f86494f7b71088075e916839a33269fc98a893dff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27749250$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clauss, G.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, M.</creatorcontrib><title>How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states</title><title>Ocean engineering</title><description>How safe is ‘safe’? During the design phase of floating structures, specifications such as range of application, warranty of economical efficiency and reliability are integral parts of the evaluation process. The key decision is the choice of environmental design conditions to be considered for operation and survival: this issue cannot be solved globally, i.e. different operating conditions (transit, operation, survival) and criteria (body motions, local and global loads) will lead to individual results. In this paper a procedure for the systematic identification of critical (design) wave sequences for offshore structures is presented—a response based identification tool for critical wave sequence detection. The basic principle of this procedure is characterized by tailoring of short wave sequences to obtain a certain maximum response. The fully automated procedure combines wave/structure interaction analysis programs with an optimization algorithm. The objective is to find a critical wave sequence with respect to the predefined maximum responses. By means of this procedure, the identification and evaluation of critical design conditions can be conducted more systematically, accurately and thus efficiently. To demonstrate the broad scope of this procedure, a typical example is presented. The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods. The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.
•We present a tool for systematic identification of critical wave–structure scenarios.•The identification of critical design conditions can be conducted more efficiently.•The tool is demonstrated on a multi-body offshore problem.•The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods.•The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Critical wave sequences</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Deterministic time domain analysis</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Floating structures</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Marine construction</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Response based optimization</subject><subject>Stochastic frequency domain analysis</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Transit</subject><subject>Warranties</subject><subject>Wave–structure interaction</subject><issn>0029-8018</issn><issn>1873-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtKBDEQRYMoOD5-QbIR3HRbSbrzAEFFfIHgQl2HTDrRDDPdY6pV3PkZ-nt-iT2MutVV1eLcutQhZIdByYDJ_UnZ-eDa0N6XHJgoQZbA2QoZMa1EUfNar5IRADeFBqbXyQbiBACkBDEiBxfdC0UXA01IP9_eF-vn28chvXlIc9q8tm6WPNLUUp9Tn7ybUgyOYu_6gFtkLbophu3vuUnuzk5vTy6Kq-vzy5Pjq8JXoPtChnpcV16AiCCYHkPNm4rVUcvKVFGNFQOtQdXBMKmFcUJwaaI32mkjmhjFJtlb3p3n7vEpYG9nCX2YToevuye0TCplmDZa_wOVmktQTA2oXKI-d4g5RDvPaebyq2VgF2btxP6YtQuzFqQdzA7B3e8Oh4OQmF3rE_6muVKV4TUM3NGSC4Ob5xSyRZ9C60OTcvC9bbr0V9UXhVOQsA</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Clauss, G.F.</creator><creator>Klein, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states</title><author>Clauss, G.F. ; Klein, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6e5b54c303f0318b052d415f86494f7b71088075e916839a33269fc98a893dff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Critical wave sequences</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Deterministic time domain analysis</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Floating structures</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Marine construction</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Response based optimization</topic><topic>Stochastic frequency domain analysis</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Transit</topic><topic>Warranties</topic><topic>Wave–structure interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clauss, G.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clauss, G.F.</au><au>Klein, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states</atitle><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>72</volume><spage>87</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>87-97</pages><issn>0029-8018</issn><eissn>1873-5258</eissn><coden>OCENBQ</coden><abstract>How safe is ‘safe’? During the design phase of floating structures, specifications such as range of application, warranty of economical efficiency and reliability are integral parts of the evaluation process. The key decision is the choice of environmental design conditions to be considered for operation and survival: this issue cannot be solved globally, i.e. different operating conditions (transit, operation, survival) and criteria (body motions, local and global loads) will lead to individual results. In this paper a procedure for the systematic identification of critical (design) wave sequences for offshore structures is presented—a response based identification tool for critical wave sequence detection. The basic principle of this procedure is characterized by tailoring of short wave sequences to obtain a certain maximum response. The fully automated procedure combines wave/structure interaction analysis programs with an optimization algorithm. The objective is to find a critical wave sequence with respect to the predefined maximum responses. By means of this procedure, the identification and evaluation of critical design conditions can be conducted more systematically, accurately and thus efficiently. To demonstrate the broad scope of this procedure, a typical example is presented. The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods. The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.
•We present a tool for systematic identification of critical wave–structure scenarios.•The identification of critical design conditions can be conducted more efficiently.•The tool is demonstrated on a multi-body offshore problem.•The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods.•The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.021</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8018 |
ispartof | Ocean engineering, 2013-11, Vol.72, p.87-97 |
issn | 0029-8018 1873-5258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677918988 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Algorithms Applied sciences Critical wave sequences Design engineering Deterministic time domain analysis Economics Exact sciences and technology Floating structures Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction Marine construction Mathematical models Response based optimization Stochastic frequency domain analysis Survival Transit Warranties Wave–structure interaction |
title | How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T11%3A19%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20safe%20is%20%E2%80%98safe%E2%80%99?%20Ship%20dynamics%20in%20critical%20sea%20states&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20engineering&rft.au=Clauss,%20G.F.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=72&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=87-97&rft.issn=0029-8018&rft.eissn=1873-5258&rft.coden=OCENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1668260717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1668260717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0029801813002679&rfr_iscdi=true |