How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states

How safe is ‘safe’? During the design phase of floating structures, specifications such as range of application, warranty of economical efficiency and reliability are integral parts of the evaluation process. The key decision is the choice of environmental design conditions to be considered for oper...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ocean engineering 2013-11, Vol.72, p.87-97
Hauptverfasser: Clauss, G.F., Klein, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue
container_start_page 87
container_title Ocean engineering
container_volume 72
creator Clauss, G.F.
Klein, M.
description How safe is ‘safe’? During the design phase of floating structures, specifications such as range of application, warranty of economical efficiency and reliability are integral parts of the evaluation process. The key decision is the choice of environmental design conditions to be considered for operation and survival: this issue cannot be solved globally, i.e. different operating conditions (transit, operation, survival) and criteria (body motions, local and global loads) will lead to individual results. In this paper a procedure for the systematic identification of critical (design) wave sequences for offshore structures is presented—a response based identification tool for critical wave sequence detection. The basic principle of this procedure is characterized by tailoring of short wave sequences to obtain a certain maximum response. The fully automated procedure combines wave/structure interaction analysis programs with an optimization algorithm. The objective is to find a critical wave sequence with respect to the predefined maximum responses. By means of this procedure, the identification and evaluation of critical design conditions can be conducted more systematically, accurately and thus efficiently. To demonstrate the broad scope of this procedure, a typical example is presented. The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods. The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations. •We present a tool for systematic identification of critical wave–structure scenarios.•The identification of critical design conditions can be conducted more efficiently.•The tool is demonstrated on a multi-body offshore problem.•The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods.•The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677918988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029801813002679</els_id><sourcerecordid>1668260717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6e5b54c303f0318b052d415f86494f7b71088075e916839a33269fc98a893dff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKBDEQRYMoOD5-QbIR3HRbSbrzAEFFfIHgQl2HTDrRDDPdY6pV3PkZ-nt-iT2MutVV1eLcutQhZIdByYDJ_UnZ-eDa0N6XHJgoQZbA2QoZMa1EUfNar5IRADeFBqbXyQbiBACkBDEiBxfdC0UXA01IP9_eF-vn28chvXlIc9q8tm6WPNLUUp9Tn7ybUgyOYu_6gFtkLbophu3vuUnuzk5vTy6Kq-vzy5Pjq8JXoPtChnpcV16AiCCYHkPNm4rVUcvKVFGNFQOtQdXBMKmFcUJwaaI32mkjmhjFJtlb3p3n7vEpYG9nCX2YToevuye0TCplmDZa_wOVmktQTA2oXKI-d4g5RDvPaebyq2VgF2btxP6YtQuzFqQdzA7B3e8Oh4OQmF3rE_6muVKV4TUM3NGSC4Ob5xSyRZ9C60OTcvC9bbr0V9UXhVOQsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1668260717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Clauss, G.F. ; Klein, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clauss, G.F. ; Klein, M.</creatorcontrib><description>How safe is ‘safe’? During the design phase of floating structures, specifications such as range of application, warranty of economical efficiency and reliability are integral parts of the evaluation process. The key decision is the choice of environmental design conditions to be considered for operation and survival: this issue cannot be solved globally, i.e. different operating conditions (transit, operation, survival) and criteria (body motions, local and global loads) will lead to individual results. In this paper a procedure for the systematic identification of critical (design) wave sequences for offshore structures is presented—a response based identification tool for critical wave sequence detection. The basic principle of this procedure is characterized by tailoring of short wave sequences to obtain a certain maximum response. The fully automated procedure combines wave/structure interaction analysis programs with an optimization algorithm. The objective is to find a critical wave sequence with respect to the predefined maximum responses. By means of this procedure, the identification and evaluation of critical design conditions can be conducted more systematically, accurately and thus efficiently. To demonstrate the broad scope of this procedure, a typical example is presented. The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods. The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations. •We present a tool for systematic identification of critical wave–structure scenarios.•The identification of critical design conditions can be conducted more efficiently.•The tool is demonstrated on a multi-body offshore problem.•The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods.•The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.021</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OCENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Applied sciences ; Critical wave sequences ; Design engineering ; Deterministic time domain analysis ; Economics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Floating structures ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Marine construction ; Mathematical models ; Response based optimization ; Stochastic frequency domain analysis ; Survival ; Transit ; Warranties ; Wave–structure interaction</subject><ispartof>Ocean engineering, 2013-11, Vol.72, p.87-97</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6e5b54c303f0318b052d415f86494f7b71088075e916839a33269fc98a893dff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6e5b54c303f0318b052d415f86494f7b71088075e916839a33269fc98a893dff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27749250$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clauss, G.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, M.</creatorcontrib><title>How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states</title><title>Ocean engineering</title><description>How safe is ‘safe’? During the design phase of floating structures, specifications such as range of application, warranty of economical efficiency and reliability are integral parts of the evaluation process. The key decision is the choice of environmental design conditions to be considered for operation and survival: this issue cannot be solved globally, i.e. different operating conditions (transit, operation, survival) and criteria (body motions, local and global loads) will lead to individual results. In this paper a procedure for the systematic identification of critical (design) wave sequences for offshore structures is presented—a response based identification tool for critical wave sequence detection. The basic principle of this procedure is characterized by tailoring of short wave sequences to obtain a certain maximum response. The fully automated procedure combines wave/structure interaction analysis programs with an optimization algorithm. The objective is to find a critical wave sequence with respect to the predefined maximum responses. By means of this procedure, the identification and evaluation of critical design conditions can be conducted more systematically, accurately and thus efficiently. To demonstrate the broad scope of this procedure, a typical example is presented. The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods. The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations. •We present a tool for systematic identification of critical wave–structure scenarios.•The identification of critical design conditions can be conducted more efficiently.•The tool is demonstrated on a multi-body offshore problem.•The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods.•The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Critical wave sequences</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Deterministic time domain analysis</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Floating structures</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Marine construction</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Response based optimization</subject><subject>Stochastic frequency domain analysis</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Transit</subject><subject>Warranties</subject><subject>Wave–structure interaction</subject><issn>0029-8018</issn><issn>1873-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtKBDEQRYMoOD5-QbIR3HRbSbrzAEFFfIHgQl2HTDrRDDPdY6pV3PkZ-nt-iT2MutVV1eLcutQhZIdByYDJ_UnZ-eDa0N6XHJgoQZbA2QoZMa1EUfNar5IRADeFBqbXyQbiBACkBDEiBxfdC0UXA01IP9_eF-vn28chvXlIc9q8tm6WPNLUUp9Tn7ybUgyOYu_6gFtkLbophu3vuUnuzk5vTy6Kq-vzy5Pjq8JXoPtChnpcV16AiCCYHkPNm4rVUcvKVFGNFQOtQdXBMKmFcUJwaaI32mkjmhjFJtlb3p3n7vEpYG9nCX2YToevuye0TCplmDZa_wOVmktQTA2oXKI-d4g5RDvPaebyq2VgF2btxP6YtQuzFqQdzA7B3e8Oh4OQmF3rE_6muVKV4TUM3NGSC4Ob5xSyRZ9C60OTcvC9bbr0V9UXhVOQsA</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Clauss, G.F.</creator><creator>Klein, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states</title><author>Clauss, G.F. ; Klein, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6e5b54c303f0318b052d415f86494f7b71088075e916839a33269fc98a893dff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Critical wave sequences</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Deterministic time domain analysis</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Floating structures</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Marine construction</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Response based optimization</topic><topic>Stochastic frequency domain analysis</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Transit</topic><topic>Warranties</topic><topic>Wave–structure interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clauss, G.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clauss, G.F.</au><au>Klein, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states</atitle><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>72</volume><spage>87</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>87-97</pages><issn>0029-8018</issn><eissn>1873-5258</eissn><coden>OCENBQ</coden><abstract>How safe is ‘safe’? During the design phase of floating structures, specifications such as range of application, warranty of economical efficiency and reliability are integral parts of the evaluation process. The key decision is the choice of environmental design conditions to be considered for operation and survival: this issue cannot be solved globally, i.e. different operating conditions (transit, operation, survival) and criteria (body motions, local and global loads) will lead to individual results. In this paper a procedure for the systematic identification of critical (design) wave sequences for offshore structures is presented—a response based identification tool for critical wave sequence detection. The basic principle of this procedure is characterized by tailoring of short wave sequences to obtain a certain maximum response. The fully automated procedure combines wave/structure interaction analysis programs with an optimization algorithm. The objective is to find a critical wave sequence with respect to the predefined maximum responses. By means of this procedure, the identification and evaluation of critical design conditions can be conducted more systematically, accurately and thus efficiently. To demonstrate the broad scope of this procedure, a typical example is presented. The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods. The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations. •We present a tool for systematic identification of critical wave–structure scenarios.•The identification of critical design conditions can be conducted more efficiently.•The tool is demonstrated on a multi-body offshore problem.•The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods.•The investigations comprise numerical calculations as well as model test validations.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.021</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8018
ispartof Ocean engineering, 2013-11, Vol.72, p.87-97
issn 0029-8018
1873-5258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677918988
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Algorithms
Applied sciences
Critical wave sequences
Design engineering
Deterministic time domain analysis
Economics
Exact sciences and technology
Floating structures
Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction
Marine construction
Mathematical models
Response based optimization
Stochastic frequency domain analysis
Survival
Transit
Warranties
Wave–structure interaction
title How safe is ‘safe’? Ship dynamics in critical sea states
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T11%3A19%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20safe%20is%20%E2%80%98safe%E2%80%99?%20Ship%20dynamics%20in%20critical%20sea%20states&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20engineering&rft.au=Clauss,%20G.F.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=72&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=87-97&rft.issn=0029-8018&rft.eissn=1873-5258&rft.coden=OCENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1668260717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1668260717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0029801813002679&rfr_iscdi=true