Minesoil Response to Reclamation by Using a Flue Gas Desulfurization Product

Mine lands are an environmental concern worldwide because of their potential strong negative impact on water and soil quality. A field study was conducted to assess the use of a dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD) product for reclamation of an abandoned surface coal mine in Ohio. The FGD product was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2013-09, Vol.77 (5), p.1744-1754
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Liming, Stehouwer, Richard, Wu, Manli, Kost, Dave, Guo, Xiaolu, Bigham, Jerry M., Beeghly, Joel, Dick, Warren A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1754
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1744
container_title Soil Science Society of America journal
container_volume 77
creator Chen, Liming
Stehouwer, Richard
Wu, Manli
Kost, Dave
Guo, Xiaolu
Bigham, Jerry M.
Beeghly, Joel
Dick, Warren A.
description Mine lands are an environmental concern worldwide because of their potential strong negative impact on water and soil quality. A field study was conducted to assess the use of a dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD) product for reclamation of an abandoned surface coal mine in Ohio. The FGD product was an atmospheric fluidized bed combustion residue and was applied to the graded mine site at 280 Mg ha‐1, both alone and in combination with 112 Mg ha‐1 yard waste compost, and was compared with conventional reclamation with 20 cm of borrow soil plus 157 Mg ha‐1 of agricultural limestone. A grass‐legume sward was planted, and soil physical and chemical properties and β‐glucosidase activity were measured over both short‐ (1–4 yr) and long‐term (15–17 yr) periods following reclamation. Soil pH at 0‐ to 20‐cm depth increased from 3.1 to approximately neutral and was sustained at this level for 15 yr. Compared with the conventional reclamation, extractable Ca, S, B, and Zn concentrations at 0‐ to 20‐cm depth were generally increased by the treatments with FGD product, while other extractable trace metals measured were generally not increased in short‐ or long‐term measurements. Seventeen years after reclamation, β‐glucosidase activity had increased in all three treatments at 0‐ to 5‐ and 5‐ to 10‐cm depths compared with an adjacent untreated area. Furthermore, β‐glucosidase activity more than doubled in the treatments with FGD product compared with the conventional soil treatment at 0‐ to 5‐cm depth. These results suggest that the use of high lime FGD products for reclamation of acid coal mine lands can provide effective long‐term reclamation.
doi_str_mv 10.2136/sssaj2013.02.0054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677913335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3104029791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-1111945d24efa12426c5e667781d49538f48888b1cd329ed69dc3babc71882b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hF4sIlxetX42N5tICKQJSeLSdxUKo0LtlEqPx6XII4cIE52Cvrm5HWQ8gp0BEDri4Q0a4YBT6ibESpFHtkAILLmCoF-2RAuYJYai0PyRHiilKQmtIBmT-UtUNfVtGzw42v0UWtD3NW2bVtS19H6TZaYlm_RjaaVp2LZhaja4ddVXRN-dEzT43Pu6w9JgeFrdCdfN9DspzevFzdxvPH2d3VZB5bwUDEEKSFzJlwhQUmmMqkU2o8TiAXWvKkEElQClnOmXa50nnGU5tmY0gSlgo-JOd97qbxb53D1qxLzFxV2dr5Dg2ELA2cc_kflPNEhv8I6NkvdOW7pg6LGBCC8zFQrQMFPZU1HrFxhdk05do2WwPU7KowP1UYysyuiuC57D3vZeW2fxvMYnLPFovdGV4p-wr5BL-vjoE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443371099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minesoil Response to Reclamation by Using a Flue Gas Desulfurization Product</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Chen, Liming ; Stehouwer, Richard ; Wu, Manli ; Kost, Dave ; Guo, Xiaolu ; Bigham, Jerry M. ; Beeghly, Joel ; Dick, Warren A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liming ; Stehouwer, Richard ; Wu, Manli ; Kost, Dave ; Guo, Xiaolu ; Bigham, Jerry M. ; Beeghly, Joel ; Dick, Warren A.</creatorcontrib><description>Mine lands are an environmental concern worldwide because of their potential strong negative impact on water and soil quality. A field study was conducted to assess the use of a dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD) product for reclamation of an abandoned surface coal mine in Ohio. The FGD product was an atmospheric fluidized bed combustion residue and was applied to the graded mine site at 280 Mg ha‐1, both alone and in combination with 112 Mg ha‐1 yard waste compost, and was compared with conventional reclamation with 20 cm of borrow soil plus 157 Mg ha‐1 of agricultural limestone. A grass‐legume sward was planted, and soil physical and chemical properties and β‐glucosidase activity were measured over both short‐ (1–4 yr) and long‐term (15–17 yr) periods following reclamation. Soil pH at 0‐ to 20‐cm depth increased from 3.1 to approximately neutral and was sustained at this level for 15 yr. Compared with the conventional reclamation, extractable Ca, S, B, and Zn concentrations at 0‐ to 20‐cm depth were generally increased by the treatments with FGD product, while other extractable trace metals measured were generally not increased in short‐ or long‐term measurements. Seventeen years after reclamation, β‐glucosidase activity had increased in all three treatments at 0‐ to 5‐ and 5‐ to 10‐cm depths compared with an adjacent untreated area. Furthermore, β‐glucosidase activity more than doubled in the treatments with FGD product compared with the conventional soil treatment at 0‐ to 5‐cm depth. These results suggest that the use of high lime FGD products for reclamation of acid coal mine lands can provide effective long‐term reclamation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2013.02.0054</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSSJD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Abandoned mines ; Air pollution control ; Chemical properties ; Coal mines ; Coal mining ; Composting ; Desulfurization ; Desulfurizing ; Earthmoving equipment ; Environmental perception ; Enzymes ; Flue gas ; Flue gas desulfurization ; Flue gases ; Land ; Limestone ; Magnesium ; Mines ; Pollution control equipment ; Reclamation ; Soil (material) ; Soil pH ; Soil quality ; Soil treatment ; Surface water ; Trace metals ; Water quality ; Yard waste</subject><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2013-09, Vol.77 (5), p.1744-1754</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Sep/Oct 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-1111945d24efa12426c5e667781d49538f48888b1cd329ed69dc3babc71882b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-1111945d24efa12426c5e667781d49538f48888b1cd329ed69dc3babc71882b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2136%2Fsssaj2013.02.0054$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136%2Fsssaj2013.02.0054$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stehouwer, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Manli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kost, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xiaolu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigham, Jerry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeghly, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dick, Warren A.</creatorcontrib><title>Minesoil Response to Reclamation by Using a Flue Gas Desulfurization Product</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>Mine lands are an environmental concern worldwide because of their potential strong negative impact on water and soil quality. A field study was conducted to assess the use of a dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD) product for reclamation of an abandoned surface coal mine in Ohio. The FGD product was an atmospheric fluidized bed combustion residue and was applied to the graded mine site at 280 Mg ha‐1, both alone and in combination with 112 Mg ha‐1 yard waste compost, and was compared with conventional reclamation with 20 cm of borrow soil plus 157 Mg ha‐1 of agricultural limestone. A grass‐legume sward was planted, and soil physical and chemical properties and β‐glucosidase activity were measured over both short‐ (1–4 yr) and long‐term (15–17 yr) periods following reclamation. Soil pH at 0‐ to 20‐cm depth increased from 3.1 to approximately neutral and was sustained at this level for 15 yr. Compared with the conventional reclamation, extractable Ca, S, B, and Zn concentrations at 0‐ to 20‐cm depth were generally increased by the treatments with FGD product, while other extractable trace metals measured were generally not increased in short‐ or long‐term measurements. Seventeen years after reclamation, β‐glucosidase activity had increased in all three treatments at 0‐ to 5‐ and 5‐ to 10‐cm depths compared with an adjacent untreated area. Furthermore, β‐glucosidase activity more than doubled in the treatments with FGD product compared with the conventional soil treatment at 0‐ to 5‐cm depth. These results suggest that the use of high lime FGD products for reclamation of acid coal mine lands can provide effective long‐term reclamation.</description><subject>Abandoned mines</subject><subject>Air pollution control</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>Coal mines</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Desulfurization</subject><subject>Desulfurizing</subject><subject>Earthmoving equipment</subject><subject>Environmental perception</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Flue gas</subject><subject>Flue gas desulfurization</subject><subject>Flue gases</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Limestone</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Mines</subject><subject>Pollution control equipment</subject><subject>Reclamation</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Soil pH</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Soil treatment</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Trace metals</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Yard waste</subject><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hF4sIlxetX42N5tICKQJSeLSdxUKo0LtlEqPx6XII4cIE52Cvrm5HWQ8gp0BEDri4Q0a4YBT6ibESpFHtkAILLmCoF-2RAuYJYai0PyRHiilKQmtIBmT-UtUNfVtGzw42v0UWtD3NW2bVtS19H6TZaYlm_RjaaVp2LZhaja4ddVXRN-dEzT43Pu6w9JgeFrdCdfN9DspzevFzdxvPH2d3VZB5bwUDEEKSFzJlwhQUmmMqkU2o8TiAXWvKkEElQClnOmXa50nnGU5tmY0gSlgo-JOd97qbxb53D1qxLzFxV2dr5Dg2ELA2cc_kflPNEhv8I6NkvdOW7pg6LGBCC8zFQrQMFPZU1HrFxhdk05do2WwPU7KowP1UYysyuiuC57D3vZeW2fxvMYnLPFovdGV4p-wr5BL-vjoE</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Chen, Liming</creator><creator>Stehouwer, Richard</creator><creator>Wu, Manli</creator><creator>Kost, Dave</creator><creator>Guo, Xiaolu</creator><creator>Bigham, Jerry M.</creator><creator>Beeghly, Joel</creator><creator>Dick, Warren A.</creator><general>The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Minesoil Response to Reclamation by Using a Flue Gas Desulfurization Product</title><author>Chen, Liming ; Stehouwer, Richard ; Wu, Manli ; Kost, Dave ; Guo, Xiaolu ; Bigham, Jerry M. ; Beeghly, Joel ; Dick, Warren A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-1111945d24efa12426c5e667781d49538f48888b1cd329ed69dc3babc71882b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abandoned mines</topic><topic>Air pollution control</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>Coal mines</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Desulfurization</topic><topic>Desulfurizing</topic><topic>Earthmoving equipment</topic><topic>Environmental perception</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Flue gas</topic><topic>Flue gas desulfurization</topic><topic>Flue gases</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Limestone</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Mines</topic><topic>Pollution control equipment</topic><topic>Reclamation</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Soil pH</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Soil treatment</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Trace metals</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Yard waste</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stehouwer, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Manli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kost, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xiaolu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigham, Jerry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeghly, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dick, Warren A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Liming</au><au>Stehouwer, Richard</au><au>Wu, Manli</au><au>Kost, Dave</au><au>Guo, Xiaolu</au><au>Bigham, Jerry M.</au><au>Beeghly, Joel</au><au>Dick, Warren A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minesoil Response to Reclamation by Using a Flue Gas Desulfurization Product</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1744</spage><epage>1754</epage><pages>1744-1754</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><coden>SSSJD4</coden><abstract>Mine lands are an environmental concern worldwide because of their potential strong negative impact on water and soil quality. A field study was conducted to assess the use of a dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD) product for reclamation of an abandoned surface coal mine in Ohio. The FGD product was an atmospheric fluidized bed combustion residue and was applied to the graded mine site at 280 Mg ha‐1, both alone and in combination with 112 Mg ha‐1 yard waste compost, and was compared with conventional reclamation with 20 cm of borrow soil plus 157 Mg ha‐1 of agricultural limestone. A grass‐legume sward was planted, and soil physical and chemical properties and β‐glucosidase activity were measured over both short‐ (1–4 yr) and long‐term (15–17 yr) periods following reclamation. Soil pH at 0‐ to 20‐cm depth increased from 3.1 to approximately neutral and was sustained at this level for 15 yr. Compared with the conventional reclamation, extractable Ca, S, B, and Zn concentrations at 0‐ to 20‐cm depth were generally increased by the treatments with FGD product, while other extractable trace metals measured were generally not increased in short‐ or long‐term measurements. Seventeen years after reclamation, β‐glucosidase activity had increased in all three treatments at 0‐ to 5‐ and 5‐ to 10‐cm depths compared with an adjacent untreated area. Furthermore, β‐glucosidase activity more than doubled in the treatments with FGD product compared with the conventional soil treatment at 0‐ to 5‐cm depth. These results suggest that the use of high lime FGD products for reclamation of acid coal mine lands can provide effective long‐term reclamation.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><doi>10.2136/sssaj2013.02.0054</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-5995
ispartof Soil Science Society of America journal, 2013-09, Vol.77 (5), p.1744-1754
issn 0361-5995
1435-0661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677913335
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Abandoned mines
Air pollution control
Chemical properties
Coal mines
Coal mining
Composting
Desulfurization
Desulfurizing
Earthmoving equipment
Environmental perception
Enzymes
Flue gas
Flue gas desulfurization
Flue gases
Land
Limestone
Magnesium
Mines
Pollution control equipment
Reclamation
Soil (material)
Soil pH
Soil quality
Soil treatment
Surface water
Trace metals
Water quality
Yard waste
title Minesoil Response to Reclamation by Using a Flue Gas Desulfurization Product
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A12%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minesoil%20Response%20to%20Reclamation%20by%20Using%20a%20Flue%20Gas%20Desulfurization%20Product&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Chen,%20Liming&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1744&rft.epage=1754&rft.pages=1744-1754&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft.coden=SSSJD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136/sssaj2013.02.0054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3104029791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443371099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true