Comparison of slamming and whipping loads by fully coupled hydroelastic analysis and experimental measurement

This paper proposes a numerical method for analyzing whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The numerical analysis method utilizes a 3-D Rankine panel method, 1-D/3-D finite element methods, and a 2-D generalized Wagner model, which are strongly coupled in the time domain. The computatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of fluids and structures 2015-01, Vol.52, p.145-165
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Jung-Hyun, Kim, Yonghwan, Yuck, Rae-Hyoung, Lee, Dong-Yeon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue
container_start_page 145
container_title Journal of fluids and structures
container_volume 52
creator Kim, Jung-Hyun
Kim, Yonghwan
Yuck, Rae-Hyoung
Lee, Dong-Yeon
description This paper proposes a numerical method for analyzing whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The numerical analysis method utilizes a 3-D Rankine panel method, 1-D/3-D finite element methods, and a 2-D generalized Wagner model, which are strongly coupled in the time domain. The computational results were compared with those of a model test of an 18000-TEU containership. The slamming pressures and whipping responses to regular waves for bow flare and stern slamming were compared. Furthermore, the slamming pressure was decomposed into its dynamic and static components. The numerical and experimental models produced similar results. In addition, the effects of the discretization and geometric approximation of the 2-D slamming sections were investigated. •A fully coupled numerical model is introduced for simulating slamming–whipping of an 18000-TEU containership.•The computational result showed good agreement with the experimental result in terms of slamming pressure and VBM.•An enough number of sections are required near the stern to consider the effect of stern slamming.•It is observed that slamming load suppressed the pitch motion in the present ship model.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.10.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677908709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889974614002266</els_id><sourcerecordid>1668252910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-c0a56a15b62d8943f754748b7ec77a15ce6b14ddd41599932bc9a7ba4b111b013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcuO1DAQtBBIDAv_EIkLlwzujGPH4oRGy0NaaS_L2XLsDuuREwd3AuTvcRgu3PbUqq6qVpeKsbfAj8BBvr8cL0Ncg6clr26hY8NBFObIAZ6xA3Dd1p1smufswLtO11oJ-ZK9IrpwzrU4wYGN5zTONgdKU5WGiqIdxzB9r-zkq1-PYZ53EJP1VPVbNawxbpVL6xzRV4-bzwmjpSW4YrBxo0B_nfh7xhxGnBYbqxEtrRl39Jq9GGwkfPNv3rBvn24fzl_qu_vPX88f72onhFxqx20rLbS9bHxX_hxUK5ToeoVOqbJ3KHsQ3nsBrdb61PROW9Vb0QNAz-F0w95d7845_ViRFjMGchijnTCtZEAqpXmnuH6CVHZN22jgRfrhKnU5EWUczFxC2rwZ4Gbvw1zMf32YvY-dLH0U9-3VjSX4z4DZkAs4OfQho1uMT-FJd_4AqLOejA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1668252910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of slamming and whipping loads by fully coupled hydroelastic analysis and experimental measurement</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kim, Jung-Hyun ; Kim, Yonghwan ; Yuck, Rae-Hyoung ; Lee, Dong-Yeon</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung-Hyun ; Kim, Yonghwan ; Yuck, Rae-Hyoung ; Lee, Dong-Yeon</creatorcontrib><description>This paper proposes a numerical method for analyzing whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The numerical analysis method utilizes a 3-D Rankine panel method, 1-D/3-D finite element methods, and a 2-D generalized Wagner model, which are strongly coupled in the time domain. The computational results were compared with those of a model test of an 18000-TEU containership. The slamming pressures and whipping responses to regular waves for bow flare and stern slamming were compared. Furthermore, the slamming pressure was decomposed into its dynamic and static components. The numerical and experimental models produced similar results. In addition, the effects of the discretization and geometric approximation of the 2-D slamming sections were investigated. •A fully coupled numerical model is introduced for simulating slamming–whipping of an 18000-TEU containership.•The computational result showed good agreement with the experimental result in terms of slamming pressure and VBM.•An enough number of sections are required near the stern to consider the effect of stern slamming.•It is observed that slamming load suppressed the pitch motion in the present ship model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-9746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8622</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.10.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Discretization ; Flares ; Fluid–structure interaction ; Generalized Wagner approach ; Hydroelasticity ; Joining ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Numerical analysis ; Panels ; Slamming ; Three dimensional ; Whipping</subject><ispartof>Journal of fluids and structures, 2015-01, Vol.52, p.145-165</ispartof><rights>2014 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-c0a56a15b62d8943f754748b7ec77a15ce6b14ddd41599932bc9a7ba4b111b013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-c0a56a15b62d8943f754748b7ec77a15ce6b14ddd41599932bc9a7ba4b111b013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.10.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yonghwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuck, Rae-Hyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong-Yeon</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of slamming and whipping loads by fully coupled hydroelastic analysis and experimental measurement</title><title>Journal of fluids and structures</title><description>This paper proposes a numerical method for analyzing whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The numerical analysis method utilizes a 3-D Rankine panel method, 1-D/3-D finite element methods, and a 2-D generalized Wagner model, which are strongly coupled in the time domain. The computational results were compared with those of a model test of an 18000-TEU containership. The slamming pressures and whipping responses to regular waves for bow flare and stern slamming were compared. Furthermore, the slamming pressure was decomposed into its dynamic and static components. The numerical and experimental models produced similar results. In addition, the effects of the discretization and geometric approximation of the 2-D slamming sections were investigated. •A fully coupled numerical model is introduced for simulating slamming–whipping of an 18000-TEU containership.•The computational result showed good agreement with the experimental result in terms of slamming pressure and VBM.•An enough number of sections are required near the stern to consider the effect of stern slamming.•It is observed that slamming load suppressed the pitch motion in the present ship model.</description><subject>Discretization</subject><subject>Flares</subject><subject>Fluid–structure interaction</subject><subject>Generalized Wagner approach</subject><subject>Hydroelasticity</subject><subject>Joining</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Panels</subject><subject>Slamming</subject><subject>Three dimensional</subject><subject>Whipping</subject><issn>0889-9746</issn><issn>1095-8622</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUcuO1DAQtBBIDAv_EIkLlwzujGPH4oRGy0NaaS_L2XLsDuuREwd3AuTvcRgu3PbUqq6qVpeKsbfAj8BBvr8cL0Ncg6clr26hY8NBFObIAZ6xA3Dd1p1smufswLtO11oJ-ZK9IrpwzrU4wYGN5zTONgdKU5WGiqIdxzB9r-zkq1-PYZ53EJP1VPVbNawxbpVL6xzRV4-bzwmjpSW4YrBxo0B_nfh7xhxGnBYbqxEtrRl39Jq9GGwkfPNv3rBvn24fzl_qu_vPX88f72onhFxqx20rLbS9bHxX_hxUK5ToeoVOqbJ3KHsQ3nsBrdb61PROW9Vb0QNAz-F0w95d7845_ViRFjMGchijnTCtZEAqpXmnuH6CVHZN22jgRfrhKnU5EWUczFxC2rwZ4Gbvw1zMf32YvY-dLH0U9-3VjSX4z4DZkAs4OfQho1uMT-FJd_4AqLOejA</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Kim, Jung-Hyun</creator><creator>Kim, Yonghwan</creator><creator>Yuck, Rae-Hyoung</creator><creator>Lee, Dong-Yeon</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Comparison of slamming and whipping loads by fully coupled hydroelastic analysis and experimental measurement</title><author>Kim, Jung-Hyun ; Kim, Yonghwan ; Yuck, Rae-Hyoung ; Lee, Dong-Yeon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-c0a56a15b62d8943f754748b7ec77a15ce6b14ddd41599932bc9a7ba4b111b013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Discretization</topic><topic>Flares</topic><topic>Fluid–structure interaction</topic><topic>Generalized Wagner approach</topic><topic>Hydroelasticity</topic><topic>Joining</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Panels</topic><topic>Slamming</topic><topic>Three dimensional</topic><topic>Whipping</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yonghwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuck, Rae-Hyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong-Yeon</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of fluids and structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jung-Hyun</au><au>Kim, Yonghwan</au><au>Yuck, Rae-Hyoung</au><au>Lee, Dong-Yeon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of slamming and whipping loads by fully coupled hydroelastic analysis and experimental measurement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fluids and structures</jtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>145</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>145-165</pages><issn>0889-9746</issn><eissn>1095-8622</eissn><abstract>This paper proposes a numerical method for analyzing whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The numerical analysis method utilizes a 3-D Rankine panel method, 1-D/3-D finite element methods, and a 2-D generalized Wagner model, which are strongly coupled in the time domain. The computational results were compared with those of a model test of an 18000-TEU containership. The slamming pressures and whipping responses to regular waves for bow flare and stern slamming were compared. Furthermore, the slamming pressure was decomposed into its dynamic and static components. The numerical and experimental models produced similar results. In addition, the effects of the discretization and geometric approximation of the 2-D slamming sections were investigated. •A fully coupled numerical model is introduced for simulating slamming–whipping of an 18000-TEU containership.•The computational result showed good agreement with the experimental result in terms of slamming pressure and VBM.•An enough number of sections are required near the stern to consider the effect of stern slamming.•It is observed that slamming load suppressed the pitch motion in the present ship model.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.10.011</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-9746
ispartof Journal of fluids and structures, 2015-01, Vol.52, p.145-165
issn 0889-9746
1095-8622
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677908709
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Discretization
Flares
Fluid–structure interaction
Generalized Wagner approach
Hydroelasticity
Joining
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Numerical analysis
Panels
Slamming
Three dimensional
Whipping
title Comparison of slamming and whipping loads by fully coupled hydroelastic analysis and experimental measurement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T01%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20slamming%20and%20whipping%20loads%20by%20fully%20coupled%20hydroelastic%20analysis%20and%20experimental%20measurement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fluids%20and%20structures&rft.au=Kim,%20Jung-Hyun&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=145-165&rft.issn=0889-9746&rft.eissn=1095-8622&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.10.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1668252910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1668252910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0889974614002266&rfr_iscdi=true