Decision support system for the provision of emergency sanitation
Proper provision of sanitation in emergencies is considered a life-saving intervention. Without access to sanitation, refugees at emergency camps are at a high risk of contracting diseases. Even the most knowledgeable relief agencies have experienced difficulties providing sanitation alternatives in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Science of the total environment 2015-04, Vol.512-513, p.645-658 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 658 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 645 |
container_title | The Science of the total environment |
container_volume | 512-513 |
creator | Zakaria, F Garcia, H A Hooijmans, C M Brdjanovic, D |
description | Proper provision of sanitation in emergencies is considered a life-saving intervention. Without access to sanitation, refugees at emergency camps are at a high risk of contracting diseases. Even the most knowledgeable relief agencies have experienced difficulties providing sanitation alternatives in such challenging scenarios. This study developed a computer-based decision support system (DSS) to plan a sanitation response in emergencies. The sanitation alternatives suggested by the DSS are based on a sanitation chain concept that considers different steps in the faecal sludge management, from the toilet or latrine to the safe disposal of faecal matters. The DSS first screens individual sanitation technologies using the user's given input. Remaining sanitation options are then built into a feasible sanitation chain. Subsequently, each technology in the chain is evaluated on a scoring system. Different sanitation chains can later be ranked based on the total evaluation scores. The DSS addresses several deficiencies encountered in the provision of sanitation in emergencies including: the application of standard practices and intuition, the omission of site specific conditions, the limited knowledge exhibited by emergency planners, and the provision of sanitation focused exclusively on the collection step (i.e., just the provision of toilets). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.051 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677901260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1658420401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-cd9cd4ae8377799072302c157efc900c1257992ad446b1eb0a7ee2a40d1147d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-Bc3RS-LMZj-SY6mfUPCi52W7mWhK82F2I_Tfm9Lac-cyMDzvzMDD2B1CgoDqYZ14V4U2UPObcECZACYg8YxNMdN5jMDVOZsCiCzOVa4n7Mr7NYylM7xkEy6V4pniUzZ_JFf5qm0iP3Rd24fIb32gOirbPgrfFHV9-7sH2jKimvovatw28rapgg3j_JpdlHbj6ebQZ-zz-elj8Rov31_eFvNl7ATPQuyK3BXCUpZqrfMcNE-BO5SaSpcDOORyHHNbCKFWSCuwmohbAQWi0IVOZ-x-v3f86GcgH0xdeUebjW2oHbxBNe4F5ApOQdM0k5LnJ6AyExwE4IjqPer61vueStP1VW37rUEwOytmbY5WzM6KATSjlTF5ezgyrGoqjrl_DekfNQWLBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1658420401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decision support system for the provision of emergency sanitation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zakaria, F ; Garcia, H A ; Hooijmans, C M ; Brdjanovic, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, F ; Garcia, H A ; Hooijmans, C M ; Brdjanovic, D</creatorcontrib><description>Proper provision of sanitation in emergencies is considered a life-saving intervention. Without access to sanitation, refugees at emergency camps are at a high risk of contracting diseases. Even the most knowledgeable relief agencies have experienced difficulties providing sanitation alternatives in such challenging scenarios. This study developed a computer-based decision support system (DSS) to plan a sanitation response in emergencies. The sanitation alternatives suggested by the DSS are based on a sanitation chain concept that considers different steps in the faecal sludge management, from the toilet or latrine to the safe disposal of faecal matters. The DSS first screens individual sanitation technologies using the user's given input. Remaining sanitation options are then built into a feasible sanitation chain. Subsequently, each technology in the chain is evaluated on a scoring system. Different sanitation chains can later be ranked based on the total evaluation scores. The DSS addresses several deficiencies encountered in the provision of sanitation in emergencies including: the application of standard practices and intuition, the omission of site specific conditions, the limited knowledge exhibited by emergency planners, and the provision of sanitation focused exclusively on the collection step (i.e., just the provision of toilets).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25662862</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Chains ; Decision support systems ; Diseases ; Emergencies ; Refugees ; Risk ; Sanitation ; Sludge ; Toilets</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2015-04, Vol.512-513, p.645-658</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-cd9cd4ae8377799072302c157efc900c1257992ad446b1eb0a7ee2a40d1147d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-cd9cd4ae8377799072302c157efc900c1257992ad446b1eb0a7ee2a40d1147d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0485-9133</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27904,27905</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25662862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, H A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooijmans, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brdjanovic, D</creatorcontrib><title>Decision support system for the provision of emergency sanitation</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Proper provision of sanitation in emergencies is considered a life-saving intervention. Without access to sanitation, refugees at emergency camps are at a high risk of contracting diseases. Even the most knowledgeable relief agencies have experienced difficulties providing sanitation alternatives in such challenging scenarios. This study developed a computer-based decision support system (DSS) to plan a sanitation response in emergencies. The sanitation alternatives suggested by the DSS are based on a sanitation chain concept that considers different steps in the faecal sludge management, from the toilet or latrine to the safe disposal of faecal matters. The DSS first screens individual sanitation technologies using the user's given input. Remaining sanitation options are then built into a feasible sanitation chain. Subsequently, each technology in the chain is evaluated on a scoring system. Different sanitation chains can later be ranked based on the total evaluation scores. The DSS addresses several deficiencies encountered in the provision of sanitation in emergencies including: the application of standard practices and intuition, the omission of site specific conditions, the limited knowledge exhibited by emergency planners, and the provision of sanitation focused exclusively on the collection step (i.e., just the provision of toilets).</description><subject>Chains</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sanitation</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Toilets</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-Bc3RS-LMZj-SY6mfUPCi52W7mWhK82F2I_Tfm9Lac-cyMDzvzMDD2B1CgoDqYZ14V4U2UPObcECZACYg8YxNMdN5jMDVOZsCiCzOVa4n7Mr7NYylM7xkEy6V4pniUzZ_JFf5qm0iP3Rd24fIb32gOirbPgrfFHV9-7sH2jKimvovatw28rapgg3j_JpdlHbj6ebQZ-zz-elj8Rov31_eFvNl7ATPQuyK3BXCUpZqrfMcNE-BO5SaSpcDOORyHHNbCKFWSCuwmohbAQWi0IVOZ-x-v3f86GcgH0xdeUebjW2oHbxBNe4F5ApOQdM0k5LnJ6AyExwE4IjqPer61vueStP1VW37rUEwOytmbY5WzM6KATSjlTF5ezgyrGoqjrl_DekfNQWLBQ</recordid><startdate>20150415</startdate><enddate>20150415</enddate><creator>Zakaria, F</creator><creator>Garcia, H A</creator><creator>Hooijmans, C M</creator><creator>Brdjanovic, D</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-9133</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150415</creationdate><title>Decision support system for the provision of emergency sanitation</title><author>Zakaria, F ; Garcia, H A ; Hooijmans, C M ; Brdjanovic, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-cd9cd4ae8377799072302c157efc900c1257992ad446b1eb0a7ee2a40d1147d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Chains</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sanitation</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Toilets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, H A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooijmans, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brdjanovic, D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zakaria, F</au><au>Garcia, H A</au><au>Hooijmans, C M</au><au>Brdjanovic, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decision support system for the provision of emergency sanitation</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2015-04-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>512-513</volume><spage>645</spage><epage>658</epage><pages>645-658</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Proper provision of sanitation in emergencies is considered a life-saving intervention. Without access to sanitation, refugees at emergency camps are at a high risk of contracting diseases. Even the most knowledgeable relief agencies have experienced difficulties providing sanitation alternatives in such challenging scenarios. This study developed a computer-based decision support system (DSS) to plan a sanitation response in emergencies. The sanitation alternatives suggested by the DSS are based on a sanitation chain concept that considers different steps in the faecal sludge management, from the toilet or latrine to the safe disposal of faecal matters. The DSS first screens individual sanitation technologies using the user's given input. Remaining sanitation options are then built into a feasible sanitation chain. Subsequently, each technology in the chain is evaluated on a scoring system. Different sanitation chains can later be ranked based on the total evaluation scores. The DSS addresses several deficiencies encountered in the provision of sanitation in emergencies including: the application of standard practices and intuition, the omission of site specific conditions, the limited knowledge exhibited by emergency planners, and the provision of sanitation focused exclusively on the collection step (i.e., just the provision of toilets).</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>25662862</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.051</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-9133</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2015-04, Vol.512-513, p.645-658 |
issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677901260 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Chains Decision support systems Diseases Emergencies Refugees Risk Sanitation Sludge Toilets |
title | Decision support system for the provision of emergency sanitation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A13%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decision%20support%20system%20for%20the%20provision%20of%20emergency%20sanitation&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Zakaria,%20F&rft.date=2015-04-15&rft.volume=512-513&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=658&rft.pages=645-658&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1658420401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1658420401&rft_id=info:pmid/25662862&rfr_iscdi=true |