Effect of long-term storage on nanomechanical and morphological properties of dentin–adhesive interfaces

Abstract Introduction To evaluate the influence of storage time on the elastic modulus, micromorphology, nanoleakage, and micromechanical behavior of the dentin–adhesive interfaces of five adhesive systems (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Clearfil SE Bond, One Up Bond F, Adper Easy One, and Filtek LS Adhe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dental materials 2015-02, Vol.31 (2), p.141-153
Hauptverfasser: Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera, Machado, Lucas Silveira, Martini, Ana Paula, dos Santos, Paulo Henrique, Giannini, Marcelo, Janal, Malvin, Tovar, Nick, Sundfeld, Renato Herman, Rocha, Eduardo Passos, Coelho, Paulo G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 153
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title Dental materials
container_volume 31
creator Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera
Machado, Lucas Silveira
Martini, Ana Paula
dos Santos, Paulo Henrique
Giannini, Marcelo
Janal, Malvin
Tovar, Nick
Sundfeld, Renato Herman
Rocha, Eduardo Passos
Coelho, Paulo G
description Abstract Introduction To evaluate the influence of storage time on the elastic modulus, micromorphology, nanoleakage, and micromechanical behavior of the dentin–adhesive interfaces of five adhesive systems (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Clearfil SE Bond, One Up Bond F, Adper Easy One, and Filtek LS Adhesive) after 24 h (T0) and 12 months (T1). Methods Fifty teeth were restored and distributed according to each adhesive system ( n = 10). At least four specimens were obtained from each tooth. One specimen was evaluated under SEM to obtain the micromorphology of dentin–adhesive interface (DAI). Two specimens were used to assess nanoleakage, one tested in T0 and the other in T1. The last specimen was used for nanoindentation, in T0 and T1, to obtain the initial and final mechanical properties of DAI structures. Two non-restored teeth were evaluated under SEM to obtain the dentin morphology. Laboratorial data were used to build 15 finite element models to assess the maximum principal stress in each time of analysis. Results Storage resulted in hydrolysis of the dentin–adhesive interfaces for all groups. Silver impregnation increased for all groups after 1 year storage ( p < .05), except for Clearfil SE Bond. In general, a decrease in elastic modulus values was observed for all groups from T0 to T1 ( p < .05), mainly at the hybrid layer. The FEAs showed higher stress levels at T1 than T0 simulations for all adhesives. Conclusion At T1, degradation occurred at the dentin–adhesive interface formed by all adhesives, and the intensity of degradation differed depending on the type of adhesive system used. The interface formed by the self-etching primer containing the 10-MDP functional monomer showed the highest stability among the adhesive systems after 12 months of storage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677901252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0109564114006642</els_id><sourcerecordid>1677901252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-7d0736996b83ca6fc1dd7a16b1415dc3881f9dd3194eff7b0014c389671ff51c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhi0EokvhDRDKkUuCJ3Hs-IKEqgKVKnEAzpbXHu86JPZiZyv1xjvwhjwJTrflwAVOln598894_iHkJdAGKPA3Y2MxLHpqWgqsAWgo0EdkA4OQNaVSPCabosi65wzOyLOcR0opayU8JWdt37eyp7Ah46VzaJYqumqKYVcvmOYqLzHpHVYxVEGHOKPZ6-CNniodbDXHdNjHKe7ulEOKB0yLx7x6rCP58OvHT233mP0NVj4US6cN5ufkidNTxhf37zn5-v7yy8XH-vrTh6uLd9e16Qe-1MJS0XEp-XbojObOgLVCA98Cg96abhjASWs7kAydE1tavl9UyQU414Ppzsnrk28Z7fsR86Jmnw1Okw4Yj1kBF0JSaPv2P9ACDR3jK8pOqEkx54ROHZKfdbpVQNUaiBrVKRC1BqIAVFl_KXt13-G4ndH-KXpIoABvTwCWldx4TCobj8Gg9akEo2z0_-rwt4GZ_F1a3_AW8xiPKZR1K1C5VVR9Xo9ivQlglHLO2u436ci0ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652383462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of long-term storage on nanomechanical and morphological properties of dentin–adhesive interfaces</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera ; Machado, Lucas Silveira ; Martini, Ana Paula ; dos Santos, Paulo Henrique ; Giannini, Marcelo ; Janal, Malvin ; Tovar, Nick ; Sundfeld, Renato Herman ; Rocha, Eduardo Passos ; Coelho, Paulo G</creator><creatorcontrib>Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera ; Machado, Lucas Silveira ; Martini, Ana Paula ; dos Santos, Paulo Henrique ; Giannini, Marcelo ; Janal, Malvin ; Tovar, Nick ; Sundfeld, Renato Herman ; Rocha, Eduardo Passos ; Coelho, Paulo G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction To evaluate the influence of storage time on the elastic modulus, micromorphology, nanoleakage, and micromechanical behavior of the dentin–adhesive interfaces of five adhesive systems (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Clearfil SE Bond, One Up Bond F, Adper Easy One, and Filtek LS Adhesive) after 24 h (T0) and 12 months (T1). Methods Fifty teeth were restored and distributed according to each adhesive system ( n = 10). At least four specimens were obtained from each tooth. One specimen was evaluated under SEM to obtain the micromorphology of dentin–adhesive interface (DAI). Two specimens were used to assess nanoleakage, one tested in T0 and the other in T1. The last specimen was used for nanoindentation, in T0 and T1, to obtain the initial and final mechanical properties of DAI structures. Two non-restored teeth were evaluated under SEM to obtain the dentin morphology. Laboratorial data were used to build 15 finite element models to assess the maximum principal stress in each time of analysis. Results Storage resulted in hydrolysis of the dentin–adhesive interfaces for all groups. Silver impregnation increased for all groups after 1 year storage ( p &lt; .05), except for Clearfil SE Bond. In general, a decrease in elastic modulus values was observed for all groups from T0 to T1 ( p &lt; .05), mainly at the hybrid layer. The FEAs showed higher stress levels at T1 than T0 simulations for all adhesives. Conclusion At T1, degradation occurred at the dentin–adhesive interface formed by all adhesives, and the intensity of degradation differed depending on the type of adhesive system used. The interface formed by the self-etching primer containing the 10-MDP functional monomer showed the highest stability among the adhesive systems after 12 months of storage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0109-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25529501</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acid Etching, Dental - methods ; Adhesive bonding ; Adhesives ; Advanced Basic Science ; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry ; Bonding ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Construction ; Degradation ; Dental Leakage ; Dental materials ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Dentin ; Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry ; Dentin–adhesive interface ; Dentistry ; Elastic Modulus ; Finite Element Analysis ; Hybrid layer ; Hydrolytic degradation ; In Vitro Techniques ; Mechanical properties ; Methacrylates - chemistry ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Nanostructure ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Surface Properties ; Teeth ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Dental materials, 2015-02, Vol.31 (2), p.141-153</ispartof><rights>Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>2014 Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-7d0736996b83ca6fc1dd7a16b1415dc3881f9dd3194eff7b0014c389671ff51c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-7d0736996b83ca6fc1dd7a16b1415dc3881f9dd3194eff7b0014c389671ff51c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564114006642$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25529501$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Lucas Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martini, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Paulo Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janal, Malvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tovar, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundfeld, Renato Herman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Eduardo Passos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Paulo G</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of long-term storage on nanomechanical and morphological properties of dentin–adhesive interfaces</title><title>Dental materials</title><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction To evaluate the influence of storage time on the elastic modulus, micromorphology, nanoleakage, and micromechanical behavior of the dentin–adhesive interfaces of five adhesive systems (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Clearfil SE Bond, One Up Bond F, Adper Easy One, and Filtek LS Adhesive) after 24 h (T0) and 12 months (T1). Methods Fifty teeth were restored and distributed according to each adhesive system ( n = 10). At least four specimens were obtained from each tooth. One specimen was evaluated under SEM to obtain the micromorphology of dentin–adhesive interface (DAI). Two specimens were used to assess nanoleakage, one tested in T0 and the other in T1. The last specimen was used for nanoindentation, in T0 and T1, to obtain the initial and final mechanical properties of DAI structures. Two non-restored teeth were evaluated under SEM to obtain the dentin morphology. Laboratorial data were used to build 15 finite element models to assess the maximum principal stress in each time of analysis. Results Storage resulted in hydrolysis of the dentin–adhesive interfaces for all groups. Silver impregnation increased for all groups after 1 year storage ( p &lt; .05), except for Clearfil SE Bond. In general, a decrease in elastic modulus values was observed for all groups from T0 to T1 ( p &lt; .05), mainly at the hybrid layer. The FEAs showed higher stress levels at T1 than T0 simulations for all adhesives. Conclusion At T1, degradation occurred at the dentin–adhesive interface formed by all adhesives, and the intensity of degradation differed depending on the type of adhesive system used. The interface formed by the self-etching primer containing the 10-MDP functional monomer showed the highest stability among the adhesive systems after 12 months of storage.</description><subject>Acid Etching, Dental - methods</subject><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry</subject><subject>Bonding</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Dental Leakage</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Dentin–adhesive interface</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Elastic Modulus</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Hybrid layer</subject><subject>Hydrolytic degradation</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Methacrylates - chemistry</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0109-5641</issn><issn>1879-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhi0EokvhDRDKkUuCJ3Hs-IKEqgKVKnEAzpbXHu86JPZiZyv1xjvwhjwJTrflwAVOln598894_iHkJdAGKPA3Y2MxLHpqWgqsAWgo0EdkA4OQNaVSPCabosi65wzOyLOcR0opayU8JWdt37eyp7Ah46VzaJYqumqKYVcvmOYqLzHpHVYxVEGHOKPZ6-CNniodbDXHdNjHKe7ulEOKB0yLx7x6rCP58OvHT233mP0NVj4US6cN5ufkidNTxhf37zn5-v7yy8XH-vrTh6uLd9e16Qe-1MJS0XEp-XbojObOgLVCA98Cg96abhjASWs7kAydE1tavl9UyQU414Ppzsnrk28Z7fsR86Jmnw1Okw4Yj1kBF0JSaPv2P9ACDR3jK8pOqEkx54ROHZKfdbpVQNUaiBrVKRC1BqIAVFl_KXt13-G4ndH-KXpIoABvTwCWldx4TCobj8Gg9akEo2z0_-rwt4GZ_F1a3_AW8xiPKZR1K1C5VVR9Xo9ivQlglHLO2u436ci0ng</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera</creator><creator>Machado, Lucas Silveira</creator><creator>Martini, Ana Paula</creator><creator>dos Santos, Paulo Henrique</creator><creator>Giannini, Marcelo</creator><creator>Janal, Malvin</creator><creator>Tovar, Nick</creator><creator>Sundfeld, Renato Herman</creator><creator>Rocha, Eduardo Passos</creator><creator>Coelho, Paulo G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Effect of long-term storage on nanomechanical and morphological properties of dentin–adhesive interfaces</title><author>Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera ; Machado, Lucas Silveira ; Martini, Ana Paula ; dos Santos, Paulo Henrique ; Giannini, Marcelo ; Janal, Malvin ; Tovar, Nick ; Sundfeld, Renato Herman ; Rocha, Eduardo Passos ; Coelho, Paulo G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-7d0736996b83ca6fc1dd7a16b1415dc3881f9dd3194eff7b0014c389671ff51c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acid Etching, Dental - methods</topic><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry</topic><topic>Bonding</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Dental Leakage</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Dentin–adhesive interface</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Elastic Modulus</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Hybrid layer</topic><topic>Hydrolytic degradation</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Methacrylates - chemistry</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Lucas Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martini, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Paulo Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janal, Malvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tovar, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundfeld, Renato Herman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Eduardo Passos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Paulo G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera</au><au>Machado, Lucas Silveira</au><au>Martini, Ana Paula</au><au>dos Santos, Paulo Henrique</au><au>Giannini, Marcelo</au><au>Janal, Malvin</au><au>Tovar, Nick</au><au>Sundfeld, Renato Herman</au><au>Rocha, Eduardo Passos</au><au>Coelho, Paulo G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of long-term storage on nanomechanical and morphological properties of dentin–adhesive interfaces</atitle><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>141-153</pages><issn>0109-5641</issn><eissn>1879-0097</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction To evaluate the influence of storage time on the elastic modulus, micromorphology, nanoleakage, and micromechanical behavior of the dentin–adhesive interfaces of five adhesive systems (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Clearfil SE Bond, One Up Bond F, Adper Easy One, and Filtek LS Adhesive) after 24 h (T0) and 12 months (T1). Methods Fifty teeth were restored and distributed according to each adhesive system ( n = 10). At least four specimens were obtained from each tooth. One specimen was evaluated under SEM to obtain the micromorphology of dentin–adhesive interface (DAI). Two specimens were used to assess nanoleakage, one tested in T0 and the other in T1. The last specimen was used for nanoindentation, in T0 and T1, to obtain the initial and final mechanical properties of DAI structures. Two non-restored teeth were evaluated under SEM to obtain the dentin morphology. Laboratorial data were used to build 15 finite element models to assess the maximum principal stress in each time of analysis. Results Storage resulted in hydrolysis of the dentin–adhesive interfaces for all groups. Silver impregnation increased for all groups after 1 year storage ( p &lt; .05), except for Clearfil SE Bond. In general, a decrease in elastic modulus values was observed for all groups from T0 to T1 ( p &lt; .05), mainly at the hybrid layer. The FEAs showed higher stress levels at T1 than T0 simulations for all adhesives. Conclusion At T1, degradation occurred at the dentin–adhesive interface formed by all adhesives, and the intensity of degradation differed depending on the type of adhesive system used. The interface formed by the self-etching primer containing the 10-MDP functional monomer showed the highest stability among the adhesive systems after 12 months of storage.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25529501</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.010</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0109-5641
ispartof Dental materials, 2015-02, Vol.31 (2), p.141-153
issn 0109-5641
1879-0097
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677901252
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acid Etching, Dental - methods
Adhesive bonding
Adhesives
Advanced Basic Science
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry
Bonding
Composite Resins - chemistry
Construction
Degradation
Dental Leakage
Dental materials
Dental Materials - chemistry
Dentin
Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry
Dentin–adhesive interface
Dentistry
Elastic Modulus
Finite Element Analysis
Hybrid layer
Hydrolytic degradation
In Vitro Techniques
Mechanical properties
Methacrylates - chemistry
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Nanostructure
Resin Cements - chemistry
Surface Properties
Teeth
Time Factors
title Effect of long-term storage on nanomechanical and morphological properties of dentin–adhesive interfaces
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A22%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20long-term%20storage%20on%20nanomechanical%20and%20morphological%20properties%20of%20dentin%E2%80%93adhesive%20interfaces&rft.jtitle=Dental%20materials&rft.au=Anchieta,%20Rodolfo%20Bruniera&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=141-153&rft.issn=0109-5641&rft.eissn=1879-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677901252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652383462&rft_id=info:pmid/25529501&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0109564114006642&rfr_iscdi=true