The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire: an otology-specific patient-recorded outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and a report of preliminary reliability and validity

Objective The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire (COQOL) is a patient‐recorded outcome measurement (PROM) designed to quantify the quality of life of patients attending otology clinics. Design Item‐reduction model. A systematically designed long‐form version (74 items) was tested with p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical otolaryngology 2015-04, Vol.40 (2), p.130-139
Hauptverfasser: Martin, T.P.C., Moualed, D., Paul, A., Ronan, N., Tysome, J.R., Donnelly, N.P., Cook, R., Axon, P.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue 2
container_start_page 130
container_title Clinical otolaryngology
container_volume 40
creator Martin, T.P.C.
Moualed, D.
Paul, A.
Ronan, N.
Tysome, J.R.
Donnelly, N.P.
Cook, R.
Axon, P.R.
description Objective The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire (COQOL) is a patient‐recorded outcome measurement (PROM) designed to quantify the quality of life of patients attending otology clinics. Design Item‐reduction model. A systematically designed long‐form version (74 items) was tested with patient focus groups before being presented to adult otology patients (n. 137). Preliminary item analysis tested reliability, reducing the COQOL to 24 questions. This was then presented in conjunction with the SF‐36 (V1) questionnaire to a total of 203 patients. Subsequently, these were re‐presented at T + 3 months, and patients recorded whether they felt their condition had improved, deteriorated or remained the same. Non‐responders were contacted by post. A correlation between COQOL scores and patient perception of change was examined to analyse content validity. Setting Teaching hospital and university psychology department. Participants Adult patients attending otology clinics with a wide range of otological conditions. Main outcome measurements Item reliability measured by item–total correlation, internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Validity measured by correlation between COQOL scores and patient‐reported symptom change. Results Reliability: the COQOL showed excellent internal consistency at both initial presentation (α = 0.90) and 3 months later (α = 0.93). Validity: One‐way analysis of variance showed a significant difference between groups reporting change and those reporting no change in quality of life (F(2, 80) = 5.866, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/coa.12338
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677894824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3622130421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3528-81076a6904bb350a8b7ca2e51a239afb9cd44d2081e6a571d69ab484e0b0af433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc2O0zAUhSMEYn5gwQsgS2zYpOO_xA67UjEDqGqFKGJp3SQ3xUMSBzsB-oY8Fk47dIE3vlf-zvWxT5K8YHTB4rqpHCwYF0I_Si6ZkkUqpc4fn2ulL5KrEO4plYIq9jS54FnBFdXiMvmz-4ZkBV3pbb1Hsh1d6_YH8mmC1o4H4hqytg3GHsNoXd-D9fiGQE_ciUzDgJVtbEUGGC32Y-qxcr7GmrhprFyHpEMIk8cFWUZmQE9qDJW3pe33ZIy32z6Mfuqidj6x-z6OrwkQj4Pz42xh8NjazvbgD2QuobRHdzP3MxqtY_MsedJAG_D5w36dfLl9t1u9T9fbuw-r5Tq1IuM61YyqHPKCyrIUGQVdqgo4Zgy4KKApi6qWsuZUM8whU6zOCyillkhLCo0U4jp5fZo7ePdj_hXT2VBh20KPbgqG5UrpQmouI_rqP_TeTb6P7iKV8yzLCskj9fKBmsoOazN428WHmn8ZReDmBPyyLR7O54yaOXwTwzfH8M1quzwWUZGeFDaM-PusAP_d5EqozHzd3Jlswz_qz5u3Zif-AuX6tCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1662555942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire: an otology-specific patient-recorded outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and a report of preliminary reliability and validity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Martin, T.P.C. ; Moualed, D. ; Paul, A. ; Ronan, N. ; Tysome, J.R. ; Donnelly, N.P. ; Cook, R. ; Axon, P.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, T.P.C. ; Moualed, D. ; Paul, A. ; Ronan, N. ; Tysome, J.R. ; Donnelly, N.P. ; Cook, R. ; Axon, P.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire (COQOL) is a patient‐recorded outcome measurement (PROM) designed to quantify the quality of life of patients attending otology clinics. Design Item‐reduction model. A systematically designed long‐form version (74 items) was tested with patient focus groups before being presented to adult otology patients (n. 137). Preliminary item analysis tested reliability, reducing the COQOL to 24 questions. This was then presented in conjunction with the SF‐36 (V1) questionnaire to a total of 203 patients. Subsequently, these were re‐presented at T + 3 months, and patients recorded whether they felt their condition had improved, deteriorated or remained the same. Non‐responders were contacted by post. A correlation between COQOL scores and patient perception of change was examined to analyse content validity. Setting Teaching hospital and university psychology department. Participants Adult patients attending otology clinics with a wide range of otological conditions. Main outcome measurements Item reliability measured by item–total correlation, internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Validity measured by correlation between COQOL scores and patient‐reported symptom change. Results Reliability: the COQOL showed excellent internal consistency at both initial presentation (α = 0.90) and 3 months later (α = 0.93). Validity: One‐way analysis of variance showed a significant difference between groups reporting change and those reporting no change in quality of life (F(2, 80) = 5.866, P &lt; 0.01). Conclusions The COQOL is the first otology‐specific PROM. Initial studies demonstrate excellent reliability and encouraging preliminary criterion validity: further studies will allow a deeper validation of the instrument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-4478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-4486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/coa.12338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25927083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Humans ; Male ; Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - complications ; Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - psychology ; Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - therapy ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Clinical otolaryngology, 2015-04, Vol.40 (2), p.130-139</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcoa.12338$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcoa.12338$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, T.P.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moualed, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronan, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tysome, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnelly, N.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axon, P.R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire: an otology-specific patient-recorded outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and a report of preliminary reliability and validity</title><title>Clinical otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Clin Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Objective The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire (COQOL) is a patient‐recorded outcome measurement (PROM) designed to quantify the quality of life of patients attending otology clinics. Design Item‐reduction model. A systematically designed long‐form version (74 items) was tested with patient focus groups before being presented to adult otology patients (n. 137). Preliminary item analysis tested reliability, reducing the COQOL to 24 questions. This was then presented in conjunction with the SF‐36 (V1) questionnaire to a total of 203 patients. Subsequently, these were re‐presented at T + 3 months, and patients recorded whether they felt their condition had improved, deteriorated or remained the same. Non‐responders were contacted by post. A correlation between COQOL scores and patient perception of change was examined to analyse content validity. Setting Teaching hospital and university psychology department. Participants Adult patients attending otology clinics with a wide range of otological conditions. Main outcome measurements Item reliability measured by item–total correlation, internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Validity measured by correlation between COQOL scores and patient‐reported symptom change. Results Reliability: the COQOL showed excellent internal consistency at both initial presentation (α = 0.90) and 3 months later (α = 0.93). Validity: One‐way analysis of variance showed a significant difference between groups reporting change and those reporting no change in quality of life (F(2, 80) = 5.866, P &lt; 0.01). Conclusions The COQOL is the first otology‐specific PROM. Initial studies demonstrate excellent reliability and encouraging preliminary criterion validity: further studies will allow a deeper validation of the instrument.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - psychology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1749-4478</issn><issn>1749-4486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc2O0zAUhSMEYn5gwQsgS2zYpOO_xA67UjEDqGqFKGJp3SQ3xUMSBzsB-oY8Fk47dIE3vlf-zvWxT5K8YHTB4rqpHCwYF0I_Si6ZkkUqpc4fn2ulL5KrEO4plYIq9jS54FnBFdXiMvmz-4ZkBV3pbb1Hsh1d6_YH8mmC1o4H4hqytg3GHsNoXd-D9fiGQE_ciUzDgJVtbEUGGC32Y-qxcr7GmrhprFyHpEMIk8cFWUZmQE9qDJW3pe33ZIy32z6Mfuqidj6x-z6OrwkQj4Pz42xh8NjazvbgD2QuobRHdzP3MxqtY_MsedJAG_D5w36dfLl9t1u9T9fbuw-r5Tq1IuM61YyqHPKCyrIUGQVdqgo4Zgy4KKApi6qWsuZUM8whU6zOCyillkhLCo0U4jp5fZo7ePdj_hXT2VBh20KPbgqG5UrpQmouI_rqP_TeTb6P7iKV8yzLCskj9fKBmsoOazN428WHmn8ZReDmBPyyLR7O54yaOXwTwzfH8M1quzwWUZGeFDaM-PusAP_d5EqozHzd3Jlswz_qz5u3Zif-AuX6tCw</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Martin, T.P.C.</creator><creator>Moualed, D.</creator><creator>Paul, A.</creator><creator>Ronan, N.</creator><creator>Tysome, J.R.</creator><creator>Donnelly, N.P.</creator><creator>Cook, R.</creator><creator>Axon, P.R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire: an otology-specific patient-recorded outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and a report of preliminary reliability and validity</title><author>Martin, T.P.C. ; Moualed, D. ; Paul, A. ; Ronan, N. ; Tysome, J.R. ; Donnelly, N.P. ; Cook, R. ; Axon, P.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3528-81076a6904bb350a8b7ca2e51a239afb9cd44d2081e6a571d69ab484e0b0af433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - psychology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, T.P.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moualed, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronan, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tysome, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnelly, N.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axon, P.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, T.P.C.</au><au>Moualed, D.</au><au>Paul, A.</au><au>Ronan, N.</au><au>Tysome, J.R.</au><au>Donnelly, N.P.</au><au>Cook, R.</au><au>Axon, P.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire: an otology-specific patient-recorded outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and a report of preliminary reliability and validity</atitle><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>130-139</pages><issn>1749-4478</issn><eissn>1749-4486</eissn><abstract>Objective The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire (COQOL) is a patient‐recorded outcome measurement (PROM) designed to quantify the quality of life of patients attending otology clinics. Design Item‐reduction model. A systematically designed long‐form version (74 items) was tested with patient focus groups before being presented to adult otology patients (n. 137). Preliminary item analysis tested reliability, reducing the COQOL to 24 questions. This was then presented in conjunction with the SF‐36 (V1) questionnaire to a total of 203 patients. Subsequently, these were re‐presented at T + 3 months, and patients recorded whether they felt their condition had improved, deteriorated or remained the same. Non‐responders were contacted by post. A correlation between COQOL scores and patient perception of change was examined to analyse content validity. Setting Teaching hospital and university psychology department. Participants Adult patients attending otology clinics with a wide range of otological conditions. Main outcome measurements Item reliability measured by item–total correlation, internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Validity measured by correlation between COQOL scores and patient‐reported symptom change. Results Reliability: the COQOL showed excellent internal consistency at both initial presentation (α = 0.90) and 3 months later (α = 0.93). Validity: One‐way analysis of variance showed a significant difference between groups reporting change and those reporting no change in quality of life (F(2, 80) = 5.866, P &lt; 0.01). Conclusions The COQOL is the first otology‐specific PROM. Initial studies demonstrate excellent reliability and encouraging preliminary criterion validity: further studies will allow a deeper validation of the instrument.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25927083</pmid><doi>10.1111/coa.12338</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-4478
ispartof Clinical otolaryngology, 2015-04, Vol.40 (2), p.130-139
issn 1749-4478
1749-4486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677894824
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Female
Focus Groups
Humans
Male
Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - complications
Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - psychology
Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases - therapy
Patient Outcome Assessment
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
title The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire: an otology-specific patient-recorded outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and a report of preliminary reliability and validity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A02%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Cambridge%20Otology%20Quality%20of%20Life%20Questionnaire:%20an%20otology-specific%20patient-recorded%20outcome%20measure.%20A%20paper%20describing%20the%20instrument%20design%20and%20a%20report%20of%20preliminary%20reliability%20and%20validity&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Martin,%20T.P.C.&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=130-139&rft.issn=1749-4478&rft.eissn=1749-4486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/coa.12338&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3622130421%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1662555942&rft_id=info:pmid/25927083&rfr_iscdi=true