Antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters for prevention of infections in patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECT The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters (antimicrobial catheters) in reducing the risk of infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting or ventricular drainage. METHODS The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Cath...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurosurgery 2015-05, Vol.122 (5), p.1096-1112
Hauptverfasser: Konstantelias, Athanasios A, Vardakas, Konstantinos Z, Polyzos, Konstantinos A, Tansarli, Giannoula S, Falagas, Matthew E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1112
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1096
container_title Journal of neurosurgery
container_volume 122
creator Konstantelias, Athanasios A
Vardakas, Konstantinos Z
Polyzos, Konstantinos A
Tansarli, Giannoula S
Falagas, Matthew E
description OBJECT The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters (antimicrobial catheters) in reducing the risk of infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting or ventricular drainage. METHODS The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Catheter implantation was classified as either shunting (mainly ventriculoperitoneal shunting) or ventricular drainage (mainly external [EVD]). Studies evaluating antibioticimpregnated catheters (AICs), silver-coated catheters (SCCs), and hydrogel-coated catheters (HCCs) were included. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS Thirty-six studies (7 randomized and 29 nonrandomized, 16,796 procedures) were included. The majority of data derive from studies on the effectiveness of AICs, followed by studies on the effectiveness of SCCs. Statistical heterogeneity was observed in several analyses. Antimicrobial shunt catheters (AICs, SCCs) were associated with lower risk for CSF catheter-associated infections than conventional catheters (CCs) (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.56). Fewer infections developed in the patients treated with antimicrobial catheters regardless of randomization, number of participating centers, funding, shunting or ventricular drainage, definition of infections, de novo implantation, and rate of infections in the study. There was no difference regarding gram-positive bacteria, all staphylococci, coagulase-negative streptococci, and Staphylococcus aureus, when analyzed separately. On the contrary, the risk for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, RR 2.64, 95% CI 1.26-5.51), nonstaphylococcal (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22-2.52), and gram-negative bacterial (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.33-3.43) infections increased with antimicrobial shunt catheters. CONCLUSIONS Based on data mainly from nonrandomized studies, AICs and SCCs reduce the risk for infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting. Future studies should evaluate the higher risk for MRSA and gram-negative infections. Additional trials are needed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of the different types of antimicrobial catheters.
doi_str_mv 10.3171/2014.12.JNS14908
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677892173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1677892173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e7099382d4b1fcdcfa048ad63936c402d40717ea20be109f5bdcdfdf19340d2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UcluFTEQtBCIvATunJCPXObRbc-bhVsUsQRFcADOI4_dZoxmw-0hen_C5-KXhVNvVdVSlRCvEPYaa3yrAMs9qv3nL9-wbKF5InbYal1A1eqnYgegVKGhOZyJc-ZfAFiVlXouztShrppG4078vZxTmIKNSx_MWIRpjfRzNomcNLOThV3ueh62OUlr0kCJIku_RJmRfyizl1kuXobZkz0NnFu5mhTyjeVtSIMcji4ultbBjBu_k0bykRNNGWNlFgl0e_dsomQKM5vxyIFfiGfejEwvH-qF-PHh_ferT8XN14_XV5c3hdUlpoJqaFvdKFf26K2z3kDZGFfpVle2hLyHGmsyCnpCaP2hd9Z557NNJThF-kK8uddd4_J7I07dFNjSOJqZlo07rOq6aRXWOkPhHprdYo7kuzWGycRjh9Cd8uhOeXSousc8MuX1g_rWT-T-Ex4D0P8AueeKaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1677892173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters for prevention of infections in patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Konstantelias, Athanasios A ; Vardakas, Konstantinos Z ; Polyzos, Konstantinos A ; Tansarli, Giannoula S ; Falagas, Matthew E</creator><creatorcontrib>Konstantelias, Athanasios A ; Vardakas, Konstantinos Z ; Polyzos, Konstantinos A ; Tansarli, Giannoula S ; Falagas, Matthew E</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECT The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters (antimicrobial catheters) in reducing the risk of infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting or ventricular drainage. METHODS The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Catheter implantation was classified as either shunting (mainly ventriculoperitoneal shunting) or ventricular drainage (mainly external [EVD]). Studies evaluating antibioticimpregnated catheters (AICs), silver-coated catheters (SCCs), and hydrogel-coated catheters (HCCs) were included. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS Thirty-six studies (7 randomized and 29 nonrandomized, 16,796 procedures) were included. The majority of data derive from studies on the effectiveness of AICs, followed by studies on the effectiveness of SCCs. Statistical heterogeneity was observed in several analyses. Antimicrobial shunt catheters (AICs, SCCs) were associated with lower risk for CSF catheter-associated infections than conventional catheters (CCs) (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.56). Fewer infections developed in the patients treated with antimicrobial catheters regardless of randomization, number of participating centers, funding, shunting or ventricular drainage, definition of infections, de novo implantation, and rate of infections in the study. There was no difference regarding gram-positive bacteria, all staphylococci, coagulase-negative streptococci, and Staphylococcus aureus, when analyzed separately. On the contrary, the risk for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, RR 2.64, 95% CI 1.26-5.51), nonstaphylococcal (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22-2.52), and gram-negative bacterial (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.33-3.43) infections increased with antimicrobial shunt catheters. CONCLUSIONS Based on data mainly from nonrandomized studies, AICs and SCCs reduce the risk for infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting. Future studies should evaluate the higher risk for MRSA and gram-negative infections. Additional trials are needed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of the different types of antimicrobial catheters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1933-0693</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS14908</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25768831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects ; Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts - instrumentation ; Drainage - instrumentation ; Drug Carriers ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Hydrocephalus - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurosurgery, 2015-05, Vol.122 (5), p.1096-1112</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e7099382d4b1fcdcfa048ad63936c402d40717ea20be109f5bdcdfdf19340d2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e7099382d4b1fcdcfa048ad63936c402d40717ea20be109f5bdcdfdf19340d2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25768831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Konstantelias, Athanasios A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vardakas, Konstantinos Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polyzos, Konstantinos A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansarli, Giannoula S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falagas, Matthew E</creatorcontrib><title>Antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters for prevention of infections in patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of neurosurgery</title><addtitle>J Neurosurg</addtitle><description>OBJECT The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters (antimicrobial catheters) in reducing the risk of infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting or ventricular drainage. METHODS The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Catheter implantation was classified as either shunting (mainly ventriculoperitoneal shunting) or ventricular drainage (mainly external [EVD]). Studies evaluating antibioticimpregnated catheters (AICs), silver-coated catheters (SCCs), and hydrogel-coated catheters (HCCs) were included. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS Thirty-six studies (7 randomized and 29 nonrandomized, 16,796 procedures) were included. The majority of data derive from studies on the effectiveness of AICs, followed by studies on the effectiveness of SCCs. Statistical heterogeneity was observed in several analyses. Antimicrobial shunt catheters (AICs, SCCs) were associated with lower risk for CSF catheter-associated infections than conventional catheters (CCs) (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.56). Fewer infections developed in the patients treated with antimicrobial catheters regardless of randomization, number of participating centers, funding, shunting or ventricular drainage, definition of infections, de novo implantation, and rate of infections in the study. There was no difference regarding gram-positive bacteria, all staphylococci, coagulase-negative streptococci, and Staphylococcus aureus, when analyzed separately. On the contrary, the risk for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, RR 2.64, 95% CI 1.26-5.51), nonstaphylococcal (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22-2.52), and gram-negative bacterial (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.33-3.43) infections increased with antimicrobial shunt catheters. CONCLUSIONS Based on data mainly from nonrandomized studies, AICs and SCCs reduce the risk for infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting. Future studies should evaluate the higher risk for MRSA and gram-negative infections. Additional trials are needed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of the different types of antimicrobial catheters.</description><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts - instrumentation</subject><subject>Drainage - instrumentation</subject><subject>Drug Carriers</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus - surgery</subject><issn>0022-3085</issn><issn>1933-0693</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UcluFTEQtBCIvATunJCPXObRbc-bhVsUsQRFcADOI4_dZoxmw-0hen_C5-KXhVNvVdVSlRCvEPYaa3yrAMs9qv3nL9-wbKF5InbYal1A1eqnYgegVKGhOZyJc-ZfAFiVlXouztShrppG4078vZxTmIKNSx_MWIRpjfRzNomcNLOThV3ueh62OUlr0kCJIku_RJmRfyizl1kuXobZkz0NnFu5mhTyjeVtSIMcji4ultbBjBu_k0bykRNNGWNlFgl0e_dsomQKM5vxyIFfiGfejEwvH-qF-PHh_ferT8XN14_XV5c3hdUlpoJqaFvdKFf26K2z3kDZGFfpVle2hLyHGmsyCnpCaP2hd9Z557NNJThF-kK8uddd4_J7I07dFNjSOJqZlo07rOq6aRXWOkPhHprdYo7kuzWGycRjh9Cd8uhOeXSousc8MuX1g_rWT-T-Ex4D0P8AueeKaQ</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Konstantelias, Athanasios A</creator><creator>Vardakas, Konstantinos Z</creator><creator>Polyzos, Konstantinos A</creator><creator>Tansarli, Giannoula S</creator><creator>Falagas, Matthew E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters for prevention of infections in patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Konstantelias, Athanasios A ; Vardakas, Konstantinos Z ; Polyzos, Konstantinos A ; Tansarli, Giannoula S ; Falagas, Matthew E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e7099382d4b1fcdcfa048ad63936c402d40717ea20be109f5bdcdfdf19340d2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts - instrumentation</topic><topic>Drainage - instrumentation</topic><topic>Drug Carriers</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Konstantelias, Athanasios A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vardakas, Konstantinos Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polyzos, Konstantinos A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansarli, Giannoula S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falagas, Matthew E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Konstantelias, Athanasios A</au><au>Vardakas, Konstantinos Z</au><au>Polyzos, Konstantinos A</au><au>Tansarli, Giannoula S</au><au>Falagas, Matthew E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters for prevention of infections in patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1096</spage><epage>1112</epage><pages>1096-1112</pages><issn>0022-3085</issn><eissn>1933-0693</eissn><abstract>OBJECT The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters (antimicrobial catheters) in reducing the risk of infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting or ventricular drainage. METHODS The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Catheter implantation was classified as either shunting (mainly ventriculoperitoneal shunting) or ventricular drainage (mainly external [EVD]). Studies evaluating antibioticimpregnated catheters (AICs), silver-coated catheters (SCCs), and hydrogel-coated catheters (HCCs) were included. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS Thirty-six studies (7 randomized and 29 nonrandomized, 16,796 procedures) were included. The majority of data derive from studies on the effectiveness of AICs, followed by studies on the effectiveness of SCCs. Statistical heterogeneity was observed in several analyses. Antimicrobial shunt catheters (AICs, SCCs) were associated with lower risk for CSF catheter-associated infections than conventional catheters (CCs) (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.56). Fewer infections developed in the patients treated with antimicrobial catheters regardless of randomization, number of participating centers, funding, shunting or ventricular drainage, definition of infections, de novo implantation, and rate of infections in the study. There was no difference regarding gram-positive bacteria, all staphylococci, coagulase-negative streptococci, and Staphylococcus aureus, when analyzed separately. On the contrary, the risk for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, RR 2.64, 95% CI 1.26-5.51), nonstaphylococcal (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22-2.52), and gram-negative bacterial (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.33-3.43) infections increased with antimicrobial shunt catheters. CONCLUSIONS Based on data mainly from nonrandomized studies, AICs and SCCs reduce the risk for infection in patients undergoing CSF shunting. Future studies should evaluate the higher risk for MRSA and gram-negative infections. Additional trials are needed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of the different types of antimicrobial catheters.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>25768831</pmid><doi>10.3171/2014.12.JNS14908</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3085
ispartof Journal of neurosurgery, 2015-05, Vol.122 (5), p.1096-1112
issn 0022-3085
1933-0693
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677892173
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage
Catheter-Related Infections - prevention & control
Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects
Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts - instrumentation
Drainage - instrumentation
Drug Carriers
Equipment Design
Humans
Hydrocephalus - surgery
title Antimicrobial-impregnated and -coated shunt catheters for prevention of infections in patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A50%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antimicrobial-impregnated%20and%20-coated%20shunt%20catheters%20for%20prevention%20of%20infections%20in%20patients%20with%20hydrocephalus:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Konstantelias,%20Athanasios%20A&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1096&rft.epage=1112&rft.pages=1096-1112&rft.issn=0022-3085&rft.eissn=1933-0693&rft_id=info:doi/10.3171/2014.12.JNS14908&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677892173%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1677892173&rft_id=info:pmid/25768831&rfr_iscdi=true