Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era
Objective The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2015-05, Vol.49 (5), p.581-585 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 585 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 581 |
container_title | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Berger, P Vaartjes, I Moll, F.L De Borst, G.J Blankensteijn, J.D Bots, M.L |
description | Objective The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term incidence of AGI after primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction in the endovascular era. Methods From 2000 to 2010, all 514 patients in a tertiary referral university hospital, undergoing primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive aortic disease with at least one aortic anastomosis were included. Data were obtained by retrospectively analyzing the medical records, by contacting patients or their general practitioner by telephone, and by merging the dataset with the national Cause of Death Register. AGI was defined as proven by cultures or clinically in combination with positive imaging results. The 30 day, 1 year, and 2 year incidence rates were computed using life table analysis and expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results AGI was diagnosed in 23 of the 514 included patients. 56% of the patients underwent elective surgery and 86% underwent surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The 30 day incidence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4–2.8%), 1 year incidence was 3.6% (95% CI 1.7–5.5%), and 2 year incidence for AGI was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4–6.6%). The total number of person years (1058) yielded an AGI rate of 2.2 per 100 person years. Conclusion The 2 year cumulative incidence of AGI following primary, open aortic procedures with at least one aortic anastomosis is considerable, at around 1 in 20. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677881253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1078588415000350</els_id><sourcerecordid>1677881253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-af185effccd2c492c3904050fa9e2556abdb6f188daa7fd81a41a8f8d1a561d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiNERT_gD3BAOXJJ8DiZxCshpGq1LZUqtSpwtrz2WDhk7WInK_Xf11EKBw6cxh_vO6N53qJ4D6wGBt2noabhmGrOAGsGNWPwqjgDbHjFocPX-cx6UaEQ7WlxntLAGENo8E1xyrFvOgQ8K_x2PsyjmtyRyhuvnSGvqQy2vI7KTvnJkp5c8GW-USzvozuo-JRrSNNPmpwuL0NcygPp4NMU51XufJn_y5034aiSziNiuYvqbXFi1Zjo3Uu9KH5c7b5vv1a3d9c328vbSreIU6UsCCRrtTZctxuumw1rGTKrNsQRO7U3-y5rhFGqt0aAakEJKwwo7MCI5qL4uPZ9jOH3TGmSB5c0jaPyFOYkoet7IYBjk6V8leq8U4pk5eO6pAQmF85ykAtnuXCWDGTmnE0fXvrP-wOZv5Y_YLPg8yqgvOXRUZRJu4WtcTETlSa4__f_8o9dj847rcZf9ERpCHP0mZ8Embhk8tuS9BI0YA65QdY8AwohpZ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1677881253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Berger, P ; Vaartjes, I ; Moll, F.L ; De Borst, G.J ; Blankensteijn, J.D ; Bots, M.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, P ; Vaartjes, I ; Moll, F.L ; De Borst, G.J ; Blankensteijn, J.D ; Bots, M.L</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term incidence of AGI after primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction in the endovascular era. Methods From 2000 to 2010, all 514 patients in a tertiary referral university hospital, undergoing primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive aortic disease with at least one aortic anastomosis were included. Data were obtained by retrospectively analyzing the medical records, by contacting patients or their general practitioner by telephone, and by merging the dataset with the national Cause of Death Register. AGI was defined as proven by cultures or clinically in combination with positive imaging results. The 30 day, 1 year, and 2 year incidence rates were computed using life table analysis and expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results AGI was diagnosed in 23 of the 514 included patients. 56% of the patients underwent elective surgery and 86% underwent surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The 30 day incidence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4–2.8%), 1 year incidence was 3.6% (95% CI 1.7–5.5%), and 2 year incidence for AGI was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4–6.6%). The total number of person years (1058) yielded an AGI rate of 2.2 per 100 person years. Conclusion The 2 year cumulative incidence of AGI following primary, open aortic procedures with at least one aortic anastomosis is considerable, at around 1 in 20.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25736515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortic graft infection ; Aortic reconstructions ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2015-05, Vol.49 (5), p.581-585</ispartof><rights>European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-af185effccd2c492c3904050fa9e2556abdb6f188daa7fd81a41a8f8d1a561d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-af185effccd2c492c3904050fa9e2556abdb6f188daa7fd81a41a8f8d1a561d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588415000350$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25736515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaartjes, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, F.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Borst, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankensteijn, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bots, M.L</creatorcontrib><title>Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term incidence of AGI after primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction in the endovascular era. Methods From 2000 to 2010, all 514 patients in a tertiary referral university hospital, undergoing primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive aortic disease with at least one aortic anastomosis were included. Data were obtained by retrospectively analyzing the medical records, by contacting patients or their general practitioner by telephone, and by merging the dataset with the national Cause of Death Register. AGI was defined as proven by cultures or clinically in combination with positive imaging results. The 30 day, 1 year, and 2 year incidence rates were computed using life table analysis and expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results AGI was diagnosed in 23 of the 514 included patients. 56% of the patients underwent elective surgery and 86% underwent surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The 30 day incidence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4–2.8%), 1 year incidence was 3.6% (95% CI 1.7–5.5%), and 2 year incidence for AGI was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4–6.6%). The total number of person years (1058) yielded an AGI rate of 2.2 per 100 person years. Conclusion The 2 year cumulative incidence of AGI following primary, open aortic procedures with at least one aortic anastomosis is considerable, at around 1 in 20.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic graft infection</subject><subject>Aortic reconstructions</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiNERT_gD3BAOXJJ8DiZxCshpGq1LZUqtSpwtrz2WDhk7WInK_Xf11EKBw6cxh_vO6N53qJ4D6wGBt2noabhmGrOAGsGNWPwqjgDbHjFocPX-cx6UaEQ7WlxntLAGENo8E1xyrFvOgQ8K_x2PsyjmtyRyhuvnSGvqQy2vI7KTvnJkp5c8GW-USzvozuo-JRrSNNPmpwuL0NcygPp4NMU51XufJn_y5034aiSziNiuYvqbXFi1Zjo3Uu9KH5c7b5vv1a3d9c328vbSreIU6UsCCRrtTZctxuumw1rGTKrNsQRO7U3-y5rhFGqt0aAakEJKwwo7MCI5qL4uPZ9jOH3TGmSB5c0jaPyFOYkoet7IYBjk6V8leq8U4pk5eO6pAQmF85ykAtnuXCWDGTmnE0fXvrP-wOZv5Y_YLPg8yqgvOXRUZRJu4WtcTETlSa4__f_8o9dj847rcZf9ERpCHP0mZ8Embhk8tuS9BI0YA65QdY8AwohpZ4</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Berger, P</creator><creator>Vaartjes, I</creator><creator>Moll, F.L</creator><creator>De Borst, G.J</creator><creator>Blankensteijn, J.D</creator><creator>Bots, M.L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era</title><author>Berger, P ; Vaartjes, I ; Moll, F.L ; De Borst, G.J ; Blankensteijn, J.D ; Bots, M.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-af185effccd2c492c3904050fa9e2556abdb6f188daa7fd81a41a8f8d1a561d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic graft infection</topic><topic>Aortic reconstructions</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaartjes, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, F.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Borst, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankensteijn, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bots, M.L</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, P</au><au>Vaartjes, I</au><au>Moll, F.L</au><au>De Borst, G.J</au><au>Blankensteijn, J.D</au><au>Bots, M.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>581-585</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>Objective The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term incidence of AGI after primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction in the endovascular era. Methods From 2000 to 2010, all 514 patients in a tertiary referral university hospital, undergoing primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive aortic disease with at least one aortic anastomosis were included. Data were obtained by retrospectively analyzing the medical records, by contacting patients or their general practitioner by telephone, and by merging the dataset with the national Cause of Death Register. AGI was defined as proven by cultures or clinically in combination with positive imaging results. The 30 day, 1 year, and 2 year incidence rates were computed using life table analysis and expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results AGI was diagnosed in 23 of the 514 included patients. 56% of the patients underwent elective surgery and 86% underwent surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The 30 day incidence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4–2.8%), 1 year incidence was 3.6% (95% CI 1.7–5.5%), and 2 year incidence for AGI was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4–6.6%). The total number of person years (1058) yielded an AGI rate of 2.2 per 100 person years. Conclusion The 2 year cumulative incidence of AGI following primary, open aortic procedures with at least one aortic anastomosis is considerable, at around 1 in 20.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25736515</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.001</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-5884 |
ispartof | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2015-05, Vol.49 (5), p.581-585 |
issn | 1078-5884 1532-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677881253 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery Aortic graft infection Aortic reconstructions Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects Female Humans Incidence Male Middle Aged Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Retrospective Studies Surgery Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology Surgical Wound Infection - etiology Treatment Outcome Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects |
title | Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T14%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cumulative%20Incidence%20of%20Graft%20Infection%20after%20Primary%20Prosthetic%20Aortic%20Reconstruction%20in%20the%20Endovascular%20Era&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Berger,%20P&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=581-585&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677881253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1677881253&rft_id=info:pmid/25736515&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1078588415000350&rfr_iscdi=true |