Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era

Objective The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2015-05, Vol.49 (5), p.581-585
Hauptverfasser: Berger, P, Vaartjes, I, Moll, F.L, De Borst, G.J, Blankensteijn, J.D, Bots, M.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 585
container_issue 5
container_start_page 581
container_title European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery
container_volume 49
creator Berger, P
Vaartjes, I
Moll, F.L
De Borst, G.J
Blankensteijn, J.D
Bots, M.L
description Objective The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term incidence of AGI after primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction in the endovascular era. Methods From 2000 to 2010, all 514 patients in a tertiary referral university hospital, undergoing primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive aortic disease with at least one aortic anastomosis were included. Data were obtained by retrospectively analyzing the medical records, by contacting patients or their general practitioner by telephone, and by merging the dataset with the national Cause of Death Register. AGI was defined as proven by cultures or clinically in combination with positive imaging results. The 30 day, 1 year, and 2 year incidence rates were computed using life table analysis and expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results AGI was diagnosed in 23 of the 514 included patients. 56% of the patients underwent elective surgery and 86% underwent surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The 30 day incidence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4–2.8%), 1 year incidence was 3.6% (95% CI 1.7–5.5%), and 2 year incidence for AGI was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4–6.6%). The total number of person years (1058) yielded an AGI rate of 2.2 per 100 person years. Conclusion The 2 year cumulative incidence of AGI following primary, open aortic procedures with at least one aortic anastomosis is considerable, at around 1 in 20.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677881253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1078588415000350</els_id><sourcerecordid>1677881253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-af185effccd2c492c3904050fa9e2556abdb6f188daa7fd81a41a8f8d1a561d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiNERT_gD3BAOXJJ8DiZxCshpGq1LZUqtSpwtrz2WDhk7WInK_Xf11EKBw6cxh_vO6N53qJ4D6wGBt2noabhmGrOAGsGNWPwqjgDbHjFocPX-cx6UaEQ7WlxntLAGENo8E1xyrFvOgQ8K_x2PsyjmtyRyhuvnSGvqQy2vI7KTvnJkp5c8GW-USzvozuo-JRrSNNPmpwuL0NcygPp4NMU51XufJn_y5034aiSziNiuYvqbXFi1Zjo3Uu9KH5c7b5vv1a3d9c328vbSreIU6UsCCRrtTZctxuumw1rGTKrNsQRO7U3-y5rhFGqt0aAakEJKwwo7MCI5qL4uPZ9jOH3TGmSB5c0jaPyFOYkoet7IYBjk6V8leq8U4pk5eO6pAQmF85ykAtnuXCWDGTmnE0fXvrP-wOZv5Y_YLPg8yqgvOXRUZRJu4WtcTETlSa4__f_8o9dj847rcZf9ERpCHP0mZ8Embhk8tuS9BI0YA65QdY8AwohpZ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1677881253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Berger, P ; Vaartjes, I ; Moll, F.L ; De Borst, G.J ; Blankensteijn, J.D ; Bots, M.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, P ; Vaartjes, I ; Moll, F.L ; De Borst, G.J ; Blankensteijn, J.D ; Bots, M.L</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term incidence of AGI after primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction in the endovascular era. Methods From 2000 to 2010, all 514 patients in a tertiary referral university hospital, undergoing primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive aortic disease with at least one aortic anastomosis were included. Data were obtained by retrospectively analyzing the medical records, by contacting patients or their general practitioner by telephone, and by merging the dataset with the national Cause of Death Register. AGI was defined as proven by cultures or clinically in combination with positive imaging results. The 30 day, 1 year, and 2 year incidence rates were computed using life table analysis and expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results AGI was diagnosed in 23 of the 514 included patients. 56% of the patients underwent elective surgery and 86% underwent surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The 30 day incidence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4–2.8%), 1 year incidence was 3.6% (95% CI 1.7–5.5%), and 2 year incidence for AGI was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4–6.6%). The total number of person years (1058) yielded an AGI rate of 2.2 per 100 person years. Conclusion The 2 year cumulative incidence of AGI following primary, open aortic procedures with at least one aortic anastomosis is considerable, at around 1 in 20.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25736515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortic graft infection ; Aortic reconstructions ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2015-05, Vol.49 (5), p.581-585</ispartof><rights>European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-af185effccd2c492c3904050fa9e2556abdb6f188daa7fd81a41a8f8d1a561d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-af185effccd2c492c3904050fa9e2556abdb6f188daa7fd81a41a8f8d1a561d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588415000350$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25736515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaartjes, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, F.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Borst, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankensteijn, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bots, M.L</creatorcontrib><title>Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term incidence of AGI after primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction in the endovascular era. Methods From 2000 to 2010, all 514 patients in a tertiary referral university hospital, undergoing primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive aortic disease with at least one aortic anastomosis were included. Data were obtained by retrospectively analyzing the medical records, by contacting patients or their general practitioner by telephone, and by merging the dataset with the national Cause of Death Register. AGI was defined as proven by cultures or clinically in combination with positive imaging results. The 30 day, 1 year, and 2 year incidence rates were computed using life table analysis and expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results AGI was diagnosed in 23 of the 514 included patients. 56% of the patients underwent elective surgery and 86% underwent surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The 30 day incidence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4–2.8%), 1 year incidence was 3.6% (95% CI 1.7–5.5%), and 2 year incidence for AGI was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4–6.6%). The total number of person years (1058) yielded an AGI rate of 2.2 per 100 person years. Conclusion The 2 year cumulative incidence of AGI following primary, open aortic procedures with at least one aortic anastomosis is considerable, at around 1 in 20.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic graft infection</subject><subject>Aortic reconstructions</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiNERT_gD3BAOXJJ8DiZxCshpGq1LZUqtSpwtrz2WDhk7WInK_Xf11EKBw6cxh_vO6N53qJ4D6wGBt2noabhmGrOAGsGNWPwqjgDbHjFocPX-cx6UaEQ7WlxntLAGENo8E1xyrFvOgQ8K_x2PsyjmtyRyhuvnSGvqQy2vI7KTvnJkp5c8GW-USzvozuo-JRrSNNPmpwuL0NcygPp4NMU51XufJn_y5034aiSziNiuYvqbXFi1Zjo3Uu9KH5c7b5vv1a3d9c328vbSreIU6UsCCRrtTZctxuumw1rGTKrNsQRO7U3-y5rhFGqt0aAakEJKwwo7MCI5qL4uPZ9jOH3TGmSB5c0jaPyFOYkoet7IYBjk6V8leq8U4pk5eO6pAQmF85ykAtnuXCWDGTmnE0fXvrP-wOZv5Y_YLPg8yqgvOXRUZRJu4WtcTETlSa4__f_8o9dj847rcZf9ERpCHP0mZ8Embhk8tuS9BI0YA65QdY8AwohpZ4</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Berger, P</creator><creator>Vaartjes, I</creator><creator>Moll, F.L</creator><creator>De Borst, G.J</creator><creator>Blankensteijn, J.D</creator><creator>Bots, M.L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era</title><author>Berger, P ; Vaartjes, I ; Moll, F.L ; De Borst, G.J ; Blankensteijn, J.D ; Bots, M.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-af185effccd2c492c3904050fa9e2556abdb6f188daa7fd81a41a8f8d1a561d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic graft infection</topic><topic>Aortic reconstructions</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaartjes, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, F.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Borst, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankensteijn, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bots, M.L</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, P</au><au>Vaartjes, I</au><au>Moll, F.L</au><au>De Borst, G.J</au><au>Blankensteijn, J.D</au><au>Bots, M.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>581-585</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>Objective The introduction of endovascular techniques has had a major impact on the case mix of patients that undergo open aortic reconstruction. Hypothetically, this may also have increased the incidence of aortic graft infection (AGI). The aim of this study was to report on the short and mid-term incidence of AGI after primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction in the endovascular era. Methods From 2000 to 2010, all 514 patients in a tertiary referral university hospital, undergoing primary open prosthetic aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive aortic disease with at least one aortic anastomosis were included. Data were obtained by retrospectively analyzing the medical records, by contacting patients or their general practitioner by telephone, and by merging the dataset with the national Cause of Death Register. AGI was defined as proven by cultures or clinically in combination with positive imaging results. The 30 day, 1 year, and 2 year incidence rates were computed using life table analysis and expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results AGI was diagnosed in 23 of the 514 included patients. 56% of the patients underwent elective surgery and 86% underwent surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The 30 day incidence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4–2.8%), 1 year incidence was 3.6% (95% CI 1.7–5.5%), and 2 year incidence for AGI was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4–6.6%). The total number of person years (1058) yielded an AGI rate of 2.2 per 100 person years. Conclusion The 2 year cumulative incidence of AGI following primary, open aortic procedures with at least one aortic anastomosis is considerable, at around 1 in 20.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25736515</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.001</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-5884
ispartof European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2015-05, Vol.49 (5), p.581-585
issn 1078-5884
1532-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677881253
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Aortic graft infection
Aortic reconstructions
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Female
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology
Surgical Wound Infection - etiology
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
title Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T14%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cumulative%20Incidence%20of%20Graft%20Infection%20after%20Primary%20Prosthetic%20Aortic%20Reconstruction%20in%20the%20Endovascular%20Era&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Berger,%20P&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=581-585&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677881253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1677881253&rft_id=info:pmid/25736515&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1078588415000350&rfr_iscdi=true