Chemical burns revisited: What is the most appropriate method of decontamination?
Highlights • Decontamination has an important role in acute chemical burn management. • Immediate surgical debridement provides no benefit as compared to conventional wetting techniques and does not shorten the initial hospital stay. • Continuous irrigation is superior to wet packs in decontaminatio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Burns 2015-06, Vol.41 (4), p.761-763 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 763 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 761 |
| container_title | Burns |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Tan, Teresa Wong, David S.Y |
| description | Highlights • Decontamination has an important role in acute chemical burn management. • Immediate surgical debridement provides no benefit as compared to conventional wetting techniques and does not shorten the initial hospital stay. • Continuous irrigation is superior to wet packs in decontamination of acute chemical burn wounds. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.burns.2014.10.004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677880819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0305417914003404</els_id><sourcerecordid>1677880819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-26b577e22cb463fbd9315da4a6650fae1a1a8694b3a8f6eee6bd6455822fb5e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1LJDEUDIui48cvWJAcvfSYpJN0t-Auy6DugiCiyx5DOnnNZOzuzCYZYf69aUc97GVzCTyq6r2qQugrJXNKqLxYzdtNGOOcEcrzZE4I_4JmtK6agnLS7KEZKYkoOK2aQ3QU44rkJ2pygA6Z4KJhVM7Qw2IJgzO6x29iOMCLiy6BvcR_ljphF3FaAh58TFiv18Gvg9MpDyAtvcW-wxaMH5Me3KiT8-P3E7Tf6T7C6ft_jH7fXD8tfhZ397e_Fj_uCsMpTwWTragqYMy0XJZda5uSCqu5llKQTgPVVNey4W2p604CgGyt5ELUjHWtAFEeo_Odbj7q7wZiUoOLBvpej-A3UVFZVXVNatpkaLmDmuBjDNCp7GLQYasoUVOWaqXe7Kspy2mYs8yss_cFm3YA-8n5CC8DrnYAyDZfHAQVjYPRgHUBTFLWu_8s-PYP3_RunMp4hi3Elc-MnKCiKjJF1ONU59RmbpeUPAu8Aqtym6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1677880819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemical burns revisited: What is the most appropriate method of decontamination?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tan, Teresa ; Wong, David S.Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Teresa ; Wong, David S.Y</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • Decontamination has an important role in acute chemical burn management. • Immediate surgical debridement provides no benefit as compared to conventional wetting techniques and does not shorten the initial hospital stay. • Continuous irrigation is superior to wet packs in decontamination of acute chemical burn wounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25459216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body Surface Area ; Burn management ; Burn surgery ; Burn Units ; Burns, Chemical - mortality ; Burns, Chemical - therapy ; Chemical burns ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cohort Studies ; Critical Care ; Debridement - methods ; Decontamination ; Decontamination - methods ; Female ; Hong Kong ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Immediate debridement ; Irrigation ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Therapeutic Irrigation - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Burns, 2015-06, Vol.41 (4), p.761-763</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-26b577e22cb463fbd9315da4a6650fae1a1a8694b3a8f6eee6bd6455822fb5e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-26b577e22cb463fbd9315da4a6650fae1a1a8694b3a8f6eee6bd6455822fb5e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0330-7310</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417914003404$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25459216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, David S.Y</creatorcontrib><title>Chemical burns revisited: What is the most appropriate method of decontamination?</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>Highlights • Decontamination has an important role in acute chemical burn management. • Immediate surgical debridement provides no benefit as compared to conventional wetting techniques and does not shorten the initial hospital stay. • Continuous irrigation is superior to wet packs in decontamination of acute chemical burn wounds.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body Surface Area</subject><subject>Burn management</subject><subject>Burn surgery</subject><subject>Burn Units</subject><subject>Burns, Chemical - mortality</subject><subject>Burns, Chemical - therapy</subject><subject>Chemical burns</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Debridement - methods</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Decontamination - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immediate debridement</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1LJDEUDIui48cvWJAcvfSYpJN0t-Auy6DugiCiyx5DOnnNZOzuzCYZYf69aUc97GVzCTyq6r2qQugrJXNKqLxYzdtNGOOcEcrzZE4I_4JmtK6agnLS7KEZKYkoOK2aQ3QU44rkJ2pygA6Z4KJhVM7Qw2IJgzO6x29iOMCLiy6BvcR_ljphF3FaAh58TFiv18Gvg9MpDyAtvcW-wxaMH5Me3KiT8-P3E7Tf6T7C6ft_jH7fXD8tfhZ397e_Fj_uCsMpTwWTragqYMy0XJZda5uSCqu5llKQTgPVVNey4W2p604CgGyt5ELUjHWtAFEeo_Odbj7q7wZiUoOLBvpej-A3UVFZVXVNatpkaLmDmuBjDNCp7GLQYasoUVOWaqXe7Kspy2mYs8yss_cFm3YA-8n5CC8DrnYAyDZfHAQVjYPRgHUBTFLWu_8s-PYP3_RunMp4hi3Elc-MnKCiKjJF1ONU59RmbpeUPAu8Aqtym6Q</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Tan, Teresa</creator><creator>Wong, David S.Y</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0330-7310</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Chemical burns revisited: What is the most appropriate method of decontamination?</title><author>Tan, Teresa ; Wong, David S.Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-26b577e22cb463fbd9315da4a6650fae1a1a8694b3a8f6eee6bd6455822fb5e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body Surface Area</topic><topic>Burn management</topic><topic>Burn surgery</topic><topic>Burn Units</topic><topic>Burns, Chemical - mortality</topic><topic>Burns, Chemical - therapy</topic><topic>Chemical burns</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Debridement - methods</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Decontamination - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immediate debridement</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, David S.Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Teresa</au><au>Wong, David S.Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemical burns revisited: What is the most appropriate method of decontamination?</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>761-763</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><abstract>Highlights • Decontamination has an important role in acute chemical burn management. • Immediate surgical debridement provides no benefit as compared to conventional wetting techniques and does not shorten the initial hospital stay. • Continuous irrigation is superior to wet packs in decontamination of acute chemical burn wounds.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25459216</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.burns.2014.10.004</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0330-7310</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-4179 |
| ispartof | Burns, 2015-06, Vol.41 (4), p.761-763 |
| issn | 0305-4179 1879-1409 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677880819 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Body Surface Area Burn management Burn surgery Burn Units Burns, Chemical - mortality Burns, Chemical - therapy Chemical burns Child Child, Preschool Cohort Studies Critical Care Debridement - methods Decontamination Decontamination - methods Female Hong Kong Hospital Mortality Humans Immediate debridement Irrigation Length of Stay Male Middle Aged Retrospective Studies Therapeutic Irrigation - methods Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
| title | Chemical burns revisited: What is the most appropriate method of decontamination? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T19%3A36%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemical%20burns%20revisited:%20What%20is%20the%20most%20appropriate%20method%20of%20decontamination?&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=Tan,%20Teresa&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=761-763&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.burns.2014.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677880819%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1677880819&rft_id=info:pmid/25459216&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0305417914003404&rfr_iscdi=true |