Quantification of different classical swine fever virus transmission routes within a single compartment

•We quantified CSFV transmission within- and between pens and via air.•CSFV transmission within a pen was highest (β of 6.1).•CSFV transmission via the air and between adjacent pens was comparable (β of 0.3).•The route via the air created new focal points of infection.•Transmission via the air plays...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary microbiology 2014-12, Vol.174 (3-4), p.353-361
Hauptverfasser: Weesendorp, Eefke, Backer, Jantien, Loeffen, Willie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We quantified CSFV transmission within- and between pens and via air.•CSFV transmission within a pen was highest (β of 6.1).•CSFV transmission via the air and between adjacent pens was comparable (β of 0.3).•The route via the air created new focal points of infection.•Transmission via the air plays a relevant role in the fast spread of the virus. During outbreaks of classical swine fever (CSF), CSF virus (CSFV) can be transmitted via different routes. Understanding these transmission routes is crucial in preventing the unlimited spread of the virus in a naïve population, and the subsequent eradication of the virus from that population. The objectives of the present study were to quantify virus transmission within a compartment, differentiating between transmission within a pen, transmission between pens via contact through (open) pen partitions, and transmission via the air. Furthermore, the possible contribution of each of these routes to infection of individual pigs was quantified. A CSFV outbreak was mimicked in a compartment housing 24 pigs in six different pens. Two pigs in one pen were inoculated with the moderately virulent Paderborn strain, and virus transmission to other pigs was followed in time. Virus transmission rates for transmission via the air (β of 0.33 (0.14–0.64) per day) and transmission between adjacent pens (β of 0.30 (0–0.88) per day) were comparable, but significantly lower than for virus transmission within a pen (β of 6.1 (0.86–18) per day). The route via the air created new focal points of infection, from which virus transmission continued through other routes. This shows that, at least within a compartment, transmission via the air is expected to play a relevant role in the fast spread of the virus after an initial slow start. This will have consequences for efficacy of intervention measures, including vaccination during an outbreak.
ISSN:0378-1135
1873-2542
DOI:10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.10.022