A genome-wide study of inherited deletions identified two regions associated with nonsyndromic isolated oral clefts

Background DNA copy number variants play an important part in the development of common birth defects such as oral clefts. Individual patients with multiple birth defects (including oral clefts) have been shown to carry small and large chromosomal deletions. Methods We investigated the role of polym...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Birth defects research. A Clinical and molecular teratology 2015-04, Vol.103 (4), p.276-283
Hauptverfasser: Younkin, Samuel G., Scharpf, Robert B., Schwender, Holger, Parker, Margaret M., Scott, Alan F., Marazita, Mary L., Beaty, Terri H., Ruczinski, Ingo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background DNA copy number variants play an important part in the development of common birth defects such as oral clefts. Individual patients with multiple birth defects (including oral clefts) have been shown to carry small and large chromosomal deletions. Methods We investigated the role of polymorphic copy number deletions by comparing transmission rates of deletions from parents to offspring in case‐parent trios of European ancestry ascertained through a cleft proband with trios ascertained through a normal offspring. DNA copy numbers in trios were called using the joint hidden Markov model in the freely available PennCNV software. All statistical analyses were performed using Bioconductor tools in the open source environment R. Results We identified a 67 kb region in the gene MGAM on chromosome 7q34, and a 206 kb region overlapping genes ADAM3A and ADAM5 on chromosome 8p11, where deletions are more frequently transmitted to cleft offspring than control offspring. Conclusions These genes or nearby regulatory elements may be involved in the etiology of oral clefts. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 103:276–283, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:1542-0752
1542-0760
DOI:10.1002/bdra.23362