Evaluation of the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation and the impact on consumers and product manufacturers
•We evaluated the SCP Regulation and identified the universe of Candidate Chemicals.•The key aspects and requirements of the SCP Regulation are summarized.•The most prevalent chemicals were lead, DEHP, perchloroethylene, and benzene.•The most prevalent were either persistent, bioaccumulative, carcin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology 2014-02, Vol.68 (1), p.23-40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 40 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Cowan, Dallas M. Kingsbury, Tony Perez, Angela L. Woods, Tyler A. Kovochich, Michael Hill, Denise S. Madl, Amy K. Paustenbach, Dennis J. |
description | •We evaluated the SCP Regulation and identified the universe of Candidate Chemicals.•The key aspects and requirements of the SCP Regulation are summarized.•The most prevalent chemicals were lead, DEHP, perchloroethylene, and benzene.•The most prevalent were either persistent, bioaccumulative, carcinogenic, or reprotoxic.•Several examples and case studies are presented.
Chemistry enables more than 95% of products in the marketplace. Over the past 20years, various entities began to generate inventories of chemicals (“chemical watch lists”) potentially associated with human or environmental health risks. Some lists included thousands of chemicals, while others listed only a few chemistries with limited properties or toxicological endpoints (e.g., neurotoxicants). Enacted on October 1, 2013, the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation (SCP) utilized data from chemical inventory lists to create one master list. This paper aims to discuss the background and requirements of this regulation. Additionally, we wanted to understand the universe of Candidate Chemicals identified by the Regulation. Data from all 23 chemical lists identified in the SCP Regulation were entered into a database. The most prevalent chemicals among the ∼2900 chemicals are identified, including the most prevalent chemical, lead, appearing on 65% of lists, followed by DEHP (52%), perchloroethylene (48%), and benzene (48%). Our results indicated that the most prevalent Candidate Chemicals were either persistent, bioaccumulative, carcinogenic, or reprotoxic. This regulation will have wide-ranging impact in California and throughout the global supply chain, which is highlighted through selected examples and case studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.11.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676357127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0273230013001852</els_id><sourcerecordid>1676357127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6cb8f3075ca36d8f8dea53991ae586cc967618f3d4349d8d8072e7c8c37e734d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EglJ4AiSUI5cEL0nsHDigqiwSEojlbBl7Aq6yYceV-vaYpnDkZMvz_TPjD6EzgjOCSXm5yjZuHD4zignLCMkwJntoRnBVpphWxT6aYcpZShnGR-jY-xXGmArBD9ERzSkjBc1nKCzXqglqtH2X9HUyfkKyUI2te9dZlbyoGlyy6Dsf2nh5cr0JevTJM3yEZgqpzmxTth2UHpP4one439aGKZO0qgt1JIKLlRN0UKvGw-nunKO3m-Xr4i59eLy9X1w_pJpVdExL_S5qhnmhFSuNqIUBVbCqIgoKUWpdlbwkkTA5yysjjMCcAtdCMw6c5YbN0cXUN27xFcCPsrVeQ9OoDvrgJYkNWMFJ9DRHbEK16713UMvB2Va5jSRY_viWK7n1LX98S0Jk9B1T57sB4b0F85f5FRyBqwmA-M21BSe9ttBpMNaBHqXp7b8DvgGgJpRd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676357127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation and the impact on consumers and product manufacturers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Cowan, Dallas M. ; Kingsbury, Tony ; Perez, Angela L. ; Woods, Tyler A. ; Kovochich, Michael ; Hill, Denise S. ; Madl, Amy K. ; Paustenbach, Dennis J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Dallas M. ; Kingsbury, Tony ; Perez, Angela L. ; Woods, Tyler A. ; Kovochich, Michael ; Hill, Denise S. ; Madl, Amy K. ; Paustenbach, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><description>•We evaluated the SCP Regulation and identified the universe of Candidate Chemicals.•The key aspects and requirements of the SCP Regulation are summarized.•The most prevalent chemicals were lead, DEHP, perchloroethylene, and benzene.•The most prevalent were either persistent, bioaccumulative, carcinogenic, or reprotoxic.•Several examples and case studies are presented.
Chemistry enables more than 95% of products in the marketplace. Over the past 20years, various entities began to generate inventories of chemicals (“chemical watch lists”) potentially associated with human or environmental health risks. Some lists included thousands of chemicals, while others listed only a few chemistries with limited properties or toxicological endpoints (e.g., neurotoxicants). Enacted on October 1, 2013, the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation (SCP) utilized data from chemical inventory lists to create one master list. This paper aims to discuss the background and requirements of this regulation. Additionally, we wanted to understand the universe of Candidate Chemicals identified by the Regulation. Data from all 23 chemical lists identified in the SCP Regulation were entered into a database. The most prevalent chemicals among the ∼2900 chemicals are identified, including the most prevalent chemical, lead, appearing on 65% of lists, followed by DEHP (52%), perchloroethylene (48%), and benzene (48%). Our results indicated that the most prevalent Candidate Chemicals were either persistent, bioaccumulative, carcinogenic, or reprotoxic. This regulation will have wide-ranging impact in California and throughout the global supply chain, which is highlighted through selected examples and case studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-2300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.11.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24231524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alternatives analysis ; California ; Candidate Chemicals ; Chemicals of concern ; Consumer Product Safety - legislation & jurisprudence ; Government Regulation ; Green chemistry ; Hazardous Substances ; Humans ; Priority product ; Product risk assessment ; Product sustainability ; Safer consumer products ; Sustainable chemistry</subject><ispartof>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2014-02, Vol.68 (1), p.23-40</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6cb8f3075ca36d8f8dea53991ae586cc967618f3d4349d8d8072e7c8c37e734d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6cb8f3075ca36d8f8dea53991ae586cc967618f3d4349d8d8072e7c8c37e734d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.11.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24231524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Dallas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsbury, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Angela L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, Tyler A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovochich, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Denise S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madl, Amy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paustenbach, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation and the impact on consumers and product manufacturers</title><title>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><description>•We evaluated the SCP Regulation and identified the universe of Candidate Chemicals.•The key aspects and requirements of the SCP Regulation are summarized.•The most prevalent chemicals were lead, DEHP, perchloroethylene, and benzene.•The most prevalent were either persistent, bioaccumulative, carcinogenic, or reprotoxic.•Several examples and case studies are presented.
Chemistry enables more than 95% of products in the marketplace. Over the past 20years, various entities began to generate inventories of chemicals (“chemical watch lists”) potentially associated with human or environmental health risks. Some lists included thousands of chemicals, while others listed only a few chemistries with limited properties or toxicological endpoints (e.g., neurotoxicants). Enacted on October 1, 2013, the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation (SCP) utilized data from chemical inventory lists to create one master list. This paper aims to discuss the background and requirements of this regulation. Additionally, we wanted to understand the universe of Candidate Chemicals identified by the Regulation. Data from all 23 chemical lists identified in the SCP Regulation were entered into a database. The most prevalent chemicals among the ∼2900 chemicals are identified, including the most prevalent chemical, lead, appearing on 65% of lists, followed by DEHP (52%), perchloroethylene (48%), and benzene (48%). Our results indicated that the most prevalent Candidate Chemicals were either persistent, bioaccumulative, carcinogenic, or reprotoxic. This regulation will have wide-ranging impact in California and throughout the global supply chain, which is highlighted through selected examples and case studies.</description><subject>Alternatives analysis</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Candidate Chemicals</subject><subject>Chemicals of concern</subject><subject>Consumer Product Safety - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>Green chemistry</subject><subject>Hazardous Substances</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Priority product</subject><subject>Product risk assessment</subject><subject>Product sustainability</subject><subject>Safer consumer products</subject><subject>Sustainable chemistry</subject><issn>0273-2300</issn><issn>1096-0295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EglJ4AiSUI5cEL0nsHDigqiwSEojlbBl7Aq6yYceV-vaYpnDkZMvz_TPjD6EzgjOCSXm5yjZuHD4zignLCMkwJntoRnBVpphWxT6aYcpZShnGR-jY-xXGmArBD9ERzSkjBc1nKCzXqglqtH2X9HUyfkKyUI2te9dZlbyoGlyy6Dsf2nh5cr0JevTJM3yEZgqpzmxTth2UHpP4one439aGKZO0qgt1JIKLlRN0UKvGw-nunKO3m-Xr4i59eLy9X1w_pJpVdExL_S5qhnmhFSuNqIUBVbCqIgoKUWpdlbwkkTA5yysjjMCcAtdCMw6c5YbN0cXUN27xFcCPsrVeQ9OoDvrgJYkNWMFJ9DRHbEK16713UMvB2Va5jSRY_viWK7n1LX98S0Jk9B1T57sB4b0F85f5FRyBqwmA-M21BSe9ttBpMNaBHqXp7b8DvgGgJpRd</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Cowan, Dallas M.</creator><creator>Kingsbury, Tony</creator><creator>Perez, Angela L.</creator><creator>Woods, Tyler A.</creator><creator>Kovochich, Michael</creator><creator>Hill, Denise S.</creator><creator>Madl, Amy K.</creator><creator>Paustenbach, Dennis J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation and the impact on consumers and product manufacturers</title><author>Cowan, Dallas M. ; Kingsbury, Tony ; Perez, Angela L. ; Woods, Tyler A. ; Kovochich, Michael ; Hill, Denise S. ; Madl, Amy K. ; Paustenbach, Dennis J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6cb8f3075ca36d8f8dea53991ae586cc967618f3d4349d8d8072e7c8c37e734d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alternatives analysis</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Candidate Chemicals</topic><topic>Chemicals of concern</topic><topic>Consumer Product Safety - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>Green chemistry</topic><topic>Hazardous Substances</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Priority product</topic><topic>Product risk assessment</topic><topic>Product sustainability</topic><topic>Safer consumer products</topic><topic>Sustainable chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Dallas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsbury, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Angela L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, Tyler A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovochich, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Denise S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madl, Amy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paustenbach, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cowan, Dallas M.</au><au>Kingsbury, Tony</au><au>Perez, Angela L.</au><au>Woods, Tyler A.</au><au>Kovochich, Michael</au><au>Hill, Denise S.</au><au>Madl, Amy K.</au><au>Paustenbach, Dennis J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation and the impact on consumers and product manufacturers</atitle><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>23-40</pages><issn>0273-2300</issn><eissn>1096-0295</eissn><abstract>•We evaluated the SCP Regulation and identified the universe of Candidate Chemicals.•The key aspects and requirements of the SCP Regulation are summarized.•The most prevalent chemicals were lead, DEHP, perchloroethylene, and benzene.•The most prevalent were either persistent, bioaccumulative, carcinogenic, or reprotoxic.•Several examples and case studies are presented.
Chemistry enables more than 95% of products in the marketplace. Over the past 20years, various entities began to generate inventories of chemicals (“chemical watch lists”) potentially associated with human or environmental health risks. Some lists included thousands of chemicals, while others listed only a few chemistries with limited properties or toxicological endpoints (e.g., neurotoxicants). Enacted on October 1, 2013, the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation (SCP) utilized data from chemical inventory lists to create one master list. This paper aims to discuss the background and requirements of this regulation. Additionally, we wanted to understand the universe of Candidate Chemicals identified by the Regulation. Data from all 23 chemical lists identified in the SCP Regulation were entered into a database. The most prevalent chemicals among the ∼2900 chemicals are identified, including the most prevalent chemical, lead, appearing on 65% of lists, followed by DEHP (52%), perchloroethylene (48%), and benzene (48%). Our results indicated that the most prevalent Candidate Chemicals were either persistent, bioaccumulative, carcinogenic, or reprotoxic. This regulation will have wide-ranging impact in California and throughout the global supply chain, which is highlighted through selected examples and case studies.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24231524</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.11.001</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-2300 |
ispartof | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2014-02, Vol.68 (1), p.23-40 |
issn | 0273-2300 1096-0295 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676357127 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Alternatives analysis California Candidate Chemicals Chemicals of concern Consumer Product Safety - legislation & jurisprudence Government Regulation Green chemistry Hazardous Substances Humans Priority product Product risk assessment Product sustainability Safer consumer products Sustainable chemistry |
title | Evaluation of the California Safer Consumer Products Regulation and the impact on consumers and product manufacturers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A10%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20California%20Safer%20Consumer%20Products%20Regulation%20and%20the%20impact%20on%20consumers%20and%20product%20manufacturers&rft.jtitle=Regulatory%20toxicology%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Cowan,%20Dallas%20M.&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=23-40&rft.issn=0273-2300&rft.eissn=1096-0295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1676357127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676357127&rft_id=info:pmid/24231524&rft_els_id=S0273230013001852&rfr_iscdi=true |