Evaluating the Clinical Impact of a Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer Using Individualized Decision Analysis: e0116866

Background Currently there is controversy surrounding the optimal way to treat patients with prostate cancer in the post-prostatectomy setting. Adjuvant therapies carry possible benefits of improved curative results, but there is uncertainty in which patients should receive adjuvant therapy. There a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2015-04, Vol.10 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Lobo, Jennifer Mason, Dicker, Adam P, Buerki, Christine, Daviconi, Elai, Karnes, R Jeffrey, Jenkins, Robert B, Patel, Nirav, Den, Robert B, Showalter, Timothy N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Lobo, Jennifer Mason
Dicker, Adam P
Buerki, Christine
Daviconi, Elai
Karnes, R Jeffrey
Jenkins, Robert B
Patel, Nirav
Den, Robert B
Showalter, Timothy N
description Background Currently there is controversy surrounding the optimal way to treat patients with prostate cancer in the post-prostatectomy setting. Adjuvant therapies carry possible benefits of improved curative results, but there is uncertainty in which patients should receive adjuvant therapy. There are concerns about giving toxicity to a whole population for the benefit of only a subset. We hypothesized that making post-prostatectomy treatment decisions using genomics-based risk prediction estimates would improve cancer and quality of life outcomes. Methods We developed a state-transition model to simulate outcomes over a 10 year horizon for a cohort of post-prostatectomy patients. Outcomes included cancer progression rates at 5 and 10 years, overall survival, and quality-adjusted survival with reductions for treatment, side effects, and cancer stage. We compared outcomes using population-level versus individual-level risk of cancer progression, and for genomics-based care versus usual care treatment recommendations. Results Cancer progression outcomes, expected life-years (LYs), and expected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were significantly different when individual genomics-based cancer progression risk estimates were used in place of population-level risk estimates. Use of the genomic classifier to guide treatment decisions provided small, but statistically significant, improvements in model outcomes. We observed an additional 0.03 LYs and 0.07 QALYs, a 12% relative increase in the 5-year recurrence-free survival probability, and a 4% relative reduction in the 5-year probability of metastatic disease or death. Conclusions The use of genomics-based risk prediction to guide treatment decisions may improve outcomes for prostate cancer patients. This study offers a framework for individualized decision analysis, and can be extended to incorporate a wide range of personal attributes to enable delivery of patient-centered tools for informed decision-making.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0116866
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676352435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1676352435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16763524353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjs1OwzAQhC0kJMrPG3DYI5cGOyYucEOllN44wLlaORvYyrFD1q5En54g9QU4jTTfzGiUuja6MnZhbnepjBFDNaRIlTbG3Tt3ombmwdZzV2t7ps5Fdlo3dgIzdVjtMRTMHD8hfxEsA0f2GGDTD-gzpA4Q1hRTz36CKMId0wgc4W1MkjFPHYx-sj7kb2QTW95zWzDwgVp4Js_CKcLTdOpHWB6Bjq8u1WmHQejqqBfq5mX1vnydD2P6LiR527N4CgEjpSJb4xbONvWdbew_or9Z7FhI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676352435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the Clinical Impact of a Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer Using Individualized Decision Analysis: e0116866</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lobo, Jennifer Mason ; Dicker, Adam P ; Buerki, Christine ; Daviconi, Elai ; Karnes, R Jeffrey ; Jenkins, Robert B ; Patel, Nirav ; Den, Robert B ; Showalter, Timothy N</creator><creatorcontrib>Lobo, Jennifer Mason ; Dicker, Adam P ; Buerki, Christine ; Daviconi, Elai ; Karnes, R Jeffrey ; Jenkins, Robert B ; Patel, Nirav ; Den, Robert B ; Showalter, Timothy N</creatorcontrib><description>Background Currently there is controversy surrounding the optimal way to treat patients with prostate cancer in the post-prostatectomy setting. Adjuvant therapies carry possible benefits of improved curative results, but there is uncertainty in which patients should receive adjuvant therapy. There are concerns about giving toxicity to a whole population for the benefit of only a subset. We hypothesized that making post-prostatectomy treatment decisions using genomics-based risk prediction estimates would improve cancer and quality of life outcomes. Methods We developed a state-transition model to simulate outcomes over a 10 year horizon for a cohort of post-prostatectomy patients. Outcomes included cancer progression rates at 5 and 10 years, overall survival, and quality-adjusted survival with reductions for treatment, side effects, and cancer stage. We compared outcomes using population-level versus individual-level risk of cancer progression, and for genomics-based care versus usual care treatment recommendations. Results Cancer progression outcomes, expected life-years (LYs), and expected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were significantly different when individual genomics-based cancer progression risk estimates were used in place of population-level risk estimates. Use of the genomic classifier to guide treatment decisions provided small, but statistically significant, improvements in model outcomes. We observed an additional 0.03 LYs and 0.07 QALYs, a 12% relative increase in the 5-year recurrence-free survival probability, and a 4% relative reduction in the 5-year probability of metastatic disease or death. Conclusions The use of genomics-based risk prediction to guide treatment decisions may improve outcomes for prostate cancer patients. This study offers a framework for individualized decision analysis, and can be extended to incorporate a wide range of personal attributes to enable delivery of patient-centered tools for informed decision-making.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116866</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-04, Vol.10 (4)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lobo, Jennifer Mason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dicker, Adam P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buerki, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daviconi, Elai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karnes, R Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Nirav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Den, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Showalter, Timothy N</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the Clinical Impact of a Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer Using Individualized Decision Analysis: e0116866</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Background Currently there is controversy surrounding the optimal way to treat patients with prostate cancer in the post-prostatectomy setting. Adjuvant therapies carry possible benefits of improved curative results, but there is uncertainty in which patients should receive adjuvant therapy. There are concerns about giving toxicity to a whole population for the benefit of only a subset. We hypothesized that making post-prostatectomy treatment decisions using genomics-based risk prediction estimates would improve cancer and quality of life outcomes. Methods We developed a state-transition model to simulate outcomes over a 10 year horizon for a cohort of post-prostatectomy patients. Outcomes included cancer progression rates at 5 and 10 years, overall survival, and quality-adjusted survival with reductions for treatment, side effects, and cancer stage. We compared outcomes using population-level versus individual-level risk of cancer progression, and for genomics-based care versus usual care treatment recommendations. Results Cancer progression outcomes, expected life-years (LYs), and expected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were significantly different when individual genomics-based cancer progression risk estimates were used in place of population-level risk estimates. Use of the genomic classifier to guide treatment decisions provided small, but statistically significant, improvements in model outcomes. We observed an additional 0.03 LYs and 0.07 QALYs, a 12% relative increase in the 5-year recurrence-free survival probability, and a 4% relative reduction in the 5-year probability of metastatic disease or death. Conclusions The use of genomics-based risk prediction to guide treatment decisions may improve outcomes for prostate cancer patients. This study offers a framework for individualized decision analysis, and can be extended to incorporate a wide range of personal attributes to enable delivery of patient-centered tools for informed decision-making.</description><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjs1OwzAQhC0kJMrPG3DYI5cGOyYucEOllN44wLlaORvYyrFD1q5En54g9QU4jTTfzGiUuja6MnZhbnepjBFDNaRIlTbG3Tt3ombmwdZzV2t7ps5Fdlo3dgIzdVjtMRTMHD8hfxEsA0f2GGDTD-gzpA4Q1hRTz36CKMId0wgc4W1MkjFPHYx-sj7kb2QTW95zWzDwgVp4Js_CKcLTdOpHWB6Bjq8u1WmHQejqqBfq5mX1vnydD2P6LiR527N4CgEjpSJb4xbONvWdbew_or9Z7FhI</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Lobo, Jennifer Mason</creator><creator>Dicker, Adam P</creator><creator>Buerki, Christine</creator><creator>Daviconi, Elai</creator><creator>Karnes, R Jeffrey</creator><creator>Jenkins, Robert B</creator><creator>Patel, Nirav</creator><creator>Den, Robert B</creator><creator>Showalter, Timothy N</creator><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Evaluating the Clinical Impact of a Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer Using Individualized Decision Analysis: e0116866</title><author>Lobo, Jennifer Mason ; Dicker, Adam P ; Buerki, Christine ; Daviconi, Elai ; Karnes, R Jeffrey ; Jenkins, Robert B ; Patel, Nirav ; Den, Robert B ; Showalter, Timothy N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16763524353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lobo, Jennifer Mason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dicker, Adam P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buerki, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daviconi, Elai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karnes, R Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Nirav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Den, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Showalter, Timothy N</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lobo, Jennifer Mason</au><au>Dicker, Adam P</au><au>Buerki, Christine</au><au>Daviconi, Elai</au><au>Karnes, R Jeffrey</au><au>Jenkins, Robert B</au><au>Patel, Nirav</au><au>Den, Robert B</au><au>Showalter, Timothy N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the Clinical Impact of a Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer Using Individualized Decision Analysis: e0116866</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Background Currently there is controversy surrounding the optimal way to treat patients with prostate cancer in the post-prostatectomy setting. Adjuvant therapies carry possible benefits of improved curative results, but there is uncertainty in which patients should receive adjuvant therapy. There are concerns about giving toxicity to a whole population for the benefit of only a subset. We hypothesized that making post-prostatectomy treatment decisions using genomics-based risk prediction estimates would improve cancer and quality of life outcomes. Methods We developed a state-transition model to simulate outcomes over a 10 year horizon for a cohort of post-prostatectomy patients. Outcomes included cancer progression rates at 5 and 10 years, overall survival, and quality-adjusted survival with reductions for treatment, side effects, and cancer stage. We compared outcomes using population-level versus individual-level risk of cancer progression, and for genomics-based care versus usual care treatment recommendations. Results Cancer progression outcomes, expected life-years (LYs), and expected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were significantly different when individual genomics-based cancer progression risk estimates were used in place of population-level risk estimates. Use of the genomic classifier to guide treatment decisions provided small, but statistically significant, improvements in model outcomes. We observed an additional 0.03 LYs and 0.07 QALYs, a 12% relative increase in the 5-year recurrence-free survival probability, and a 4% relative reduction in the 5-year probability of metastatic disease or death. Conclusions The use of genomics-based risk prediction to guide treatment decisions may improve outcomes for prostate cancer patients. This study offers a framework for individualized decision analysis, and can be extended to incorporate a wide range of personal attributes to enable delivery of patient-centered tools for informed decision-making.</abstract><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0116866</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-04, Vol.10 (4)
issn 1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676352435
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
title Evaluating the Clinical Impact of a Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer Using Individualized Decision Analysis: e0116866
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A27%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20Clinical%20Impact%20of%20a%20Genomic%20Classifier%20in%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Using%20Individualized%20Decision%20Analysis:%20e0116866&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lobo,%20Jennifer%20Mason&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0116866&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1676352435%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676352435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true