Negative indirect effects of neighbors on imperiled scleractinian corals
Predation pressure on an individual may be influenced by spatial associations with other organisms. In the case of rare and imperiled species, such indirect interactions may affect the persistence and recovery of local populations. This study examined the effects of coral neighborhood composition on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Coral reefs 2014-12, Vol.33 (4), p.1047-1056 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1056 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1047 |
container_title | Coral reefs |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Johnston, Lyza Miller, M. W. |
description | Predation pressure on an individual may be influenced by spatial associations with other organisms. In the case of rare and imperiled species, such indirect interactions may affect the persistence and recovery of local populations. This study examined the effects of coral neighborhood composition on the foraging behavior and impact of the corallivorous gastropod,
Coralliophila abbreviata
. We conducted a manipulative field experiment in which focal colonies of the threatened scleractinian coral
Acropora cervicornis
had no neighbors, conspecific neighbors, alternative prey (
Orbicella faveolata
) neighbors, or non-prey (
Porites asteroides
) neighbors. Individually tagged
C. abbreviata
were then seeded into the study area and allowed to colonize the experimental plots. Initial colonization was significantly affected by the species of neighboring corals and snail abundance after colonization was negatively correlated with focal colony growth. Snails exhibited a strong prey preference for
A. cervicornis
over
O. faveolata
and responded numerically to neighborhood quality (i.e., relative preference for neighboring corals). Thus, conspecific neighbors had the greatest predator-mediated negative effect on focal colony performance followed by
O. faveolata
neighbors. The results suggest that
C. abbreviata
mediate apparent competition between
O. faveolata
and
A. cervicornis
as both species contributed to the local abundance of their shared predator. Additionally, home range estimates for tagged
C. abbreviata
were calculated, compared among sexes, and found to be significantly greater for males than for females. Overall, this study sheds light on the foraging behavior of an important coral predator and highlights the potential importance of consumer-mediated indirect interactions in the dynamics of severely reduced populations. The results also have direct implications for conservation and population enhancement efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00338-014-1176-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676347782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3480714381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-d2f73858e2d18609cad2e1915b52a919b5ea0f69993762bc975f03e3911ea9743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1qHDEQhEVwIGvHD-DbQAjkMkm3fkbS0ZjYDpj4Yp-FVtPayMxq1tJsIG9vLWtMCORUNP1VURRjFwhfEUB_qwBCmB5Q9oh66M07tkIpeA9WqxO2As15L4GbD-y01icAUMqKFbv9SRu_pN_UpTymQmHpKMYmtZtjlyltfq3n0o7cpe2OSppo7GqYqPiwpJx87sJc_FQ_svexCZ2_6hl7vP7-cHXb393f_Li6vOuDRL70I49aGGWIj2gGsMGPnNCiWivuLdq1Ig9xsNYKPfB1aO0jCBIWkbzVUpyxL8fcXZmf91QXt0010DT5TPO-Ohz0IKTWhjf00z_o07wvubVrFFrJlZHQKDxSocy1FopuV9LWlz8OwR22dcdtXdvWHbZ1pnk-vyb7GvwUi88h1TcjNxalgkMDfuRqe-UNlb8a_Df8BSash4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1619425840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negative indirect effects of neighbors on imperiled scleractinian corals</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Johnston, Lyza ; Miller, M. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Lyza ; Miller, M. W.</creatorcontrib><description>Predation pressure on an individual may be influenced by spatial associations with other organisms. In the case of rare and imperiled species, such indirect interactions may affect the persistence and recovery of local populations. This study examined the effects of coral neighborhood composition on the foraging behavior and impact of the corallivorous gastropod,
Coralliophila abbreviata
. We conducted a manipulative field experiment in which focal colonies of the threatened scleractinian coral
Acropora cervicornis
had no neighbors, conspecific neighbors, alternative prey (
Orbicella faveolata
) neighbors, or non-prey (
Porites asteroides
) neighbors. Individually tagged
C. abbreviata
were then seeded into the study area and allowed to colonize the experimental plots. Initial colonization was significantly affected by the species of neighboring corals and snail abundance after colonization was negatively correlated with focal colony growth. Snails exhibited a strong prey preference for
A. cervicornis
over
O. faveolata
and responded numerically to neighborhood quality (i.e., relative preference for neighboring corals). Thus, conspecific neighbors had the greatest predator-mediated negative effect on focal colony performance followed by
O. faveolata
neighbors. The results suggest that
C. abbreviata
mediate apparent competition between
O. faveolata
and
A. cervicornis
as both species contributed to the local abundance of their shared predator. Additionally, home range estimates for tagged
C. abbreviata
were calculated, compared among sexes, and found to be significantly greater for males than for females. Overall, this study sheds light on the foraging behavior of an important coral predator and highlights the potential importance of consumer-mediated indirect interactions in the dynamics of severely reduced populations. The results also have direct implications for conservation and population enhancement efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0722-4028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00338-014-1176-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CORFDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acropora cervicornis ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cnidaria. Ctenaria ; Colonization ; Coral reefs ; Coralliophila abbreviata ; Foraging behavior ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gastropoda ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Local population ; Marine ecology ; Mollusks ; Oceanography ; Porites ; Predation ; Prey ; Rare species ; Scleractinia ; Sea water ecosystems ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Coral reefs, 2014-12, Vol.33 (4), p.1047-1056</ispartof><rights>US Government 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-d2f73858e2d18609cad2e1915b52a919b5ea0f69993762bc975f03e3911ea9743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-d2f73858e2d18609cad2e1915b52a919b5ea0f69993762bc975f03e3911ea9743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00338-014-1176-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00338-014-1176-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28914502$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Lyza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, M. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Negative indirect effects of neighbors on imperiled scleractinian corals</title><title>Coral reefs</title><addtitle>Coral Reefs</addtitle><description>Predation pressure on an individual may be influenced by spatial associations with other organisms. In the case of rare and imperiled species, such indirect interactions may affect the persistence and recovery of local populations. This study examined the effects of coral neighborhood composition on the foraging behavior and impact of the corallivorous gastropod,
Coralliophila abbreviata
. We conducted a manipulative field experiment in which focal colonies of the threatened scleractinian coral
Acropora cervicornis
had no neighbors, conspecific neighbors, alternative prey (
Orbicella faveolata
) neighbors, or non-prey (
Porites asteroides
) neighbors. Individually tagged
C. abbreviata
were then seeded into the study area and allowed to colonize the experimental plots. Initial colonization was significantly affected by the species of neighboring corals and snail abundance after colonization was negatively correlated with focal colony growth. Snails exhibited a strong prey preference for
A. cervicornis
over
O. faveolata
and responded numerically to neighborhood quality (i.e., relative preference for neighboring corals). Thus, conspecific neighbors had the greatest predator-mediated negative effect on focal colony performance followed by
O. faveolata
neighbors. The results suggest that
C. abbreviata
mediate apparent competition between
O. faveolata
and
A. cervicornis
as both species contributed to the local abundance of their shared predator. Additionally, home range estimates for tagged
C. abbreviata
were calculated, compared among sexes, and found to be significantly greater for males than for females. Overall, this study sheds light on the foraging behavior of an important coral predator and highlights the potential importance of consumer-mediated indirect interactions in the dynamics of severely reduced populations. The results also have direct implications for conservation and population enhancement efforts.</description><subject>Acropora cervicornis</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cnidaria. Ctenaria</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Coralliophila abbreviata</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gastropoda</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Local population</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Porites</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Rare species</subject><subject>Scleractinia</subject><subject>Sea water ecosystems</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0722-4028</issn><issn>1432-0975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1qHDEQhEVwIGvHD-DbQAjkMkm3fkbS0ZjYDpj4Yp-FVtPayMxq1tJsIG9vLWtMCORUNP1VURRjFwhfEUB_qwBCmB5Q9oh66M07tkIpeA9WqxO2As15L4GbD-y01icAUMqKFbv9SRu_pN_UpTymQmHpKMYmtZtjlyltfq3n0o7cpe2OSppo7GqYqPiwpJx87sJc_FQ_svexCZ2_6hl7vP7-cHXb393f_Li6vOuDRL70I49aGGWIj2gGsMGPnNCiWivuLdq1Ig9xsNYKPfB1aO0jCBIWkbzVUpyxL8fcXZmf91QXt0010DT5TPO-Ohz0IKTWhjf00z_o07wvubVrFFrJlZHQKDxSocy1FopuV9LWlz8OwR22dcdtXdvWHbZ1pnk-vyb7GvwUi88h1TcjNxalgkMDfuRqe-UNlb8a_Df8BSash4s</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Johnston, Lyza</creator><creator>Miller, M. W.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Negative indirect effects of neighbors on imperiled scleractinian corals</title><author>Johnston, Lyza ; Miller, M. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-d2f73858e2d18609cad2e1915b52a919b5ea0f69993762bc975f03e3911ea9743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acropora cervicornis</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cnidaria. Ctenaria</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Coralliophila abbreviata</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gastropoda</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Local population</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Porites</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Rare species</topic><topic>Scleractinia</topic><topic>Sea water ecosystems</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Lyza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, M. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Coral reefs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnston, Lyza</au><au>Miller, M. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negative indirect effects of neighbors on imperiled scleractinian corals</atitle><jtitle>Coral reefs</jtitle><stitle>Coral Reefs</stitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1047</spage><epage>1056</epage><pages>1047-1056</pages><issn>0722-4028</issn><eissn>1432-0975</eissn><coden>CORFDL</coden><abstract>Predation pressure on an individual may be influenced by spatial associations with other organisms. In the case of rare and imperiled species, such indirect interactions may affect the persistence and recovery of local populations. This study examined the effects of coral neighborhood composition on the foraging behavior and impact of the corallivorous gastropod,
Coralliophila abbreviata
. We conducted a manipulative field experiment in which focal colonies of the threatened scleractinian coral
Acropora cervicornis
had no neighbors, conspecific neighbors, alternative prey (
Orbicella faveolata
) neighbors, or non-prey (
Porites asteroides
) neighbors. Individually tagged
C. abbreviata
were then seeded into the study area and allowed to colonize the experimental plots. Initial colonization was significantly affected by the species of neighboring corals and snail abundance after colonization was negatively correlated with focal colony growth. Snails exhibited a strong prey preference for
A. cervicornis
over
O. faveolata
and responded numerically to neighborhood quality (i.e., relative preference for neighboring corals). Thus, conspecific neighbors had the greatest predator-mediated negative effect on focal colony performance followed by
O. faveolata
neighbors. The results suggest that
C. abbreviata
mediate apparent competition between
O. faveolata
and
A. cervicornis
as both species contributed to the local abundance of their shared predator. Additionally, home range estimates for tagged
C. abbreviata
were calculated, compared among sexes, and found to be significantly greater for males than for females. Overall, this study sheds light on the foraging behavior of an important coral predator and highlights the potential importance of consumer-mediated indirect interactions in the dynamics of severely reduced populations. The results also have direct implications for conservation and population enhancement efforts.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00338-014-1176-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0722-4028 |
ispartof | Coral reefs, 2014-12, Vol.33 (4), p.1047-1056 |
issn | 0722-4028 1432-0975 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676347782 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Acropora cervicornis Animal and plant ecology Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Cnidaria. Ctenaria Colonization Coral reefs Coralliophila abbreviata Foraging behavior Freshwater & Marine Ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gastropoda Invertebrates Life Sciences Local population Marine ecology Mollusks Oceanography Porites Predation Prey Rare species Scleractinia Sea water ecosystems Synecology |
title | Negative indirect effects of neighbors on imperiled scleractinian corals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A09%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negative%20indirect%20effects%20of%20neighbors%20on%20imperiled%20scleractinian%20corals&rft.jtitle=Coral%20reefs&rft.au=Johnston,%20Lyza&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1047&rft.epage=1056&rft.pages=1047-1056&rft.issn=0722-4028&rft.eissn=1432-0975&rft.coden=CORFDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00338-014-1176-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3480714381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1619425840&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |