Impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for gestational diabetes
Highlights • The IADPSG criteria classify a larger fraction of women as having GDM, when compared to other criteria in use. • Most women with GDM according to the IADPSG criteria were classified by an abnormal fasting glucose value. • The IADPSG criteria do not result in larger risks for adverse pre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes research and clinical practice 2015-05, Vol.108 (2), p.288-295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 295 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 288 |
container_title | Diabetes research and clinical practice |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Trujillo, Janet Vigo, Alvaro Duncan, Bruce B Falavigna, Maicon Wendland, Eliana M Campos, Maria A Schmidt, Maria I |
description | Highlights • The IADPSG criteria classify a larger fraction of women as having GDM, when compared to other criteria in use. • Most women with GDM according to the IADPSG criteria were classified by an abnormal fasting glucose value. • The IADPSG criteria do not result in larger risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes. • The diagnostic impact of the IADPSG criteria is small in terms of the detection of adverse pregnancy outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.02.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1675875690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0168822715001047</els_id><sourcerecordid>1675875690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-768268c2509dade116862ff23256890b446fbd1b52a2b983c48fd4be16a02f503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUc1u1DAYtBCoXUofAeQjl00_O7HjXEBVgXalSlRqOVuO_aV4ycbBTirt2-N0txy4cLItzY9nhpD3DAoGTF5sC-dNGzEVHJgogBcA9SuyYqrma8V5_ZqsMk4930_J25S2ACDLSpyQUy5qKaRUKzJudqOxEw0dnX4i3QwTxsFMPgymp5cpBeufXwvgSzbECRM1g6N3ER8HM9g9vZ9mt6fXMcxjojb6rOAN7UKkj5imFy13JL8jbzrTJzw_nmfkx7evD1c369vv15ury9u1rRqY1rVUXCrLBTTOOGQ5ieRdx0supGqgrSrZtY61ghveNqq0lepc1SKTBngnoDwjHw-6Ywy_5_wRvfPJYt-bAcOcNJO1ULWQzQIVB6iNIaWInR6j35m41wz0Urbe6mPZeilbA9e57Mz7cLSY2x26v6yXdjPg8wGAOeiTx6iT9ThYdD6inbQL_r8Wn_5RsL0fvDX9L9xj2oY5r9XnNDplgr5fFl8GZwKAQVWXfwCc36iP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1675875690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for gestational diabetes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Trujillo, Janet ; Vigo, Alvaro ; Duncan, Bruce B ; Falavigna, Maicon ; Wendland, Eliana M ; Campos, Maria A ; Schmidt, Maria I</creator><creatorcontrib>Trujillo, Janet ; Vigo, Alvaro ; Duncan, Bruce B ; Falavigna, Maicon ; Wendland, Eliana M ; Campos, Maria A ; Schmidt, Maria I</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • The IADPSG criteria classify a larger fraction of women as having GDM, when compared to other criteria in use. • Most women with GDM according to the IADPSG criteria were classified by an abnormal fasting glucose value. • The IADPSG criteria do not result in larger risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes. • The diagnostic impact of the IADPSG criteria is small in terms of the detection of adverse pregnancy outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.02.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25765668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brazil - epidemiology ; Cohort Studies ; Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis ; Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology ; Diagnostic criteria ; Endocrinology & Metabolism ; Female ; Fetal Macrosomia - diagnosis ; Fetal Macrosomia - epidemiology ; Gestational Age ; Gestational diabetes mellitus ; Glucose Tolerance Test - standards ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia - diagnosis ; Hyperglycemia - epidemiology ; Infant, Newborn ; International Agencies - standards ; Large for gestational age ; Postpartum Period ; Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards ; Pre-Eclampsia - diagnosis ; Pre-Eclampsia - epidemiology ; Preeclampsia ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology ; Prenatal Care ; Prognosis</subject><ispartof>Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2015-05, Vol.108 (2), p.288-295</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-768268c2509dade116862ff23256890b446fbd1b52a2b983c48fd4be16a02f503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-768268c2509dade116862ff23256890b446fbd1b52a2b983c48fd4be16a02f503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822715001047$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25765668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trujillo, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigo, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Bruce B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falavigna, Maicon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendland, Eliana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Maria A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Maria I</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for gestational diabetes</title><title>Diabetes research and clinical practice</title><addtitle>Diabetes Res Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Highlights • The IADPSG criteria classify a larger fraction of women as having GDM, when compared to other criteria in use. • Most women with GDM according to the IADPSG criteria were classified by an abnormal fasting glucose value. • The IADPSG criteria do not result in larger risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes. • The diagnostic impact of the IADPSG criteria is small in terms of the detection of adverse pregnancy outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brazil - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diagnostic criteria</subject><subject>Endocrinology & Metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Macrosomia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fetal Macrosomia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Glucose Tolerance Test - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>International Agencies - standards</subject><subject>Large for gestational age</subject><subject>Postpartum Period</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Pre-Eclampsia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pre-Eclampsia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Preeclampsia</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prenatal Care</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><issn>0168-8227</issn><issn>1872-8227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUc1u1DAYtBCoXUofAeQjl00_O7HjXEBVgXalSlRqOVuO_aV4ycbBTirt2-N0txy4cLItzY9nhpD3DAoGTF5sC-dNGzEVHJgogBcA9SuyYqrma8V5_ZqsMk4930_J25S2ACDLSpyQUy5qKaRUKzJudqOxEw0dnX4i3QwTxsFMPgymp5cpBeufXwvgSzbECRM1g6N3ER8HM9g9vZ9mt6fXMcxjojb6rOAN7UKkj5imFy13JL8jbzrTJzw_nmfkx7evD1c369vv15ury9u1rRqY1rVUXCrLBTTOOGQ5ieRdx0supGqgrSrZtY61ghveNqq0lepc1SKTBngnoDwjHw-6Ywy_5_wRvfPJYt-bAcOcNJO1ULWQzQIVB6iNIaWInR6j35m41wz0Urbe6mPZeilbA9e57Mz7cLSY2x26v6yXdjPg8wGAOeiTx6iT9ThYdD6inbQL_r8Wn_5RsL0fvDX9L9xj2oY5r9XnNDplgr5fFl8GZwKAQVWXfwCc36iP</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Trujillo, Janet</creator><creator>Vigo, Alvaro</creator><creator>Duncan, Bruce B</creator><creator>Falavigna, Maicon</creator><creator>Wendland, Eliana M</creator><creator>Campos, Maria A</creator><creator>Schmidt, Maria I</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for gestational diabetes</title><author>Trujillo, Janet ; Vigo, Alvaro ; Duncan, Bruce B ; Falavigna, Maicon ; Wendland, Eliana M ; Campos, Maria A ; Schmidt, Maria I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-768268c2509dade116862ff23256890b446fbd1b52a2b983c48fd4be16a02f503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brazil - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diagnostic criteria</topic><topic>Endocrinology & Metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Macrosomia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fetal Macrosomia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Glucose Tolerance Test - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>International Agencies - standards</topic><topic>Large for gestational age</topic><topic>Postpartum Period</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Pre-Eclampsia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pre-Eclampsia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Preeclampsia</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prenatal Care</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trujillo, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigo, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Bruce B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falavigna, Maicon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendland, Eliana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Maria A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Maria I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diabetes research and clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trujillo, Janet</au><au>Vigo, Alvaro</au><au>Duncan, Bruce B</au><au>Falavigna, Maicon</au><au>Wendland, Eliana M</au><au>Campos, Maria A</au><au>Schmidt, Maria I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for gestational diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes research and clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Res Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>288</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>288-295</pages><issn>0168-8227</issn><eissn>1872-8227</eissn><abstract>Highlights • The IADPSG criteria classify a larger fraction of women as having GDM, when compared to other criteria in use. • Most women with GDM according to the IADPSG criteria were classified by an abnormal fasting glucose value. • The IADPSG criteria do not result in larger risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes. • The diagnostic impact of the IADPSG criteria is small in terms of the detection of adverse pregnancy outcomes.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>25765668</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.diabres.2015.02.007</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-8227 |
ispartof | Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2015-05, Vol.108 (2), p.288-295 |
issn | 0168-8227 1872-8227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1675875690 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Brazil - epidemiology Cohort Studies Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology Diagnostic criteria Endocrinology & Metabolism Female Fetal Macrosomia - diagnosis Fetal Macrosomia - epidemiology Gestational Age Gestational diabetes mellitus Glucose Tolerance Test - standards Humans Hyperglycemia - diagnosis Hyperglycemia - epidemiology Infant, Newborn International Agencies - standards Large for gestational age Postpartum Period Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards Pre-Eclampsia - diagnosis Pre-Eclampsia - epidemiology Preeclampsia Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology Prenatal Care Prognosis |
title | Impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for gestational diabetes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A55%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%20International%20Association%20of%20Diabetes%20and%20Pregnancy%20Study%20Groups%20criteria%20for%20gestational%20diabetes&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20research%20and%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Trujillo,%20Janet&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=288&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=288-295&rft.issn=0168-8227&rft.eissn=1872-8227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.diabres.2015.02.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1675875690%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1675875690&rft_id=info:pmid/25765668&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0168822715001047&rfr_iscdi=true |