Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium

Purpose Recent years have witnessed growing international interest in the active involvement, or engagement [patient engagement (PE)], of patients and the public in health services research. However, there is limited evidence of the extent or impact of PE in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality of life research 2015-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1069-1076
Hauptverfasser: Haywood, Kirstie, Brett, Jo, Salek, Sam, Marlett, Nancy, Penman, Colin, Shklarov, Svetlana, Norris, Colleen, Santana, Maria Jose, Staniszewska, Sophie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1076
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1069
container_title Quality of life research
container_volume 24
creator Haywood, Kirstie
Brett, Jo
Salek, Sam
Marlett, Nancy
Penman, Colin
Shklarov, Svetlana
Norris, Colleen
Santana, Maria Jose
Staniszewska, Sophie
description Purpose Recent years have witnessed growing international interest in the active involvement, or engagement [patient engagement (PE)], of patients and the public in health services research. However, there is limited evidence of the extent or impact of PE in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) research. Therefore, in October 2013, the International Society for Quality of Life research (ISOQOL) hosted its first symposium, which sought to explore the potential for PE in this field. Methods A 'World Café' format encouraged the exploration of three 'menu' questions' in small groups at round tables. Views, opinions and concerns were captured. A thematic analysis was undertaken, and key themes listed. Results Sixty conference attendees participated in the 'PE Café', which lasted for 90 min. A diversity of experience was communicated, with most participants positive about the potential for PE. Similarities and differences in approaches, barriers and solutions were identified. However, a key message focused on the uncertainty about how to effectively engage with patients throughout the research process. Moreover, the lack of evidence-base demonstrating the impact of PE was a significant concern. No patient partners participated in the meeting. Conclusion This study describes the first international exploration of PE in HRQL and PRO research. Discussions highlighted that, in the absence of good practice guidelines, a framework or toolkit of how to embed PE within HRQL and PRO research is required. Moreover, this framework should support the rigorous evaluation of PE impact. ISOQOL should be instrumental in taking these ideas forward, actively engaging with patient partners towards shaping a future ISOQOL PE strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674959177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44849111</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44849111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-15e54da94e0c4e824f31040c40b67f59032c76dad77f4bfbaf0402f583d915563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotvCD-AAssSll4AdO_GaC0IVhUorLQg4R04y3niVxFuPo2p_JP8Jh2yrigMnjzzfe2-kR8grzt5xxtR75JyLMmNcZkzpMhNPyIoXSmR5KfVTsmK6zDMtpDgj54h7xthas_w5OcsLrmUCV-T3NxMdjJGasaWHqe5dQ2HcmR0M868baQemj10WoDcRWno7md7FI_WW9s7Cols8EnPwYYb8FBs_ANIACCY03Qd615lkh9QNM2NOiXfdkWLnpz6NQBsT4CO9dmPrxh1SG_xAYwfUuoCR3vzYft9u7sMeX4nHZIpuGl6QZ9b0CC9P7wX5df3559XXbLP9cnP1aZM1QsuY8QIK2RotgTUS1rm0gjOZZlaXyhaaibxRZWtapaysbW1s2ua2WItW86IoxQW5XHwPwd9OgLEaHDbQ92YEP2HFSyV1oblSCX37D7r3UxjTdX-p1EOuRKL4QjXBIwaw1SG4wYRjxVk1d10tXVep62ruupo1b07OUz1A-6C4LzcB-QJgWo07CI-i_-P6ehHtMfrwYCrlWuoZ_gOy1sFm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674194273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Haywood, Kirstie ; Brett, Jo ; Salek, Sam ; Marlett, Nancy ; Penman, Colin ; Shklarov, Svetlana ; Norris, Colleen ; Santana, Maria Jose ; Staniszewska, Sophie</creator><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Kirstie ; Brett, Jo ; Salek, Sam ; Marlett, Nancy ; Penman, Colin ; Shklarov, Svetlana ; Norris, Colleen ; Santana, Maria Jose ; Staniszewska, Sophie</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Recent years have witnessed growing international interest in the active involvement, or engagement [patient engagement (PE)], of patients and the public in health services research. However, there is limited evidence of the extent or impact of PE in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) research. Therefore, in October 2013, the International Society for Quality of Life research (ISOQOL) hosted its first symposium, which sought to explore the potential for PE in this field. Methods A 'World Café' format encouraged the exploration of three 'menu' questions' in small groups at round tables. Views, opinions and concerns were captured. A thematic analysis was undertaken, and key themes listed. Results Sixty conference attendees participated in the 'PE Café', which lasted for 90 min. A diversity of experience was communicated, with most participants positive about the potential for PE. Similarities and differences in approaches, barriers and solutions were identified. However, a key message focused on the uncertainty about how to effectively engage with patients throughout the research process. Moreover, the lack of evidence-base demonstrating the impact of PE was a significant concern. No patient partners participated in the meeting. Conclusion This study describes the first international exploration of PE in HRQL and PRO research. Discussions highlighted that, in the absence of good practice guidelines, a framework or toolkit of how to embed PE within HRQL and PRO research is required. Moreover, this framework should support the rigorous evaluation of PE impact. ISOQOL should be instrumental in taking these ideas forward, actively engaging with patient partners towards shaping a future ISOQOL PE strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25194573</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Collaboration ; Conferences ; Congresses as Topic ; Health Services Research ; Health Status ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; PATIENT ENGAGEMENT SPECIAL SECTION ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Patient Participation - methods ; Patients ; Public Health ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Research methodology ; Self Report ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2015-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1069-1076</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing 2015</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-15e54da94e0c4e824f31040c40b67f59032c76dad77f4bfbaf0402f583d915563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-15e54da94e0c4e824f31040c40b67f59032c76dad77f4bfbaf0402f583d915563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44849111$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44849111$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194573$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Kirstie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brett, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salek, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marlett, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penman, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shklarov, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Maria Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staniszewska, Sophie</creatorcontrib><title>Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose Recent years have witnessed growing international interest in the active involvement, or engagement [patient engagement (PE)], of patients and the public in health services research. However, there is limited evidence of the extent or impact of PE in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) research. Therefore, in October 2013, the International Society for Quality of Life research (ISOQOL) hosted its first symposium, which sought to explore the potential for PE in this field. Methods A 'World Café' format encouraged the exploration of three 'menu' questions' in small groups at round tables. Views, opinions and concerns were captured. A thematic analysis was undertaken, and key themes listed. Results Sixty conference attendees participated in the 'PE Café', which lasted for 90 min. A diversity of experience was communicated, with most participants positive about the potential for PE. Similarities and differences in approaches, barriers and solutions were identified. However, a key message focused on the uncertainty about how to effectively engage with patients throughout the research process. Moreover, the lack of evidence-base demonstrating the impact of PE was a significant concern. No patient partners participated in the meeting. Conclusion This study describes the first international exploration of PE in HRQL and PRO research. Discussions highlighted that, in the absence of good practice guidelines, a framework or toolkit of how to embed PE within HRQL and PRO research is required. Moreover, this framework should support the rigorous evaluation of PE impact. ISOQOL should be instrumental in taking these ideas forward, actively engaging with patient partners towards shaping a future ISOQOL PE strategy.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Congresses as Topic</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PATIENT ENGAGEMENT SPECIAL SECTION</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Patient Participation - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotvCD-AAssSll4AdO_GaC0IVhUorLQg4R04y3niVxFuPo2p_JP8Jh2yrigMnjzzfe2-kR8grzt5xxtR75JyLMmNcZkzpMhNPyIoXSmR5KfVTsmK6zDMtpDgj54h7xthas_w5OcsLrmUCV-T3NxMdjJGasaWHqe5dQ2HcmR0M868baQemj10WoDcRWno7md7FI_WW9s7Cols8EnPwYYb8FBs_ANIACCY03Qd615lkh9QNM2NOiXfdkWLnpz6NQBsT4CO9dmPrxh1SG_xAYwfUuoCR3vzYft9u7sMeX4nHZIpuGl6QZ9b0CC9P7wX5df3559XXbLP9cnP1aZM1QsuY8QIK2RotgTUS1rm0gjOZZlaXyhaaibxRZWtapaysbW1s2ua2WItW86IoxQW5XHwPwd9OgLEaHDbQ92YEP2HFSyV1oblSCX37D7r3UxjTdX-p1EOuRKL4QjXBIwaw1SG4wYRjxVk1d10tXVep62ruupo1b07OUz1A-6C4LzcB-QJgWo07CI-i_-P6ehHtMfrwYCrlWuoZ_gOy1sFm</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Haywood, Kirstie</creator><creator>Brett, Jo</creator><creator>Salek, Sam</creator><creator>Marlett, Nancy</creator><creator>Penman, Colin</creator><creator>Shklarov, Svetlana</creator><creator>Norris, Colleen</creator><creator>Santana, Maria Jose</creator><creator>Staniszewska, Sophie</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium</title><author>Haywood, Kirstie ; Brett, Jo ; Salek, Sam ; Marlett, Nancy ; Penman, Colin ; Shklarov, Svetlana ; Norris, Colleen ; Santana, Maria Jose ; Staniszewska, Sophie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-15e54da94e0c4e824f31040c40b67f59032c76dad77f4bfbaf0402f583d915563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Congresses as Topic</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PATIENT ENGAGEMENT SPECIAL SECTION</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Patient Participation - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Kirstie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brett, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salek, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marlett, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penman, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shklarov, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Maria Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staniszewska, Sophie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haywood, Kirstie</au><au>Brett, Jo</au><au>Salek, Sam</au><au>Marlett, Nancy</au><au>Penman, Colin</au><au>Shklarov, Svetlana</au><au>Norris, Colleen</au><au>Santana, Maria Jose</au><au>Staniszewska, Sophie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1069</spage><epage>1076</epage><pages>1069-1076</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose Recent years have witnessed growing international interest in the active involvement, or engagement [patient engagement (PE)], of patients and the public in health services research. However, there is limited evidence of the extent or impact of PE in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) research. Therefore, in October 2013, the International Society for Quality of Life research (ISOQOL) hosted its first symposium, which sought to explore the potential for PE in this field. Methods A 'World Café' format encouraged the exploration of three 'menu' questions' in small groups at round tables. Views, opinions and concerns were captured. A thematic analysis was undertaken, and key themes listed. Results Sixty conference attendees participated in the 'PE Café', which lasted for 90 min. A diversity of experience was communicated, with most participants positive about the potential for PE. Similarities and differences in approaches, barriers and solutions were identified. However, a key message focused on the uncertainty about how to effectively engage with patients throughout the research process. Moreover, the lack of evidence-base demonstrating the impact of PE was a significant concern. No patient partners participated in the meeting. Conclusion This study describes the first international exploration of PE in HRQL and PRO research. Discussions highlighted that, in the absence of good practice guidelines, a framework or toolkit of how to embed PE within HRQL and PRO research is required. Moreover, this framework should support the rigorous evaluation of PE impact. ISOQOL should be instrumental in taking these ideas forward, actively engaging with patient partners towards shaping a future ISOQOL PE strategy.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>25194573</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-9343
ispartof Quality of life research, 2015-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1069-1076
issn 0962-9343
1573-2649
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674959177
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Clinical outcomes
Collaboration
Conferences
Congresses as Topic
Health Services Research
Health Status
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
PATIENT ENGAGEMENT SPECIAL SECTION
Patient Outcome Assessment
Patient Participation - methods
Patients
Public Health
Quality of Life
Quality of Life Research
Research methodology
Self Report
Sociology
title Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T15%3A23%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20and%20public%20engagement%20in%20health-related%20quality%20of%20life%20and%20patient-reported%20outcomes%20research:%20what%20is%20important%20and%20why%20should%20we%20care?%20Findings%20from%20the%20first%20ISOQOL%20patient%20engagement%20symposium&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Haywood,%20Kirstie&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1069&rft.epage=1076&rft.pages=1069-1076&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44849111%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674194273&rft_id=info:pmid/25194573&rft_jstor_id=44849111&rfr_iscdi=true