Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium
Purpose Recent years have witnessed growing international interest in the active involvement, or engagement [patient engagement (PE)], of patients and the public in health services research. However, there is limited evidence of the extent or impact of PE in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality of life research 2015-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1069-1076 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1076 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1069 |
container_title | Quality of life research |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Haywood, Kirstie Brett, Jo Salek, Sam Marlett, Nancy Penman, Colin Shklarov, Svetlana Norris, Colleen Santana, Maria Jose Staniszewska, Sophie |
description | Purpose Recent years have witnessed growing international interest in the active involvement, or engagement [patient engagement (PE)], of patients and the public in health services research. However, there is limited evidence of the extent or impact of PE in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) research. Therefore, in October 2013, the International Society for Quality of Life research (ISOQOL) hosted its first symposium, which sought to explore the potential for PE in this field. Methods A 'World Café' format encouraged the exploration of three 'menu' questions' in small groups at round tables. Views, opinions and concerns were captured. A thematic analysis was undertaken, and key themes listed. Results Sixty conference attendees participated in the 'PE Café', which lasted for 90 min. A diversity of experience was communicated, with most participants positive about the potential for PE. Similarities and differences in approaches, barriers and solutions were identified. However, a key message focused on the uncertainty about how to effectively engage with patients throughout the research process. Moreover, the lack of evidence-base demonstrating the impact of PE was a significant concern. No patient partners participated in the meeting. Conclusion This study describes the first international exploration of PE in HRQL and PRO research. Discussions highlighted that, in the absence of good practice guidelines, a framework or toolkit of how to embed PE within HRQL and PRO research is required. Moreover, this framework should support the rigorous evaluation of PE impact. ISOQOL should be instrumental in taking these ideas forward, actively engaging with patient partners towards shaping a future ISOQOL PE strategy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674959177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44849111</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44849111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-15e54da94e0c4e824f31040c40b67f59032c76dad77f4bfbaf0402f583d915563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotvCD-AAssSll4AdO_GaC0IVhUorLQg4R04y3niVxFuPo2p_JP8Jh2yrigMnjzzfe2-kR8grzt5xxtR75JyLMmNcZkzpMhNPyIoXSmR5KfVTsmK6zDMtpDgj54h7xthas_w5OcsLrmUCV-T3NxMdjJGasaWHqe5dQ2HcmR0M868baQemj10WoDcRWno7md7FI_WW9s7Cols8EnPwYYb8FBs_ANIACCY03Qd615lkh9QNM2NOiXfdkWLnpz6NQBsT4CO9dmPrxh1SG_xAYwfUuoCR3vzYft9u7sMeX4nHZIpuGl6QZ9b0CC9P7wX5df3559XXbLP9cnP1aZM1QsuY8QIK2RotgTUS1rm0gjOZZlaXyhaaibxRZWtapaysbW1s2ua2WItW86IoxQW5XHwPwd9OgLEaHDbQ92YEP2HFSyV1oblSCX37D7r3UxjTdX-p1EOuRKL4QjXBIwaw1SG4wYRjxVk1d10tXVep62ruupo1b07OUz1A-6C4LzcB-QJgWo07CI-i_-P6ehHtMfrwYCrlWuoZ_gOy1sFm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674194273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Haywood, Kirstie ; Brett, Jo ; Salek, Sam ; Marlett, Nancy ; Penman, Colin ; Shklarov, Svetlana ; Norris, Colleen ; Santana, Maria Jose ; Staniszewska, Sophie</creator><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Kirstie ; Brett, Jo ; Salek, Sam ; Marlett, Nancy ; Penman, Colin ; Shklarov, Svetlana ; Norris, Colleen ; Santana, Maria Jose ; Staniszewska, Sophie</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Recent years have witnessed growing international interest in the active involvement, or engagement [patient engagement (PE)], of patients and the public in health services research. However, there is limited evidence of the extent or impact of PE in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) research. Therefore, in October 2013, the International Society for Quality of Life research (ISOQOL) hosted its first symposium, which sought to explore the potential for PE in this field. Methods A 'World Café' format encouraged the exploration of three 'menu' questions' in small groups at round tables. Views, opinions and concerns were captured. A thematic analysis was undertaken, and key themes listed. Results Sixty conference attendees participated in the 'PE Café', which lasted for 90 min. A diversity of experience was communicated, with most participants positive about the potential for PE. Similarities and differences in approaches, barriers and solutions were identified. However, a key message focused on the uncertainty about how to effectively engage with patients throughout the research process. Moreover, the lack of evidence-base demonstrating the impact of PE was a significant concern. No patient partners participated in the meeting. Conclusion This study describes the first international exploration of PE in HRQL and PRO research. Discussions highlighted that, in the absence of good practice guidelines, a framework or toolkit of how to embed PE within HRQL and PRO research is required. Moreover, this framework should support the rigorous evaluation of PE impact. ISOQOL should be instrumental in taking these ideas forward, actively engaging with patient partners towards shaping a future ISOQOL PE strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25194573</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Collaboration ; Conferences ; Congresses as Topic ; Health Services Research ; Health Status ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; PATIENT ENGAGEMENT SPECIAL SECTION ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Patient Participation - methods ; Patients ; Public Health ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Research methodology ; Self Report ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2015-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1069-1076</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing 2015</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-15e54da94e0c4e824f31040c40b67f59032c76dad77f4bfbaf0402f583d915563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-15e54da94e0c4e824f31040c40b67f59032c76dad77f4bfbaf0402f583d915563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44849111$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44849111$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194573$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Kirstie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brett, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salek, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marlett, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penman, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shklarov, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Maria Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staniszewska, Sophie</creatorcontrib><title>Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose Recent years have witnessed growing international interest in the active involvement, or engagement [patient engagement (PE)], of patients and the public in health services research. However, there is limited evidence of the extent or impact of PE in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) research. Therefore, in October 2013, the International Society for Quality of Life research (ISOQOL) hosted its first symposium, which sought to explore the potential for PE in this field. Methods A 'World Café' format encouraged the exploration of three 'menu' questions' in small groups at round tables. Views, opinions and concerns were captured. A thematic analysis was undertaken, and key themes listed. Results Sixty conference attendees participated in the 'PE Café', which lasted for 90 min. A diversity of experience was communicated, with most participants positive about the potential for PE. Similarities and differences in approaches, barriers and solutions were identified. However, a key message focused on the uncertainty about how to effectively engage with patients throughout the research process. Moreover, the lack of evidence-base demonstrating the impact of PE was a significant concern. No patient partners participated in the meeting. Conclusion This study describes the first international exploration of PE in HRQL and PRO research. Discussions highlighted that, in the absence of good practice guidelines, a framework or toolkit of how to embed PE within HRQL and PRO research is required. Moreover, this framework should support the rigorous evaluation of PE impact. ISOQOL should be instrumental in taking these ideas forward, actively engaging with patient partners towards shaping a future ISOQOL PE strategy.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Congresses as Topic</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PATIENT ENGAGEMENT SPECIAL SECTION</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Patient Participation - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotvCD-AAssSll4AdO_GaC0IVhUorLQg4R04y3niVxFuPo2p_JP8Jh2yrigMnjzzfe2-kR8grzt5xxtR75JyLMmNcZkzpMhNPyIoXSmR5KfVTsmK6zDMtpDgj54h7xthas_w5OcsLrmUCV-T3NxMdjJGasaWHqe5dQ2HcmR0M868baQemj10WoDcRWno7md7FI_WW9s7Cols8EnPwYYb8FBs_ANIACCY03Qd615lkh9QNM2NOiXfdkWLnpz6NQBsT4CO9dmPrxh1SG_xAYwfUuoCR3vzYft9u7sMeX4nHZIpuGl6QZ9b0CC9P7wX5df3559XXbLP9cnP1aZM1QsuY8QIK2RotgTUS1rm0gjOZZlaXyhaaibxRZWtapaysbW1s2ua2WItW86IoxQW5XHwPwd9OgLEaHDbQ92YEP2HFSyV1oblSCX37D7r3UxjTdX-p1EOuRKL4QjXBIwaw1SG4wYRjxVk1d10tXVep62ruupo1b07OUz1A-6C4LzcB-QJgWo07CI-i_-P6ehHtMfrwYCrlWuoZ_gOy1sFm</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Haywood, Kirstie</creator><creator>Brett, Jo</creator><creator>Salek, Sam</creator><creator>Marlett, Nancy</creator><creator>Penman, Colin</creator><creator>Shklarov, Svetlana</creator><creator>Norris, Colleen</creator><creator>Santana, Maria Jose</creator><creator>Staniszewska, Sophie</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium</title><author>Haywood, Kirstie ; Brett, Jo ; Salek, Sam ; Marlett, Nancy ; Penman, Colin ; Shklarov, Svetlana ; Norris, Colleen ; Santana, Maria Jose ; Staniszewska, Sophie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-15e54da94e0c4e824f31040c40b67f59032c76dad77f4bfbaf0402f583d915563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Congresses as Topic</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PATIENT ENGAGEMENT SPECIAL SECTION</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Patient Participation - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Kirstie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brett, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salek, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marlett, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penman, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shklarov, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Maria Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staniszewska, Sophie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haywood, Kirstie</au><au>Brett, Jo</au><au>Salek, Sam</au><au>Marlett, Nancy</au><au>Penman, Colin</au><au>Shklarov, Svetlana</au><au>Norris, Colleen</au><au>Santana, Maria Jose</au><au>Staniszewska, Sophie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1069</spage><epage>1076</epage><pages>1069-1076</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose Recent years have witnessed growing international interest in the active involvement, or engagement [patient engagement (PE)], of patients and the public in health services research. However, there is limited evidence of the extent or impact of PE in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) research. Therefore, in October 2013, the International Society for Quality of Life research (ISOQOL) hosted its first symposium, which sought to explore the potential for PE in this field. Methods A 'World Café' format encouraged the exploration of three 'menu' questions' in small groups at round tables. Views, opinions and concerns were captured. A thematic analysis was undertaken, and key themes listed. Results Sixty conference attendees participated in the 'PE Café', which lasted for 90 min. A diversity of experience was communicated, with most participants positive about the potential for PE. Similarities and differences in approaches, barriers and solutions were identified. However, a key message focused on the uncertainty about how to effectively engage with patients throughout the research process. Moreover, the lack of evidence-base demonstrating the impact of PE was a significant concern. No patient partners participated in the meeting. Conclusion This study describes the first international exploration of PE in HRQL and PRO research. Discussions highlighted that, in the absence of good practice guidelines, a framework or toolkit of how to embed PE within HRQL and PRO research is required. Moreover, this framework should support the rigorous evaluation of PE impact. ISOQOL should be instrumental in taking these ideas forward, actively engaging with patient partners towards shaping a future ISOQOL PE strategy.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>25194573</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-9343 |
ispartof | Quality of life research, 2015-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1069-1076 |
issn | 0962-9343 1573-2649 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674959177 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Clinical outcomes Collaboration Conferences Congresses as Topic Health Services Research Health Status Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged PATIENT ENGAGEMENT SPECIAL SECTION Patient Outcome Assessment Patient Participation - methods Patients Public Health Quality of Life Quality of Life Research Research methodology Self Report Sociology |
title | Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T15%3A23%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20and%20public%20engagement%20in%20health-related%20quality%20of%20life%20and%20patient-reported%20outcomes%20research:%20what%20is%20important%20and%20why%20should%20we%20care?%20Findings%20from%20the%20first%20ISOQOL%20patient%20engagement%20symposium&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Haywood,%20Kirstie&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1069&rft.epage=1076&rft.pages=1069-1076&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44849111%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674194273&rft_id=info:pmid/25194573&rft_jstor_id=44849111&rfr_iscdi=true |