Systematic review recommends the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal cancer–specific module for measuring quality of life in colorectal cancer patients
Abstract Objectives To critically appraise the measurement properties of standardized health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to provide recommendations on the choice of HRQOL instruments. Study Design and Setting Systematic review of English langu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2015-03, Vol.68 (3), p.266-278 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 278 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 266 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical epidemiology |
| container_volume | 68 |
| creator | Wong, Carlos K.H Chen, Jing Yu, Charlotte L.Y Sham, Mansy Lam, Cindy L.K |
| description | Abstract Objectives To critically appraise the measurement properties of standardized health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to provide recommendations on the choice of HRQOL instruments. Study Design and Setting Systematic review of English language literature published between January 1985 and May 2014 identified through a database search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE. HRQOL instruments were rated on methodological quality and overall levels of evidence using a Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument checklist. Results Internal consistency and hypothesis testing were evaluated most frequently in 63 studies identified. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was the most extensively evaluated. The highest number of positive ratings in the overall level of evidence was found in the CRC-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38) in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module, followed by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel instrument, FACT-C, and Quick-FLIC. The EORTC QLQ-CR38 had the most positive ratings on measurement property and was recommended. Conclusion The EORTC QLQ-CR38 was recommended to assess HRQOL in patients with CRC, regardless of disease stage and primary tumor site. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.021 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674210294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0895435614003977</els_id><sourcerecordid>3605868541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-b16eab92c362599e7e9992b552be658fdead7c5983ad23a6cc1b386b684626673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstu1TAQhiNERQ-FV6gssWGTYDuxE28Q6KhcpEqV2rK2HGfSOjh2aiegw4p34HF4G54Ep6cFqSzwZiTrm38u_2TZMcEFwYS_GopBW-NgMgXFpCqwKDAlj7INaeomZ4KSx9kGN4LlVcn4YfY0xgFjUuOaPckOKasYa8pmk_282MUZRjUbjQJ8MfA1Be3HEVwX0XwN6GQJfgLl0Fm4Us58S6h3qPcBnUMEFfQ1Uq5DlwHUnLJm5Hu0VU5DQNpbn9RmZZG-_fn1_UecQJs-VRt9t1i4FRpBxSUYd4VuFmXNvFs1rOkBGfevCJpSC6lQfJYd9MpGeH4Xj7JP704utx_y07P3H7dvT3NdCTHnLeGgWkF1ySkTAmoQQtCWMdoCZ03fgepqzURTqo6WimtN2rLhLW8qTjmvy6Ps5V53Cv5mgTjL0UQN1ioHfomS8LqiBFNRJfTFA3TwS3Cpu0Sxpqpxeonie0oHH2OAXk7BjCrsJMFytVcO8t5eudorsZDJ3pR4fCe_tCN0f9Lu_UzAmz0AaR_JzSCjTrvS0Jl1h7Lz5v81Xj-QWCmjlf0MO4h_55GRSiwv1iNbb4xUaTJR1-VvNtnT-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1658470000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic review recommends the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal cancer–specific module for measuring quality of life in colorectal cancer patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Wong, Carlos K.H ; Chen, Jing ; Yu, Charlotte L.Y ; Sham, Mansy ; Lam, Cindy L.K</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Carlos K.H ; Chen, Jing ; Yu, Charlotte L.Y ; Sham, Mansy ; Lam, Cindy L.K</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives To critically appraise the measurement properties of standardized health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to provide recommendations on the choice of HRQOL instruments. Study Design and Setting Systematic review of English language literature published between January 1985 and May 2014 identified through a database search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE. HRQOL instruments were rated on methodological quality and overall levels of evidence using a Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument checklist. Results Internal consistency and hypothesis testing were evaluated most frequently in 63 studies identified. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was the most extensively evaluated. The highest number of positive ratings in the overall level of evidence was found in the CRC-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38) in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module, followed by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel instrument, FACT-C, and Quick-FLIC. The EORTC QLQ-CR38 had the most positive ratings on measurement property and was recommended. Conclusion The EORTC QLQ-CR38 was recommended to assess HRQOL in patients with CRC, regardless of disease stage and primary tumor site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25455838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy ; COSMIN ; Epidemiology ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Measurement property ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Psychometrics ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Review Literature as Topic ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2015-03, Vol.68 (3), p.266-278</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-b16eab92c362599e7e9992b552be658fdead7c5983ad23a6cc1b386b684626673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-b16eab92c362599e7e9992b552be658fdead7c5983ad23a6cc1b386b684626673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6895-6071 ; 0000-0002-5907-3867</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1658470000?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25455838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Carlos K.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Charlotte L.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sham, Mansy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Cindy L.K</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic review recommends the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal cancer–specific module for measuring quality of life in colorectal cancer patients</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives To critically appraise the measurement properties of standardized health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to provide recommendations on the choice of HRQOL instruments. Study Design and Setting Systematic review of English language literature published between January 1985 and May 2014 identified through a database search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE. HRQOL instruments were rated on methodological quality and overall levels of evidence using a Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument checklist. Results Internal consistency and hypothesis testing were evaluated most frequently in 63 studies identified. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was the most extensively evaluated. The highest number of positive ratings in the overall level of evidence was found in the CRC-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38) in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module, followed by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel instrument, FACT-C, and Quick-FLIC. The EORTC QLQ-CR38 had the most positive ratings on measurement property and was recommended. Conclusion The EORTC QLQ-CR38 was recommended to assess HRQOL in patients with CRC, regardless of disease stage and primary tumor site.</description><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>COSMIN</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Measurement property</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Review Literature as Topic</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkstu1TAQhiNERQ-FV6gssWGTYDuxE28Q6KhcpEqV2rK2HGfSOjh2aiegw4p34HF4G54Ep6cFqSzwZiTrm38u_2TZMcEFwYS_GopBW-NgMgXFpCqwKDAlj7INaeomZ4KSx9kGN4LlVcn4YfY0xgFjUuOaPckOKasYa8pmk_282MUZRjUbjQJ8MfA1Be3HEVwX0XwN6GQJfgLl0Fm4Us58S6h3qPcBnUMEFfQ1Uq5DlwHUnLJm5Hu0VU5DQNpbn9RmZZG-_fn1_UecQJs-VRt9t1i4FRpBxSUYd4VuFmXNvFs1rOkBGfevCJpSC6lQfJYd9MpGeH4Xj7JP704utx_y07P3H7dvT3NdCTHnLeGgWkF1ySkTAmoQQtCWMdoCZ03fgepqzURTqo6WimtN2rLhLW8qTjmvy6Ps5V53Cv5mgTjL0UQN1ioHfomS8LqiBFNRJfTFA3TwS3Cpu0Sxpqpxeonie0oHH2OAXk7BjCrsJMFytVcO8t5eudorsZDJ3pR4fCe_tCN0f9Lu_UzAmz0AaR_JzSCjTrvS0Jl1h7Lz5v81Xj-QWCmjlf0MO4h_55GRSiwv1iNbb4xUaTJR1-VvNtnT-g</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Wong, Carlos K.H</creator><creator>Chen, Jing</creator><creator>Yu, Charlotte L.Y</creator><creator>Sham, Mansy</creator><creator>Lam, Cindy L.K</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6895-6071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-3867</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Systematic review recommends the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal cancer–specific module for measuring quality of life in colorectal cancer patients</title><author>Wong, Carlos K.H ; Chen, Jing ; Yu, Charlotte L.Y ; Sham, Mansy ; Lam, Cindy L.K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-b16eab92c362599e7e9992b552be658fdead7c5983ad23a6cc1b386b684626673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>COSMIN</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Measurement property</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Review Literature as Topic</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Carlos K.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Charlotte L.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sham, Mansy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Cindy L.K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Carlos K.H</au><au>Chen, Jing</au><au>Yu, Charlotte L.Y</au><au>Sham, Mansy</au><au>Lam, Cindy L.K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic review recommends the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal cancer–specific module for measuring quality of life in colorectal cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>266</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>266-278</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives To critically appraise the measurement properties of standardized health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to provide recommendations on the choice of HRQOL instruments. Study Design and Setting Systematic review of English language literature published between January 1985 and May 2014 identified through a database search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE. HRQOL instruments were rated on methodological quality and overall levels of evidence using a Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument checklist. Results Internal consistency and hypothesis testing were evaluated most frequently in 63 studies identified. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was the most extensively evaluated. The highest number of positive ratings in the overall level of evidence was found in the CRC-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38) in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module, followed by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel instrument, FACT-C, and Quick-FLIC. The EORTC QLQ-CR38 had the most positive ratings on measurement property and was recommended. Conclusion The EORTC QLQ-CR38 was recommended to assess HRQOL in patients with CRC, regardless of disease stage and primary tumor site.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25455838</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.021</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6895-6071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-3867</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0895-4356 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2015-03, Vol.68 (3), p.266-278 |
| issn | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674210294 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma Colorectal Neoplasms - physiopathology Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy COSMIN Epidemiology Health Status Indicators Humans Internal Medicine Measurement property Patient Outcome Assessment Psychometrics Quality of life Quality of Life - psychology Review Literature as Topic Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Systematic review Tumors |
| title | Systematic review recommends the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal cancer–specific module for measuring quality of life in colorectal cancer patients |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T19%3A56%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20review%20recommends%20the%20European%20Organization%20for%20Research%20and%20Treatment%20of%20Cancer%20colorectal%20cancer%E2%80%93specific%20module%20for%20measuring%20quality%20of%20life%20in%20colorectal%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=Wong,%20Carlos%20K.H&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=266-278&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3605868541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1658470000&rft_id=info:pmid/25455838&rft_els_id=S0895435614003977&rfr_iscdi=true |