Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation
There is a need to reappraise the effects of UV‐B radiation on plant morphology in light of improved mechanistic understanding of UV‐B effects, particularly elucidation of the UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor. We review responses at cell and organismal levels, and explore their underlying...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant, cell and environment cell and environment, 2015-05, Vol.38 (5), p.856-866 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 866 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 856 |
container_title | Plant, cell and environment |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | ROBSON, T. MATTHEW KLEM, KAREL URBAN, OTMAR JANSEN, MARCEL A. K |
description | There is a need to reappraise the effects of UV‐B radiation on plant morphology in light of improved mechanistic understanding of UV‐B effects, particularly elucidation of the UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor. We review responses at cell and organismal levels, and explore their underlying regulatory mechanisms, function in UV protection and consequences for plant fitness. UV‐induced morphological changes include thicker leaves, shorter petioles, shorter stems, increased axillary branching and altered root:shoot ratios. At the cellular level, UV‐B morphogenesis comprises changes in cell division, elongation and/or differentiation. However, notwithstanding substantial new knowledge of molecular, cellular and organismal UV‐B responses, there remains a clear gap in our understanding of the interactions between these organizational levels, and how they control plant architecture. Furthermore, despite a broad consensus that UV‐B induces relatively compact architecture, we note substantial diversity in reported phenotypes. This may relate to UV‐induced morphological changes being underpinned by different mechanisms at high and low UV‐B doses. It remains unproven whether UV‐induced morphological changes have a protective function involving shading and decreased leaf penetration of UV‐B, counterbalancing trade‐offs such as decreased photosynthetic light capture and plant‐competitive abilities. Future research will need to disentangle seemingly contradictory interactions occurring at the threshold UV dose where regulation and stress‐induced morphogenesis overlap. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pce.12374 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674204020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1674204020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4784-3dd9b05f8d2b577c958d995dd880d3d06fad7ecf3b02b059f7200ef9d7bfba623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1KAzEQx4Motn4cfAFd8KKH1Umy22yOWvwCQVHrNWQ3SU3ZbtZki_TmI_iMPomprR4E5xIYfvNj5h-E9jCc4FinbaVPMKEsW0N9TAd5SiGDddQHnEHKGMc9tBXCBCA2GN9EPZIVHBimfTR80J_vH7bptG-97mwzTtpaNl0ydb59cbUb20rWidehdU3QIelcMnqOI-eJl8rKzrpmB20YWQe9u3q30ejy4ml4nd7eXd0Mz27TKmNFllKleAm5KRQpc8YqnheK81ypogBFFQyMVExXhpZAIscNIwDacMVKU8oBodvoaOltvXud6dCJqQ2VruO-2s2CwAOWkXg5gYge_kEnbuabuN2CoiQHni2Ex0uq8i4Er41ovZ1KPxcYxCJZEZMV38lGdn9lnJVTrX7JnygjcLoE3myt5_-bxP3w4kd5sJww0gk59jaI0SMBnMd_KljOgX4BY7aMoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1673250942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW ; KLEM, KAREL ; URBAN, OTMAR ; JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</creator><creatorcontrib>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW ; KLEM, KAREL ; URBAN, OTMAR ; JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</creatorcontrib><description>There is a need to reappraise the effects of UV‐B radiation on plant morphology in light of improved mechanistic understanding of UV‐B effects, particularly elucidation of the UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor. We review responses at cell and organismal levels, and explore their underlying regulatory mechanisms, function in UV protection and consequences for plant fitness. UV‐induced morphological changes include thicker leaves, shorter petioles, shorter stems, increased axillary branching and altered root:shoot ratios. At the cellular level, UV‐B morphogenesis comprises changes in cell division, elongation and/or differentiation. However, notwithstanding substantial new knowledge of molecular, cellular and organismal UV‐B responses, there remains a clear gap in our understanding of the interactions between these organizational levels, and how they control plant architecture. Furthermore, despite a broad consensus that UV‐B induces relatively compact architecture, we note substantial diversity in reported phenotypes. This may relate to UV‐induced morphological changes being underpinned by different mechanisms at high and low UV‐B doses. It remains unproven whether UV‐induced morphological changes have a protective function involving shading and decreased leaf penetration of UV‐B, counterbalancing trade‐offs such as decreased photosynthetic light capture and plant‐competitive abilities. Future research will need to disentangle seemingly contradictory interactions occurring at the threshold UV dose where regulation and stress‐induced morphogenesis overlap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-7791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pce.12374</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24890713</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLCEDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Scientific Publications</publisher><subject>auxin homeostasis ; branching ; canopy structure and light interception ; cell division ; chronic/acute stress ; flavonoid accumulation ; Flavonoids - metabolism ; loci ; morphogenesis ; Morphogenesis - radiation effects ; petioles ; Phenotype ; photoreceptors ; plant architecture ; Plants - radiation effects ; plant–plant interactions ; root shoot ratio ; shade ; stems ; stress‐induced morphogenic responses (SIMR) ; ultraviolet radiation ; Ultraviolet Rays ; UVR8 photoreceptor ; whole‐plant phenotype</subject><ispartof>Plant, cell and environment, 2015-05, Vol.38 (5), p.856-866</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4784-3dd9b05f8d2b577c958d995dd880d3d06fad7ecf3b02b059f7200ef9d7bfba623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4784-3dd9b05f8d2b577c958d995dd880d3d06fad7ecf3b02b059f7200ef9d7bfba623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8631-796X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpce.12374$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpce.12374$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,27931,27932,45581,45582,46416,46840</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24890713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLEM, KAREL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>URBAN, OTMAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</creatorcontrib><title>Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation</title><title>Plant, cell and environment</title><addtitle>Plant Cell Environ</addtitle><description>There is a need to reappraise the effects of UV‐B radiation on plant morphology in light of improved mechanistic understanding of UV‐B effects, particularly elucidation of the UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor. We review responses at cell and organismal levels, and explore their underlying regulatory mechanisms, function in UV protection and consequences for plant fitness. UV‐induced morphological changes include thicker leaves, shorter petioles, shorter stems, increased axillary branching and altered root:shoot ratios. At the cellular level, UV‐B morphogenesis comprises changes in cell division, elongation and/or differentiation. However, notwithstanding substantial new knowledge of molecular, cellular and organismal UV‐B responses, there remains a clear gap in our understanding of the interactions between these organizational levels, and how they control plant architecture. Furthermore, despite a broad consensus that UV‐B induces relatively compact architecture, we note substantial diversity in reported phenotypes. This may relate to UV‐induced morphological changes being underpinned by different mechanisms at high and low UV‐B doses. It remains unproven whether UV‐induced morphological changes have a protective function involving shading and decreased leaf penetration of UV‐B, counterbalancing trade‐offs such as decreased photosynthetic light capture and plant‐competitive abilities. Future research will need to disentangle seemingly contradictory interactions occurring at the threshold UV dose where regulation and stress‐induced morphogenesis overlap.</description><subject>auxin homeostasis</subject><subject>branching</subject><subject>canopy structure and light interception</subject><subject>cell division</subject><subject>chronic/acute stress</subject><subject>flavonoid accumulation</subject><subject>Flavonoids - metabolism</subject><subject>loci</subject><subject>morphogenesis</subject><subject>Morphogenesis - radiation effects</subject><subject>petioles</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>photoreceptors</subject><subject>plant architecture</subject><subject>Plants - radiation effects</subject><subject>plant–plant interactions</subject><subject>root shoot ratio</subject><subject>shade</subject><subject>stems</subject><subject>stress‐induced morphogenic responses (SIMR)</subject><subject>ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>UVR8 photoreceptor</subject><subject>whole‐plant phenotype</subject><issn>0140-7791</issn><issn>1365-3040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1KAzEQx4Motn4cfAFd8KKH1Umy22yOWvwCQVHrNWQ3SU3ZbtZki_TmI_iMPomprR4E5xIYfvNj5h-E9jCc4FinbaVPMKEsW0N9TAd5SiGDddQHnEHKGMc9tBXCBCA2GN9EPZIVHBimfTR80J_vH7bptG-97mwzTtpaNl0ydb59cbUb20rWidehdU3QIelcMnqOI-eJl8rKzrpmB20YWQe9u3q30ejy4ml4nd7eXd0Mz27TKmNFllKleAm5KRQpc8YqnheK81ypogBFFQyMVExXhpZAIscNIwDacMVKU8oBodvoaOltvXud6dCJqQ2VruO-2s2CwAOWkXg5gYge_kEnbuabuN2CoiQHni2Ex0uq8i4Er41ovZ1KPxcYxCJZEZMV38lGdn9lnJVTrX7JnygjcLoE3myt5_-bxP3w4kd5sJww0gk59jaI0SMBnMd_KljOgX4BY7aMoA</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW</creator><creator>KLEM, KAREL</creator><creator>URBAN, OTMAR</creator><creator>JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</creator><general>Blackwell Scientific Publications</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-796X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation</title><author>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW ; KLEM, KAREL ; URBAN, OTMAR ; JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4784-3dd9b05f8d2b577c958d995dd880d3d06fad7ecf3b02b059f7200ef9d7bfba623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>auxin homeostasis</topic><topic>branching</topic><topic>canopy structure and light interception</topic><topic>cell division</topic><topic>chronic/acute stress</topic><topic>flavonoid accumulation</topic><topic>Flavonoids - metabolism</topic><topic>loci</topic><topic>morphogenesis</topic><topic>Morphogenesis - radiation effects</topic><topic>petioles</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>photoreceptors</topic><topic>plant architecture</topic><topic>Plants - radiation effects</topic><topic>plant–plant interactions</topic><topic>root shoot ratio</topic><topic>shade</topic><topic>stems</topic><topic>stress‐induced morphogenic responses (SIMR)</topic><topic>ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>UVR8 photoreceptor</topic><topic>whole‐plant phenotype</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLEM, KAREL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>URBAN, OTMAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant, cell and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW</au><au>KLEM, KAREL</au><au>URBAN, OTMAR</au><au>JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation</atitle><jtitle>Plant, cell and environment</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Cell Environ</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>856</spage><epage>866</epage><pages>856-866</pages><issn>0140-7791</issn><eissn>1365-3040</eissn><coden>PLCEDV</coden><abstract>There is a need to reappraise the effects of UV‐B radiation on plant morphology in light of improved mechanistic understanding of UV‐B effects, particularly elucidation of the UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor. We review responses at cell and organismal levels, and explore their underlying regulatory mechanisms, function in UV protection and consequences for plant fitness. UV‐induced morphological changes include thicker leaves, shorter petioles, shorter stems, increased axillary branching and altered root:shoot ratios. At the cellular level, UV‐B morphogenesis comprises changes in cell division, elongation and/or differentiation. However, notwithstanding substantial new knowledge of molecular, cellular and organismal UV‐B responses, there remains a clear gap in our understanding of the interactions between these organizational levels, and how they control plant architecture. Furthermore, despite a broad consensus that UV‐B induces relatively compact architecture, we note substantial diversity in reported phenotypes. This may relate to UV‐induced morphological changes being underpinned by different mechanisms at high and low UV‐B doses. It remains unproven whether UV‐induced morphological changes have a protective function involving shading and decreased leaf penetration of UV‐B, counterbalancing trade‐offs such as decreased photosynthetic light capture and plant‐competitive abilities. Future research will need to disentangle seemingly contradictory interactions occurring at the threshold UV dose where regulation and stress‐induced morphogenesis overlap.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Scientific Publications</pub><pmid>24890713</pmid><doi>10.1111/pce.12374</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-796X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-7791 |
ispartof | Plant, cell and environment, 2015-05, Vol.38 (5), p.856-866 |
issn | 0140-7791 1365-3040 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674204020 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | auxin homeostasis branching canopy structure and light interception cell division chronic/acute stress flavonoid accumulation Flavonoids - metabolism loci morphogenesis Morphogenesis - radiation effects petioles Phenotype photoreceptors plant architecture Plants - radiation effects plant–plant interactions root shoot ratio shade stems stress‐induced morphogenic responses (SIMR) ultraviolet radiation Ultraviolet Rays UVR8 photoreceptor whole‐plant phenotype |
title | Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T00%3A25%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re%E2%80%90interpreting%20plant%20morphological%20responses%20to%20UV%E2%80%90B%20radiation&rft.jtitle=Plant,%20cell%20and%20environment&rft.au=ROBSON,%20T.%20MATTHEW&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=856&rft.epage=866&rft.pages=856-866&rft.issn=0140-7791&rft.eissn=1365-3040&rft.coden=PLCEDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pce.12374&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1674204020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1673250942&rft_id=info:pmid/24890713&rfr_iscdi=true |