Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation

There is a need to reappraise the effects of UV‐B radiation on plant morphology in light of improved mechanistic understanding of UV‐B effects, particularly elucidation of the UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor. We review responses at cell and organismal levels, and explore their underlying...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant, cell and environment cell and environment, 2015-05, Vol.38 (5), p.856-866
Hauptverfasser: ROBSON, T. MATTHEW, KLEM, KAREL, URBAN, OTMAR, JANSEN, MARCEL A. K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 866
container_issue 5
container_start_page 856
container_title Plant, cell and environment
container_volume 38
creator ROBSON, T. MATTHEW
KLEM, KAREL
URBAN, OTMAR
JANSEN, MARCEL A. K
description There is a need to reappraise the effects of UV‐B radiation on plant morphology in light of improved mechanistic understanding of UV‐B effects, particularly elucidation of the UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor. We review responses at cell and organismal levels, and explore their underlying regulatory mechanisms, function in UV protection and consequences for plant fitness. UV‐induced morphological changes include thicker leaves, shorter petioles, shorter stems, increased axillary branching and altered root:shoot ratios. At the cellular level, UV‐B morphogenesis comprises changes in cell division, elongation and/or differentiation. However, notwithstanding substantial new knowledge of molecular, cellular and organismal UV‐B responses, there remains a clear gap in our understanding of the interactions between these organizational levels, and how they control plant architecture. Furthermore, despite a broad consensus that UV‐B induces relatively compact architecture, we note substantial diversity in reported phenotypes. This may relate to UV‐induced morphological changes being underpinned by different mechanisms at high and low UV‐B doses. It remains unproven whether UV‐induced morphological changes have a protective function involving shading and decreased leaf penetration of UV‐B, counterbalancing trade‐offs such as decreased photosynthetic light capture and plant‐competitive abilities. Future research will need to disentangle seemingly contradictory interactions occurring at the threshold UV dose where regulation and stress‐induced morphogenesis overlap.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pce.12374
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674204020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1674204020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4784-3dd9b05f8d2b577c958d995dd880d3d06fad7ecf3b02b059f7200ef9d7bfba623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1KAzEQx4Motn4cfAFd8KKH1Umy22yOWvwCQVHrNWQ3SU3ZbtZki_TmI_iMPomprR4E5xIYfvNj5h-E9jCc4FinbaVPMKEsW0N9TAd5SiGDddQHnEHKGMc9tBXCBCA2GN9EPZIVHBimfTR80J_vH7bptG-97mwzTtpaNl0ydb59cbUb20rWidehdU3QIelcMnqOI-eJl8rKzrpmB20YWQe9u3q30ejy4ml4nd7eXd0Mz27TKmNFllKleAm5KRQpc8YqnheK81ypogBFFQyMVExXhpZAIscNIwDacMVKU8oBodvoaOltvXud6dCJqQ2VruO-2s2CwAOWkXg5gYge_kEnbuabuN2CoiQHni2Ex0uq8i4Er41ovZ1KPxcYxCJZEZMV38lGdn9lnJVTrX7JnygjcLoE3myt5_-bxP3w4kd5sJww0gk59jaI0SMBnMd_KljOgX4BY7aMoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1673250942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW ; KLEM, KAREL ; URBAN, OTMAR ; JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</creator><creatorcontrib>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW ; KLEM, KAREL ; URBAN, OTMAR ; JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</creatorcontrib><description>There is a need to reappraise the effects of UV‐B radiation on plant morphology in light of improved mechanistic understanding of UV‐B effects, particularly elucidation of the UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor. We review responses at cell and organismal levels, and explore their underlying regulatory mechanisms, function in UV protection and consequences for plant fitness. UV‐induced morphological changes include thicker leaves, shorter petioles, shorter stems, increased axillary branching and altered root:shoot ratios. At the cellular level, UV‐B morphogenesis comprises changes in cell division, elongation and/or differentiation. However, notwithstanding substantial new knowledge of molecular, cellular and organismal UV‐B responses, there remains a clear gap in our understanding of the interactions between these organizational levels, and how they control plant architecture. Furthermore, despite a broad consensus that UV‐B induces relatively compact architecture, we note substantial diversity in reported phenotypes. This may relate to UV‐induced morphological changes being underpinned by different mechanisms at high and low UV‐B doses. It remains unproven whether UV‐induced morphological changes have a protective function involving shading and decreased leaf penetration of UV‐B, counterbalancing trade‐offs such as decreased photosynthetic light capture and plant‐competitive abilities. Future research will need to disentangle seemingly contradictory interactions occurring at the threshold UV dose where regulation and stress‐induced morphogenesis overlap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-7791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pce.12374</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24890713</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLCEDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Scientific Publications</publisher><subject>auxin homeostasis ; branching ; canopy structure and light interception ; cell division ; chronic/acute stress ; flavonoid accumulation ; Flavonoids - metabolism ; loci ; morphogenesis ; Morphogenesis - radiation effects ; petioles ; Phenotype ; photoreceptors ; plant architecture ; Plants - radiation effects ; plant–plant interactions ; root shoot ratio ; shade ; stems ; stress‐induced morphogenic responses (SIMR) ; ultraviolet radiation ; Ultraviolet Rays ; UVR8 photoreceptor ; whole‐plant phenotype</subject><ispartof>Plant, cell and environment, 2015-05, Vol.38 (5), p.856-866</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4784-3dd9b05f8d2b577c958d995dd880d3d06fad7ecf3b02b059f7200ef9d7bfba623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4784-3dd9b05f8d2b577c958d995dd880d3d06fad7ecf3b02b059f7200ef9d7bfba623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8631-796X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpce.12374$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpce.12374$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,27931,27932,45581,45582,46416,46840</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24890713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLEM, KAREL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>URBAN, OTMAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</creatorcontrib><title>Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation</title><title>Plant, cell and environment</title><addtitle>Plant Cell Environ</addtitle><description>There is a need to reappraise the effects of UV‐B radiation on plant morphology in light of improved mechanistic understanding of UV‐B effects, particularly elucidation of the UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor. We review responses at cell and organismal levels, and explore their underlying regulatory mechanisms, function in UV protection and consequences for plant fitness. UV‐induced morphological changes include thicker leaves, shorter petioles, shorter stems, increased axillary branching and altered root:shoot ratios. At the cellular level, UV‐B morphogenesis comprises changes in cell division, elongation and/or differentiation. However, notwithstanding substantial new knowledge of molecular, cellular and organismal UV‐B responses, there remains a clear gap in our understanding of the interactions between these organizational levels, and how they control plant architecture. Furthermore, despite a broad consensus that UV‐B induces relatively compact architecture, we note substantial diversity in reported phenotypes. This may relate to UV‐induced morphological changes being underpinned by different mechanisms at high and low UV‐B doses. It remains unproven whether UV‐induced morphological changes have a protective function involving shading and decreased leaf penetration of UV‐B, counterbalancing trade‐offs such as decreased photosynthetic light capture and plant‐competitive abilities. Future research will need to disentangle seemingly contradictory interactions occurring at the threshold UV dose where regulation and stress‐induced morphogenesis overlap.</description><subject>auxin homeostasis</subject><subject>branching</subject><subject>canopy structure and light interception</subject><subject>cell division</subject><subject>chronic/acute stress</subject><subject>flavonoid accumulation</subject><subject>Flavonoids - metabolism</subject><subject>loci</subject><subject>morphogenesis</subject><subject>Morphogenesis - radiation effects</subject><subject>petioles</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>photoreceptors</subject><subject>plant architecture</subject><subject>Plants - radiation effects</subject><subject>plant–plant interactions</subject><subject>root shoot ratio</subject><subject>shade</subject><subject>stems</subject><subject>stress‐induced morphogenic responses (SIMR)</subject><subject>ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>UVR8 photoreceptor</subject><subject>whole‐plant phenotype</subject><issn>0140-7791</issn><issn>1365-3040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1KAzEQx4Motn4cfAFd8KKH1Umy22yOWvwCQVHrNWQ3SU3ZbtZki_TmI_iMPomprR4E5xIYfvNj5h-E9jCc4FinbaVPMKEsW0N9TAd5SiGDddQHnEHKGMc9tBXCBCA2GN9EPZIVHBimfTR80J_vH7bptG-97mwzTtpaNl0ydb59cbUb20rWidehdU3QIelcMnqOI-eJl8rKzrpmB20YWQe9u3q30ejy4ml4nd7eXd0Mz27TKmNFllKleAm5KRQpc8YqnheK81ypogBFFQyMVExXhpZAIscNIwDacMVKU8oBodvoaOltvXud6dCJqQ2VruO-2s2CwAOWkXg5gYge_kEnbuabuN2CoiQHni2Ex0uq8i4Er41ovZ1KPxcYxCJZEZMV38lGdn9lnJVTrX7JnygjcLoE3myt5_-bxP3w4kd5sJww0gk59jaI0SMBnMd_KljOgX4BY7aMoA</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW</creator><creator>KLEM, KAREL</creator><creator>URBAN, OTMAR</creator><creator>JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</creator><general>Blackwell Scientific Publications</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-796X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation</title><author>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW ; KLEM, KAREL ; URBAN, OTMAR ; JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4784-3dd9b05f8d2b577c958d995dd880d3d06fad7ecf3b02b059f7200ef9d7bfba623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>auxin homeostasis</topic><topic>branching</topic><topic>canopy structure and light interception</topic><topic>cell division</topic><topic>chronic/acute stress</topic><topic>flavonoid accumulation</topic><topic>Flavonoids - metabolism</topic><topic>loci</topic><topic>morphogenesis</topic><topic>Morphogenesis - radiation effects</topic><topic>petioles</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>photoreceptors</topic><topic>plant architecture</topic><topic>Plants - radiation effects</topic><topic>plant–plant interactions</topic><topic>root shoot ratio</topic><topic>shade</topic><topic>stems</topic><topic>stress‐induced morphogenic responses (SIMR)</topic><topic>ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>UVR8 photoreceptor</topic><topic>whole‐plant phenotype</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLEM, KAREL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>URBAN, OTMAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant, cell and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROBSON, T. MATTHEW</au><au>KLEM, KAREL</au><au>URBAN, OTMAR</au><au>JANSEN, MARCEL A. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation</atitle><jtitle>Plant, cell and environment</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Cell Environ</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>856</spage><epage>866</epage><pages>856-866</pages><issn>0140-7791</issn><eissn>1365-3040</eissn><coden>PLCEDV</coden><abstract>There is a need to reappraise the effects of UV‐B radiation on plant morphology in light of improved mechanistic understanding of UV‐B effects, particularly elucidation of the UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor. We review responses at cell and organismal levels, and explore their underlying regulatory mechanisms, function in UV protection and consequences for plant fitness. UV‐induced morphological changes include thicker leaves, shorter petioles, shorter stems, increased axillary branching and altered root:shoot ratios. At the cellular level, UV‐B morphogenesis comprises changes in cell division, elongation and/or differentiation. However, notwithstanding substantial new knowledge of molecular, cellular and organismal UV‐B responses, there remains a clear gap in our understanding of the interactions between these organizational levels, and how they control plant architecture. Furthermore, despite a broad consensus that UV‐B induces relatively compact architecture, we note substantial diversity in reported phenotypes. This may relate to UV‐induced morphological changes being underpinned by different mechanisms at high and low UV‐B doses. It remains unproven whether UV‐induced morphological changes have a protective function involving shading and decreased leaf penetration of UV‐B, counterbalancing trade‐offs such as decreased photosynthetic light capture and plant‐competitive abilities. Future research will need to disentangle seemingly contradictory interactions occurring at the threshold UV dose where regulation and stress‐induced morphogenesis overlap.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Scientific Publications</pub><pmid>24890713</pmid><doi>10.1111/pce.12374</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-796X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-7791
ispartof Plant, cell and environment, 2015-05, Vol.38 (5), p.856-866
issn 0140-7791
1365-3040
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674204020
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects auxin homeostasis
branching
canopy structure and light interception
cell division
chronic/acute stress
flavonoid accumulation
Flavonoids - metabolism
loci
morphogenesis
Morphogenesis - radiation effects
petioles
Phenotype
photoreceptors
plant architecture
Plants - radiation effects
plant–plant interactions
root shoot ratio
shade
stems
stress‐induced morphogenic responses (SIMR)
ultraviolet radiation
Ultraviolet Rays
UVR8 photoreceptor
whole‐plant phenotype
title Re‐interpreting plant morphological responses to UV‐B radiation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T00%3A25%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re%E2%80%90interpreting%20plant%20morphological%20responses%20to%20UV%E2%80%90B%20radiation&rft.jtitle=Plant,%20cell%20and%20environment&rft.au=ROBSON,%20T.%20MATTHEW&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=856&rft.epage=866&rft.pages=856-866&rft.issn=0140-7791&rft.eissn=1365-3040&rft.coden=PLCEDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pce.12374&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1674204020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1673250942&rft_id=info:pmid/24890713&rfr_iscdi=true