Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis

Background: A known side effect of labour epidural analgesia (EDA) is maternal fever. It is unclear whether this has effects on the anti-infectious management of the neonate. Methods: A systematic literature search and a hand search of abstract publications were conducted. Studies reporting sepsis e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of perinatal medicine 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.625-630
Hauptverfasser: Heesen, Michael, Klöhr, Sven, Rossaint, Rolf, Straube, Sebastian, Van de Velde, Marc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 630
container_issue 6
container_start_page 625
container_title Journal of perinatal medicine
container_volume 40
creator Heesen, Michael
Klöhr, Sven
Rossaint, Rolf
Straube, Sebastian
Van de Velde, Marc
description Background: A known side effect of labour epidural analgesia (EDA) is maternal fever. It is unclear whether this has effects on the anti-infectious management of the neonate. Methods: A systematic literature search and a hand search of abstract publications were conducted. Studies reporting sepsis evaluation or antibiotic treatment were further assessed. For meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effects model. Results: Five relevant articles reporting on 4667 parturients were identified; three were observational studies and two were randomised controlled trials (RCT). The RR for sepsis workup of all studies analysed together was 2.58 (95% CI, 1.06–6.27, P=0.04). The RR for antibiotic treatment of the neonate was 2.76 (95% CI, 1.20–6.31, P=0.02). When considering the RCTs alone, the RRs for sepsis evaluation and antimicrobial treatment were still significantly elevated. Discussion: Our data suggest that EDA-related maternal hyperthermia results in an increased likelihood of sepsis workup and antibiotic treatment of the infant. A crucial question is whether EDA-related maternal hyperthermia is truly infectious. If not, administration of antibiotics would not be justified and may be dangerous.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/jpm-2012-0064
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674202627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1674202627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f17c12eeaf2279851debf6d758553c4a713ba78f460c4dc6b170addf6a8ea25f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEuLFDEQgIMo7uzq0av0RfASrSSdpNubDOoqgyKsInsJ1enKmrUfY5IG99_bw4zroaiC-urBx9gzAa-EFvr17X7kEoTkAKZ-wDbCiJartrUP2QYUANfa2jN2nvMtgNBay8fsTCpoFTSwYT922M1Lqmgf-yXhUOGEww3liGvVr1Eij1MgX-K85Gpc2zc00lSqOVTlJ1UTzRMWelNhNVJBfpi_yzE_YY8CDpmenvIF-_b-3dX2ku--fPi4fbvjvgYoPAjrhSTCIKVtGy166oLprW60Vr5GK1SHtgm1AV_33nTCAvZ9MNgQSh3UBXt53LtP8--FcnFjzJ6GAdfPluyEsbUEaaRdUX5EfZpzThTcPsUR050T4A4y3SrTHWS6g8yVf35avXQj9ff0P3sr8OIEYPY4hISTj_k_Z0wtjtzpcMyF_tz3Mf1yxiqr3der2rXbz9fNd_vJXau_8vmMkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674202627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Heesen, Michael ; Klöhr, Sven ; Rossaint, Rolf ; Straube, Sebastian ; Van de Velde, Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Heesen, Michael ; Klöhr, Sven ; Rossaint, Rolf ; Straube, Sebastian ; Van de Velde, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>Background: A known side effect of labour epidural analgesia (EDA) is maternal fever. It is unclear whether this has effects on the anti-infectious management of the neonate. Methods: A systematic literature search and a hand search of abstract publications were conducted. Studies reporting sepsis evaluation or antibiotic treatment were further assessed. For meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effects model. Results: Five relevant articles reporting on 4667 parturients were identified; three were observational studies and two were randomised controlled trials (RCT). The RR for sepsis workup of all studies analysed together was 2.58 (95% CI, 1.06–6.27, P=0.04). The RR for antibiotic treatment of the neonate was 2.76 (95% CI, 1.20–6.31, P=0.02). When considering the RCTs alone, the RRs for sepsis evaluation and antimicrobial treatment were still significantly elevated. Discussion: Our data suggest that EDA-related maternal hyperthermia results in an increased likelihood of sepsis workup and antibiotic treatment of the infant. A crucial question is whether EDA-related maternal hyperthermia is truly infectious. If not, administration of antibiotics would not be justified and may be dangerous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-3997</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0064</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23093080</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPEMAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Walter de Gruyter</publisher><subject>Analgesia, Epidural ; Analgesia, Obstetrical ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Antibiotics ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial sepsis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; epidural anesthesia ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infectious diseases ; Labor, Obstetric ; labour analgesia ; Medical sciences ; neonatal sepsis ; obstetrics</subject><ispartof>Journal of perinatal medicine, 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.625-630</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f17c12eeaf2279851debf6d758553c4a713ba78f460c4dc6b170addf6a8ea25f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26641080$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23093080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heesen, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klöhr, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossaint, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straube, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Velde, Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of perinatal medicine</title><addtitle>J Perinat Med</addtitle><description>Background: A known side effect of labour epidural analgesia (EDA) is maternal fever. It is unclear whether this has effects on the anti-infectious management of the neonate. Methods: A systematic literature search and a hand search of abstract publications were conducted. Studies reporting sepsis evaluation or antibiotic treatment were further assessed. For meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effects model. Results: Five relevant articles reporting on 4667 parturients were identified; three were observational studies and two were randomised controlled trials (RCT). The RR for sepsis workup of all studies analysed together was 2.58 (95% CI, 1.06–6.27, P=0.04). The RR for antibiotic treatment of the neonate was 2.76 (95% CI, 1.20–6.31, P=0.02). When considering the RCTs alone, the RRs for sepsis evaluation and antimicrobial treatment were still significantly elevated. Discussion: Our data suggest that EDA-related maternal hyperthermia results in an increased likelihood of sepsis workup and antibiotic treatment of the infant. A crucial question is whether EDA-related maternal hyperthermia is truly infectious. If not, administration of antibiotics would not be justified and may be dangerous.</description><subject>Analgesia, Epidural</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial sepsis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>epidural anesthesia</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric</subject><subject>labour analgesia</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>neonatal sepsis</subject><subject>obstetrics</subject><issn>0300-5577</issn><issn>1619-3997</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEuLFDEQgIMo7uzq0av0RfASrSSdpNubDOoqgyKsInsJ1enKmrUfY5IG99_bw4zroaiC-urBx9gzAa-EFvr17X7kEoTkAKZ-wDbCiJartrUP2QYUANfa2jN2nvMtgNBay8fsTCpoFTSwYT922M1Lqmgf-yXhUOGEww3liGvVr1Eij1MgX-K85Gpc2zc00lSqOVTlJ1UTzRMWelNhNVJBfpi_yzE_YY8CDpmenvIF-_b-3dX2ku--fPi4fbvjvgYoPAjrhSTCIKVtGy166oLprW60Vr5GK1SHtgm1AV_33nTCAvZ9MNgQSh3UBXt53LtP8--FcnFjzJ6GAdfPluyEsbUEaaRdUX5EfZpzThTcPsUR050T4A4y3SrTHWS6g8yVf35avXQj9ff0P3sr8OIEYPY4hISTj_k_Z0wtjtzpcMyF_tz3Mf1yxiqr3der2rXbz9fNd_vJXau_8vmMkA</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Heesen, Michael</creator><creator>Klöhr, Sven</creator><creator>Rossaint, Rolf</creator><creator>Straube, Sebastian</creator><creator>Van de Velde, Marc</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter</general><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis</title><author>Heesen, Michael ; Klöhr, Sven ; Rossaint, Rolf ; Straube, Sebastian ; Van de Velde, Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f17c12eeaf2279851debf6d758553c4a713ba78f460c4dc6b170addf6a8ea25f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analgesia, Epidural</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial sepsis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>epidural anesthesia</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric</topic><topic>labour analgesia</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>neonatal sepsis</topic><topic>obstetrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heesen, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klöhr, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossaint, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straube, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Velde, Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of perinatal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heesen, Michael</au><au>Klöhr, Sven</au><au>Rossaint, Rolf</au><au>Straube, Sebastian</au><au>Van de Velde, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of perinatal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Perinat Med</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>630</epage><pages>625-630</pages><issn>0300-5577</issn><eissn>1619-3997</eissn><coden>JPEMAO</coden><abstract>Background: A known side effect of labour epidural analgesia (EDA) is maternal fever. It is unclear whether this has effects on the anti-infectious management of the neonate. Methods: A systematic literature search and a hand search of abstract publications were conducted. Studies reporting sepsis evaluation or antibiotic treatment were further assessed. For meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effects model. Results: Five relevant articles reporting on 4667 parturients were identified; three were observational studies and two were randomised controlled trials (RCT). The RR for sepsis workup of all studies analysed together was 2.58 (95% CI, 1.06–6.27, P=0.04). The RR for antibiotic treatment of the neonate was 2.76 (95% CI, 1.20–6.31, P=0.02). When considering the RCTs alone, the RRs for sepsis evaluation and antimicrobial treatment were still significantly elevated. Discussion: Our data suggest that EDA-related maternal hyperthermia results in an increased likelihood of sepsis workup and antibiotic treatment of the infant. A crucial question is whether EDA-related maternal hyperthermia is truly infectious. If not, administration of antibiotics would not be justified and may be dangerous.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Walter de Gruyter</pub><pmid>23093080</pmid><doi>10.1515/jpm-2012-0064</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5577
ispartof Journal of perinatal medicine, 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.625-630
issn 0300-5577
1619-3997
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674202627
source MEDLINE; De Gruyter journals
subjects Analgesia, Epidural
Analgesia, Obstetrical
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Antibiotics
Bacterial diseases
Bacterial sepsis
Biological and medical sciences
Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation
epidural anesthesia
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infectious diseases
Labor, Obstetric
labour analgesia
Medical sciences
neonatal sepsis
obstetrics
title Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A27%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Labour%20epidural%20analgesia%20and%20anti-infectious%20management%20of%20the%20neonate:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20perinatal%20medicine&rft.au=Heesen,%20Michael&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=630&rft.pages=625-630&rft.issn=0300-5577&rft.eissn=1619-3997&rft.coden=JPEMAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/jpm-2012-0064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1674202627%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674202627&rft_id=info:pmid/23093080&rfr_iscdi=true