Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis
Background: A known side effect of labour epidural analgesia (EDA) is maternal fever. It is unclear whether this has effects on the anti-infectious management of the neonate. Methods: A systematic literature search and a hand search of abstract publications were conducted. Studies reporting sepsis e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of perinatal medicine 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.625-630 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 630 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 625 |
container_title | Journal of perinatal medicine |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Heesen, Michael Klöhr, Sven Rossaint, Rolf Straube, Sebastian Van de Velde, Marc |
description | Background: A known side effect of labour epidural analgesia (EDA) is maternal fever. It is unclear whether this has effects on the anti-infectious management of the neonate. Methods: A systematic literature search and a hand search of abstract publications were conducted. Studies reporting sepsis evaluation or antibiotic treatment were further assessed. For meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effects model. Results: Five relevant articles reporting on 4667 parturients were identified; three were observational studies and two were randomised controlled trials (RCT). The RR for sepsis workup of all studies analysed together was 2.58 (95% CI, 1.06–6.27, P=0.04). The RR for antibiotic treatment of the neonate was 2.76 (95% CI, 1.20–6.31, P=0.02). When considering the RCTs alone, the RRs for sepsis evaluation and antimicrobial treatment were still significantly elevated. Discussion: Our data suggest that EDA-related maternal hyperthermia results in an increased likelihood of sepsis workup and antibiotic treatment of the infant. A crucial question is whether EDA-related maternal hyperthermia is truly infectious. If not, administration of antibiotics would not be justified and may be dangerous. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/jpm-2012-0064 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674202627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1674202627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f17c12eeaf2279851debf6d758553c4a713ba78f460c4dc6b170addf6a8ea25f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEuLFDEQgIMo7uzq0av0RfASrSSdpNubDOoqgyKsInsJ1enKmrUfY5IG99_bw4zroaiC-urBx9gzAa-EFvr17X7kEoTkAKZ-wDbCiJartrUP2QYUANfa2jN2nvMtgNBay8fsTCpoFTSwYT922M1Lqmgf-yXhUOGEww3liGvVr1Eij1MgX-K85Gpc2zc00lSqOVTlJ1UTzRMWelNhNVJBfpi_yzE_YY8CDpmenvIF-_b-3dX2ku--fPi4fbvjvgYoPAjrhSTCIKVtGy166oLprW60Vr5GK1SHtgm1AV_33nTCAvZ9MNgQSh3UBXt53LtP8--FcnFjzJ6GAdfPluyEsbUEaaRdUX5EfZpzThTcPsUR050T4A4y3SrTHWS6g8yVf35avXQj9ff0P3sr8OIEYPY4hISTj_k_Z0wtjtzpcMyF_tz3Mf1yxiqr3der2rXbz9fNd_vJXau_8vmMkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674202627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Heesen, Michael ; Klöhr, Sven ; Rossaint, Rolf ; Straube, Sebastian ; Van de Velde, Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Heesen, Michael ; Klöhr, Sven ; Rossaint, Rolf ; Straube, Sebastian ; Van de Velde, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>Background: A known side effect of labour epidural analgesia (EDA) is maternal fever. It is unclear whether this has effects on the anti-infectious management of the neonate. Methods: A systematic literature search and a hand search of abstract publications were conducted. Studies reporting sepsis evaluation or antibiotic treatment were further assessed. For meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effects model. Results: Five relevant articles reporting on 4667 parturients were identified; three were observational studies and two were randomised controlled trials (RCT). The RR for sepsis workup of all studies analysed together was 2.58 (95% CI, 1.06–6.27, P=0.04). The RR for antibiotic treatment of the neonate was 2.76 (95% CI, 1.20–6.31, P=0.02). When considering the RCTs alone, the RRs for sepsis evaluation and antimicrobial treatment were still significantly elevated. Discussion: Our data suggest that EDA-related maternal hyperthermia results in an increased likelihood of sepsis workup and antibiotic treatment of the infant. A crucial question is whether EDA-related maternal hyperthermia is truly infectious. If not, administration of antibiotics would not be justified and may be dangerous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-3997</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0064</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23093080</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPEMAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Walter de Gruyter</publisher><subject>Analgesia, Epidural ; Analgesia, Obstetrical ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Antibiotics ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial sepsis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; epidural anesthesia ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infectious diseases ; Labor, Obstetric ; labour analgesia ; Medical sciences ; neonatal sepsis ; obstetrics</subject><ispartof>Journal of perinatal medicine, 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.625-630</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f17c12eeaf2279851debf6d758553c4a713ba78f460c4dc6b170addf6a8ea25f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26641080$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23093080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heesen, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klöhr, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossaint, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straube, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Velde, Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of perinatal medicine</title><addtitle>J Perinat Med</addtitle><description>Background: A known side effect of labour epidural analgesia (EDA) is maternal fever. It is unclear whether this has effects on the anti-infectious management of the neonate. Methods: A systematic literature search and a hand search of abstract publications were conducted. Studies reporting sepsis evaluation or antibiotic treatment were further assessed. For meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effects model. Results: Five relevant articles reporting on 4667 parturients were identified; three were observational studies and two were randomised controlled trials (RCT). The RR for sepsis workup of all studies analysed together was 2.58 (95% CI, 1.06–6.27, P=0.04). The RR for antibiotic treatment of the neonate was 2.76 (95% CI, 1.20–6.31, P=0.02). When considering the RCTs alone, the RRs for sepsis evaluation and antimicrobial treatment were still significantly elevated. Discussion: Our data suggest that EDA-related maternal hyperthermia results in an increased likelihood of sepsis workup and antibiotic treatment of the infant. A crucial question is whether EDA-related maternal hyperthermia is truly infectious. If not, administration of antibiotics would not be justified and may be dangerous.</description><subject>Analgesia, Epidural</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial sepsis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>epidural anesthesia</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric</subject><subject>labour analgesia</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>neonatal sepsis</subject><subject>obstetrics</subject><issn>0300-5577</issn><issn>1619-3997</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEuLFDEQgIMo7uzq0av0RfASrSSdpNubDOoqgyKsInsJ1enKmrUfY5IG99_bw4zroaiC-urBx9gzAa-EFvr17X7kEoTkAKZ-wDbCiJartrUP2QYUANfa2jN2nvMtgNBay8fsTCpoFTSwYT922M1Lqmgf-yXhUOGEww3liGvVr1Eij1MgX-K85Gpc2zc00lSqOVTlJ1UTzRMWelNhNVJBfpi_yzE_YY8CDpmenvIF-_b-3dX2ku--fPi4fbvjvgYoPAjrhSTCIKVtGy166oLprW60Vr5GK1SHtgm1AV_33nTCAvZ9MNgQSh3UBXt53LtP8--FcnFjzJ6GAdfPluyEsbUEaaRdUX5EfZpzThTcPsUR050T4A4y3SrTHWS6g8yVf35avXQj9ff0P3sr8OIEYPY4hISTj_k_Z0wtjtzpcMyF_tz3Mf1yxiqr3der2rXbz9fNd_vJXau_8vmMkA</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Heesen, Michael</creator><creator>Klöhr, Sven</creator><creator>Rossaint, Rolf</creator><creator>Straube, Sebastian</creator><creator>Van de Velde, Marc</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter</general><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis</title><author>Heesen, Michael ; Klöhr, Sven ; Rossaint, Rolf ; Straube, Sebastian ; Van de Velde, Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f17c12eeaf2279851debf6d758553c4a713ba78f460c4dc6b170addf6a8ea25f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analgesia, Epidural</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial sepsis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>epidural anesthesia</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric</topic><topic>labour analgesia</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>neonatal sepsis</topic><topic>obstetrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heesen, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klöhr, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossaint, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straube, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Velde, Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of perinatal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heesen, Michael</au><au>Klöhr, Sven</au><au>Rossaint, Rolf</au><au>Straube, Sebastian</au><au>Van de Velde, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of perinatal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Perinat Med</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>630</epage><pages>625-630</pages><issn>0300-5577</issn><eissn>1619-3997</eissn><coden>JPEMAO</coden><abstract>Background: A known side effect of labour epidural analgesia (EDA) is maternal fever. It is unclear whether this has effects on the anti-infectious management of the neonate. Methods: A systematic literature search and a hand search of abstract publications were conducted. Studies reporting sepsis evaluation or antibiotic treatment were further assessed. For meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effects model. Results: Five relevant articles reporting on 4667 parturients were identified; three were observational studies and two were randomised controlled trials (RCT). The RR for sepsis workup of all studies analysed together was 2.58 (95% CI, 1.06–6.27, P=0.04). The RR for antibiotic treatment of the neonate was 2.76 (95% CI, 1.20–6.31, P=0.02). When considering the RCTs alone, the RRs for sepsis evaluation and antimicrobial treatment were still significantly elevated. Discussion: Our data suggest that EDA-related maternal hyperthermia results in an increased likelihood of sepsis workup and antibiotic treatment of the infant. A crucial question is whether EDA-related maternal hyperthermia is truly infectious. If not, administration of antibiotics would not be justified and may be dangerous.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Walter de Gruyter</pub><pmid>23093080</pmid><doi>10.1515/jpm-2012-0064</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-5577 |
ispartof | Journal of perinatal medicine, 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.625-630 |
issn | 0300-5577 1619-3997 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1674202627 |
source | MEDLINE; De Gruyter journals |
subjects | Analgesia, Epidural Analgesia, Obstetrical Anti-Bacterial Agents Antibiotics Bacterial diseases Bacterial sepsis Biological and medical sciences Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation epidural anesthesia Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Human bacterial diseases Humans Infant, Newborn Infectious diseases Labor, Obstetric labour analgesia Medical sciences neonatal sepsis obstetrics |
title | Labour epidural analgesia and anti-infectious management of the neonate: a meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A27%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Labour%20epidural%20analgesia%20and%20anti-infectious%20management%20of%20the%20neonate:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20perinatal%20medicine&rft.au=Heesen,%20Michael&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=630&rft.pages=625-630&rft.issn=0300-5577&rft.eissn=1619-3997&rft.coden=JPEMAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/jpm-2012-0064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1674202627%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674202627&rft_id=info:pmid/23093080&rfr_iscdi=true |