Effect of Scalp Blocks with Levobupivacaine on Recovery Profiles After Craniotomy for Aneurysm Clipping: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study
Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of scalp blocks using levobupivacaine on recovery profiles including postoperative pain, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other adverse events in patients undergoing frontoparietal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2015-01, Vol.83 (1), p.108-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 108 |
container_title | World neurosurgery |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Hwang, Jin-Young Bang, Jae-Seung Oh, Chang-Wan Joo, Jin-Deok Park, Seong-Joo Do, Sang-Hwan Yoo, Yong-Jae Ryu, Jung-Hee |
description | Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of scalp blocks using levobupivacaine on recovery profiles including postoperative pain, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other adverse events in patients undergoing frontoparietal craniotomy for aneurysm clipping. Methods Fifty-two patients scheduled for elective frontoparietal craniotomy for unruptured aneurysm clipping were enrolled. After surgery, scalp blocks were performed using normal saline (group C, n = 26) or 0.75% levobupivacaine (group L, n = 26). Postoperative pain scores and PCA consumption were recorded for 72 hours after recovery of consciousness. The time from patient recovery to the first use of PCA drug and rescue analgesics, the requirement for vasoactive agents, and adverse effects related to PCA and local anesthetics also were recorded. Results Postoperative pain scores and PCA consumption in group L were lower than in group C ( P < .05). The time intervals from patient recovery to the first use of PCA drug ( P < .001) and rescue analgesics ( P = .038) was longer in group L than in group C. Additionally, less antihypertensive agent was required ( P = .017), and PONV occurred less frequently ( P = .039) in group L than in group C. Conclusions Scalp blocks with 0.75% levobupivacaine improved recovery profiles in that it effectively lowered postoperative pain and PCA consumption without severe adverse events and also reduced the requirement for a postoperative antihypertensive agent and the incidence of PONV in patients who underwent frontoparietal craniotomy for aneurysm clipping. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.05.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1673790558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875013006979</els_id><sourcerecordid>1673790558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-721c3eaed509d43957f3c8b0aa3246afd42db0299f0b6199e1ad08c92831fa633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXpC7BAXrIgUzvOnxFCmoYWkEYCdWBtOfY1eOrYqZ1MFd6Et8WjKV2wwBvb8jlH1_e7WfaS4BXBpL7Yre4dzKsCE7rC1Qpj9iQ7JW3T5m1Ts6eP5wqfZOcx7nBalJRtQ59nJwVtSloQdpr9vtIa5IS8Rlsp7IgurZe3Ed2b6SfawN7382j2QgrjAHmHbkD6PYQFfQ1eGwsRrfUEAXVBOOMnPyxI-4DWqbawxAF11oyjcT_eojW6EU75wfwC9QZ98HNvIb-0xqVbekCdd1Pw1oJC22lWy4vsmRY2wvnDfpZ9v7761n3KN18-fu7Wm1yWLZnypiCSggBVYaZKyqpGU9n2WAhalLXQqixUjwvGNO5rwhgQoXArWdFSokVN6Vn2-pg7Bn83Q5z4YKIEa4UDP0dO6oY2DFdVm6TFUSqDjzGA5mMwgwgLJ5gfqPAdP1DhByocVzxRSaZXD_lzP4B6tPxlkATvjgJIv9wbCDxKA06CMiGh4cqb_-e__8cuU1NNgnkLC8Sdn4NL_eOEx4Jjvj3MxWEsCMW4Zg2jfwAkP7Rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1673790558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Scalp Blocks with Levobupivacaine on Recovery Profiles After Craniotomy for Aneurysm Clipping: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hwang, Jin-Young ; Bang, Jae-Seung ; Oh, Chang-Wan ; Joo, Jin-Deok ; Park, Seong-Joo ; Do, Sang-Hwan ; Yoo, Yong-Jae ; Ryu, Jung-Hee</creator><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jin-Young ; Bang, Jae-Seung ; Oh, Chang-Wan ; Joo, Jin-Deok ; Park, Seong-Joo ; Do, Sang-Hwan ; Yoo, Yong-Jae ; Ryu, Jung-Hee</creatorcontrib><description>Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of scalp blocks using levobupivacaine on recovery profiles including postoperative pain, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other adverse events in patients undergoing frontoparietal craniotomy for aneurysm clipping. Methods Fifty-two patients scheduled for elective frontoparietal craniotomy for unruptured aneurysm clipping were enrolled. After surgery, scalp blocks were performed using normal saline (group C, n = 26) or 0.75% levobupivacaine (group L, n = 26). Postoperative pain scores and PCA consumption were recorded for 72 hours after recovery of consciousness. The time from patient recovery to the first use of PCA drug and rescue analgesics, the requirement for vasoactive agents, and adverse effects related to PCA and local anesthetics also were recorded. Results Postoperative pain scores and PCA consumption in group L were lower than in group C ( P < .05). The time intervals from patient recovery to the first use of PCA drug ( P < .001) and rescue analgesics ( P = .038) was longer in group L than in group C. Additionally, less antihypertensive agent was required ( P = .017), and PONV occurred less frequently ( P = .039) in group L than in group C. Conclusions Scalp blocks with 0.75% levobupivacaine improved recovery profiles in that it effectively lowered postoperative pain and PCA consumption without severe adverse events and also reduced the requirement for a postoperative antihypertensive agent and the incidence of PONV in patients who underwent frontoparietal craniotomy for aneurysm clipping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.05.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23743219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analgesia ; Anesthetics, Local ; Aneurysm ; Bupivacaine - analogs & derivatives ; Craniotomy - methods ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery ; Levobupivacaine ; Local anesthetics ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Block - methods ; Neurosurgery ; Neurosurgical Procedures - methods ; Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control ; Postoperative ; Regional blockade ; Scalp ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2015-01, Vol.83 (1), p.108-113</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-721c3eaed509d43957f3c8b0aa3246afd42db0299f0b6199e1ad08c92831fa633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-721c3eaed509d43957f3c8b0aa3246afd42db0299f0b6199e1ad08c92831fa633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.05.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23743219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jin-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Jae-Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Chang-Wan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Jin-Deok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Seong-Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, Sang-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Yong-Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Jung-Hee</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Scalp Blocks with Levobupivacaine on Recovery Profiles After Craniotomy for Aneurysm Clipping: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of scalp blocks using levobupivacaine on recovery profiles including postoperative pain, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other adverse events in patients undergoing frontoparietal craniotomy for aneurysm clipping. Methods Fifty-two patients scheduled for elective frontoparietal craniotomy for unruptured aneurysm clipping were enrolled. After surgery, scalp blocks were performed using normal saline (group C, n = 26) or 0.75% levobupivacaine (group L, n = 26). Postoperative pain scores and PCA consumption were recorded for 72 hours after recovery of consciousness. The time from patient recovery to the first use of PCA drug and rescue analgesics, the requirement for vasoactive agents, and adverse effects related to PCA and local anesthetics also were recorded. Results Postoperative pain scores and PCA consumption in group L were lower than in group C ( P < .05). The time intervals from patient recovery to the first use of PCA drug ( P < .001) and rescue analgesics ( P = .038) was longer in group L than in group C. Additionally, less antihypertensive agent was required ( P = .017), and PONV occurred less frequently ( P = .039) in group L than in group C. Conclusions Scalp blocks with 0.75% levobupivacaine improved recovery profiles in that it effectively lowered postoperative pain and PCA consumption without severe adverse events and also reduced the requirement for a postoperative antihypertensive agent and the incidence of PONV in patients who underwent frontoparietal craniotomy for aneurysm clipping.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Aneurysm</subject><subject>Bupivacaine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Craniotomy - methods</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery</subject><subject>Levobupivacaine</subject><subject>Local anesthetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</subject><subject>Postoperative</subject><subject>Regional blockade</subject><subject>Scalp</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXpC7BAXrIgUzvOnxFCmoYWkEYCdWBtOfY1eOrYqZ1MFd6Et8WjKV2wwBvb8jlH1_e7WfaS4BXBpL7Yre4dzKsCE7rC1Qpj9iQ7JW3T5m1Ts6eP5wqfZOcx7nBalJRtQ59nJwVtSloQdpr9vtIa5IS8Rlsp7IgurZe3Ed2b6SfawN7382j2QgrjAHmHbkD6PYQFfQ1eGwsRrfUEAXVBOOMnPyxI-4DWqbawxAF11oyjcT_eojW6EU75wfwC9QZ98HNvIb-0xqVbekCdd1Pw1oJC22lWy4vsmRY2wvnDfpZ9v7761n3KN18-fu7Wm1yWLZnypiCSggBVYaZKyqpGU9n2WAhalLXQqixUjwvGNO5rwhgQoXArWdFSokVN6Vn2-pg7Bn83Q5z4YKIEa4UDP0dO6oY2DFdVm6TFUSqDjzGA5mMwgwgLJ5gfqPAdP1DhByocVzxRSaZXD_lzP4B6tPxlkATvjgJIv9wbCDxKA06CMiGh4cqb_-e__8cuU1NNgnkLC8Sdn4NL_eOEx4Jjvj3MxWEsCMW4Zg2jfwAkP7Rw</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Hwang, Jin-Young</creator><creator>Bang, Jae-Seung</creator><creator>Oh, Chang-Wan</creator><creator>Joo, Jin-Deok</creator><creator>Park, Seong-Joo</creator><creator>Do, Sang-Hwan</creator><creator>Yoo, Yong-Jae</creator><creator>Ryu, Jung-Hee</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Effect of Scalp Blocks with Levobupivacaine on Recovery Profiles After Craniotomy for Aneurysm Clipping: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study</title><author>Hwang, Jin-Young ; Bang, Jae-Seung ; Oh, Chang-Wan ; Joo, Jin-Deok ; Park, Seong-Joo ; Do, Sang-Hwan ; Yoo, Yong-Jae ; Ryu, Jung-Hee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-721c3eaed509d43957f3c8b0aa3246afd42db0299f0b6199e1ad08c92831fa633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Aneurysm</topic><topic>Bupivacaine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Craniotomy - methods</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery</topic><topic>Levobupivacaine</topic><topic>Local anesthetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</topic><topic>Postoperative</topic><topic>Regional blockade</topic><topic>Scalp</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jin-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Jae-Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Chang-Wan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Jin-Deok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Seong-Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, Sang-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Yong-Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Jung-Hee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hwang, Jin-Young</au><au>Bang, Jae-Seung</au><au>Oh, Chang-Wan</au><au>Joo, Jin-Deok</au><au>Park, Seong-Joo</au><au>Do, Sang-Hwan</au><au>Yoo, Yong-Jae</au><au>Ryu, Jung-Hee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Scalp Blocks with Levobupivacaine on Recovery Profiles After Craniotomy for Aneurysm Clipping: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>108-113</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of scalp blocks using levobupivacaine on recovery profiles including postoperative pain, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other adverse events in patients undergoing frontoparietal craniotomy for aneurysm clipping. Methods Fifty-two patients scheduled for elective frontoparietal craniotomy for unruptured aneurysm clipping were enrolled. After surgery, scalp blocks were performed using normal saline (group C, n = 26) or 0.75% levobupivacaine (group L, n = 26). Postoperative pain scores and PCA consumption were recorded for 72 hours after recovery of consciousness. The time from patient recovery to the first use of PCA drug and rescue analgesics, the requirement for vasoactive agents, and adverse effects related to PCA and local anesthetics also were recorded. Results Postoperative pain scores and PCA consumption in group L were lower than in group C ( P < .05). The time intervals from patient recovery to the first use of PCA drug ( P < .001) and rescue analgesics ( P = .038) was longer in group L than in group C. Additionally, less antihypertensive agent was required ( P = .017), and PONV occurred less frequently ( P = .039) in group L than in group C. Conclusions Scalp blocks with 0.75% levobupivacaine improved recovery profiles in that it effectively lowered postoperative pain and PCA consumption without severe adverse events and also reduced the requirement for a postoperative antihypertensive agent and the incidence of PONV in patients who underwent frontoparietal craniotomy for aneurysm clipping.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23743219</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2013.05.009</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1878-8750 |
ispartof | World neurosurgery, 2015-01, Vol.83 (1), p.108-113 |
issn | 1878-8750 1878-8769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1673790558 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Aged Analgesia Anesthetics, Local Aneurysm Bupivacaine - analogs & derivatives Craniotomy - methods Double-Blind Method Female Humans Intracranial Aneurysm - surgery Levobupivacaine Local anesthetics Male Middle Aged Nerve Block - methods Neurosurgery Neurosurgical Procedures - methods Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control Postoperative Regional blockade Scalp Surgery |
title | Effect of Scalp Blocks with Levobupivacaine on Recovery Profiles After Craniotomy for Aneurysm Clipping: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T04%3A19%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Scalp%20Blocks%20with%20Levobupivacaine%20on%20Recovery%20Profiles%20After%20Craniotomy%20for%20Aneurysm%20Clipping:%20A%20Randomized,%20Double-Blind,%20and%20Controlled%20Study&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Hwang,%20Jin-Young&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=108-113&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1673790558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1673790558&rft_id=info:pmid/23743219&rft_els_id=S1878875013006979&rfr_iscdi=true |