Novel continuous passive motion device for self-treatment of chronic lower back pain: a randomised controlled study

Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a novel, angular, continuous passive motion device for self-treatment at home in patients with mild-to-moderate, non-specific, chronic low back pain (LBP). Design Prospective, randomised, waiting-list-controlled (WLC) trial. Setting Recruitment and asse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiotherapy 2015-03, Vol.101 (1), p.75-81
Hauptverfasser: Gavish, L, Barzilay, Y, Koren, C, Stern, A, Weinrauch, L, Friedman, D.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 81
container_issue 1
container_start_page 75
container_title Physiotherapy
container_volume 101
creator Gavish, L
Barzilay, Y
Koren, C
Stern, A
Weinrauch, L
Friedman, D.J
description Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a novel, angular, continuous passive motion device for self-treatment at home in patients with mild-to-moderate, non-specific, chronic low back pain (LBP). Design Prospective, randomised, waiting-list-controlled (WLC) trial. Setting Recruitment and assessment were conducted at the Koren Centre for Physical Therapy. Self-treatment was performed at home. Participants Thirty-six patients with a score ≤6 on the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients completed treatment. Interventions Participants were randomised to receive the Kyrobak (Radiancy, Hod-hasharon, Israel) at enrolment [immediate treatment (IT) group] or 3 weeks later (WLC group). Self-treatment was prescribed for 10 minutes, one to three times per day, for 3 weeks. The treatment period was followed by a 3-week follow-up period. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was self-reported pain level (NRS). Results Three weeks of self-treatment with the Kyrobak reduced pain levels significantly in the IT group compared with the WLC group {mean [standard deviation (SD)] ΔNRS score from baseline to post-treatment: IT group, 1.4 (1.5), 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 2.3; WLC group, −0.1 (2.2), 95% CI −1.1 to 1.2; effect mean difference 1.5}. This benefit was maintained over the follow-up period [from baseline to end of follow-up, mean (SD) ΔNRS score 1.1 (1.8), 95% CI 0.4 to 1.8]. Multi-linear regression analysis found that higher baseline pain resulted in greater pain reduction ( P = 0.003). Eighty-three percent of participants with a baseline NRS score >4.35 (threshold determined by logistic regression, P = 0.01) achieved the minimal important change criterion of ΔNRS score ≥2. Daily NRS score reduced gradually over the treatment period [regression slope −0.052 (0.01), 95% CI −0.07 to −0.03]. Conclusions Preliminary evidence suggests that the Kyrobak may be beneficial for short-term relief of non-specific, chronic LBP, particularly in participants with a moderate level of pain. A longer treatment period may lead to a further reduction in pain.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.physio.2014.06.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1673383227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0031940614000741</els_id><sourcerecordid>1673383227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-77e5b2098db9da21a66ad87886bcc5a76d322043ab0d33c8ec65cb637bec0d503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk-PFCEQxYnRuOPqNzCGo5duC-iGHg8mZuO_ZKMH9UxoqM4yS8MI3bOZby_jrB686AlC3ntV1K8Iec6gZcDkq127vzkWn1oOrGtBtgDiAdmwQYmGdbJ_SDb1hTXbDuQFeVLKDoD3TLHH5IL3fAAJYkPK53TAQG2Ki49rWgvdm1L8AemcFp8idXjwFumUMi0YpmbJaJYZ40LTRO1NTtFbGtIdZjoae1vtPr6mhmYTXZp9QfcrPKcQ6rUsqzs-JY8mEwo-uz8vyff3775dfWyuv3z4dPX2urE9h6VRCvuRw3Zw49YZzoyUxg1qGORobW-UdIJz6IQZwQlhB7Syt6MUakQLrgdxSV6ec_c5_VixLLr2YzEEE7H-VDOphBhqiPoPac87xqUaqrQ7S21OpWSc9D772eSjZqBPZPROn8noExkNUlcO1fbivsI6zuj-mH6jqII3ZwHWkRw8Zl2sx2jR-Yx20S75f1X4O8AGX-mYcItHLLu05ljHrZkuXIP-etqO03KwDgBUx8RPjj63tA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652412678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel continuous passive motion device for self-treatment of chronic lower back pain: a randomised controlled study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gavish, L ; Barzilay, Y ; Koren, C ; Stern, A ; Weinrauch, L ; Friedman, D.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Gavish, L ; Barzilay, Y ; Koren, C ; Stern, A ; Weinrauch, L ; Friedman, D.J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a novel, angular, continuous passive motion device for self-treatment at home in patients with mild-to-moderate, non-specific, chronic low back pain (LBP). Design Prospective, randomised, waiting-list-controlled (WLC) trial. Setting Recruitment and assessment were conducted at the Koren Centre for Physical Therapy. Self-treatment was performed at home. Participants Thirty-six patients with a score ≤6 on the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients completed treatment. Interventions Participants were randomised to receive the Kyrobak (Radiancy, Hod-hasharon, Israel) at enrolment [immediate treatment (IT) group] or 3 weeks later (WLC group). Self-treatment was prescribed for 10 minutes, one to three times per day, for 3 weeks. The treatment period was followed by a 3-week follow-up period. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was self-reported pain level (NRS). Results Three weeks of self-treatment with the Kyrobak reduced pain levels significantly in the IT group compared with the WLC group {mean [standard deviation (SD)] ΔNRS score from baseline to post-treatment: IT group, 1.4 (1.5), 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 2.3; WLC group, −0.1 (2.2), 95% CI −1.1 to 1.2; effect mean difference 1.5}. This benefit was maintained over the follow-up period [from baseline to end of follow-up, mean (SD) ΔNRS score 1.1 (1.8), 95% CI 0.4 to 1.8]. Multi-linear regression analysis found that higher baseline pain resulted in greater pain reduction ( P = 0.003). Eighty-three percent of participants with a baseline NRS score &gt;4.35 (threshold determined by logistic regression, P = 0.01) achieved the minimal important change criterion of ΔNRS score ≥2. Daily NRS score reduced gradually over the treatment period [regression slope −0.052 (0.01), 95% CI −0.07 to −0.03]. Conclusions Preliminary evidence suggests that the Kyrobak may be beneficial for short-term relief of non-specific, chronic LBP, particularly in participants with a moderate level of pain. A longer treatment period may lead to a further reduction in pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.06.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25280603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Continuous passive ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Safety ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Home care device ; Home Care Services ; Humans ; Israel ; Low back pain ; Low Back Pain - diagnosis ; Low Back Pain - rehabilitation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motion therapy ; Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive - instrumentation ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Satisfaction ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Prospective Studies ; Self Care - instrumentation ; Self-treatment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Physiotherapy, 2015-03, Vol.101 (1), p.75-81</ispartof><rights>Chartered Society of Physiotherapy</rights><rights>2014 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-77e5b2098db9da21a66ad87886bcc5a76d322043ab0d33c8ec65cb637bec0d503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-77e5b2098db9da21a66ad87886bcc5a76d322043ab0d33c8ec65cb637bec0d503</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6970-3693</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2014.06.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25280603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gavish, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barzilay, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koren, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinrauch, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, D.J</creatorcontrib><title>Novel continuous passive motion device for self-treatment of chronic lower back pain: a randomised controlled study</title><title>Physiotherapy</title><addtitle>Physiotherapy</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a novel, angular, continuous passive motion device for self-treatment at home in patients with mild-to-moderate, non-specific, chronic low back pain (LBP). Design Prospective, randomised, waiting-list-controlled (WLC) trial. Setting Recruitment and assessment were conducted at the Koren Centre for Physical Therapy. Self-treatment was performed at home. Participants Thirty-six patients with a score ≤6 on the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients completed treatment. Interventions Participants were randomised to receive the Kyrobak (Radiancy, Hod-hasharon, Israel) at enrolment [immediate treatment (IT) group] or 3 weeks later (WLC group). Self-treatment was prescribed for 10 minutes, one to three times per day, for 3 weeks. The treatment period was followed by a 3-week follow-up period. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was self-reported pain level (NRS). Results Three weeks of self-treatment with the Kyrobak reduced pain levels significantly in the IT group compared with the WLC group {mean [standard deviation (SD)] ΔNRS score from baseline to post-treatment: IT group, 1.4 (1.5), 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 2.3; WLC group, −0.1 (2.2), 95% CI −1.1 to 1.2; effect mean difference 1.5}. This benefit was maintained over the follow-up period [from baseline to end of follow-up, mean (SD) ΔNRS score 1.1 (1.8), 95% CI 0.4 to 1.8]. Multi-linear regression analysis found that higher baseline pain resulted in greater pain reduction ( P = 0.003). Eighty-three percent of participants with a baseline NRS score &gt;4.35 (threshold determined by logistic regression, P = 0.01) achieved the minimal important change criterion of ΔNRS score ≥2. Daily NRS score reduced gradually over the treatment period [regression slope −0.052 (0.01), 95% CI −0.07 to −0.03]. Conclusions Preliminary evidence suggests that the Kyrobak may be beneficial for short-term relief of non-specific, chronic LBP, particularly in participants with a moderate level of pain. A longer treatment period may lead to a further reduction in pain.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Continuous passive</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Home care device</subject><subject>Home Care Services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motion therapy</subject><subject>Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive - instrumentation</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Self Care - instrumentation</subject><subject>Self-treatment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0031-9406</issn><issn>1873-1465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk-PFCEQxYnRuOPqNzCGo5duC-iGHg8mZuO_ZKMH9UxoqM4yS8MI3bOZby_jrB686AlC3ntV1K8Iec6gZcDkq127vzkWn1oOrGtBtgDiAdmwQYmGdbJ_SDb1hTXbDuQFeVLKDoD3TLHH5IL3fAAJYkPK53TAQG2Ki49rWgvdm1L8AemcFp8idXjwFumUMi0YpmbJaJYZ40LTRO1NTtFbGtIdZjoae1vtPr6mhmYTXZp9QfcrPKcQ6rUsqzs-JY8mEwo-uz8vyff3775dfWyuv3z4dPX2urE9h6VRCvuRw3Zw49YZzoyUxg1qGORobW-UdIJz6IQZwQlhB7Syt6MUakQLrgdxSV6ec_c5_VixLLr2YzEEE7H-VDOphBhqiPoPac87xqUaqrQ7S21OpWSc9D772eSjZqBPZPROn8noExkNUlcO1fbivsI6zuj-mH6jqII3ZwHWkRw8Zl2sx2jR-Yx20S75f1X4O8AGX-mYcItHLLu05ljHrZkuXIP-etqO03KwDgBUx8RPjj63tA</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Gavish, L</creator><creator>Barzilay, Y</creator><creator>Koren, C</creator><creator>Stern, A</creator><creator>Weinrauch, L</creator><creator>Friedman, D.J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6970-3693</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Novel continuous passive motion device for self-treatment of chronic lower back pain: a randomised controlled study</title><author>Gavish, L ; Barzilay, Y ; Koren, C ; Stern, A ; Weinrauch, L ; Friedman, D.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-77e5b2098db9da21a66ad87886bcc5a76d322043ab0d33c8ec65cb637bec0d503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Continuous passive</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Home care device</topic><topic>Home Care Services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motion therapy</topic><topic>Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive - instrumentation</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Self Care - instrumentation</topic><topic>Self-treatment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gavish, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barzilay, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koren, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinrauch, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, D.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Physiotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gavish, L</au><au>Barzilay, Y</au><au>Koren, C</au><au>Stern, A</au><au>Weinrauch, L</au><au>Friedman, D.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel continuous passive motion device for self-treatment of chronic lower back pain: a randomised controlled study</atitle><jtitle>Physiotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Physiotherapy</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>75-81</pages><issn>0031-9406</issn><eissn>1873-1465</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a novel, angular, continuous passive motion device for self-treatment at home in patients with mild-to-moderate, non-specific, chronic low back pain (LBP). Design Prospective, randomised, waiting-list-controlled (WLC) trial. Setting Recruitment and assessment were conducted at the Koren Centre for Physical Therapy. Self-treatment was performed at home. Participants Thirty-six patients with a score ≤6 on the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients completed treatment. Interventions Participants were randomised to receive the Kyrobak (Radiancy, Hod-hasharon, Israel) at enrolment [immediate treatment (IT) group] or 3 weeks later (WLC group). Self-treatment was prescribed for 10 minutes, one to three times per day, for 3 weeks. The treatment period was followed by a 3-week follow-up period. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was self-reported pain level (NRS). Results Three weeks of self-treatment with the Kyrobak reduced pain levels significantly in the IT group compared with the WLC group {mean [standard deviation (SD)] ΔNRS score from baseline to post-treatment: IT group, 1.4 (1.5), 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 2.3; WLC group, −0.1 (2.2), 95% CI −1.1 to 1.2; effect mean difference 1.5}. This benefit was maintained over the follow-up period [from baseline to end of follow-up, mean (SD) ΔNRS score 1.1 (1.8), 95% CI 0.4 to 1.8]. Multi-linear regression analysis found that higher baseline pain resulted in greater pain reduction ( P = 0.003). Eighty-three percent of participants with a baseline NRS score &gt;4.35 (threshold determined by logistic regression, P = 0.01) achieved the minimal important change criterion of ΔNRS score ≥2. Daily NRS score reduced gradually over the treatment period [regression slope −0.052 (0.01), 95% CI −0.07 to −0.03]. Conclusions Preliminary evidence suggests that the Kyrobak may be beneficial for short-term relief of non-specific, chronic LBP, particularly in participants with a moderate level of pain. A longer treatment period may lead to a further reduction in pain.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25280603</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.physio.2014.06.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6970-3693</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9406
ispartof Physiotherapy, 2015-03, Vol.101 (1), p.75-81
issn 0031-9406
1873-1465
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1673383227
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Continuous passive
Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation
Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods
Equipment Design
Equipment Safety
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Home care device
Home Care Services
Humans
Israel
Low back pain
Low Back Pain - diagnosis
Low Back Pain - rehabilitation
Male
Middle Aged
Motion therapy
Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive - instrumentation
Pain Measurement
Patient Satisfaction
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Prospective Studies
Self Care - instrumentation
Self-treatment
Severity of Illness Index
Statistics, Nonparametric
Treatment Outcome
title Novel continuous passive motion device for self-treatment of chronic lower back pain: a randomised controlled study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A49%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20continuous%20passive%20motion%20device%20for%20self-treatment%20of%20chronic%20lower%20back%20pain:%20a%20randomised%20controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=Physiotherapy&rft.au=Gavish,%20L&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=75-81&rft.issn=0031-9406&rft.eissn=1873-1465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.physio.2014.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1673383227%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652412678&rft_id=info:pmid/25280603&rft_els_id=S0031940614000741&rfr_iscdi=true