The role of philosophy in global bioethics: introducing four trends
This article examines the relationship between philosophy and culture in global bioethics. First, it studies what is meant by the term "global" in global bioethics. Second, the author introduces four different types, or recognizable trends, in philosophical inquiry in bioethics today. The...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.185-194 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 194 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 185 |
| container_title | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Hellsten, Sirkku K |
| description | This article examines the relationship between philosophy and culture in global bioethics. First, it studies what is meant by the term "global" in global bioethics. Second, the author introduces four different types, or recognizable trends, in philosophical inquiry in bioethics today. The main argument is that, in order to make better sense of the complexity of the ethical questions and challenges we face today across the globe, we need to embrace the universal nature of self-critical and analytical philosophical analysis and argumentation, rather than using seemingly philosophical approaches to give unjustified normative emphasis on different cultural approaches to bioethics. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0963180114000498 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1673375539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1673375539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-ca1970afa1abdd4a358fa9703c52e932b78d2974ca5fd03799dbb870537fbb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwA1hQJBaWgK8dxzEbqnhJlRjoHvnZpErjYidD_z2uWhhgutK53zk6OghdA74HDPzhE4uSQoUBCoxxIaoTNIWiFDmBgp-i6f6d7_8TdBHjOjGEYDhHE8I4CMqKKZovG5sF39nMu2zbtJ2PftvssrbPVp1XsstU6-3QtDo-JnEI3oy67VeZ82PIhmB7Ey_RmZNdtFfHO0PLl-fl_C1ffLy-z58WuSYVDLmWIDiWToJUxhSSssrJpFDNiBWUKF4ZInihJXMGUy6EUarimFHulCrpDN0dYrfBf402DvWmjdp2neytH2MNJaeUM0ZFQm__oOtUt0_lEsUqRqjgPFFwoHTwMQbr6m1oNzLsasD1fuD638DJc3NMHtXGml_Hz6L0GyzndKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1658523977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of philosophy in global bioethics: introducing four trends</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Hellsten, Sirkku K</creator><creatorcontrib>Hellsten, Sirkku K</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the relationship between philosophy and culture in global bioethics. First, it studies what is meant by the term "global" in global bioethics. Second, the author introduces four different types, or recognizable trends, in philosophical inquiry in bioethics today. The main argument is that, in order to make better sense of the complexity of the ethical questions and challenges we face today across the globe, we need to embrace the universal nature of self-critical and analytical philosophical analysis and argumentation, rather than using seemingly philosophical approaches to give unjustified normative emphasis on different cultural approaches to bioethics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0963180114000498</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25719354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; Bioethics - trends ; Cultural Characteristics ; Cultural Diversity ; Culture ; Ethical Analysis ; Ethical Theory ; Global Health ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Internationality ; Morals ; Philosophy ; Social Values</subject><ispartof>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.185-194</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-ca1970afa1abdd4a358fa9703c52e932b78d2974ca5fd03799dbb870537fbb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27866,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25719354$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hellsten, Sirkku K</creatorcontrib><title>The role of philosophy in global bioethics: introducing four trends</title><title>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</title><addtitle>Camb Q Healthc Ethics</addtitle><description>This article examines the relationship between philosophy and culture in global bioethics. First, it studies what is meant by the term "global" in global bioethics. Second, the author introduces four different types, or recognizable trends, in philosophical inquiry in bioethics today. The main argument is that, in order to make better sense of the complexity of the ethical questions and challenges we face today across the globe, we need to embrace the universal nature of self-critical and analytical philosophical analysis and argumentation, rather than using seemingly philosophical approaches to give unjustified normative emphasis on different cultural approaches to bioethics.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Bioethics - trends</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics</subject><subject>Cultural Diversity</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Ethical Analysis</subject><subject>Ethical Theory</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><issn>0963-1801</issn><issn>1469-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwA1hQJBaWgK8dxzEbqnhJlRjoHvnZpErjYidD_z2uWhhgutK53zk6OghdA74HDPzhE4uSQoUBCoxxIaoTNIWiFDmBgp-i6f6d7_8TdBHjOjGEYDhHE8I4CMqKKZovG5sF39nMu2zbtJ2PftvssrbPVp1XsstU6-3QtDo-JnEI3oy67VeZ82PIhmB7Ey_RmZNdtFfHO0PLl-fl_C1ffLy-z58WuSYVDLmWIDiWToJUxhSSssrJpFDNiBWUKF4ZInihJXMGUy6EUarimFHulCrpDN0dYrfBf402DvWmjdp2neytH2MNJaeUM0ZFQm__oOtUt0_lEsUqRqjgPFFwoHTwMQbr6m1oNzLsasD1fuD638DJc3NMHtXGml_Hz6L0GyzndKg</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Hellsten, Sirkku K</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>The role of philosophy in global bioethics: introducing four trends</title><author>Hellsten, Sirkku K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-ca1970afa1abdd4a358fa9703c52e932b78d2974ca5fd03799dbb870537fbb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Bioethics - trends</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics</topic><topic>Cultural Diversity</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Ethical Analysis</topic><topic>Ethical Theory</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hellsten, Sirkku K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hellsten, Sirkku K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of philosophy in global bioethics: introducing four trends</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Camb Q Healthc Ethics</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>185-194</pages><issn>0963-1801</issn><eissn>1469-2147</eissn><abstract>This article examines the relationship between philosophy and culture in global bioethics. First, it studies what is meant by the term "global" in global bioethics. Second, the author introduces four different types, or recognizable trends, in philosophical inquiry in bioethics today. The main argument is that, in order to make better sense of the complexity of the ethical questions and challenges we face today across the globe, we need to embrace the universal nature of self-critical and analytical philosophical analysis and argumentation, rather than using seemingly philosophical approaches to give unjustified normative emphasis on different cultural approaches to bioethics.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>25719354</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0963180114000498</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0963-1801 |
| ispartof | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.185-194 |
| issn | 0963-1801 1469-2147 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1673375539 |
| source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Bioethics Bioethics - trends Cultural Characteristics Cultural Diversity Culture Ethical Analysis Ethical Theory Global Health Humans Interdisciplinary Communication Internationality Morals Philosophy Social Values |
| title | The role of philosophy in global bioethics: introducing four trends |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A06%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20philosophy%20in%20global%20bioethics:%20introducing%20four%20trends&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20quarterly%20of%20healthcare%20ethics&rft.au=Hellsten,%20Sirkku%20K&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=185-194&rft.issn=0963-1801&rft.eissn=1469-2147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0963180114000498&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1673375539%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1658523977&rft_id=info:pmid/25719354&rfr_iscdi=true |