Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes
Purpose (1) To survey the dissemination of SILC; (2) to determine which SILC method has become mainstream; (3) to determine whether the characteristic complications vary according to the type of procedure. Methods An electronic search of PubMed, Databases@Ovid, and SciVerse Scopus between 2003/01/01...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2015-05, Vol.45 (5), p.537-548 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 548 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 537 |
| container_title | Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Yamazaki, Masato Yasuda, Hideki Koda, Keiji |
| description | Purpose
(1) To survey the dissemination of SILC; (2) to determine which SILC method has become mainstream; (3) to determine whether the characteristic complications vary according to the type of procedure.
Methods
An electronic search of PubMed, Databases@Ovid, and SciVerse Scopus between 2003/01/01 and 2012/12/31 was performed.
Results
The peak number of annually published articles was 70 in 2011. The most common procedures were single skin incision, the use of a SILS Port
®
, suture suspension and a 5-mm oblique scope. The intraoperative complications rate was 1.69 %. Postoperative complications occurred in 213/5283 cases. According to the surgical procedure, five factors (approach;
P
= 0.0017, gallbladder anchorage;
P
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00595-014-0908-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1673372059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1673372059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-c19e3fd91beecc9930606925d19be2a30a514500cc4c82cb1343a2cd19dbdd233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhgdRbK0-gBvJ0s3omUuSjjsRb1BwoS5lmJyctilJpmYSpW_vlFaXrn4O_wXOx9i5gCsBkF8HgNSkHITmYGDK5QEbC60yLqdCHbIxGC24kEaM2EkIKwCppwDHbBRVp7nKx-zjtWoXNfGqxSpUvk1qt3adD-jXFSa49DXhJvSEvW82N4lLwvZqXB_djr4q-k78PGmoX_rS136xSVxbJn7o0TcUTtnR3NWBzvY6Ye8P9293T3z28vh8dzvjqLO85ygMqXlpREGEaIyCDDIj01KYgqRT4FKhUwBEjVOJhVBaOYnRLouylEpN2OVud935z4FCb5sqINW1a8kPwYosVyqXkVaMil0U45eho7ldd1Xjuo0VYLdU7Y6qjVTtlqqVsXOxnx-Khsq_xi_GGJC7QIhWu6DOrvzQtfHlf1Z_AEmvhDY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1673372059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Yamazaki, Masato ; Yasuda, Hideki ; Koda, Keiji</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Masato ; Yasuda, Hideki ; Koda, Keiji</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
(1) To survey the dissemination of SILC; (2) to determine which SILC method has become mainstream; (3) to determine whether the characteristic complications vary according to the type of procedure.
Methods
An electronic search of PubMed, Databases@Ovid, and SciVerse Scopus between 2003/01/01 and 2012/12/31 was performed.
Results
The peak number of annually published articles was 70 in 2011. The most common procedures were single skin incision, the use of a SILS Port
®
, suture suspension and a 5-mm oblique scope. The intraoperative complications rate was 1.69 %. Postoperative complications occurred in 213/5283 cases. According to the surgical procedure, five factors (approach;
P
= 0.0017, gallbladder anchorage;
P
< 0.001, size;
P
= 0.049 and type;
P
< 0.001 of the scope, and size of the clip applier;
P
= 0.074) significantly affected the incidence of wound infection. The incidence of wound seroma/bleeding was significantly influenced by gallbladder anchorage (
P
= 0.009), the use of curved/articulated instruments (
P
= 0.048), and the diameter of the clip applier (
P
< 0.001).
Conclusion
To determine the best operative procedure for SILC, an analysis of uniform operative procedures is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-1291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-2813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0908-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24845737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - instrumentation ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Databases, Bibliographic ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Review Article ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan), 2015-05, Vol.45 (5), p.537-548</ispartof><rights>Springer Japan 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-c19e3fd91beecc9930606925d19be2a30a514500cc4c82cb1343a2cd19dbdd233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-c19e3fd91beecc9930606925d19be2a30a514500cc4c82cb1343a2cd19dbdd233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00595-014-0908-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00595-014-0908-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24845737$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koda, Keiji</creatorcontrib><title>Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes</title><title>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</title><addtitle>Surg Today</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Today</addtitle><description>Purpose
(1) To survey the dissemination of SILC; (2) to determine which SILC method has become mainstream; (3) to determine whether the characteristic complications vary according to the type of procedure.
Methods
An electronic search of PubMed, Databases@Ovid, and SciVerse Scopus between 2003/01/01 and 2012/12/31 was performed.
Results
The peak number of annually published articles was 70 in 2011. The most common procedures were single skin incision, the use of a SILS Port
®
, suture suspension and a 5-mm oblique scope. The intraoperative complications rate was 1.69 %. Postoperative complications occurred in 213/5283 cases. According to the surgical procedure, five factors (approach;
P
= 0.0017, gallbladder anchorage;
P
< 0.001, size;
P
= 0.049 and type;
P
< 0.001 of the scope, and size of the clip applier;
P
= 0.074) significantly affected the incidence of wound infection. The incidence of wound seroma/bleeding was significantly influenced by gallbladder anchorage (
P
= 0.009), the use of curved/articulated instruments (
P
= 0.048), and the diameter of the clip applier (
P
< 0.001).
Conclusion
To determine the best operative procedure for SILC, an analysis of uniform operative procedures is needed.</description><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Databases, Bibliographic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0941-1291</issn><issn>1436-2813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhgdRbK0-gBvJ0s3omUuSjjsRb1BwoS5lmJyctilJpmYSpW_vlFaXrn4O_wXOx9i5gCsBkF8HgNSkHITmYGDK5QEbC60yLqdCHbIxGC24kEaM2EkIKwCppwDHbBRVp7nKx-zjtWoXNfGqxSpUvk1qt3adD-jXFSa49DXhJvSEvW82N4lLwvZqXB_djr4q-k78PGmoX_rS136xSVxbJn7o0TcUTtnR3NWBzvY6Ye8P9293T3z28vh8dzvjqLO85ygMqXlpREGEaIyCDDIj01KYgqRT4FKhUwBEjVOJhVBaOYnRLouylEpN2OVud935z4FCb5sqINW1a8kPwYosVyqXkVaMil0U45eho7ldd1Xjuo0VYLdU7Y6qjVTtlqqVsXOxnx-Khsq_xi_GGJC7QIhWu6DOrvzQtfHlf1Z_AEmvhDY</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Yamazaki, Masato</creator><creator>Yasuda, Hideki</creator><creator>Koda, Keiji</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes</title><author>Yamazaki, Masato ; Yasuda, Hideki ; Koda, Keiji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-c19e3fd91beecc9930606925d19be2a30a514500cc4c82cb1343a2cd19dbdd233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Databases, Bibliographic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koda, Keiji</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamazaki, Masato</au><au>Yasuda, Hideki</au><au>Koda, Keiji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan)</jtitle><stitle>Surg Today</stitle><addtitle>Surg Today</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>537</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>537-548</pages><issn>0941-1291</issn><eissn>1436-2813</eissn><abstract>Purpose
(1) To survey the dissemination of SILC; (2) to determine which SILC method has become mainstream; (3) to determine whether the characteristic complications vary according to the type of procedure.
Methods
An electronic search of PubMed, Databases@Ovid, and SciVerse Scopus between 2003/01/01 and 2012/12/31 was performed.
Results
The peak number of annually published articles was 70 in 2011. The most common procedures were single skin incision, the use of a SILS Port
®
, suture suspension and a 5-mm oblique scope. The intraoperative complications rate was 1.69 %. Postoperative complications occurred in 213/5283 cases. According to the surgical procedure, five factors (approach;
P
= 0.0017, gallbladder anchorage;
P
< 0.001, size;
P
= 0.049 and type;
P
< 0.001 of the scope, and size of the clip applier;
P
= 0.074) significantly affected the incidence of wound infection. The incidence of wound seroma/bleeding was significantly influenced by gallbladder anchorage (
P
= 0.009), the use of curved/articulated instruments (
P
= 0.048), and the diameter of the clip applier (
P
< 0.001).
Conclusion
To determine the best operative procedure for SILC, an analysis of uniform operative procedures is needed.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>24845737</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00595-014-0908-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0941-1291 |
| ispartof | Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan), 2015-05, Vol.45 (5), p.537-548 |
| issn | 0941-1291 1436-2813 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1673372059 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - instrumentation Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods Databases, Bibliographic Humans Incidence Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Review Article Surgery Surgical Oncology Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology Treatment Outcome |
| title | Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A25%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-incision%20laparoscopic%20cholecystectomy:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20methodology%20and%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Surgery%20today%20(Tokyo,%20Japan)&rft.au=Yamazaki,%20Masato&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=537&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=537-548&rft.issn=0941-1291&rft.eissn=1436-2813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00595-014-0908-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1673372059%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1673372059&rft_id=info:pmid/24845737&rfr_iscdi=true |