Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model
Demographic models have been used to calculate effective population size, (Ne) which is a measure of the expected rate of loss of genetic variability. However, accurately calculating effective size for most populations of wild vertebrates is difficult because the required demographic or pedigree dat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological conservation 1995, Vol.71 (3), p.299-304 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 304 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 299 |
container_title | Biological conservation |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Blackwell, Bradley F. Doerr, P.D. Reed, J. Michael Walters, Jeffrey R. |
description | Demographic models have been used to calculate effective population size, (Ne) which is a measure of the expected rate of loss of genetic variability. However, accurately calculating effective size for most populations of wild vertebrates is difficult because the required demographic or pedigree data are unavailable. We used data from a long-term study of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis in south-central North Carolina to construct a pedigree, which we then used to calculate the realized rate of inbreeding (F). We compared our values, estimated via pedigree analysis, with published, expected values of F calculated from a demographic model. The change in inbreeding coefficient per generation (ΔF) based on a demographic model fell below the 95% confidence limit around the pedigree value. Thus, ΔF, as calculated from a demographic model, significantly underestimated the ΔF estimated via pedigree analysis. We suggest that a multi-method approach can be useful to managers in increasing the accuracy of estimates of rate of loss of genetic variability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00050-Z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16729200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>000632079400050Z</els_id><sourcerecordid>16729200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91f61dc0de827cd11218ca60a971a41abd2f0c75fad7f0bd3791dd1486445e9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEuXjHzB4QAiGgJ2kccyAVCE-KiGxwMJivdrPxSiJg50WlV-PS1FHJutZ9x77HUJOOLvkjFdXjLEqK3ImzmV5kYYxy952yIjXoshyycUuGW0j--Qgxo80iqIaj8jXtJsFROO6OQ0wIIXOULQW9eCWSHvfLxoYnO9odN94TSdU-7aH4GK68pZiHFybepHa4FvaJ9I88RIGmlV08ZcH1GDr5wH6d6dp6w02R2TPQhPx-O88JK_3dy-3j9nT88P0dvKU6aIqh0xyW3GjmcE6F9pwnvNaQ8VACg4lh5nJLdNibMEIy2amEJIbw8u6KssxSl0ckrMNtw_-c5F-q1oXNTYNdOgXUfFK5DJnLAXLTVAHH2NAq_qQNgsrxZlaW1ZrhWqtUMlS_VpWb6l2-seHqKGxATrt4rZbFFLKuk6xm00M065Lh0FF7bDTSVdIqpXx7v93fgCVY5KR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16729200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Blackwell, Bradley F. ; Doerr, P.D. ; Reed, J. Michael ; Walters, Jeffrey R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Bradley F. ; Doerr, P.D. ; Reed, J. Michael ; Walters, Jeffrey R.</creatorcontrib><description>Demographic models have been used to calculate effective population size, (Ne) which is a measure of the expected rate of loss of genetic variability. However, accurately calculating effective size for most populations of wild vertebrates is difficult because the required demographic or pedigree data are unavailable. We used data from a long-term study of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis in south-central North Carolina to construct a pedigree, which we then used to calculate the realized rate of inbreeding (F). We compared our values, estimated via pedigree analysis, with published, expected values of F calculated from a demographic model. The change in inbreeding coefficient per generation (ΔF) based on a demographic model fell below the 95% confidence limit around the pedigree value. Thus, ΔF, as calculated from a demographic model, significantly underestimated the ΔF estimated via pedigree analysis. We suggest that a multi-method approach can be useful to managers in increasing the accuracy of estimates of rate of loss of genetic variability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00050-Z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; demographic model ; effective population size ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genetic variability ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; inbreeding ; pedigree ; Picoides borealis ; Population genetics, reproduction patterns ; red-cockaded woodpecker ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 1995, Vol.71 (3), p.299-304</ispartof><rights>1995 Elsevier Science Limited</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91f61dc0de827cd11218ca60a971a41abd2f0c75fad7f0bd3791dd1486445e9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91f61dc0de827cd11218ca60a971a41abd2f0c75fad7f0bd3791dd1486445e9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000632079400050Z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3399988$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Bradley F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerr, P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, J. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Jeffrey R.</creatorcontrib><title>Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>Demographic models have been used to calculate effective population size, (Ne) which is a measure of the expected rate of loss of genetic variability. However, accurately calculating effective size for most populations of wild vertebrates is difficult because the required demographic or pedigree data are unavailable. We used data from a long-term study of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis in south-central North Carolina to construct a pedigree, which we then used to calculate the realized rate of inbreeding (F). We compared our values, estimated via pedigree analysis, with published, expected values of F calculated from a demographic model. The change in inbreeding coefficient per generation (ΔF) based on a demographic model fell below the 95% confidence limit around the pedigree value. Thus, ΔF, as calculated from a demographic model, significantly underestimated the ΔF estimated via pedigree analysis. We suggest that a multi-method approach can be useful to managers in increasing the accuracy of estimates of rate of loss of genetic variability.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>demographic model</subject><subject>effective population size</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genetic variability</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>inbreeding</subject><subject>pedigree</subject><subject>Picoides borealis</subject><subject>Population genetics, reproduction patterns</subject><subject>red-cockaded woodpecker</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEuXjHzB4QAiGgJ2kccyAVCE-KiGxwMJivdrPxSiJg50WlV-PS1FHJutZ9x77HUJOOLvkjFdXjLEqK3ImzmV5kYYxy952yIjXoshyycUuGW0j--Qgxo80iqIaj8jXtJsFROO6OQ0wIIXOULQW9eCWSHvfLxoYnO9odN94TSdU-7aH4GK68pZiHFybepHa4FvaJ9I88RIGmlV08ZcH1GDr5wH6d6dp6w02R2TPQhPx-O88JK_3dy-3j9nT88P0dvKU6aIqh0xyW3GjmcE6F9pwnvNaQ8VACg4lh5nJLdNibMEIy2amEJIbw8u6KssxSl0ckrMNtw_-c5F-q1oXNTYNdOgXUfFK5DJnLAXLTVAHH2NAq_qQNgsrxZlaW1ZrhWqtUMlS_VpWb6l2-seHqKGxATrt4rZbFFLKuk6xm00M065Lh0FF7bDTSVdIqpXx7v93fgCVY5KR</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Blackwell, Bradley F.</creator><creator>Doerr, P.D.</creator><creator>Reed, J. Michael</creator><creator>Walters, Jeffrey R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model</title><author>Blackwell, Bradley F. ; Doerr, P.D. ; Reed, J. Michael ; Walters, Jeffrey R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91f61dc0de827cd11218ca60a971a41abd2f0c75fad7f0bd3791dd1486445e9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>demographic model</topic><topic>effective population size</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genetic variability</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>inbreeding</topic><topic>pedigree</topic><topic>Picoides borealis</topic><topic>Population genetics, reproduction patterns</topic><topic>red-cockaded woodpecker</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Bradley F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerr, P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, J. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Jeffrey R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blackwell, Bradley F.</au><au>Doerr, P.D.</au><au>Reed, J. Michael</au><au>Walters, Jeffrey R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>299-304</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>Demographic models have been used to calculate effective population size, (Ne) which is a measure of the expected rate of loss of genetic variability. However, accurately calculating effective size for most populations of wild vertebrates is difficult because the required demographic or pedigree data are unavailable. We used data from a long-term study of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis in south-central North Carolina to construct a pedigree, which we then used to calculate the realized rate of inbreeding (F). We compared our values, estimated via pedigree analysis, with published, expected values of F calculated from a demographic model. The change in inbreeding coefficient per generation (ΔF) based on a demographic model fell below the 95% confidence limit around the pedigree value. Thus, ΔF, as calculated from a demographic model, significantly underestimated the ΔF estimated via pedigree analysis. We suggest that a multi-method approach can be useful to managers in increasing the accuracy of estimates of rate of loss of genetic variability.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0006-3207(94)00050-Z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3207 |
ispartof | Biological conservation, 1995, Vol.71 (3), p.299-304 |
issn | 0006-3207 1873-2917 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16729200 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences demographic model effective population size Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology genetic variability Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution inbreeding pedigree Picoides borealis Population genetics, reproduction patterns red-cockaded woodpecker Vertebrata |
title | Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A14%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inbreeding%20rate%20and%20effective%20population%20size:%20A%20comparison%20of%20estimates%20from%20pedigree%20analysis%20and%20a%20demographic%20model&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Blackwell,%20Bradley%20F.&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=299-304&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0006-3207(94)00050-Z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16729200%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16729200&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=000632079400050Z&rfr_iscdi=true |