Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model

Demographic models have been used to calculate effective population size, (Ne) which is a measure of the expected rate of loss of genetic variability. However, accurately calculating effective size for most populations of wild vertebrates is difficult because the required demographic or pedigree dat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological conservation 1995, Vol.71 (3), p.299-304
Hauptverfasser: Blackwell, Bradley F., Doerr, P.D., Reed, J. Michael, Walters, Jeffrey R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 304
container_issue 3
container_start_page 299
container_title Biological conservation
container_volume 71
creator Blackwell, Bradley F.
Doerr, P.D.
Reed, J. Michael
Walters, Jeffrey R.
description Demographic models have been used to calculate effective population size, (Ne) which is a measure of the expected rate of loss of genetic variability. However, accurately calculating effective size for most populations of wild vertebrates is difficult because the required demographic or pedigree data are unavailable. We used data from a long-term study of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis in south-central North Carolina to construct a pedigree, which we then used to calculate the realized rate of inbreeding (F). We compared our values, estimated via pedigree analysis, with published, expected values of F calculated from a demographic model. The change in inbreeding coefficient per generation (ΔF) based on a demographic model fell below the 95% confidence limit around the pedigree value. Thus, ΔF, as calculated from a demographic model, significantly underestimated the ΔF estimated via pedigree analysis. We suggest that a multi-method approach can be useful to managers in increasing the accuracy of estimates of rate of loss of genetic variability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00050-Z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16729200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>000632079400050Z</els_id><sourcerecordid>16729200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91f61dc0de827cd11218ca60a971a41abd2f0c75fad7f0bd3791dd1486445e9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEuXjHzB4QAiGgJ2kccyAVCE-KiGxwMJivdrPxSiJg50WlV-PS1FHJutZ9x77HUJOOLvkjFdXjLEqK3ImzmV5kYYxy952yIjXoshyycUuGW0j--Qgxo80iqIaj8jXtJsFROO6OQ0wIIXOULQW9eCWSHvfLxoYnO9odN94TSdU-7aH4GK68pZiHFybepHa4FvaJ9I88RIGmlV08ZcH1GDr5wH6d6dp6w02R2TPQhPx-O88JK_3dy-3j9nT88P0dvKU6aIqh0xyW3GjmcE6F9pwnvNaQ8VACg4lh5nJLdNibMEIy2amEJIbw8u6KssxSl0ckrMNtw_-c5F-q1oXNTYNdOgXUfFK5DJnLAXLTVAHH2NAq_qQNgsrxZlaW1ZrhWqtUMlS_VpWb6l2-seHqKGxATrt4rZbFFLKuk6xm00M065Lh0FF7bDTSVdIqpXx7v93fgCVY5KR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16729200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Blackwell, Bradley F. ; Doerr, P.D. ; Reed, J. Michael ; Walters, Jeffrey R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Bradley F. ; Doerr, P.D. ; Reed, J. Michael ; Walters, Jeffrey R.</creatorcontrib><description>Demographic models have been used to calculate effective population size, (Ne) which is a measure of the expected rate of loss of genetic variability. However, accurately calculating effective size for most populations of wild vertebrates is difficult because the required demographic or pedigree data are unavailable. We used data from a long-term study of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis in south-central North Carolina to construct a pedigree, which we then used to calculate the realized rate of inbreeding (F). We compared our values, estimated via pedigree analysis, with published, expected values of F calculated from a demographic model. The change in inbreeding coefficient per generation (ΔF) based on a demographic model fell below the 95% confidence limit around the pedigree value. Thus, ΔF, as calculated from a demographic model, significantly underestimated the ΔF estimated via pedigree analysis. We suggest that a multi-method approach can be useful to managers in increasing the accuracy of estimates of rate of loss of genetic variability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00050-Z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; demographic model ; effective population size ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genetic variability ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; inbreeding ; pedigree ; Picoides borealis ; Population genetics, reproduction patterns ; red-cockaded woodpecker ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 1995, Vol.71 (3), p.299-304</ispartof><rights>1995 Elsevier Science Limited</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91f61dc0de827cd11218ca60a971a41abd2f0c75fad7f0bd3791dd1486445e9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91f61dc0de827cd11218ca60a971a41abd2f0c75fad7f0bd3791dd1486445e9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000632079400050Z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3399988$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Bradley F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerr, P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, J. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Jeffrey R.</creatorcontrib><title>Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>Demographic models have been used to calculate effective population size, (Ne) which is a measure of the expected rate of loss of genetic variability. However, accurately calculating effective size for most populations of wild vertebrates is difficult because the required demographic or pedigree data are unavailable. We used data from a long-term study of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis in south-central North Carolina to construct a pedigree, which we then used to calculate the realized rate of inbreeding (F). We compared our values, estimated via pedigree analysis, with published, expected values of F calculated from a demographic model. The change in inbreeding coefficient per generation (ΔF) based on a demographic model fell below the 95% confidence limit around the pedigree value. Thus, ΔF, as calculated from a demographic model, significantly underestimated the ΔF estimated via pedigree analysis. We suggest that a multi-method approach can be useful to managers in increasing the accuracy of estimates of rate of loss of genetic variability.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>demographic model</subject><subject>effective population size</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genetic variability</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>inbreeding</subject><subject>pedigree</subject><subject>Picoides borealis</subject><subject>Population genetics, reproduction patterns</subject><subject>red-cockaded woodpecker</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEuXjHzB4QAiGgJ2kccyAVCE-KiGxwMJivdrPxSiJg50WlV-PS1FHJutZ9x77HUJOOLvkjFdXjLEqK3ImzmV5kYYxy952yIjXoshyycUuGW0j--Qgxo80iqIaj8jXtJsFROO6OQ0wIIXOULQW9eCWSHvfLxoYnO9odN94TSdU-7aH4GK68pZiHFybepHa4FvaJ9I88RIGmlV08ZcH1GDr5wH6d6dp6w02R2TPQhPx-O88JK_3dy-3j9nT88P0dvKU6aIqh0xyW3GjmcE6F9pwnvNaQ8VACg4lh5nJLdNibMEIy2amEJIbw8u6KssxSl0ckrMNtw_-c5F-q1oXNTYNdOgXUfFK5DJnLAXLTVAHH2NAq_qQNgsrxZlaW1ZrhWqtUMlS_VpWb6l2-seHqKGxATrt4rZbFFLKuk6xm00M065Lh0FF7bDTSVdIqpXx7v93fgCVY5KR</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Blackwell, Bradley F.</creator><creator>Doerr, P.D.</creator><creator>Reed, J. Michael</creator><creator>Walters, Jeffrey R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model</title><author>Blackwell, Bradley F. ; Doerr, P.D. ; Reed, J. Michael ; Walters, Jeffrey R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91f61dc0de827cd11218ca60a971a41abd2f0c75fad7f0bd3791dd1486445e9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>demographic model</topic><topic>effective population size</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genetic variability</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>inbreeding</topic><topic>pedigree</topic><topic>Picoides borealis</topic><topic>Population genetics, reproduction patterns</topic><topic>red-cockaded woodpecker</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Bradley F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerr, P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, J. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Jeffrey R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blackwell, Bradley F.</au><au>Doerr, P.D.</au><au>Reed, J. Michael</au><au>Walters, Jeffrey R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>299-304</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>Demographic models have been used to calculate effective population size, (Ne) which is a measure of the expected rate of loss of genetic variability. However, accurately calculating effective size for most populations of wild vertebrates is difficult because the required demographic or pedigree data are unavailable. We used data from a long-term study of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis in south-central North Carolina to construct a pedigree, which we then used to calculate the realized rate of inbreeding (F). We compared our values, estimated via pedigree analysis, with published, expected values of F calculated from a demographic model. The change in inbreeding coefficient per generation (ΔF) based on a demographic model fell below the 95% confidence limit around the pedigree value. Thus, ΔF, as calculated from a demographic model, significantly underestimated the ΔF estimated via pedigree analysis. We suggest that a multi-method approach can be useful to managers in increasing the accuracy of estimates of rate of loss of genetic variability.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0006-3207(94)00050-Z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3207
ispartof Biological conservation, 1995, Vol.71 (3), p.299-304
issn 0006-3207
1873-2917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16729200
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
demographic model
effective population size
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
genetic variability
Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution
inbreeding
pedigree
Picoides borealis
Population genetics, reproduction patterns
red-cockaded woodpecker
Vertebrata
title Inbreeding rate and effective population size: A comparison of estimates from pedigree analysis and a demographic model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A14%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inbreeding%20rate%20and%20effective%20population%20size:%20A%20comparison%20of%20estimates%20from%20pedigree%20analysis%20and%20a%20demographic%20model&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Blackwell,%20Bradley%20F.&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=299-304&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0006-3207(94)00050-Z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16729200%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16729200&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=000632079400050Z&rfr_iscdi=true