Ethics, embodiment and organizations

Noting that ethics and responsibility in business are well established fields of research and practice, we suggest that the limits of dominant approaches lie in their privileging of rationality, penchant for codification, tendency to self-congratulation, predilection to control, affinity to masculin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organization (London, England) England), 2015-03, Vol.22 (2), p.159-165
Hauptverfasser: Pullen, Alison, Rhodes, Carl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 2
container_start_page 159
container_title Organization (London, England)
container_volume 22
creator Pullen, Alison
Rhodes, Carl
description Noting that ethics and responsibility in business are well established fields of research and practice, we suggest that the limits of dominant approaches lie in their privileging of rationality, penchant for codification, tendency to self-congratulation, predilection to control, affinity to masculinity, blindness to social injustice, and subsumption under corporate goals. We observe that such lines of thought are blind to affectual relations, care, compassion or any forms of feeling experienced pre-reflexively through the body. We argue that this begs the rethinking of ethics in organizations from an embodied perspective. On this basis, and on the basis on the work herein, we retain the hope that our interaction with each other and with the world, might foster ways of organizational life that resist domination and oppression in favour of the enactment of care and respect for difference as it is lived and experienced.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1350508414558727
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1672875818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1350508414558727</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1672875818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3239a1b6fe2bf01191393f76b4cca834f66b976c9d160600542a0ac5f8a2d3453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0aCgYGAL-evjKgqH1IlFpgjx7FLqiYudjLAX4-rMKBKTHfS-713p0fIJdA7ACnvATnlVDFgnCtZyCMyAyYgl1jgcdqTnO_1U3IW44ZSisjEjFwvh4_WxNvMdrVv2s72Q6b7JvNhrfv2Ww-t7-M5OXF6G-3F75yT98fl2-I5X70-vSweVrlBiUOeLpUaauFsUTsKUAKW6KSomTFaIXNC1KUUpmxAUEEpZ4Wm2nCndNEg4zgnN1PuLvjP0cah6tpo7Hare-vHWIGQhZJcgUro1QG68WPo03eJEoCiRIRE0YkywccYrKt2oe10-KqAVvvaqsPakiWfLFGv7Z_Q__gfPoZpLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661369331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics, embodiment and organizations</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Pullen, Alison ; Rhodes, Carl</creator><contributor>Pullen, Alison ; Rhodes, Carl</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pullen, Alison ; Rhodes, Carl ; Pullen, Alison ; Rhodes, Carl</creatorcontrib><description>Noting that ethics and responsibility in business are well established fields of research and practice, we suggest that the limits of dominant approaches lie in their privileging of rationality, penchant for codification, tendency to self-congratulation, predilection to control, affinity to masculinity, blindness to social injustice, and subsumption under corporate goals. We observe that such lines of thought are blind to affectual relations, care, compassion or any forms of feeling experienced pre-reflexively through the body. We argue that this begs the rethinking of ethics in organizations from an embodied perspective. On this basis, and on the basis on the work herein, we retain the hope that our interaction with each other and with the world, might foster ways of organizational life that resist domination and oppression in favour of the enactment of care and respect for difference as it is lived and experienced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-5084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1350508414558727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Business ethics ; Corporate objectives ; Embodiment ; Ethics ; Injustice ; Organizations ; Practice ; Social interaction ; Social justice ; Social responsibility ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Organization (London, England), 2015-03, Vol.22 (2), p.159-165</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3239a1b6fe2bf01191393f76b4cca834f66b976c9d160600542a0ac5f8a2d3453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3239a1b6fe2bf01191393f76b4cca834f66b976c9d160600542a0ac5f8a2d3453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1350508414558727$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1350508414558727$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Pullen, Alison</contributor><contributor>Rhodes, Carl</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pullen, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Carl</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics, embodiment and organizations</title><title>Organization (London, England)</title><description>Noting that ethics and responsibility in business are well established fields of research and practice, we suggest that the limits of dominant approaches lie in their privileging of rationality, penchant for codification, tendency to self-congratulation, predilection to control, affinity to masculinity, blindness to social injustice, and subsumption under corporate goals. We observe that such lines of thought are blind to affectual relations, care, compassion or any forms of feeling experienced pre-reflexively through the body. We argue that this begs the rethinking of ethics in organizations from an embodied perspective. On this basis, and on the basis on the work herein, we retain the hope that our interaction with each other and with the world, might foster ways of organizational life that resist domination and oppression in favour of the enactment of care and respect for difference as it is lived and experienced.</description><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Corporate objectives</subject><subject>Embodiment</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Injustice</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1350-5084</issn><issn>1461-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0aCgYGAL-evjKgqH1IlFpgjx7FLqiYudjLAX4-rMKBKTHfS-713p0fIJdA7ACnvATnlVDFgnCtZyCMyAyYgl1jgcdqTnO_1U3IW44ZSisjEjFwvh4_WxNvMdrVv2s72Q6b7JvNhrfv2Ww-t7-M5OXF6G-3F75yT98fl2-I5X70-vSweVrlBiUOeLpUaauFsUTsKUAKW6KSomTFaIXNC1KUUpmxAUEEpZ4Wm2nCndNEg4zgnN1PuLvjP0cah6tpo7Hare-vHWIGQhZJcgUro1QG68WPo03eJEoCiRIRE0YkywccYrKt2oe10-KqAVvvaqsPakiWfLFGv7Z_Q__gfPoZpLQ</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Pullen, Alison</creator><creator>Rhodes, Carl</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Ethics, embodiment and organizations</title><author>Pullen, Alison ; Rhodes, Carl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3239a1b6fe2bf01191393f76b4cca834f66b976c9d160600542a0ac5f8a2d3453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Corporate objectives</topic><topic>Embodiment</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Injustice</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pullen, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Carl</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Organization (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pullen, Alison</au><au>Rhodes, Carl</au><au>Pullen, Alison</au><au>Rhodes, Carl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics, embodiment and organizations</atitle><jtitle>Organization (London, England)</jtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>159-165</pages><issn>1350-5084</issn><eissn>1461-7323</eissn><abstract>Noting that ethics and responsibility in business are well established fields of research and practice, we suggest that the limits of dominant approaches lie in their privileging of rationality, penchant for codification, tendency to self-congratulation, predilection to control, affinity to masculinity, blindness to social injustice, and subsumption under corporate goals. We observe that such lines of thought are blind to affectual relations, care, compassion or any forms of feeling experienced pre-reflexively through the body. We argue that this begs the rethinking of ethics in organizations from an embodied perspective. On this basis, and on the basis on the work herein, we retain the hope that our interaction with each other and with the world, might foster ways of organizational life that resist domination and oppression in favour of the enactment of care and respect for difference as it is lived and experienced.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1350508414558727</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-5084
ispartof Organization (London, England), 2015-03, Vol.22 (2), p.159-165
issn 1350-5084
1461-7323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1672875818
source SAGE Publications; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Business ethics
Corporate objectives
Embodiment
Ethics
Injustice
Organizations
Practice
Social interaction
Social justice
Social responsibility
Studies
title Ethics, embodiment and organizations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T07%3A16%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics,%20embodiment%20and%20organizations&rft.jtitle=Organization%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Pullen,%20Alison&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=159-165&rft.issn=1350-5084&rft.eissn=1461-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1350508414558727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1672875818%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661369331&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1350508414558727&rfr_iscdi=true