Ethics, embodiment and organizations
Noting that ethics and responsibility in business are well established fields of research and practice, we suggest that the limits of dominant approaches lie in their privileging of rationality, penchant for codification, tendency to self-congratulation, predilection to control, affinity to masculin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organization (London, England) England), 2015-03, Vol.22 (2), p.159-165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 165 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | Organization (London, England) |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Pullen, Alison Rhodes, Carl |
description | Noting that ethics and responsibility in business are well established fields of research and practice, we suggest that the limits of dominant approaches lie in their privileging of rationality, penchant for codification, tendency to self-congratulation, predilection to control, affinity to masculinity, blindness to social injustice, and subsumption under corporate goals. We observe that such lines of thought are blind to affectual relations, care, compassion or any forms of feeling experienced pre-reflexively through the body. We argue that this begs the rethinking of ethics in organizations from an embodied perspective. On this basis, and on the basis on the work herein, we retain the hope that our interaction with each other and with the world, might foster ways of organizational life that resist domination and oppression in favour of the enactment of care and respect for difference as it is lived and experienced. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1350508414558727 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1672875818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1350508414558727</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1672875818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3239a1b6fe2bf01191393f76b4cca834f66b976c9d160600542a0ac5f8a2d3453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0aCgYGAL-evjKgqH1IlFpgjx7FLqiYudjLAX4-rMKBKTHfS-713p0fIJdA7ACnvATnlVDFgnCtZyCMyAyYgl1jgcdqTnO_1U3IW44ZSisjEjFwvh4_WxNvMdrVv2s72Q6b7JvNhrfv2Ww-t7-M5OXF6G-3F75yT98fl2-I5X70-vSweVrlBiUOeLpUaauFsUTsKUAKW6KSomTFaIXNC1KUUpmxAUEEpZ4Wm2nCndNEg4zgnN1PuLvjP0cah6tpo7Hare-vHWIGQhZJcgUro1QG68WPo03eJEoCiRIRE0YkywccYrKt2oe10-KqAVvvaqsPakiWfLFGv7Z_Q__gfPoZpLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661369331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics, embodiment and organizations</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Pullen, Alison ; Rhodes, Carl</creator><contributor>Pullen, Alison ; Rhodes, Carl</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pullen, Alison ; Rhodes, Carl ; Pullen, Alison ; Rhodes, Carl</creatorcontrib><description>Noting that ethics and responsibility in business are well established fields of research and practice, we suggest that the limits of dominant approaches lie in their privileging of rationality, penchant for codification, tendency to self-congratulation, predilection to control, affinity to masculinity, blindness to social injustice, and subsumption under corporate goals. We observe that such lines of thought are blind to affectual relations, care, compassion or any forms of feeling experienced pre-reflexively through the body. We argue that this begs the rethinking of ethics in organizations from an embodied perspective. On this basis, and on the basis on the work herein, we retain the hope that our interaction with each other and with the world, might foster ways of organizational life that resist domination and oppression in favour of the enactment of care and respect for difference as it is lived and experienced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-5084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1350508414558727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Business ethics ; Corporate objectives ; Embodiment ; Ethics ; Injustice ; Organizations ; Practice ; Social interaction ; Social justice ; Social responsibility ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Organization (London, England), 2015-03, Vol.22 (2), p.159-165</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3239a1b6fe2bf01191393f76b4cca834f66b976c9d160600542a0ac5f8a2d3453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3239a1b6fe2bf01191393f76b4cca834f66b976c9d160600542a0ac5f8a2d3453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1350508414558727$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1350508414558727$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Pullen, Alison</contributor><contributor>Rhodes, Carl</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pullen, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Carl</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics, embodiment and organizations</title><title>Organization (London, England)</title><description>Noting that ethics and responsibility in business are well established fields of research and practice, we suggest that the limits of dominant approaches lie in their privileging of rationality, penchant for codification, tendency to self-congratulation, predilection to control, affinity to masculinity, blindness to social injustice, and subsumption under corporate goals. We observe that such lines of thought are blind to affectual relations, care, compassion or any forms of feeling experienced pre-reflexively through the body. We argue that this begs the rethinking of ethics in organizations from an embodied perspective. On this basis, and on the basis on the work herein, we retain the hope that our interaction with each other and with the world, might foster ways of organizational life that resist domination and oppression in favour of the enactment of care and respect for difference as it is lived and experienced.</description><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Corporate objectives</subject><subject>Embodiment</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Injustice</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1350-5084</issn><issn>1461-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0aCgYGAL-evjKgqH1IlFpgjx7FLqiYudjLAX4-rMKBKTHfS-713p0fIJdA7ACnvATnlVDFgnCtZyCMyAyYgl1jgcdqTnO_1U3IW44ZSisjEjFwvh4_WxNvMdrVv2s72Q6b7JvNhrfv2Ww-t7-M5OXF6G-3F75yT98fl2-I5X70-vSweVrlBiUOeLpUaauFsUTsKUAKW6KSomTFaIXNC1KUUpmxAUEEpZ4Wm2nCndNEg4zgnN1PuLvjP0cah6tpo7Hare-vHWIGQhZJcgUro1QG68WPo03eJEoCiRIRE0YkywccYrKt2oe10-KqAVvvaqsPakiWfLFGv7Z_Q__gfPoZpLQ</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Pullen, Alison</creator><creator>Rhodes, Carl</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Ethics, embodiment and organizations</title><author>Pullen, Alison ; Rhodes, Carl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3239a1b6fe2bf01191393f76b4cca834f66b976c9d160600542a0ac5f8a2d3453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Corporate objectives</topic><topic>Embodiment</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Injustice</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pullen, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Carl</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Organization (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pullen, Alison</au><au>Rhodes, Carl</au><au>Pullen, Alison</au><au>Rhodes, Carl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics, embodiment and organizations</atitle><jtitle>Organization (London, England)</jtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>159-165</pages><issn>1350-5084</issn><eissn>1461-7323</eissn><abstract>Noting that ethics and responsibility in business are well established fields of research and practice, we suggest that the limits of dominant approaches lie in their privileging of rationality, penchant for codification, tendency to self-congratulation, predilection to control, affinity to masculinity, blindness to social injustice, and subsumption under corporate goals. We observe that such lines of thought are blind to affectual relations, care, compassion or any forms of feeling experienced pre-reflexively through the body. We argue that this begs the rethinking of ethics in organizations from an embodied perspective. On this basis, and on the basis on the work herein, we retain the hope that our interaction with each other and with the world, might foster ways of organizational life that resist domination and oppression in favour of the enactment of care and respect for difference as it is lived and experienced.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1350508414558727</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-5084 |
ispartof | Organization (London, England), 2015-03, Vol.22 (2), p.159-165 |
issn | 1350-5084 1461-7323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1672875818 |
source | SAGE Publications; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Business ethics Corporate objectives Embodiment Ethics Injustice Organizations Practice Social interaction Social justice Social responsibility Studies |
title | Ethics, embodiment and organizations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T07%3A16%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics,%20embodiment%20and%20organizations&rft.jtitle=Organization%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Pullen,%20Alison&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=159-165&rft.issn=1350-5084&rft.eissn=1461-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1350508414558727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1672875818%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661369331&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1350508414558727&rfr_iscdi=true |