Epidemics as Events and as Crises: Comparing Two Plague Outbreaks in Manchuria (1910-11 and 1920-21)
This article draws on Alain Badiou's notion of the event and on Michel Foucault's critique of the notion of crisis in comparing two pneumonic plague outbreaks in Manchuria. It is argued that the two epidemics, although apparently involving the same pathogen and geographical region, cannot...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge anthropology 2014-04, Vol.32 (1), p.62-76 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This article draws on Alain Badiou's notion of the event and on Michel Foucault's critique of the notion of crisis in comparing two pneumonic plague outbreaks in Manchuria. It is argued that the two epidemics, although apparently involving the same pathogen and geographical region, cannot be treated as analogous. The article approaches the Manchurian pneumonic plague epidemic of 1910-11 as an event, and the Manchurian pneumonic plague epidemic of 1920-21 as a crisis, stressing that the crucial difference between the two lies with the way in which they produced and reproduced biopolitical subjects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0305-7674 2047-7716 |
DOI: | 10.3167/ca.2014.320106 |