Timed up and go right and left unipodal stance results in Chilean older people with different degrees of disability
The Preventive Health Examination of older people in Chile incorporates the timed up and go (TUG) and right and left unipodal stance test (RUPS and LUPS) as functional assessment methods. To assess if TUG and LUPS discriminate older people with different degrees of disability. TUG, RUPS and LUPS wer...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Revista medíca de Chile 2015-01, Vol.143 (1), p.39-46 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | spa |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 46 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 39 |
| container_title | Revista medíca de Chile |
| container_volume | 143 |
| creator | Mancilla S, Eladio Valenzuela H, José Escobar C, Máximo |
| description | The Preventive Health Examination of older people in Chile incorporates the timed up and go (TUG) and right and left unipodal stance test (RUPS and LUPS) as functional assessment methods.
To assess if TUG and LUPS discriminate older people with different degrees of disability.
TUG, RUPS and LUPS were assessed in 860 participants aged 71.3 ± 6.9 years (591 females) attending a primary health care clinic. The results of the three tests were expressed in seconds. Participants were classified as non-disabled without any risk, non-disabled with risk and in risk of dependence, using the Functional Assessment of Older People of EFAM (the Spanish acronym), previously validated for Chilean older people.
In all participants TUG, LUPS and RUPS values were 8.9 ± 3.6, 10 ± 10.6 and 9.7 ± 10.3 seconds (sec) respectively. Among non-disabled participants without risk, the values for TUG, RUPS and LUPS were: 7.9 ± 2.3, 12.7 ± 11.1 and 12.2 ± 10.9 sec respectively. The figures for non-disabled participants with risk were 8.4 ± 2.6, 8.8 ± 9.8 and 8.9 ± 9.8 sec respectively. The figures for participants in risk of dependence were 11.7 ± 5.3, 5.1 ± 7.8 and 4.5 ± 7.1 sec, respectively.
In this group of older participants there is an association between the degree of disability and the results of TUG, RUPS and LUPS. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4067/S0034-98872015000100005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1672608580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1672608580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-cf01cc36839a0acdd40513ed25fd327eeb85eb4877a695ae907bb46391e6d1033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LxDAYhIMg7rr6FzRHL9U3SfPRoyx-wYIH13NJm7e7kWxbkxTZf2_x4zAMMzzMYQi5ZnBbgtJ3bwCiLCpjNAcmAYDNAnlClqCZLhRTYkHOU_oA4Foxc0YWXBoFXOklSVt_QEenkdre0d1Ao9_t808I2GU69X4cnA00Zdu3SCOmKeREfU_Xex_Q9nQIDiMdcRgD0i-f99T5rsOIfaYOdxEx0aGby2QbH3w-XpDTzoaEl3--Iu-PD9v1c7F5fXpZ32-KkZUsF20HrG2FMqKyYFvnSpBMoOOyc4JrxMZIbEqjtVWVtFiBbppSiYqhcgyEWJGb390xDp8TplwffGoxBNvjMKWaKc0VGGlgRq_-0KmZ_6jH6A82Huv_o8Q39QFrHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1672608580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Timed up and go right and left unipodal stance results in Chilean older people with different degrees of disability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Mancilla S, Eladio ; Valenzuela H, José ; Escobar C, Máximo</creator><creatorcontrib>Mancilla S, Eladio ; Valenzuela H, José ; Escobar C, Máximo</creatorcontrib><description>The Preventive Health Examination of older people in Chile incorporates the timed up and go (TUG) and right and left unipodal stance test (RUPS and LUPS) as functional assessment methods.
To assess if TUG and LUPS discriminate older people with different degrees of disability.
TUG, RUPS and LUPS were assessed in 860 participants aged 71.3 ± 6.9 years (591 females) attending a primary health care clinic. The results of the three tests were expressed in seconds. Participants were classified as non-disabled without any risk, non-disabled with risk and in risk of dependence, using the Functional Assessment of Older People of EFAM (the Spanish acronym), previously validated for Chilean older people.
In all participants TUG, LUPS and RUPS values were 8.9 ± 3.6, 10 ± 10.6 and 9.7 ± 10.3 seconds (sec) respectively. Among non-disabled participants without risk, the values for TUG, RUPS and LUPS were: 7.9 ± 2.3, 12.7 ± 11.1 and 12.2 ± 10.9 sec respectively. The figures for non-disabled participants with risk were 8.4 ± 2.6, 8.8 ± 9.8 and 8.9 ± 9.8 sec respectively. The figures for participants in risk of dependence were 11.7 ± 5.3, 5.1 ± 7.8 and 4.5 ± 7.1 sec, respectively.
In this group of older participants there is an association between the degree of disability and the results of TUG, RUPS and LUPS.</description><identifier>EISSN: 0717-6163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4067/S0034-98872015000100005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25860267</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Chile</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention & control ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Chile ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disabled Persons ; Female ; Frail Elderly ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Geriatric Assessment - statistics & numerical data ; Health Services for the Aged ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors</subject><ispartof>Revista medíca de Chile, 2015-01, Vol.143 (1), p.39-46</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25860267$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mancilla S, Eladio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valenzuela H, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escobar C, Máximo</creatorcontrib><title>Timed up and go right and left unipodal stance results in Chilean older people with different degrees of disability</title><title>Revista medíca de Chile</title><addtitle>Rev Med Chil</addtitle><description>The Preventive Health Examination of older people in Chile incorporates the timed up and go (TUG) and right and left unipodal stance test (RUPS and LUPS) as functional assessment methods.
To assess if TUG and LUPS discriminate older people with different degrees of disability.
TUG, RUPS and LUPS were assessed in 860 participants aged 71.3 ± 6.9 years (591 females) attending a primary health care clinic. The results of the three tests were expressed in seconds. Participants were classified as non-disabled without any risk, non-disabled with risk and in risk of dependence, using the Functional Assessment of Older People of EFAM (the Spanish acronym), previously validated for Chilean older people.
In all participants TUG, LUPS and RUPS values were 8.9 ± 3.6, 10 ± 10.6 and 9.7 ± 10.3 seconds (sec) respectively. Among non-disabled participants without risk, the values for TUG, RUPS and LUPS were: 7.9 ± 2.3, 12.7 ± 11.1 and 12.2 ± 10.9 sec respectively. The figures for non-disabled participants with risk were 8.4 ± 2.6, 8.8 ± 9.8 and 8.9 ± 9.8 sec respectively. The figures for participants in risk of dependence were 11.7 ± 5.3, 5.1 ± 7.8 and 4.5 ± 7.1 sec, respectively.
In this group of older participants there is an association between the degree of disability and the results of TUG, RUPS and LUPS.</description><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention & control</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Chile</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disabled Persons</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frail Elderly</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health Services for the Aged</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><issn>0717-6163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE1LxDAYhIMg7rr6FzRHL9U3SfPRoyx-wYIH13NJm7e7kWxbkxTZf2_x4zAMMzzMYQi5ZnBbgtJ3bwCiLCpjNAcmAYDNAnlClqCZLhRTYkHOU_oA4Foxc0YWXBoFXOklSVt_QEenkdre0d1Ao9_t808I2GU69X4cnA00Zdu3SCOmKeREfU_Xex_Q9nQIDiMdcRgD0i-f99T5rsOIfaYOdxEx0aGby2QbH3w-XpDTzoaEl3--Iu-PD9v1c7F5fXpZ32-KkZUsF20HrG2FMqKyYFvnSpBMoOOyc4JrxMZIbEqjtVWVtFiBbppSiYqhcgyEWJGb390xDp8TplwffGoxBNvjMKWaKc0VGGlgRq_-0KmZ_6jH6A82Huv_o8Q39QFrHQ</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Mancilla S, Eladio</creator><creator>Valenzuela H, José</creator><creator>Escobar C, Máximo</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Timed up and go right and left unipodal stance results in Chilean older people with different degrees of disability</title><author>Mancilla S, Eladio ; Valenzuela H, José ; Escobar C, Máximo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-cf01cc36839a0acdd40513ed25fd327eeb85eb4877a695ae907bb46391e6d1033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls - prevention & control</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Chile</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disabled Persons</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frail Elderly</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health Services for the Aged</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mancilla S, Eladio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valenzuela H, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escobar C, Máximo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista medíca de Chile</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mancilla S, Eladio</au><au>Valenzuela H, José</au><au>Escobar C, Máximo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Timed up and go right and left unipodal stance results in Chilean older people with different degrees of disability</atitle><jtitle>Revista medíca de Chile</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Med Chil</addtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>39-46</pages><eissn>0717-6163</eissn><abstract>The Preventive Health Examination of older people in Chile incorporates the timed up and go (TUG) and right and left unipodal stance test (RUPS and LUPS) as functional assessment methods.
To assess if TUG and LUPS discriminate older people with different degrees of disability.
TUG, RUPS and LUPS were assessed in 860 participants aged 71.3 ± 6.9 years (591 females) attending a primary health care clinic. The results of the three tests were expressed in seconds. Participants were classified as non-disabled without any risk, non-disabled with risk and in risk of dependence, using the Functional Assessment of Older People of EFAM (the Spanish acronym), previously validated for Chilean older people.
In all participants TUG, LUPS and RUPS values were 8.9 ± 3.6, 10 ± 10.6 and 9.7 ± 10.3 seconds (sec) respectively. Among non-disabled participants without risk, the values for TUG, RUPS and LUPS were: 7.9 ± 2.3, 12.7 ± 11.1 and 12.2 ± 10.9 sec respectively. The figures for non-disabled participants with risk were 8.4 ± 2.6, 8.8 ± 9.8 and 8.9 ± 9.8 sec respectively. The figures for participants in risk of dependence were 11.7 ± 5.3, 5.1 ± 7.8 and 4.5 ± 7.1 sec, respectively.
In this group of older participants there is an association between the degree of disability and the results of TUG, RUPS and LUPS.</abstract><cop>Chile</cop><pmid>25860267</pmid><doi>10.4067/S0034-98872015000100005</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | EISSN: 0717-6163 |
| ispartof | Revista medíca de Chile, 2015-01, Vol.143 (1), p.39-46 |
| issn | 0717-6163 |
| language | spa |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1672608580 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Accidental Falls - prevention & control Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Chile Cross-Sectional Studies Disabled Persons Female Frail Elderly Geriatric Assessment - methods Geriatric Assessment - statistics & numerical data Health Services for the Aged Humans Male Middle Aged Risk Factors Sex Factors |
| title | Timed up and go right and left unipodal stance results in Chilean older people with different degrees of disability |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A03%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Timed%20up%20and%20go%20right%20and%20left%20unipodal%20stance%20results%20in%20Chilean%20older%20people%20with%20different%20degrees%20of%20disability&rft.jtitle=Revista%20med%C3%ADca%20de%20Chile&rft.au=Mancilla%20S,%20Eladio&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=39-46&rft.eissn=0717-6163&rft_id=info:doi/10.4067/S0034-98872015000100005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1672608580%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1672608580&rft_id=info:pmid/25860267&rfr_iscdi=true |