Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program
To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Core Competency Measure (CCM), an instrument designed to assess professional competencies as defined by the Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and targeted by Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Maternal and child health journal 2015-02, Vol.19 (2), p.314-323 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 323 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 314 |
container_title | Maternal and child health journal |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Leff, Stephen S. Baum, Katherine T. Bevans, Katherine B. Blum, Nathan J. |
description | To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Core Competency Measure (CCM), an instrument designed to assess professional competencies as defined by the Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and targeted by Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) programs. The CCM is a 44-item self-report measure comprised of six subscales to assess clinical, interdisciplinary, family-centered/cultural, community, research, and advocacy/policy competencies. The CCM was developed in an iterative fashion through participatory action research, and then nine cohorts of LEND trainees (N = 144) from 14 different disciplines completed the CCM during the first week of the training program. A 6-factor confirmatory factor analysis model was fit to data from the 44 original items. After three items were removed, the model adequately fit the data (comparative fit indices = .93, root mean error of approximation = .06) with all factor loadings exceeding .55. The measure was determined to be quite reliable as adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability were found for each subscale. The instrument’s construct validity was supported by expected differences in self-rated competencies among fellows representing various disciplines, and the convergent validity was supported by the pattern of inter-correlations between subscale scores. The CCM appears to be a reliable and valid measure of MCHB core competencies for our sample of LEND trainees. It provides an assessment of key training areas addressed by the LEND program. Although the measure was developed within only one LEND Program, with additional research it has the potential to serve as a standardized tool to evaluate the strengths and limitations of MCHB training, both within and between programs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1672095689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A407669126</galeid><sourcerecordid>A407669126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2b138c23d627f58a187491eb8cc3c2cd748c51ec29f5071f8541bfe39fa0e8623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkmFr1DAcxosobk4_gG8kIMiEdSZp07Qvj7ubDo4p4nwbcum_dxlpcktSYftKfsmlu6k3OcEE0ib5Pc-fJE-WvSb4lGDMPwSCm4blmJQ5YWm4fZIdEsaLvKpo_TT944bmvObsIHsRwhXGSYXL59kBLRvMMS0Ps58z-AHGbXqw8QR9l0a3MmpnT5C0LbqM2uh4g1yXpujchuiHkUTRoUkIEAKaOg9p6DcQwSoNAWmL4hrQAmQLPqz1Bs3bQd27jnsXMHjX_qkqzX2pr2BkhBbNdJDLsepodbyYX8zeoy_erbzsX2bPOmkCvHr4HmWXZ_Nv00_54vPH8-lkkSvGy5jTJSlqRYu2orxjtSQ1LxsCy1qpQlHV8rJWjICiTccwJ13NSrLsoGg6iaGuaHGUHW99N95dDxCi6HVQYIy04IYgSMUpblhVN_-BMlriOrWEvv0LvXKDt-kgiSp5QXhBd6iVNCC07Vz0Uo2mYlJiXlUNoVWi8j3UCix4aZyFTqflR_zpHj71Fnqt9gre7QjWIE1cB2eG8RHDY5BsQeVdCB46sfG6l_5GECzGkIptSEUKqRhDKm6T5s3DTQzLHtrfil-pTADdAiFt2RX4nav6p-sdL3DwYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647317328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Leff, Stephen S. ; Baum, Katherine T. ; Bevans, Katherine B. ; Blum, Nathan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leff, Stephen S. ; Baum, Katherine T. ; Bevans, Katherine B. ; Blum, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><description>To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Core Competency Measure (CCM), an instrument designed to assess professional competencies as defined by the Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and targeted by Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) programs. The CCM is a 44-item self-report measure comprised of six subscales to assess clinical, interdisciplinary, family-centered/cultural, community, research, and advocacy/policy competencies. The CCM was developed in an iterative fashion through participatory action research, and then nine cohorts of LEND trainees (N = 144) from 14 different disciplines completed the CCM during the first week of the training program. A 6-factor confirmatory factor analysis model was fit to data from the 44 original items. After three items were removed, the model adequately fit the data (comparative fit indices = .93, root mean error of approximation = .06) with all factor loadings exceeding .55. The measure was determined to be quite reliable as adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability were found for each subscale. The instrument’s construct validity was supported by expected differences in self-rated competencies among fellows representing various disciplines, and the convergent validity was supported by the pattern of inter-correlations between subscale scores. The CCM appears to be a reliable and valid measure of MCHB core competencies for our sample of LEND trainees. It provides an assessment of key training areas addressed by the LEND program. Although the measure was developed within only one LEND Program, with additional research it has the potential to serve as a standardized tool to evaluate the strengths and limitations of MCHB training, both within and between programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24907024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Action research ; Adult ; Analysis ; Child ; Child & adolescent psychiatry ; Childrens health ; Core competencies ; Degeneration ; Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis ; Developmental Disabilities - therapy ; Disabilities ; Education ; Factor analysis ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health Personnel - education ; Health Services Research ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Interdisciplinary Studies ; Leadership ; Male ; Maternal & child health ; Maternal and Child Health ; Maternal-Child Health Centers - organization & administration ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nervous system ; Participatory research ; Pediatrics ; Population Economics ; Professional Competence ; Professionals ; Program Development ; Program Evaluation ; Psychometrics ; Public Health ; Quantitative psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sociology ; Training ; United States</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2015-02, Vol.19 (2), p.314-323</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2b138c23d627f58a187491eb8cc3c2cd748c51ec29f5071f8541bfe39fa0e8623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2b138c23d627f58a187491eb8cc3c2cd748c51ec29f5071f8541bfe39fa0e8623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24907024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leff, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Katherine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevans, Katherine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><title>Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Core Competency Measure (CCM), an instrument designed to assess professional competencies as defined by the Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and targeted by Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) programs. The CCM is a 44-item self-report measure comprised of six subscales to assess clinical, interdisciplinary, family-centered/cultural, community, research, and advocacy/policy competencies. The CCM was developed in an iterative fashion through participatory action research, and then nine cohorts of LEND trainees (N = 144) from 14 different disciplines completed the CCM during the first week of the training program. A 6-factor confirmatory factor analysis model was fit to data from the 44 original items. After three items were removed, the model adequately fit the data (comparative fit indices = .93, root mean error of approximation = .06) with all factor loadings exceeding .55. The measure was determined to be quite reliable as adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability were found for each subscale. The instrument’s construct validity was supported by expected differences in self-rated competencies among fellows representing various disciplines, and the convergent validity was supported by the pattern of inter-correlations between subscale scores. The CCM appears to be a reliable and valid measure of MCHB core competencies for our sample of LEND trainees. It provides an assessment of key training areas addressed by the LEND program. Although the measure was developed within only one LEND Program, with additional research it has the potential to serve as a standardized tool to evaluate the strengths and limitations of MCHB training, both within and between programs.</description><subject>Action research</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child & adolescent psychiatry</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Core competencies</subject><subject>Degeneration</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - therapy</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health Personnel - education</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Studies</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maternal & child health</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Maternal-Child Health Centers - organization & administration</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkmFr1DAcxosobk4_gG8kIMiEdSZp07Qvj7ubDo4p4nwbcum_dxlpcktSYftKfsmlu6k3OcEE0ib5Pc-fJE-WvSb4lGDMPwSCm4blmJQ5YWm4fZIdEsaLvKpo_TT944bmvObsIHsRwhXGSYXL59kBLRvMMS0Ps58z-AHGbXqw8QR9l0a3MmpnT5C0LbqM2uh4g1yXpujchuiHkUTRoUkIEAKaOg9p6DcQwSoNAWmL4hrQAmQLPqz1Bs3bQd27jnsXMHjX_qkqzX2pr2BkhBbNdJDLsepodbyYX8zeoy_erbzsX2bPOmkCvHr4HmWXZ_Nv00_54vPH8-lkkSvGy5jTJSlqRYu2orxjtSQ1LxsCy1qpQlHV8rJWjICiTccwJ13NSrLsoGg6iaGuaHGUHW99N95dDxCi6HVQYIy04IYgSMUpblhVN_-BMlriOrWEvv0LvXKDt-kgiSp5QXhBd6iVNCC07Vz0Uo2mYlJiXlUNoVWi8j3UCix4aZyFTqflR_zpHj71Fnqt9gre7QjWIE1cB2eG8RHDY5BsQeVdCB46sfG6l_5GECzGkIptSEUKqRhDKm6T5s3DTQzLHtrfil-pTADdAiFt2RX4nav6p-sdL3DwYw</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Leff, Stephen S.</creator><creator>Baum, Katherine T.</creator><creator>Bevans, Katherine B.</creator><creator>Blum, Nathan J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program</title><author>Leff, Stephen S. ; Baum, Katherine T. ; Bevans, Katherine B. ; Blum, Nathan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2b138c23d627f58a187491eb8cc3c2cd748c51ec29f5071f8541bfe39fa0e8623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Action research</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child & adolescent psychiatry</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Core competencies</topic><topic>Degeneration</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - therapy</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health Personnel - education</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Studies</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maternal & child health</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Maternal-Child Health Centers - organization & administration</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leff, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Katherine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevans, Katherine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leff, Stephen S.</au><au>Baum, Katherine T.</au><au>Bevans, Katherine B.</au><au>Blum, Nathan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>314</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>314-323</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Core Competency Measure (CCM), an instrument designed to assess professional competencies as defined by the Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and targeted by Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) programs. The CCM is a 44-item self-report measure comprised of six subscales to assess clinical, interdisciplinary, family-centered/cultural, community, research, and advocacy/policy competencies. The CCM was developed in an iterative fashion through participatory action research, and then nine cohorts of LEND trainees (N = 144) from 14 different disciplines completed the CCM during the first week of the training program. A 6-factor confirmatory factor analysis model was fit to data from the 44 original items. After three items were removed, the model adequately fit the data (comparative fit indices = .93, root mean error of approximation = .06) with all factor loadings exceeding .55. The measure was determined to be quite reliable as adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability were found for each subscale. The instrument’s construct validity was supported by expected differences in self-rated competencies among fellows representing various disciplines, and the convergent validity was supported by the pattern of inter-correlations between subscale scores. The CCM appears to be a reliable and valid measure of MCHB core competencies for our sample of LEND trainees. It provides an assessment of key training areas addressed by the LEND program. Although the measure was developed within only one LEND Program, with additional research it has the potential to serve as a standardized tool to evaluate the strengths and limitations of MCHB training, both within and between programs.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>24907024</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-7875 |
ispartof | Maternal and child health journal, 2015-02, Vol.19 (2), p.314-323 |
issn | 1092-7875 1573-6628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1672095689 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Action research Adult Analysis Child Child & adolescent psychiatry Childrens health Core competencies Degeneration Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis Developmental Disabilities - therapy Disabilities Education Factor analysis Female Gynecology Health Personnel - education Health Services Research Hospitals Humans Interdisciplinary aspects Interdisciplinary Studies Leadership Male Maternal & child health Maternal and Child Health Maternal-Child Health Centers - organization & administration Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nervous system Participatory research Pediatrics Population Economics Professional Competence Professionals Program Development Program Evaluation Psychometrics Public Health Quantitative psychology Reproducibility of Results Sociology Training United States |
title | Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A57%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development,%20Validation,%20and%20Utility%20of%20an%20Instrument%20to%20Assess%20Core%20Competencies%20in%20the%20Leadership%20Education%20in%20Neurodevelopmental%20and%20Related%20Disabilities%20(LEND)%20Program&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Leff,%20Stephen%20S.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=314&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=314-323&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA407669126%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647317328&rft_id=info:pmid/24907024&rft_galeid=A407669126&rfr_iscdi=true |