Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program

To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Core Competency Measure (CCM), an instrument designed to assess professional competencies as defined by the Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and targeted by Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Maternal and child health journal 2015-02, Vol.19 (2), p.314-323
Hauptverfasser: Leff, Stephen S., Baum, Katherine T., Bevans, Katherine B., Blum, Nathan J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 323
container_issue 2
container_start_page 314
container_title Maternal and child health journal
container_volume 19
creator Leff, Stephen S.
Baum, Katherine T.
Bevans, Katherine B.
Blum, Nathan J.
description To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Core Competency Measure (CCM), an instrument designed to assess professional competencies as defined by the Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and targeted by Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) programs. The CCM is a 44-item self-report measure comprised of six subscales to assess clinical, interdisciplinary, family-centered/cultural, community, research, and advocacy/policy competencies. The CCM was developed in an iterative fashion through participatory action research, and then nine cohorts of LEND trainees (N = 144) from 14 different disciplines completed the CCM during the first week of the training program. A 6-factor confirmatory factor analysis model was fit to data from the 44 original items. After three items were removed, the model adequately fit the data (comparative fit indices = .93, root mean error of approximation = .06) with all factor loadings exceeding .55. The measure was determined to be quite reliable as adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability were found for each subscale. The instrument’s construct validity was supported by expected differences in self-rated competencies among fellows representing various disciplines, and the convergent validity was supported by the pattern of inter-correlations between subscale scores. The CCM appears to be a reliable and valid measure of MCHB core competencies for our sample of LEND trainees. It provides an assessment of key training areas addressed by the LEND program. Although the measure was developed within only one LEND Program, with additional research it has the potential to serve as a standardized tool to evaluate the strengths and limitations of MCHB training, both within and between programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1672095689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A407669126</galeid><sourcerecordid>A407669126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2b138c23d627f58a187491eb8cc3c2cd748c51ec29f5071f8541bfe39fa0e8623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkmFr1DAcxosobk4_gG8kIMiEdSZp07Qvj7ubDo4p4nwbcum_dxlpcktSYftKfsmlu6k3OcEE0ib5Pc-fJE-WvSb4lGDMPwSCm4blmJQ5YWm4fZIdEsaLvKpo_TT944bmvObsIHsRwhXGSYXL59kBLRvMMS0Ps58z-AHGbXqw8QR9l0a3MmpnT5C0LbqM2uh4g1yXpujchuiHkUTRoUkIEAKaOg9p6DcQwSoNAWmL4hrQAmQLPqz1Bs3bQd27jnsXMHjX_qkqzX2pr2BkhBbNdJDLsepodbyYX8zeoy_erbzsX2bPOmkCvHr4HmWXZ_Nv00_54vPH8-lkkSvGy5jTJSlqRYu2orxjtSQ1LxsCy1qpQlHV8rJWjICiTccwJ13NSrLsoGg6iaGuaHGUHW99N95dDxCi6HVQYIy04IYgSMUpblhVN_-BMlriOrWEvv0LvXKDt-kgiSp5QXhBd6iVNCC07Vz0Uo2mYlJiXlUNoVWi8j3UCix4aZyFTqflR_zpHj71Fnqt9gre7QjWIE1cB2eG8RHDY5BsQeVdCB46sfG6l_5GECzGkIptSEUKqRhDKm6T5s3DTQzLHtrfil-pTADdAiFt2RX4nav6p-sdL3DwYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647317328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Leff, Stephen S. ; Baum, Katherine T. ; Bevans, Katherine B. ; Blum, Nathan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leff, Stephen S. ; Baum, Katherine T. ; Bevans, Katherine B. ; Blum, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><description>To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Core Competency Measure (CCM), an instrument designed to assess professional competencies as defined by the Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and targeted by Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) programs. The CCM is a 44-item self-report measure comprised of six subscales to assess clinical, interdisciplinary, family-centered/cultural, community, research, and advocacy/policy competencies. The CCM was developed in an iterative fashion through participatory action research, and then nine cohorts of LEND trainees (N = 144) from 14 different disciplines completed the CCM during the first week of the training program. A 6-factor confirmatory factor analysis model was fit to data from the 44 original items. After three items were removed, the model adequately fit the data (comparative fit indices = .93, root mean error of approximation = .06) with all factor loadings exceeding .55. The measure was determined to be quite reliable as adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability were found for each subscale. The instrument’s construct validity was supported by expected differences in self-rated competencies among fellows representing various disciplines, and the convergent validity was supported by the pattern of inter-correlations between subscale scores. The CCM appears to be a reliable and valid measure of MCHB core competencies for our sample of LEND trainees. It provides an assessment of key training areas addressed by the LEND program. Although the measure was developed within only one LEND Program, with additional research it has the potential to serve as a standardized tool to evaluate the strengths and limitations of MCHB training, both within and between programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24907024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Action research ; Adult ; Analysis ; Child ; Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry ; Childrens health ; Core competencies ; Degeneration ; Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis ; Developmental Disabilities - therapy ; Disabilities ; Education ; Factor analysis ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health Personnel - education ; Health Services Research ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Interdisciplinary Studies ; Leadership ; Male ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Maternal and Child Health ; Maternal-Child Health Centers - organization &amp; administration ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nervous system ; Participatory research ; Pediatrics ; Population Economics ; Professional Competence ; Professionals ; Program Development ; Program Evaluation ; Psychometrics ; Public Health ; Quantitative psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sociology ; Training ; United States</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2015-02, Vol.19 (2), p.314-323</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2b138c23d627f58a187491eb8cc3c2cd748c51ec29f5071f8541bfe39fa0e8623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2b138c23d627f58a187491eb8cc3c2cd748c51ec29f5071f8541bfe39fa0e8623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24907024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leff, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Katherine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevans, Katherine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><title>Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Core Competency Measure (CCM), an instrument designed to assess professional competencies as defined by the Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and targeted by Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) programs. The CCM is a 44-item self-report measure comprised of six subscales to assess clinical, interdisciplinary, family-centered/cultural, community, research, and advocacy/policy competencies. The CCM was developed in an iterative fashion through participatory action research, and then nine cohorts of LEND trainees (N = 144) from 14 different disciplines completed the CCM during the first week of the training program. A 6-factor confirmatory factor analysis model was fit to data from the 44 original items. After three items were removed, the model adequately fit the data (comparative fit indices = .93, root mean error of approximation = .06) with all factor loadings exceeding .55. The measure was determined to be quite reliable as adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability were found for each subscale. The instrument’s construct validity was supported by expected differences in self-rated competencies among fellows representing various disciplines, and the convergent validity was supported by the pattern of inter-correlations between subscale scores. The CCM appears to be a reliable and valid measure of MCHB core competencies for our sample of LEND trainees. It provides an assessment of key training areas addressed by the LEND program. Although the measure was developed within only one LEND Program, with additional research it has the potential to serve as a standardized tool to evaluate the strengths and limitations of MCHB training, both within and between programs.</description><subject>Action research</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Core competencies</subject><subject>Degeneration</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - therapy</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health Personnel - education</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Studies</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Maternal-Child Health Centers - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkmFr1DAcxosobk4_gG8kIMiEdSZp07Qvj7ubDo4p4nwbcum_dxlpcktSYftKfsmlu6k3OcEE0ib5Pc-fJE-WvSb4lGDMPwSCm4blmJQ5YWm4fZIdEsaLvKpo_TT944bmvObsIHsRwhXGSYXL59kBLRvMMS0Ps58z-AHGbXqw8QR9l0a3MmpnT5C0LbqM2uh4g1yXpujchuiHkUTRoUkIEAKaOg9p6DcQwSoNAWmL4hrQAmQLPqz1Bs3bQd27jnsXMHjX_qkqzX2pr2BkhBbNdJDLsepodbyYX8zeoy_erbzsX2bPOmkCvHr4HmWXZ_Nv00_54vPH8-lkkSvGy5jTJSlqRYu2orxjtSQ1LxsCy1qpQlHV8rJWjICiTccwJ13NSrLsoGg6iaGuaHGUHW99N95dDxCi6HVQYIy04IYgSMUpblhVN_-BMlriOrWEvv0LvXKDt-kgiSp5QXhBd6iVNCC07Vz0Uo2mYlJiXlUNoVWi8j3UCix4aZyFTqflR_zpHj71Fnqt9gre7QjWIE1cB2eG8RHDY5BsQeVdCB46sfG6l_5GECzGkIptSEUKqRhDKm6T5s3DTQzLHtrfil-pTADdAiFt2RX4nav6p-sdL3DwYw</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Leff, Stephen S.</creator><creator>Baum, Katherine T.</creator><creator>Bevans, Katherine B.</creator><creator>Blum, Nathan J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program</title><author>Leff, Stephen S. ; Baum, Katherine T. ; Bevans, Katherine B. ; Blum, Nathan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-2b138c23d627f58a187491eb8cc3c2cd748c51ec29f5071f8541bfe39fa0e8623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Action research</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Core competencies</topic><topic>Degeneration</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - therapy</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health Personnel - education</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Studies</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Maternal-Child Health Centers - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leff, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Katherine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevans, Katherine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leff, Stephen S.</au><au>Baum, Katherine T.</au><au>Bevans, Katherine B.</au><au>Blum, Nathan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>314</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>314-323</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Core Competency Measure (CCM), an instrument designed to assess professional competencies as defined by the Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) and targeted by Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) programs. The CCM is a 44-item self-report measure comprised of six subscales to assess clinical, interdisciplinary, family-centered/cultural, community, research, and advocacy/policy competencies. The CCM was developed in an iterative fashion through participatory action research, and then nine cohorts of LEND trainees (N = 144) from 14 different disciplines completed the CCM during the first week of the training program. A 6-factor confirmatory factor analysis model was fit to data from the 44 original items. After three items were removed, the model adequately fit the data (comparative fit indices = .93, root mean error of approximation = .06) with all factor loadings exceeding .55. The measure was determined to be quite reliable as adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability were found for each subscale. The instrument’s construct validity was supported by expected differences in self-rated competencies among fellows representing various disciplines, and the convergent validity was supported by the pattern of inter-correlations between subscale scores. The CCM appears to be a reliable and valid measure of MCHB core competencies for our sample of LEND trainees. It provides an assessment of key training areas addressed by the LEND program. Although the measure was developed within only one LEND Program, with additional research it has the potential to serve as a standardized tool to evaluate the strengths and limitations of MCHB training, both within and between programs.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>24907024</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-7875
ispartof Maternal and child health journal, 2015-02, Vol.19 (2), p.314-323
issn 1092-7875
1573-6628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1672095689
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Action research
Adult
Analysis
Child
Child & adolescent psychiatry
Childrens health
Core competencies
Degeneration
Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis
Developmental Disabilities - therapy
Disabilities
Education
Factor analysis
Female
Gynecology
Health Personnel - education
Health Services Research
Hospitals
Humans
Interdisciplinary aspects
Interdisciplinary Studies
Leadership
Male
Maternal & child health
Maternal and Child Health
Maternal-Child Health Centers - organization & administration
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nervous system
Participatory research
Pediatrics
Population Economics
Professional Competence
Professionals
Program Development
Program Evaluation
Psychometrics
Public Health
Quantitative psychology
Reproducibility of Results
Sociology
Training
United States
title Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A57%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development,%20Validation,%20and%20Utility%20of%20an%20Instrument%20to%20Assess%20Core%20Competencies%20in%20the%20Leadership%20Education%20in%20Neurodevelopmental%20and%20Related%20Disabilities%20(LEND)%20Program&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Leff,%20Stephen%20S.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=314&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=314-323&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-014-1514-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA407669126%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647317328&rft_id=info:pmid/24907024&rft_galeid=A407669126&rfr_iscdi=true