Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles of company car drivers

•In the current situation the conventional technology is preferred to AFVs.•Improvements in technology and refuelling infrastructure increase AFV preferences.•Current policy tax incentives in the Netherlands increase AFV preferences.•AFV preferences are different for company car drivers than for pri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Resource and energy economics 2014-08, Vol.37, p.279-301
Hauptverfasser: Koetse, Mark J., Hoen, Anco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 301
container_issue
container_start_page 279
container_title Resource and energy economics
container_volume 37
creator Koetse, Mark J.
Hoen, Anco
description •In the current situation the conventional technology is preferred to AFVs.•Improvements in technology and refuelling infrastructure increase AFV preferences.•Current policy tax incentives in the Netherlands increase AFV preferences.•AFV preferences are different for company car drivers than for private car owners.•Early adopters of electric and fuel cell cars are among drivers with low mileage. Costs of car ownership for company cars drivers and private car owners are very different. Car use, car choice decisions and preferences for car characteristics may therefore differ substantially between these two markets. In this paper, we present results of a study on the preferences of company car drivers for alternative fuel vehicles and their characteristics, based on data from an online stated choice experiment in the Netherlands. Results show that, assuming current car characteristics, preferences for alternative fuel vehicles, and for electric and fuel cell cars in particular, are substantially lower than those for the conventional technology. Limited driving ranges, long recharge/refuelling times and limited availability of refuelling opportunities, are to a large extent responsible for this. Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles increase considerably with improvements on these aspects, especially for the hybrid and flexifuel car. Under the current company car tax system in the Netherlands, which favours cleaner technologies, these two car types are even preferred to the conventional technology, assuming equal catalogue prices and personal monthly cost contributions. Comparing results with those from a similar choice experiment among private car owners shows that willingness to pay patterns for AFV improvements regarding driving range, recharge and refuelling times, fuel availability and diversity in AFV supply, are considerably different for company car drivers than for private car owners. Company and private car drivers may therefore react (very) differently to future improvements in AFV technology and fuel availability. We finally show that preferences of company car drivers for fuel cell and electric cars depend to a large extent on annual mileage. Market share simulations show that potential early adopters of electric and fuel cell cars can be found among people with a relatively low annual mileage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.12.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671615941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0928765514000049</els_id><sourcerecordid>3379082471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-25620147531a6bd37bd1af8853ce2eea99f45048b79d8e664502772f3eba371c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLAzEQgIMoWKu_wQURvOyaxybZvVmKLyjoQc8hzU4wZbupyW6h_94sLT146WkI881kZj6EbgkuCCbicVUEiNABGF9QTFhBaIGxOEMTUkmWY0rJOZrgmla5FJxfoqsYVxhjjnE9QU-fASwE6AzEzPqQ6baH0OnebSGzA7TZFn6caVPW28z49UZ3u8zokDUhISFeowur2wg3hzhF3y_PX_O3fPHx-j6fLXLDJetzykUarpScES2WDZPLhmhbVZwZoAC6rm3JcVktZd1UIER6UCmpZbDUTBLDpuhh33cT_O8AsVdrFw20re7AD1ERIYkgvC7JaZTzEWVMJvTuH7ryQ1q_HalSpGmprBIl95QJPsZ0MLUJbq3DThGsRglqpY4S1ChBEaqShFR5f-ivo9GtDbozLh7LaSVwWrVM3GzPQTrh1kFQ0bhRSuMCmF413p386w90b589</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1546531278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles of company car drivers</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Koetse, Mark J. ; Hoen, Anco</creator><creatorcontrib>Koetse, Mark J. ; Hoen, Anco</creatorcontrib><description>•In the current situation the conventional technology is preferred to AFVs.•Improvements in technology and refuelling infrastructure increase AFV preferences.•Current policy tax incentives in the Netherlands increase AFV preferences.•AFV preferences are different for company car drivers than for private car owners.•Early adopters of electric and fuel cell cars are among drivers with low mileage. Costs of car ownership for company cars drivers and private car owners are very different. Car use, car choice decisions and preferences for car characteristics may therefore differ substantially between these two markets. In this paper, we present results of a study on the preferences of company car drivers for alternative fuel vehicles and their characteristics, based on data from an online stated choice experiment in the Netherlands. Results show that, assuming current car characteristics, preferences for alternative fuel vehicles, and for electric and fuel cell cars in particular, are substantially lower than those for the conventional technology. Limited driving ranges, long recharge/refuelling times and limited availability of refuelling opportunities, are to a large extent responsible for this. Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles increase considerably with improvements on these aspects, especially for the hybrid and flexifuel car. Under the current company car tax system in the Netherlands, which favours cleaner technologies, these two car types are even preferred to the conventional technology, assuming equal catalogue prices and personal monthly cost contributions. Comparing results with those from a similar choice experiment among private car owners shows that willingness to pay patterns for AFV improvements regarding driving range, recharge and refuelling times, fuel availability and diversity in AFV supply, are considerably different for company car drivers than for private car owners. Company and private car drivers may therefore react (very) differently to future improvements in AFV technology and fuel availability. We finally show that preferences of company car drivers for fuel cell and electric cars depend to a large extent on annual mileage. Market share simulations show that potential early adopters of electric and fuel cell cars can be found among people with a relatively low annual mileage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0928-7655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0221</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.12.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Alternative fuel vehicles ; Alternative fuels ; Annual mileage ; Applied sciences ; Automobile drivers ; Automobiles ; Automotive engineering ; Availability ; Car choice ; Choice experiment ; Clean technology ; Company automobiles ; Company cars ; Decision analysis ; Drivers ; Electric vehicles ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fuel cells ; Fuel consumption ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Hybrid vehicles ; Markets ; Policy tax ; Refuelling ; Road transportation and traffic ; Studies ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Resource and energy economics, 2014-08, Vol.37, p.279-301</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Aug 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-25620147531a6bd37bd1af8853ce2eea99f45048b79d8e664502772f3eba371c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-25620147531a6bd37bd1af8853ce2eea99f45048b79d8e664502772f3eba371c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9066-8500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.12.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28606454$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koetse, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoen, Anco</creatorcontrib><title>Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles of company car drivers</title><title>Resource and energy economics</title><description>•In the current situation the conventional technology is preferred to AFVs.•Improvements in technology and refuelling infrastructure increase AFV preferences.•Current policy tax incentives in the Netherlands increase AFV preferences.•AFV preferences are different for company car drivers than for private car owners.•Early adopters of electric and fuel cell cars are among drivers with low mileage. Costs of car ownership for company cars drivers and private car owners are very different. Car use, car choice decisions and preferences for car characteristics may therefore differ substantially between these two markets. In this paper, we present results of a study on the preferences of company car drivers for alternative fuel vehicles and their characteristics, based on data from an online stated choice experiment in the Netherlands. Results show that, assuming current car characteristics, preferences for alternative fuel vehicles, and for electric and fuel cell cars in particular, are substantially lower than those for the conventional technology. Limited driving ranges, long recharge/refuelling times and limited availability of refuelling opportunities, are to a large extent responsible for this. Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles increase considerably with improvements on these aspects, especially for the hybrid and flexifuel car. Under the current company car tax system in the Netherlands, which favours cleaner technologies, these two car types are even preferred to the conventional technology, assuming equal catalogue prices and personal monthly cost contributions. Comparing results with those from a similar choice experiment among private car owners shows that willingness to pay patterns for AFV improvements regarding driving range, recharge and refuelling times, fuel availability and diversity in AFV supply, are considerably different for company car drivers than for private car owners. Company and private car drivers may therefore react (very) differently to future improvements in AFV technology and fuel availability. We finally show that preferences of company car drivers for fuel cell and electric cars depend to a large extent on annual mileage. Market share simulations show that potential early adopters of electric and fuel cell cars can be found among people with a relatively low annual mileage.</description><subject>Alternative fuel vehicles</subject><subject>Alternative fuels</subject><subject>Annual mileage</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Automobile drivers</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Car choice</subject><subject>Choice experiment</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Company automobiles</subject><subject>Company cars</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Drivers</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Fuel consumption</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Hybrid vehicles</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Policy tax</subject><subject>Refuelling</subject><subject>Road transportation and traffic</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0928-7655</issn><issn>1873-0221</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtLAzEQgIMoWKu_wQURvOyaxybZvVmKLyjoQc8hzU4wZbupyW6h_94sLT146WkI881kZj6EbgkuCCbicVUEiNABGF9QTFhBaIGxOEMTUkmWY0rJOZrgmla5FJxfoqsYVxhjjnE9QU-fASwE6AzEzPqQ6baH0OnebSGzA7TZFn6caVPW28z49UZ3u8zokDUhISFeowur2wg3hzhF3y_PX_O3fPHx-j6fLXLDJetzykUarpScES2WDZPLhmhbVZwZoAC6rm3JcVktZd1UIER6UCmpZbDUTBLDpuhh33cT_O8AsVdrFw20re7AD1ERIYkgvC7JaZTzEWVMJvTuH7ryQ1q_HalSpGmprBIl95QJPsZ0MLUJbq3DThGsRglqpY4S1ChBEaqShFR5f-ivo9GtDbozLh7LaSVwWrVM3GzPQTrh1kFQ0bhRSuMCmF413p386w90b589</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Koetse, Mark J.</creator><creator>Hoen, Anco</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-8500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles of company car drivers</title><author>Koetse, Mark J. ; Hoen, Anco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-25620147531a6bd37bd1af8853ce2eea99f45048b79d8e664502772f3eba371c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alternative fuel vehicles</topic><topic>Alternative fuels</topic><topic>Annual mileage</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Automobile drivers</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Car choice</topic><topic>Choice experiment</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Company automobiles</topic><topic>Company cars</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Drivers</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Fuel consumption</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Hybrid vehicles</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Policy tax</topic><topic>Refuelling</topic><topic>Road transportation and traffic</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koetse, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoen, Anco</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Resource and energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koetse, Mark J.</au><au>Hoen, Anco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles of company car drivers</atitle><jtitle>Resource and energy economics</jtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>37</volume><spage>279</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>279-301</pages><issn>0928-7655</issn><eissn>1873-0221</eissn><abstract>•In the current situation the conventional technology is preferred to AFVs.•Improvements in technology and refuelling infrastructure increase AFV preferences.•Current policy tax incentives in the Netherlands increase AFV preferences.•AFV preferences are different for company car drivers than for private car owners.•Early adopters of electric and fuel cell cars are among drivers with low mileage. Costs of car ownership for company cars drivers and private car owners are very different. Car use, car choice decisions and preferences for car characteristics may therefore differ substantially between these two markets. In this paper, we present results of a study on the preferences of company car drivers for alternative fuel vehicles and their characteristics, based on data from an online stated choice experiment in the Netherlands. Results show that, assuming current car characteristics, preferences for alternative fuel vehicles, and for electric and fuel cell cars in particular, are substantially lower than those for the conventional technology. Limited driving ranges, long recharge/refuelling times and limited availability of refuelling opportunities, are to a large extent responsible for this. Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles increase considerably with improvements on these aspects, especially for the hybrid and flexifuel car. Under the current company car tax system in the Netherlands, which favours cleaner technologies, these two car types are even preferred to the conventional technology, assuming equal catalogue prices and personal monthly cost contributions. Comparing results with those from a similar choice experiment among private car owners shows that willingness to pay patterns for AFV improvements regarding driving range, recharge and refuelling times, fuel availability and diversity in AFV supply, are considerably different for company car drivers than for private car owners. Company and private car drivers may therefore react (very) differently to future improvements in AFV technology and fuel availability. We finally show that preferences of company car drivers for fuel cell and electric cars depend to a large extent on annual mileage. Market share simulations show that potential early adopters of electric and fuel cell cars can be found among people with a relatively low annual mileage.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.12.006</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-8500</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0928-7655
ispartof Resource and energy economics, 2014-08, Vol.37, p.279-301
issn 0928-7655
1873-0221
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671615941
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Alternative fuel vehicles
Alternative fuels
Annual mileage
Applied sciences
Automobile drivers
Automobiles
Automotive engineering
Availability
Car choice
Choice experiment
Clean technology
Company automobiles
Company cars
Decision analysis
Drivers
Electric vehicles
Exact sciences and technology
Fuel cells
Fuel consumption
Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction
Hybrid vehicles
Markets
Policy tax
Refuelling
Road transportation and traffic
Studies
Willingness to pay
title Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles of company car drivers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A50%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferences%20for%20alternative%20fuel%20vehicles%20of%20company%20car%20drivers&rft.jtitle=Resource%20and%20energy%20economics&rft.au=Koetse,%20Mark%20J.&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=37&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=279-301&rft.issn=0928-7655&rft.eissn=1873-0221&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.12.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3379082471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1546531278&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0928765514000049&rfr_iscdi=true