Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants
Abstract Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem–neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical engineering & physics 2014-03, Vol.36 (3), p.300-307 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 307 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 300 |
container_title | Medical engineering & physics |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Jauch, S.Y Huber, G Haschke, H Sellenschloh, K Morlock, M.M |
description | Abstract Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem–neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesculap AG) has demonstrated a substantial number of in vivo neck fractures for Ti–Ti couplings, but there are no documented fractures for Ti–CoCr couplings. Conversely, for a comparable design (H-Max M, Limacorporate) with a Ti–Ti coupling only one clinical failure has been reported. Prostheses were mechanically tested and the micromotions were recorded using a contactless measurement system. For Ti–Ti couplings, the Metha prosthesis showed a trend towards higher micromotions compared to the H-Max M (6.5 ± 1.6 μm vs. 3.6 ± 1.5 μm, p = 0.08). Independent of the design, prostheses with Ti neck adapter caused significantly higher interface micromotions than those with CoCr ones (5.1 ± 2.1 μm vs. 0.8 ± 1.6 μm, p = 0.001). No differences in micromotions between the Metha prosthesis with CoCr neck and the H-Max M with Ti neck were observed (2.6 ± 2.0 μm, p = 0.25). The material coupling and the design are both crucial for the micromotions magnitude. The extent of micromotions seems to correspond to the number of clinically observed fractures and confirm the relationship between those and the occurrence of fretting corrosion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.11.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671583303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1350453313002555</els_id><sourcerecordid>1520360631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-73b0abeb4db42b0ad3e40d120f49d3fefeb41036d1b71457f79bf337e05b815e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwCuAjlyxjj5NsLkhVoYBUiQNwthx7suttYgc7qbQ3noBL35AnwcuWHrjQk8eab-YfzT9F8YrDigOv3-xWI1nym2m7XwnguOJ8BdA-Kk75usFSAsLjHGMFpawQT4pnKe0AQMoanxYnQiKKdStPi5_vKLmNZ5OOeqSZYmLaWzZviY06f50emAnLNDi_YToSs2RccjfE-hCPmDMxjGF2weeSjXfzYonp-U8yzTT--nHryVwz53O_XhtioWedK8dgl0FHtnUTc-M0aD-n58WTXg-JXty9Z8W3y_dfLz6WV58_fLo4vyqNbMVcNtiB7qiTtpMihxZJguUCetla7KnPKQ5YW941XFZN37Rdj9gQVN2aV4Rnxetj3ymG7wulWY0uGRryEBSWpHjd8GqNCPh_tBJZCWrkD0BhLUUtmjajzRHNy0spUq-m6EYd94qDOlisdureYnWwWHGussW58uWdyNJl4r7ur6cZOD8ClBd44yiqZBx5Q9ZFMrOywT1A5O0_PUy-AGf0cE17SruwRJ_9UVwloUB9OVza4dA4AoiqqvA3yy_Tuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508426279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Jauch, S.Y ; Huber, G ; Haschke, H ; Sellenschloh, K ; Morlock, M.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jauch, S.Y ; Huber, G ; Haschke, H ; Sellenschloh, K ; Morlock, M.M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem–neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesculap AG) has demonstrated a substantial number of in vivo neck fractures for Ti–Ti couplings, but there are no documented fractures for Ti–CoCr couplings. Conversely, for a comparable design (H-Max M, Limacorporate) with a Ti–Ti coupling only one clinical failure has been reported. Prostheses were mechanically tested and the micromotions were recorded using a contactless measurement system. For Ti–Ti couplings, the Metha prosthesis showed a trend towards higher micromotions compared to the H-Max M (6.5 ± 1.6 μm vs. 3.6 ± 1.5 μm, p = 0.08). Independent of the design, prostheses with Ti neck adapter caused significantly higher interface micromotions than those with CoCr ones (5.1 ± 2.1 μm vs. 0.8 ± 1.6 μm, p = 0.001). No differences in micromotions between the Metha prosthesis with CoCr neck and the H-Max M with Ti neck were observed (2.6 ± 2.0 μm, p = 0.25). The material coupling and the design are both crucial for the micromotions magnitude. The extent of micromotions seems to correspond to the number of clinically observed fractures and confirm the relationship between those and the occurrence of fretting corrosion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4533</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.11.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24332894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bi-modular prosthesis ; Biocompatibility ; Couplings ; Design engineering ; Elasticity ; Finite Element Analysis ; Fracture mechanics ; Fretting ; Hip Prosthesis ; Materials Testing ; Micromotion ; Motion ; Neck fracture ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Design - methods ; Prosthetics ; Radiology ; Stem–neck interface ; Surgical implants ; Titanium</subject><ispartof>Medical engineering & physics, 2014-03, Vol.36 (3), p.300-307</ispartof><rights>IPEM</rights><rights>2013 IPEM</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-73b0abeb4db42b0ad3e40d120f49d3fefeb41036d1b71457f79bf337e05b815e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-73b0abeb4db42b0ad3e40d120f49d3fefeb41036d1b71457f79bf337e05b815e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453313002555$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24332894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jauch, S.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haschke, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellenschloh, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morlock, M.M</creatorcontrib><title>Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants</title><title>Medical engineering & physics</title><addtitle>Med Eng Phys</addtitle><description>Abstract Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem–neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesculap AG) has demonstrated a substantial number of in vivo neck fractures for Ti–Ti couplings, but there are no documented fractures for Ti–CoCr couplings. Conversely, for a comparable design (H-Max M, Limacorporate) with a Ti–Ti coupling only one clinical failure has been reported. Prostheses were mechanically tested and the micromotions were recorded using a contactless measurement system. For Ti–Ti couplings, the Metha prosthesis showed a trend towards higher micromotions compared to the H-Max M (6.5 ± 1.6 μm vs. 3.6 ± 1.5 μm, p = 0.08). Independent of the design, prostheses with Ti neck adapter caused significantly higher interface micromotions than those with CoCr ones (5.1 ± 2.1 μm vs. 0.8 ± 1.6 μm, p = 0.001). No differences in micromotions between the Metha prosthesis with CoCr neck and the H-Max M with Ti neck were observed (2.6 ± 2.0 μm, p = 0.25). The material coupling and the design are both crucial for the micromotions magnitude. The extent of micromotions seems to correspond to the number of clinically observed fractures and confirm the relationship between those and the occurrence of fretting corrosion.</description><subject>Bi-modular prosthesis</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Couplings</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Fretting</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Micromotion</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Neck fracture</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design - methods</subject><subject>Prosthetics</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Stem–neck interface</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>1350-4533</issn><issn>1873-4030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwCuAjlyxjj5NsLkhVoYBUiQNwthx7suttYgc7qbQ3noBL35AnwcuWHrjQk8eab-YfzT9F8YrDigOv3-xWI1nym2m7XwnguOJ8BdA-Kk75usFSAsLjHGMFpawQT4pnKe0AQMoanxYnQiKKdStPi5_vKLmNZ5OOeqSZYmLaWzZviY06f50emAnLNDi_YToSs2RccjfE-hCPmDMxjGF2weeSjXfzYonp-U8yzTT--nHryVwz53O_XhtioWedK8dgl0FHtnUTc-M0aD-n58WTXg-JXty9Z8W3y_dfLz6WV58_fLo4vyqNbMVcNtiB7qiTtpMihxZJguUCetla7KnPKQ5YW941XFZN37Rdj9gQVN2aV4Rnxetj3ymG7wulWY0uGRryEBSWpHjd8GqNCPh_tBJZCWrkD0BhLUUtmjajzRHNy0spUq-m6EYd94qDOlisdureYnWwWHGussW58uWdyNJl4r7ur6cZOD8ClBd44yiqZBx5Q9ZFMrOywT1A5O0_PUy-AGf0cE17SruwRJ_9UVwloUB9OVza4dA4AoiqqvA3yy_Tuw</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Jauch, S.Y</creator><creator>Huber, G</creator><creator>Haschke, H</creator><creator>Sellenschloh, K</creator><creator>Morlock, M.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants</title><author>Jauch, S.Y ; Huber, G ; Haschke, H ; Sellenschloh, K ; Morlock, M.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-73b0abeb4db42b0ad3e40d120f49d3fefeb41036d1b71457f79bf337e05b815e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bi-modular prosthesis</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Couplings</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Fretting</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Micromotion</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Neck fracture</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design - methods</topic><topic>Prosthetics</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Stem–neck interface</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jauch, S.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haschke, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellenschloh, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morlock, M.M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Medical engineering & physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jauch, S.Y</au><au>Huber, G</au><au>Haschke, H</au><au>Sellenschloh, K</au><au>Morlock, M.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants</atitle><jtitle>Medical engineering & physics</jtitle><addtitle>Med Eng Phys</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>300-307</pages><issn>1350-4533</issn><eissn>1873-4030</eissn><abstract>Abstract Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem–neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesculap AG) has demonstrated a substantial number of in vivo neck fractures for Ti–Ti couplings, but there are no documented fractures for Ti–CoCr couplings. Conversely, for a comparable design (H-Max M, Limacorporate) with a Ti–Ti coupling only one clinical failure has been reported. Prostheses were mechanically tested and the micromotions were recorded using a contactless measurement system. For Ti–Ti couplings, the Metha prosthesis showed a trend towards higher micromotions compared to the H-Max M (6.5 ± 1.6 μm vs. 3.6 ± 1.5 μm, p = 0.08). Independent of the design, prostheses with Ti neck adapter caused significantly higher interface micromotions than those with CoCr ones (5.1 ± 2.1 μm vs. 0.8 ± 1.6 μm, p = 0.001). No differences in micromotions between the Metha prosthesis with CoCr neck and the H-Max M with Ti neck were observed (2.6 ± 2.0 μm, p = 0.25). The material coupling and the design are both crucial for the micromotions magnitude. The extent of micromotions seems to correspond to the number of clinically observed fractures and confirm the relationship between those and the occurrence of fretting corrosion.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24332894</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.11.009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-4533 |
ispartof | Medical engineering & physics, 2014-03, Vol.36 (3), p.300-307 |
issn | 1350-4533 1873-4030 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671583303 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Bi-modular prosthesis Biocompatibility Couplings Design engineering Elasticity Finite Element Analysis Fracture mechanics Fretting Hip Prosthesis Materials Testing Micromotion Motion Neck fracture Prostheses Prosthesis Design - methods Prosthetics Radiology Stem–neck interface Surgical implants Titanium |
title | Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A58%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20parameters%20and%20the%20material%20coupling%20are%20decisive%20for%20the%20micromotion%20magnitude%20at%20the%20stem%E2%80%93neck%20interface%20of%20bi-modular%20hip%20implants&rft.jtitle=Medical%20engineering%20&%20physics&rft.au=Jauch,%20S.Y&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=300-307&rft.issn=1350-4533&rft.eissn=1873-4030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.11.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520360631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508426279&rft_id=info:pmid/24332894&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1350453313002555&rfr_iscdi=true |