Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants

Abstract Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem–neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical engineering & physics 2014-03, Vol.36 (3), p.300-307
Hauptverfasser: Jauch, S.Y, Huber, G, Haschke, H, Sellenschloh, K, Morlock, M.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 307
container_issue 3
container_start_page 300
container_title Medical engineering & physics
container_volume 36
creator Jauch, S.Y
Huber, G
Haschke, H
Sellenschloh, K
Morlock, M.M
description Abstract Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem–neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesculap AG) has demonstrated a substantial number of in vivo neck fractures for Ti–Ti couplings, but there are no documented fractures for Ti–CoCr couplings. Conversely, for a comparable design (H-Max M, Limacorporate) with a Ti–Ti coupling only one clinical failure has been reported. Prostheses were mechanically tested and the micromotions were recorded using a contactless measurement system. For Ti–Ti couplings, the Metha prosthesis showed a trend towards higher micromotions compared to the H-Max M (6.5 ± 1.6 μm vs. 3.6 ± 1.5 μm, p = 0.08). Independent of the design, prostheses with Ti neck adapter caused significantly higher interface micromotions than those with CoCr ones (5.1 ± 2.1 μm vs. 0.8 ± 1.6 μm, p = 0.001). No differences in micromotions between the Metha prosthesis with CoCr neck and the H-Max M with Ti neck were observed (2.6 ± 2.0 μm, p = 0.25). The material coupling and the design are both crucial for the micromotions magnitude. The extent of micromotions seems to correspond to the number of clinically observed fractures and confirm the relationship between those and the occurrence of fretting corrosion.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.11.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671583303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1350453313002555</els_id><sourcerecordid>1520360631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-73b0abeb4db42b0ad3e40d120f49d3fefeb41036d1b71457f79bf337e05b815e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwCuAjlyxjj5NsLkhVoYBUiQNwthx7suttYgc7qbQ3noBL35AnwcuWHrjQk8eab-YfzT9F8YrDigOv3-xWI1nym2m7XwnguOJ8BdA-Kk75usFSAsLjHGMFpawQT4pnKe0AQMoanxYnQiKKdStPi5_vKLmNZ5OOeqSZYmLaWzZviY06f50emAnLNDi_YToSs2RccjfE-hCPmDMxjGF2weeSjXfzYonp-U8yzTT--nHryVwz53O_XhtioWedK8dgl0FHtnUTc-M0aD-n58WTXg-JXty9Z8W3y_dfLz6WV58_fLo4vyqNbMVcNtiB7qiTtpMihxZJguUCetla7KnPKQ5YW941XFZN37Rdj9gQVN2aV4Rnxetj3ymG7wulWY0uGRryEBSWpHjd8GqNCPh_tBJZCWrkD0BhLUUtmjajzRHNy0spUq-m6EYd94qDOlisdureYnWwWHGussW58uWdyNJl4r7ur6cZOD8ClBd44yiqZBx5Q9ZFMrOywT1A5O0_PUy-AGf0cE17SruwRJ_9UVwloUB9OVza4dA4AoiqqvA3yy_Tuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508426279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Jauch, S.Y ; Huber, G ; Haschke, H ; Sellenschloh, K ; Morlock, M.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jauch, S.Y ; Huber, G ; Haschke, H ; Sellenschloh, K ; Morlock, M.M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem–neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesculap AG) has demonstrated a substantial number of in vivo neck fractures for Ti–Ti couplings, but there are no documented fractures for Ti–CoCr couplings. Conversely, for a comparable design (H-Max M, Limacorporate) with a Ti–Ti coupling only one clinical failure has been reported. Prostheses were mechanically tested and the micromotions were recorded using a contactless measurement system. For Ti–Ti couplings, the Metha prosthesis showed a trend towards higher micromotions compared to the H-Max M (6.5 ± 1.6 μm vs. 3.6 ± 1.5 μm, p = 0.08). Independent of the design, prostheses with Ti neck adapter caused significantly higher interface micromotions than those with CoCr ones (5.1 ± 2.1 μm vs. 0.8 ± 1.6 μm, p = 0.001). No differences in micromotions between the Metha prosthesis with CoCr neck and the H-Max M with Ti neck were observed (2.6 ± 2.0 μm, p = 0.25). The material coupling and the design are both crucial for the micromotions magnitude. The extent of micromotions seems to correspond to the number of clinically observed fractures and confirm the relationship between those and the occurrence of fretting corrosion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4533</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.11.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24332894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bi-modular prosthesis ; Biocompatibility ; Couplings ; Design engineering ; Elasticity ; Finite Element Analysis ; Fracture mechanics ; Fretting ; Hip Prosthesis ; Materials Testing ; Micromotion ; Motion ; Neck fracture ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Design - methods ; Prosthetics ; Radiology ; Stem–neck interface ; Surgical implants ; Titanium</subject><ispartof>Medical engineering &amp; physics, 2014-03, Vol.36 (3), p.300-307</ispartof><rights>IPEM</rights><rights>2013 IPEM</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-73b0abeb4db42b0ad3e40d120f49d3fefeb41036d1b71457f79bf337e05b815e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-73b0abeb4db42b0ad3e40d120f49d3fefeb41036d1b71457f79bf337e05b815e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453313002555$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24332894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jauch, S.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haschke, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellenschloh, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morlock, M.M</creatorcontrib><title>Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants</title><title>Medical engineering &amp; physics</title><addtitle>Med Eng Phys</addtitle><description>Abstract Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem–neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesculap AG) has demonstrated a substantial number of in vivo neck fractures for Ti–Ti couplings, but there are no documented fractures for Ti–CoCr couplings. Conversely, for a comparable design (H-Max M, Limacorporate) with a Ti–Ti coupling only one clinical failure has been reported. Prostheses were mechanically tested and the micromotions were recorded using a contactless measurement system. For Ti–Ti couplings, the Metha prosthesis showed a trend towards higher micromotions compared to the H-Max M (6.5 ± 1.6 μm vs. 3.6 ± 1.5 μm, p = 0.08). Independent of the design, prostheses with Ti neck adapter caused significantly higher interface micromotions than those with CoCr ones (5.1 ± 2.1 μm vs. 0.8 ± 1.6 μm, p = 0.001). No differences in micromotions between the Metha prosthesis with CoCr neck and the H-Max M with Ti neck were observed (2.6 ± 2.0 μm, p = 0.25). The material coupling and the design are both crucial for the micromotions magnitude. The extent of micromotions seems to correspond to the number of clinically observed fractures and confirm the relationship between those and the occurrence of fretting corrosion.</description><subject>Bi-modular prosthesis</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Couplings</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Fretting</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Micromotion</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Neck fracture</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design - methods</subject><subject>Prosthetics</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Stem–neck interface</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>1350-4533</issn><issn>1873-4030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwCuAjlyxjj5NsLkhVoYBUiQNwthx7suttYgc7qbQ3noBL35AnwcuWHrjQk8eab-YfzT9F8YrDigOv3-xWI1nym2m7XwnguOJ8BdA-Kk75usFSAsLjHGMFpawQT4pnKe0AQMoanxYnQiKKdStPi5_vKLmNZ5OOeqSZYmLaWzZviY06f50emAnLNDi_YToSs2RccjfE-hCPmDMxjGF2weeSjXfzYonp-U8yzTT--nHryVwz53O_XhtioWedK8dgl0FHtnUTc-M0aD-n58WTXg-JXty9Z8W3y_dfLz6WV58_fLo4vyqNbMVcNtiB7qiTtpMihxZJguUCetla7KnPKQ5YW941XFZN37Rdj9gQVN2aV4Rnxetj3ymG7wulWY0uGRryEBSWpHjd8GqNCPh_tBJZCWrkD0BhLUUtmjajzRHNy0spUq-m6EYd94qDOlisdureYnWwWHGussW58uWdyNJl4r7ur6cZOD8ClBd44yiqZBx5Q9ZFMrOywT1A5O0_PUy-AGf0cE17SruwRJ_9UVwloUB9OVza4dA4AoiqqvA3yy_Tuw</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Jauch, S.Y</creator><creator>Huber, G</creator><creator>Haschke, H</creator><creator>Sellenschloh, K</creator><creator>Morlock, M.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants</title><author>Jauch, S.Y ; Huber, G ; Haschke, H ; Sellenschloh, K ; Morlock, M.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-73b0abeb4db42b0ad3e40d120f49d3fefeb41036d1b71457f79bf337e05b815e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bi-modular prosthesis</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Couplings</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Fretting</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Micromotion</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Neck fracture</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design - methods</topic><topic>Prosthetics</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Stem–neck interface</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jauch, S.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haschke, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellenschloh, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morlock, M.M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Medical engineering &amp; physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jauch, S.Y</au><au>Huber, G</au><au>Haschke, H</au><au>Sellenschloh, K</au><au>Morlock, M.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants</atitle><jtitle>Medical engineering &amp; physics</jtitle><addtitle>Med Eng Phys</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>300-307</pages><issn>1350-4533</issn><eissn>1873-4030</eissn><abstract>Abstract Several bi-modular hip prostheses exhibit an elevated number of fretting-related postoperative complications most probably caused by excessive micromotions at taper connections. This study investigated micromotions at the stem–neck interface of two different designs: one design (Metha, Aesculap AG) has demonstrated a substantial number of in vivo neck fractures for Ti–Ti couplings, but there are no documented fractures for Ti–CoCr couplings. Conversely, for a comparable design (H-Max M, Limacorporate) with a Ti–Ti coupling only one clinical failure has been reported. Prostheses were mechanically tested and the micromotions were recorded using a contactless measurement system. For Ti–Ti couplings, the Metha prosthesis showed a trend towards higher micromotions compared to the H-Max M (6.5 ± 1.6 μm vs. 3.6 ± 1.5 μm, p = 0.08). Independent of the design, prostheses with Ti neck adapter caused significantly higher interface micromotions than those with CoCr ones (5.1 ± 2.1 μm vs. 0.8 ± 1.6 μm, p = 0.001). No differences in micromotions between the Metha prosthesis with CoCr neck and the H-Max M with Ti neck were observed (2.6 ± 2.0 μm, p = 0.25). The material coupling and the design are both crucial for the micromotions magnitude. The extent of micromotions seems to correspond to the number of clinically observed fractures and confirm the relationship between those and the occurrence of fretting corrosion.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24332894</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.11.009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-4533
ispartof Medical engineering & physics, 2014-03, Vol.36 (3), p.300-307
issn 1350-4533
1873-4030
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671583303
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Bi-modular prosthesis
Biocompatibility
Couplings
Design engineering
Elasticity
Finite Element Analysis
Fracture mechanics
Fretting
Hip Prosthesis
Materials Testing
Micromotion
Motion
Neck fracture
Prostheses
Prosthesis Design - methods
Prosthetics
Radiology
Stem–neck interface
Surgical implants
Titanium
title Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem–neck interface of bi-modular hip implants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A58%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20parameters%20and%20the%20material%20coupling%20are%20decisive%20for%20the%20micromotion%20magnitude%20at%20the%20stem%E2%80%93neck%20interface%20of%20bi-modular%20hip%20implants&rft.jtitle=Medical%20engineering%20&%20physics&rft.au=Jauch,%20S.Y&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=300-307&rft.issn=1350-4533&rft.eissn=1873-4030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.11.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1520360631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508426279&rft_id=info:pmid/24332894&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1350453313002555&rfr_iscdi=true