Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low-rise conventional and base-isolated steel frames
In this study, the multi‐intensity seismic response of code‐designed conventional and base‐isolated steel frame buildings is evaluated using nonlinear response history analysis. The results of hazard and structural response analysis for three‐story braced‐frame buildings are presented in this paper....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics 2011-08, Vol.40 (10), p.1123-1141 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1141 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1123 |
| container_title | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Erduran, Emrah Dao, Nhan D. Ryan, Keri L. |
| description | In this study, the multi‐intensity seismic response of code‐designed conventional and base‐isolated steel frame buildings is evaluated using nonlinear response history analysis. The results of hazard and structural response analysis for three‐story braced‐frame buildings are presented in this paper. Three‐dimensional models for both buildings are created and seismic response is assessed for three scenario earthquakes. The response history analysis results indicate that the design objectives are met and the performance of the isolated building is superior to the conventional building in the design event. For the Maximum Considered Earthquake, isolation leads to reductions in story drifts and floor accelerations relative to the conventional building. However, the extremely high displacement demands of the isolation system could not be accommodated under normal circumstances, and creative approaches should be developed to control displacements in the MCE. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eqe.1078 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671559081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1017962360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3998-4d238eff5444f0e40149c1f7f5e008e1f33edf89981ee71c6b1fe7fd182ba56d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EFLHDEYxvEgLbi1hX6EXAQvU5NJMskcZVm3RdtSbCn0ErKZNxDNTNa8o3a_fSMuepKeJgw_HpI_IR85-8QZa0_hFupBmwOy4Kzvmt5I9YYsGOtNY4zUh-Qd4jVjTHRML8jNMo9bV9wc74EWwG2eEKhDBMQRppnmQMc4xdGltKO-4hRd_Z3yQ1NipT5P99XFPLlE3TTQjUNoIubkZhgozgCJhuJGwPfkbXAJ4cP-e0R-na9-Lj83l9_XX5Znl40Xfb2lHFphIAQlpQwMJOOy9zzooIAxAzwIAUMwlXIAzX234QF0GLhpN051gzgiJ0-725Jv7wBnO0b0kJKbIN-h5Z3mSvXM8P9TxnXftbXVC_UlIxYIdltqlrKryD6mtzW9fUxf6fF-1aF3qb5-8hGffSuFUrztq2ue3ENMsHt1z65-rPa7ex9r1r_P3pUb22mhlf39bW2vri7-fD1fd7YV_wBMeKLr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017962360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low-rise conventional and base-isolated steel frames</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Erduran, Emrah ; Dao, Nhan D. ; Ryan, Keri L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Erduran, Emrah ; Dao, Nhan D. ; Ryan, Keri L.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the multi‐intensity seismic response of code‐designed conventional and base‐isolated steel frame buildings is evaluated using nonlinear response history analysis. The results of hazard and structural response analysis for three‐story braced‐frame buildings are presented in this paper. Three‐dimensional models for both buildings are created and seismic response is assessed for three scenario earthquakes. The response history analysis results indicate that the design objectives are met and the performance of the isolated building is superior to the conventional building in the design event. For the Maximum Considered Earthquake, isolation leads to reductions in story drifts and floor accelerations relative to the conventional building. However, the extremely high displacement demands of the isolation system could not be accommodated under normal circumstances, and creative approaches should be developed to control displacements in the MCE. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8847</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1096-9845</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1078</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJEEBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>acceleration ; base isolation ; Buildings ; Design engineering ; Displacement ; ductility ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquake construction ; Earthquake design ; Earthquakes, seismology ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Engineering geology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Internal geophysics ; nonlinear analysis ; performance characteristics ; seismic effects ; Seismic phenomena ; Seismic response ; structural response ; Structural steels</subject><ispartof>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2011-08, Vol.40 (10), p.1123-1141</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3998-4d238eff5444f0e40149c1f7f5e008e1f33edf89981ee71c6b1fe7fd182ba56d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3998-4d238eff5444f0e40149c1f7f5e008e1f33edf89981ee71c6b1fe7fd182ba56d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feqe.1078$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feqe.1078$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24355129$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erduran, Emrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dao, Nhan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Keri L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low-rise conventional and base-isolated steel frames</title><title>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</title><addtitle>Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn</addtitle><description>In this study, the multi‐intensity seismic response of code‐designed conventional and base‐isolated steel frame buildings is evaluated using nonlinear response history analysis. The results of hazard and structural response analysis for three‐story braced‐frame buildings are presented in this paper. Three‐dimensional models for both buildings are created and seismic response is assessed for three scenario earthquakes. The response history analysis results indicate that the design objectives are met and the performance of the isolated building is superior to the conventional building in the design event. For the Maximum Considered Earthquake, isolation leads to reductions in story drifts and floor accelerations relative to the conventional building. However, the extremely high displacement demands of the isolation system could not be accommodated under normal circumstances, and creative approaches should be developed to control displacements in the MCE. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>acceleration</subject><subject>base isolation</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>ductility</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquake construction</subject><subject>Earthquake design</subject><subject>Earthquakes, seismology</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Engineering geology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>nonlinear analysis</subject><subject>performance characteristics</subject><subject>seismic effects</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>structural response</subject><subject>Structural steels</subject><issn>0098-8847</issn><issn>1096-9845</issn><issn>1096-9845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0EFLHDEYxvEgLbi1hX6EXAQvU5NJMskcZVm3RdtSbCn0ErKZNxDNTNa8o3a_fSMuepKeJgw_HpI_IR85-8QZa0_hFupBmwOy4Kzvmt5I9YYsGOtNY4zUh-Qd4jVjTHRML8jNMo9bV9wc74EWwG2eEKhDBMQRppnmQMc4xdGltKO-4hRd_Z3yQ1NipT5P99XFPLlE3TTQjUNoIubkZhgozgCJhuJGwPfkbXAJ4cP-e0R-na9-Lj83l9_XX5Znl40Xfb2lHFphIAQlpQwMJOOy9zzooIAxAzwIAUMwlXIAzX234QF0GLhpN051gzgiJ0-725Jv7wBnO0b0kJKbIN-h5Z3mSvXM8P9TxnXftbXVC_UlIxYIdltqlrKryD6mtzW9fUxf6fF-1aF3qb5-8hGffSuFUrztq2ue3ENMsHt1z65-rPa7ex9r1r_P3pUb22mhlf39bW2vri7-fD1fd7YV_wBMeKLr</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Erduran, Emrah</creator><creator>Dao, Nhan D.</creator><creator>Ryan, Keri L.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low-rise conventional and base-isolated steel frames</title><author>Erduran, Emrah ; Dao, Nhan D. ; Ryan, Keri L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3998-4d238eff5444f0e40149c1f7f5e008e1f33edf89981ee71c6b1fe7fd182ba56d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>acceleration</topic><topic>base isolation</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>ductility</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquake construction</topic><topic>Earthquake design</topic><topic>Earthquakes, seismology</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Engineering geology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>nonlinear analysis</topic><topic>performance characteristics</topic><topic>seismic effects</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>structural response</topic><topic>Structural steels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erduran, Emrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dao, Nhan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Keri L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erduran, Emrah</au><au>Dao, Nhan D.</au><au>Ryan, Keri L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low-rise conventional and base-isolated steel frames</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1123</spage><epage>1141</epage><pages>1123-1141</pages><issn>0098-8847</issn><issn>1096-9845</issn><eissn>1096-9845</eissn><coden>IJEEBG</coden><abstract>In this study, the multi‐intensity seismic response of code‐designed conventional and base‐isolated steel frame buildings is evaluated using nonlinear response history analysis. The results of hazard and structural response analysis for three‐story braced‐frame buildings are presented in this paper. Three‐dimensional models for both buildings are created and seismic response is assessed for three scenario earthquakes. The response history analysis results indicate that the design objectives are met and the performance of the isolated building is superior to the conventional building in the design event. For the Maximum Considered Earthquake, isolation leads to reductions in story drifts and floor accelerations relative to the conventional building. However, the extremely high displacement demands of the isolation system could not be accommodated under normal circumstances, and creative approaches should be developed to control displacements in the MCE. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/eqe.1078</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0098-8847 |
| ispartof | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2011-08, Vol.40 (10), p.1123-1141 |
| issn | 0098-8847 1096-9845 1096-9845 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671559081 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | acceleration base isolation Buildings Design engineering Displacement ductility Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Earthquake construction Earthquake design Earthquakes, seismology Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Engineering geology Exact sciences and technology Internal geophysics nonlinear analysis performance characteristics seismic effects Seismic phenomena Seismic response structural response Structural steels |
| title | Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low-rise conventional and base-isolated steel frames |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T17%3A01%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20response%20assessment%20of%20minimally%20compliant%20low-rise%20conventional%20and%20base-isolated%20steel%20frames&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20engineering%20&%20structural%20dynamics&rft.au=Erduran,%20Emrah&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1123&rft.epage=1141&rft.pages=1123-1141&rft.issn=0098-8847&rft.eissn=1096-9845&rft.coden=IJEEBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eqe.1078&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017962360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017962360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |