Verification of the FBR fuel bundle–duct interaction analysis code BAMBOO by the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pins
The BAMBOO computer code was verified by results for the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pin bundle deformation under the bundle–duct interaction (BDI) condition. The pin diameters of the examined test bundles were 8.5mm and 10.4mm, which are targeted as preliminary fuel pin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nuclear materials 2014-09, Vol.452 (1-3), p.552-556 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 556 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-3 |
container_start_page | 552 |
container_title | Journal of nuclear materials |
container_volume | 452 |
creator | Uwaba, Tomoyuki Ito, Masahiro Nemoto, Junichi Ichikawa, Shoichi Katsuyama, Kozo |
description | The BAMBOO computer code was verified by results for the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pin bundle deformation under the bundle–duct interaction (BDI) condition. The pin diameters of the examined test bundles were 8.5mm and 10.4mm, which are targeted as preliminary fuel pin diameters for the upgraded core of the prototype fast breeder reactor (FBR) and for demonstration and commercial FBRs studied in the FaCT project. In the bundle compression test, bundle cross-sectional views were obtained from X-ray computer tomography (CT) images and local parameters of bundle deformation such as pin-to-duct and pin-to-pin clearances were measured by CT image analyses. In the verification, calculation results of bundle deformation obtained by the BAMBOO code analyses were compared with the experimental results from the CT image analyses. The comparison showed that the BAMBOO code reasonably predicts deformation of large diameter pin bundles under the BDI condition by assuming that pin bowing and cladding oval distortion are the major deformation mechanisms, the same as in the case of small diameter pin bundles. In addition, the BAMBOO analysis results confirmed that cladding oval distortion effectively suppresses BDI in large diameter pin bundles as well as in small diameter pin bundles. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671557971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022311514003730</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671557971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f5c5ddeddc1353df2cab2268f51520ad6f117c73690b4b60dcbc5090a9bf09ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EEkvhEZB85JJ07KyTzQl1K1qQWq2EgKvljMfUqyQOtgPaW9-AA2_Ik5Dt7p3TSKPv-zWjn7G3AkoBor7cl_txxsHkUoJYl1CXy_YZW4lNUxXrjYTnbAUgZVEJoV6yVyntAUC1oFbs9zeK3nk02YeRB8fzA_Gb7WfuZup5N4-2p7-Pf-yMmfsxUzT4RJrR9IfkE8dgiW-v7re7He8OT3qYcxFcMfmezgkLNUyRUjqqmVLmv3x-4L2J34lbbwZakvnkx_SavXCmT_TmPC_Y15sPX64_Fne720_XV3cFVmuZC6dQWUvWoqhUZZ1E00lZb5wSSoKxtROiwaaqW-jWXQ0WO1TQgmk7By1hdcHenXKnGH7My0V68Amp781IYU5a1I1QqmkbsaDqhGIMKUVyeop-MPGgBehjAXqvzwXoYwEaar1sF-_9yaPlj5-eok7oaUSyPhJmbYP_T8I_z1KVcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671557971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Verification of the FBR fuel bundle–duct interaction analysis code BAMBOO by the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pins</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Uwaba, Tomoyuki ; Ito, Masahiro ; Nemoto, Junichi ; Ichikawa, Shoichi ; Katsuyama, Kozo</creator><creatorcontrib>Uwaba, Tomoyuki ; Ito, Masahiro ; Nemoto, Junichi ; Ichikawa, Shoichi ; Katsuyama, Kozo</creatorcontrib><description>The BAMBOO computer code was verified by results for the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pin bundle deformation under the bundle–duct interaction (BDI) condition. The pin diameters of the examined test bundles were 8.5mm and 10.4mm, which are targeted as preliminary fuel pin diameters for the upgraded core of the prototype fast breeder reactor (FBR) and for demonstration and commercial FBRs studied in the FaCT project. In the bundle compression test, bundle cross-sectional views were obtained from X-ray computer tomography (CT) images and local parameters of bundle deformation such as pin-to-duct and pin-to-pin clearances were measured by CT image analyses. In the verification, calculation results of bundle deformation obtained by the BAMBOO code analyses were compared with the experimental results from the CT image analyses. The comparison showed that the BAMBOO code reasonably predicts deformation of large diameter pin bundles under the BDI condition by assuming that pin bowing and cladding oval distortion are the major deformation mechanisms, the same as in the case of small diameter pin bundles. In addition, the BAMBOO analysis results confirmed that cladding oval distortion effectively suppresses BDI in large diameter pin bundles as well as in small diameter pin bundles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4820</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bamboo ; Bundles ; Bundling ; Cladding ; Compression tests ; Deformation ; Distortion ; Fuels</subject><ispartof>Journal of nuclear materials, 2014-09, Vol.452 (1-3), p.552-556</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f5c5ddeddc1353df2cab2268f51520ad6f117c73690b4b60dcbc5090a9bf09ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f5c5ddeddc1353df2cab2268f51520ad6f117c73690b4b60dcbc5090a9bf09ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uwaba, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemoto, Junichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichikawa, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsuyama, Kozo</creatorcontrib><title>Verification of the FBR fuel bundle–duct interaction analysis code BAMBOO by the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pins</title><title>Journal of nuclear materials</title><description>The BAMBOO computer code was verified by results for the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pin bundle deformation under the bundle–duct interaction (BDI) condition. The pin diameters of the examined test bundles were 8.5mm and 10.4mm, which are targeted as preliminary fuel pin diameters for the upgraded core of the prototype fast breeder reactor (FBR) and for demonstration and commercial FBRs studied in the FaCT project. In the bundle compression test, bundle cross-sectional views were obtained from X-ray computer tomography (CT) images and local parameters of bundle deformation such as pin-to-duct and pin-to-pin clearances were measured by CT image analyses. In the verification, calculation results of bundle deformation obtained by the BAMBOO code analyses were compared with the experimental results from the CT image analyses. The comparison showed that the BAMBOO code reasonably predicts deformation of large diameter pin bundles under the BDI condition by assuming that pin bowing and cladding oval distortion are the major deformation mechanisms, the same as in the case of small diameter pin bundles. In addition, the BAMBOO analysis results confirmed that cladding oval distortion effectively suppresses BDI in large diameter pin bundles as well as in small diameter pin bundles.</description><subject>Bamboo</subject><subject>Bundles</subject><subject>Bundling</subject><subject>Cladding</subject><subject>Compression tests</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Distortion</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><issn>0022-3115</issn><issn>1873-4820</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EEkvhEZB85JJ07KyTzQl1K1qQWq2EgKvljMfUqyQOtgPaW9-AA2_Ik5Dt7p3TSKPv-zWjn7G3AkoBor7cl_txxsHkUoJYl1CXy_YZW4lNUxXrjYTnbAUgZVEJoV6yVyntAUC1oFbs9zeK3nk02YeRB8fzA_Gb7WfuZup5N4-2p7-Pf-yMmfsxUzT4RJrR9IfkE8dgiW-v7re7He8OT3qYcxFcMfmezgkLNUyRUjqqmVLmv3x-4L2J34lbbwZakvnkx_SavXCmT_TmPC_Y15sPX64_Fne720_XV3cFVmuZC6dQWUvWoqhUZZ1E00lZb5wSSoKxtROiwaaqW-jWXQ0WO1TQgmk7By1hdcHenXKnGH7My0V68Amp781IYU5a1I1QqmkbsaDqhGIMKUVyeop-MPGgBehjAXqvzwXoYwEaar1sF-_9yaPlj5-eok7oaUSyPhJmbYP_T8I_z1KVcA</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Uwaba, Tomoyuki</creator><creator>Ito, Masahiro</creator><creator>Nemoto, Junichi</creator><creator>Ichikawa, Shoichi</creator><creator>Katsuyama, Kozo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Verification of the FBR fuel bundle–duct interaction analysis code BAMBOO by the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pins</title><author>Uwaba, Tomoyuki ; Ito, Masahiro ; Nemoto, Junichi ; Ichikawa, Shoichi ; Katsuyama, Kozo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f5c5ddeddc1353df2cab2268f51520ad6f117c73690b4b60dcbc5090a9bf09ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bamboo</topic><topic>Bundles</topic><topic>Bundling</topic><topic>Cladding</topic><topic>Compression tests</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Distortion</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uwaba, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemoto, Junichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichikawa, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsuyama, Kozo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of nuclear materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uwaba, Tomoyuki</au><au>Ito, Masahiro</au><au>Nemoto, Junichi</au><au>Ichikawa, Shoichi</au><au>Katsuyama, Kozo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Verification of the FBR fuel bundle–duct interaction analysis code BAMBOO by the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pins</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nuclear materials</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>452</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>552-556</pages><issn>0022-3115</issn><eissn>1873-4820</eissn><abstract>The BAMBOO computer code was verified by results for the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pin bundle deformation under the bundle–duct interaction (BDI) condition. The pin diameters of the examined test bundles were 8.5mm and 10.4mm, which are targeted as preliminary fuel pin diameters for the upgraded core of the prototype fast breeder reactor (FBR) and for demonstration and commercial FBRs studied in the FaCT project. In the bundle compression test, bundle cross-sectional views were obtained from X-ray computer tomography (CT) images and local parameters of bundle deformation such as pin-to-duct and pin-to-pin clearances were measured by CT image analyses. In the verification, calculation results of bundle deformation obtained by the BAMBOO code analyses were compared with the experimental results from the CT image analyses. The comparison showed that the BAMBOO code reasonably predicts deformation of large diameter pin bundles under the BDI condition by assuming that pin bowing and cladding oval distortion are the major deformation mechanisms, the same as in the case of small diameter pin bundles. In addition, the BAMBOO analysis results confirmed that cladding oval distortion effectively suppresses BDI in large diameter pin bundles as well as in small diameter pin bundles.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.016</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3115 |
ispartof | Journal of nuclear materials, 2014-09, Vol.452 (1-3), p.552-556 |
issn | 0022-3115 1873-4820 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671557971 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Bamboo Bundles Bundling Cladding Compression tests Deformation Distortion Fuels |
title | Verification of the FBR fuel bundle–duct interaction analysis code BAMBOO by the out-of-pile bundle compression test with large diameter pins |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T05%3A43%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Verification%20of%20the%20FBR%20fuel%20bundle%E2%80%93duct%20interaction%20analysis%20code%20BAMBOO%20by%20the%20out-of-pile%20bundle%20compression%20test%20with%20large%20diameter%20pins&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nuclear%20materials&rft.au=Uwaba,%20Tomoyuki&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=452&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=552-556&rft.issn=0022-3115&rft.eissn=1873-4820&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671557971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671557971&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022311514003730&rfr_iscdi=true |