Effects of Addition Order of the Components on Polyamide-6/Organoclay/Elastomer Ternary Nanocomposites
The effects of addition order of the components for ethylene–glycidyl methacrylate (E‐GMA) copolymers and two types of organoclays (Cloisite® 15A and Cloisite® 30B) on morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide‐6/elastomer/organoclay ternary nanocomposites were investigated by x‐ray diffracti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in polymer technology 2013-03, Vol.32 (S1), p.E675-E691 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | E691 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | S1 |
| container_start_page | E675 |
| container_title | Advances in polymer technology |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Isik-gulsac, Isil Yilmazer, Ulku Bayram, Goknur |
| description | The effects of addition order of the components for ethylene–glycidyl methacrylate (E‐GMA) copolymers and two types of organoclays (Cloisite® 15A and Cloisite® 30B) on morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide‐6/elastomer/organoclay ternary nanocomposites were investigated by x‐ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses, melt flow index (MFI) measurements, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and tensile and impact tests. Four different addition orders (All‐S, PI‐C, PC‐I, and IC‐P) were applied through melt blending in a twin‐screw extruder. All‐S indicates that the elastomer, the organoclay, and polyamide‐6 were compounded in the extruder simultaneously, and the resulting compound was extruded once more. The other symbols represent the components for the two extrusions. P, I, and C stand for polyamide‐6, elastomer, and organoclay, respectively. The first two ingredients were compounded in the first extrusion, and the resulting compound was mixed with the third component in the second extrusion run. For polyamide‐6/ Cloisite® 15A/E‐GMA nanocomposites processed by PI‐C and IC‐P addition orders, stacked silicate layers were observed in the TEM micrographs. On the contrary, the nanocomposites with Cloisite® 30B gave the best result in terms of intercalation/exfoliation in the IC‐P sequence. Generally, for Cloisite® 15A containing ternary nanocomposites, the All‐S addition order gave the highest impact strength, tensile strength, and Young's modulus owing to potential interactions between the functional groups of the three components. For polyamide‐6/Cloisite® 30B/E‐GMA ternary nanocomposites, the PC‐I mixing sequence produced the highest Young's modulus. For these nanocomposites, impact and tensile strengths and elongation at break were relatively insensitive to the mixing order. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Adv Polym Techn 32: E675–E691, 2013; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/adv.21310 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/adv.21310 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671548625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671548625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3400-571c6826492943ae279feca0a9958f35a359def5095ccab73818b2f67995e0f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwkAQhjdGExE9-A961ENhP7rb7pEgggmCMQjeNks7q9W2i7tF5d_binrzNMnM80xmXoTOCe4RjGlfZ-89ShjBB6hDsExCyqg8RB0cMxwKEctjdOL9C8aERIJ1kBkZA2ntA2uCQZbldW6rYO4ycG2nfoZgaMuNraBqmSq4s8VOl3kGoejP3ZOubFroXX9UaF_bsrEW4CrtdsGsHbWqz2vwp-jI6MLD2U_toofr0WI4Cafz8c1wMA1TFmEc8pikIqEiklRGTAONZXOdxlpKnhjGNeMyA8Ox5Gmq1zFLSLKmpnlLcsCGsi662O_dOPu2BV-rMvcpFIWuwG69IiImPEoE5Q16uUdTZ713YNTG5WVzuiJYtVmqJkv1nWXD9vfsR17A7n9QDa6Wv0a4N3Jfw-efod2rEjGLuVrNxupWTlaz--VEPbIv-WSFFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671548625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Addition Order of the Components on Polyamide-6/Organoclay/Elastomer Ternary Nanocomposites</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Isik-gulsac, Isil ; Yilmazer, Ulku ; Bayram, Goknur</creator><creatorcontrib>Isik-gulsac, Isil ; Yilmazer, Ulku ; Bayram, Goknur</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of addition order of the components for ethylene–glycidyl methacrylate (E‐GMA) copolymers and two types of organoclays (Cloisite® 15A and Cloisite® 30B) on morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide‐6/elastomer/organoclay ternary nanocomposites were investigated by x‐ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses, melt flow index (MFI) measurements, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and tensile and impact tests. Four different addition orders (All‐S, PI‐C, PC‐I, and IC‐P) were applied through melt blending in a twin‐screw extruder. All‐S indicates that the elastomer, the organoclay, and polyamide‐6 were compounded in the extruder simultaneously, and the resulting compound was extruded once more. The other symbols represent the components for the two extrusions. P, I, and C stand for polyamide‐6, elastomer, and organoclay, respectively. The first two ingredients were compounded in the first extrusion, and the resulting compound was mixed with the third component in the second extrusion run. For polyamide‐6/ Cloisite® 15A/E‐GMA nanocomposites processed by PI‐C and IC‐P addition orders, stacked silicate layers were observed in the TEM micrographs. On the contrary, the nanocomposites with Cloisite® 30B gave the best result in terms of intercalation/exfoliation in the IC‐P sequence. Generally, for Cloisite® 15A containing ternary nanocomposites, the All‐S addition order gave the highest impact strength, tensile strength, and Young's modulus owing to potential interactions between the functional groups of the three components. For polyamide‐6/Cloisite® 30B/E‐GMA ternary nanocomposites, the PC‐I mixing sequence produced the highest Young's modulus. For these nanocomposites, impact and tensile strengths and elongation at break were relatively insensitive to the mixing order. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Adv Polym Techn 32: E675–E691, 2013; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/adv.21310</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-6679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2329</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/adv.21310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Addition order ; Differential scanning calorimetry ; Elastomers ; Extrusions ; Impact modification ; Modulus of elasticity ; Nanocomposites ; Polyamides ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Tensile strength ; Transmission electron microscopy</subject><ispartof>Advances in polymer technology, 2013-03, Vol.32 (S1), p.E675-E691</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3400-571c6826492943ae279feca0a9958f35a359def5095ccab73818b2f67995e0f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3400-571c6826492943ae279feca0a9958f35a359def5095ccab73818b2f67995e0f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Isik-gulsac, Isil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmazer, Ulku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayram, Goknur</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Addition Order of the Components on Polyamide-6/Organoclay/Elastomer Ternary Nanocomposites</title><title>Advances in polymer technology</title><addtitle>Adv. Polym. Technol</addtitle><description>The effects of addition order of the components for ethylene–glycidyl methacrylate (E‐GMA) copolymers and two types of organoclays (Cloisite® 15A and Cloisite® 30B) on morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide‐6/elastomer/organoclay ternary nanocomposites were investigated by x‐ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses, melt flow index (MFI) measurements, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and tensile and impact tests. Four different addition orders (All‐S, PI‐C, PC‐I, and IC‐P) were applied through melt blending in a twin‐screw extruder. All‐S indicates that the elastomer, the organoclay, and polyamide‐6 were compounded in the extruder simultaneously, and the resulting compound was extruded once more. The other symbols represent the components for the two extrusions. P, I, and C stand for polyamide‐6, elastomer, and organoclay, respectively. The first two ingredients were compounded in the first extrusion, and the resulting compound was mixed with the third component in the second extrusion run. For polyamide‐6/ Cloisite® 15A/E‐GMA nanocomposites processed by PI‐C and IC‐P addition orders, stacked silicate layers were observed in the TEM micrographs. On the contrary, the nanocomposites with Cloisite® 30B gave the best result in terms of intercalation/exfoliation in the IC‐P sequence. Generally, for Cloisite® 15A containing ternary nanocomposites, the All‐S addition order gave the highest impact strength, tensile strength, and Young's modulus owing to potential interactions between the functional groups of the three components. For polyamide‐6/Cloisite® 30B/E‐GMA ternary nanocomposites, the PC‐I mixing sequence produced the highest Young's modulus. For these nanocomposites, impact and tensile strengths and elongation at break were relatively insensitive to the mixing order. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Adv Polym Techn 32: E675–E691, 2013; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/adv.21310</description><subject>Addition order</subject><subject>Differential scanning calorimetry</subject><subject>Elastomers</subject><subject>Extrusions</subject><subject>Impact modification</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Nanocomposites</subject><subject>Polyamides</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopy</subject><issn>0730-6679</issn><issn>1098-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PwkAQhjdGExE9-A961ENhP7rb7pEgggmCMQjeNks7q9W2i7tF5d_binrzNMnM80xmXoTOCe4RjGlfZ-89ShjBB6hDsExCyqg8RB0cMxwKEctjdOL9C8aERIJ1kBkZA2ntA2uCQZbldW6rYO4ycG2nfoZgaMuNraBqmSq4s8VOl3kGoejP3ZOubFroXX9UaF_bsrEW4CrtdsGsHbWqz2vwp-jI6MLD2U_toofr0WI4Cafz8c1wMA1TFmEc8pikIqEiklRGTAONZXOdxlpKnhjGNeMyA8Ox5Gmq1zFLSLKmpnlLcsCGsi662O_dOPu2BV-rMvcpFIWuwG69IiImPEoE5Q16uUdTZ713YNTG5WVzuiJYtVmqJkv1nWXD9vfsR17A7n9QDa6Wv0a4N3Jfw-efod2rEjGLuVrNxupWTlaz--VEPbIv-WSFFA</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Isik-gulsac, Isil</creator><creator>Yilmazer, Ulku</creator><creator>Bayram, Goknur</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Effects of Addition Order of the Components on Polyamide-6/Organoclay/Elastomer Ternary Nanocomposites</title><author>Isik-gulsac, Isil ; Yilmazer, Ulku ; Bayram, Goknur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3400-571c6826492943ae279feca0a9958f35a359def5095ccab73818b2f67995e0f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Addition order</topic><topic>Differential scanning calorimetry</topic><topic>Elastomers</topic><topic>Extrusions</topic><topic>Impact modification</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Nanocomposites</topic><topic>Polyamides</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Isik-gulsac, Isil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmazer, Ulku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayram, Goknur</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Advances in polymer technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Isik-gulsac, Isil</au><au>Yilmazer, Ulku</au><au>Bayram, Goknur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Addition Order of the Components on Polyamide-6/Organoclay/Elastomer Ternary Nanocomposites</atitle><jtitle>Advances in polymer technology</jtitle><addtitle>Adv. Polym. Technol</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>E675</spage><epage>E691</epage><pages>E675-E691</pages><issn>0730-6679</issn><eissn>1098-2329</eissn><abstract>The effects of addition order of the components for ethylene–glycidyl methacrylate (E‐GMA) copolymers and two types of organoclays (Cloisite® 15A and Cloisite® 30B) on morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide‐6/elastomer/organoclay ternary nanocomposites were investigated by x‐ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses, melt flow index (MFI) measurements, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and tensile and impact tests. Four different addition orders (All‐S, PI‐C, PC‐I, and IC‐P) were applied through melt blending in a twin‐screw extruder. All‐S indicates that the elastomer, the organoclay, and polyamide‐6 were compounded in the extruder simultaneously, and the resulting compound was extruded once more. The other symbols represent the components for the two extrusions. P, I, and C stand for polyamide‐6, elastomer, and organoclay, respectively. The first two ingredients were compounded in the first extrusion, and the resulting compound was mixed with the third component in the second extrusion run. For polyamide‐6/ Cloisite® 15A/E‐GMA nanocomposites processed by PI‐C and IC‐P addition orders, stacked silicate layers were observed in the TEM micrographs. On the contrary, the nanocomposites with Cloisite® 30B gave the best result in terms of intercalation/exfoliation in the IC‐P sequence. Generally, for Cloisite® 15A containing ternary nanocomposites, the All‐S addition order gave the highest impact strength, tensile strength, and Young's modulus owing to potential interactions between the functional groups of the three components. For polyamide‐6/Cloisite® 30B/E‐GMA ternary nanocomposites, the PC‐I mixing sequence produced the highest Young's modulus. For these nanocomposites, impact and tensile strengths and elongation at break were relatively insensitive to the mixing order. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Adv Polym Techn 32: E675–E691, 2013; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/adv.21310</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/adv.21310</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0730-6679 |
| ispartof | Advances in polymer technology, 2013-03, Vol.32 (S1), p.E675-E691 |
| issn | 0730-6679 1098-2329 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671548625 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Addition order Differential scanning calorimetry Elastomers Extrusions Impact modification Modulus of elasticity Nanocomposites Polyamides Scanning electron microscopy Tensile strength Transmission electron microscopy |
| title | Effects of Addition Order of the Components on Polyamide-6/Organoclay/Elastomer Ternary Nanocomposites |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A20%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Addition%20Order%20of%20the%20Components%20on%20Polyamide-6/Organoclay/Elastomer%20Ternary%20Nanocomposites&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20polymer%20technology&rft.au=Isik-gulsac,%20Isil&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=E675&rft.epage=E691&rft.pages=E675-E691&rft.issn=0730-6679&rft.eissn=1098-2329&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/adv.21310&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671548625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671548625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |