Evaluation of a Modular System for Low-Cost Transport and Storage of Herbaceous Biomass
A conceptual system adopting features from cotton, silage, and container shipping systems was evaluated between 2008 and 2011. The evaluation included both simulations of the anticipated full-scale system and field trials of forming, transporting, and storing biomass modules containing energy sorghu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioenergy research 2014-09, Vol.7 (3), p.824-832 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 832 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 824 |
container_title | Bioenergy research |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Searcy, Stephen W Hartley, Brandon E Thomasson, J. Alex |
description | A conceptual system adopting features from cotton, silage, and container shipping systems was evaluated between 2008 and 2011. The evaluation included both simulations of the anticipated full-scale system and field trials of forming, transporting, and storing biomass modules containing energy sorghum. The simulations utilized Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis and Logistics (IBSAL) and incorporated the anticipated module forming machine that would operate in partnership with a forage harvester, as well as a machine to load the modules onto a flatbed semi-trailer. When compared to the DOE target for logistics costs of $38.59/Mg, the estimated cost was lower for distances up to 80 km. Field results were promising, with biomass modules of up to 5.2 Mg formed, stored for up to 12 months, loaded on a truck in 2 min or less, and transported for 96 km with no significant change of shape or size. Difficulty in field drying of energy sorghum was consistent over 3 years of harvest, as was the ability to use field drying in windrows without increasing the ash content of the biomass. The manually formed module packages did not maintain an anaerobic environment throughout the storage period, and excessive biomass degradation occurred. In addition, the dry matter density in the modules was approximately 180 kg/m³ rather than the 240 kg/m³ targeted in the simulation. Despite the conceptual evaluation not achieving all the desired features, these studies demonstrated the economic and logistical advantages of a system based upon large packages of chopped biomass. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12155-014-9427-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671542921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A712239222</galeid><sourcerecordid>A712239222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-77f7fd1fb147320b06c219c32f3ec7fcdb67450a339c8cbaa1462580b71ec8ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhosouK7-AK8MeONN18wkadrL9bC6whEvzi5ehmmaHLq0zTFplf33plT8QpQQEobnGSZ5i-I58AvgXL9OgKBUyUGWjURd6gfFGTSiKQElPvxxF_Jx8SSlO84rLnlzVny6-kLDQnMfJhY8I_YhdMtAkR3u0-xG5kNk-_C13IU0s5tIUzqFODOaOnaYQ6SjW7VrF1uyLiyJvenDSCk9LR55GpJ79v08L27fXt3srsv9x3fvd5f70iop5lJrr30HvgWpBfKWVxahsQK9cFZ727WVloqTEI2tbUsEskJV81aDywUnzotXW99TDJ8Xl2Yz9sm6YaBpHcdApUFJbBD-j6qqqkX-Fszoyz_Qu7DEKT8kU0ohQqXqn9SRBmf6yYc5kl2bmksNiKJBXHtd_IXKq3Njb8PkfJ_rvwmwCTaGlKLz5hT7keK9AW7WsM0WtslhmzVso7ODm5MyOx1d_GXgf0gvNslTMHSMfTK3B8wAz1uruhHfANApskA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1555221658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Modular System for Low-Cost Transport and Storage of Herbaceous Biomass</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Searcy, Stephen W ; Hartley, Brandon E ; Thomasson, J. Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Searcy, Stephen W ; Hartley, Brandon E ; Thomasson, J. Alex</creatorcontrib><description>A conceptual system adopting features from cotton, silage, and container shipping systems was evaluated between 2008 and 2011. The evaluation included both simulations of the anticipated full-scale system and field trials of forming, transporting, and storing biomass modules containing energy sorghum. The simulations utilized Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis and Logistics (IBSAL) and incorporated the anticipated module forming machine that would operate in partnership with a forage harvester, as well as a machine to load the modules onto a flatbed semi-trailer. When compared to the DOE target for logistics costs of $38.59/Mg, the estimated cost was lower for distances up to 80 km. Field results were promising, with biomass modules of up to 5.2 Mg formed, stored for up to 12 months, loaded on a truck in 2 min or less, and transported for 96 km with no significant change of shape or size. Difficulty in field drying of energy sorghum was consistent over 3 years of harvest, as was the ability to use field drying in windrows without increasing the ash content of the biomass. The manually formed module packages did not maintain an anaerobic environment throughout the storage period, and excessive biomass degradation occurred. In addition, the dry matter density in the modules was approximately 180 kg/m³ rather than the 240 kg/m³ targeted in the simulation. Despite the conceptual evaluation not achieving all the desired features, these studies demonstrated the economic and logistical advantages of a system based upon large packages of chopped biomass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-1234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12155-014-9427-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Analysis ; ash content ; Biomass ; Biomass energy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Computer simulation ; Costs ; Cotton ; Crops ; Dry matter ; Drying ; Energy ; field experimentation ; forage ; Harvest ; Life Sciences ; Lignocellulose ; Logistics ; Magnesium ; Modules ; Moisture content ; Packages ; Packaging ; Particle size ; Plant Breeding/Biotechnology ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Sciences ; Roads & highways ; Shipping industry ; Silage ; Simulation ; Sorghum ; storage time ; Studies ; transportation ; Wood Science & Technology</subject><ispartof>Bioenergy research, 2014-09, Vol.7 (3), p.824-832</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-77f7fd1fb147320b06c219c32f3ec7fcdb67450a339c8cbaa1462580b71ec8ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-77f7fd1fb147320b06c219c32f3ec7fcdb67450a339c8cbaa1462580b71ec8ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12155-014-9427-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12155-014-9427-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Searcy, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartley, Brandon E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomasson, J. Alex</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Modular System for Low-Cost Transport and Storage of Herbaceous Biomass</title><title>Bioenergy research</title><addtitle>Bioenerg. Res</addtitle><description>A conceptual system adopting features from cotton, silage, and container shipping systems was evaluated between 2008 and 2011. The evaluation included both simulations of the anticipated full-scale system and field trials of forming, transporting, and storing biomass modules containing energy sorghum. The simulations utilized Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis and Logistics (IBSAL) and incorporated the anticipated module forming machine that would operate in partnership with a forage harvester, as well as a machine to load the modules onto a flatbed semi-trailer. When compared to the DOE target for logistics costs of $38.59/Mg, the estimated cost was lower for distances up to 80 km. Field results were promising, with biomass modules of up to 5.2 Mg formed, stored for up to 12 months, loaded on a truck in 2 min or less, and transported for 96 km with no significant change of shape or size. Difficulty in field drying of energy sorghum was consistent over 3 years of harvest, as was the ability to use field drying in windrows without increasing the ash content of the biomass. The manually formed module packages did not maintain an anaerobic environment throughout the storage period, and excessive biomass degradation occurred. In addition, the dry matter density in the modules was approximately 180 kg/m³ rather than the 240 kg/m³ targeted in the simulation. Despite the conceptual evaluation not achieving all the desired features, these studies demonstrated the economic and logistical advantages of a system based upon large packages of chopped biomass.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>ash content</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>forage</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lignocellulose</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Packages</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Roads & highways</subject><subject>Shipping industry</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>storage time</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>transportation</subject><subject>Wood Science & Technology</subject><issn>1939-1234</issn><issn>1939-1242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhosouK7-AK8MeONN18wkadrL9bC6whEvzi5ehmmaHLq0zTFplf33plT8QpQQEobnGSZ5i-I58AvgXL9OgKBUyUGWjURd6gfFGTSiKQElPvxxF_Jx8SSlO84rLnlzVny6-kLDQnMfJhY8I_YhdMtAkR3u0-xG5kNk-_C13IU0s5tIUzqFODOaOnaYQ6SjW7VrF1uyLiyJvenDSCk9LR55GpJ79v08L27fXt3srsv9x3fvd5f70iop5lJrr30HvgWpBfKWVxahsQK9cFZ727WVloqTEI2tbUsEskJV81aDywUnzotXW99TDJ8Xl2Yz9sm6YaBpHcdApUFJbBD-j6qqqkX-Fszoyz_Qu7DEKT8kU0ohQqXqn9SRBmf6yYc5kl2bmksNiKJBXHtd_IXKq3Njb8PkfJ_rvwmwCTaGlKLz5hT7keK9AW7WsM0WtslhmzVso7ODm5MyOx1d_GXgf0gvNslTMHSMfTK3B8wAz1uruhHfANApskA</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Searcy, Stephen W</creator><creator>Hartley, Brandon E</creator><creator>Thomasson, J. Alex</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Modular System for Low-Cost Transport and Storage of Herbaceous Biomass</title><author>Searcy, Stephen W ; Hartley, Brandon E ; Thomasson, J. Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-77f7fd1fb147320b06c219c32f3ec7fcdb67450a339c8cbaa1462580b71ec8ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>ash content</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>forage</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lignocellulose</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Packages</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Roads & highways</topic><topic>Shipping industry</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>storage time</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>transportation</topic><topic>Wood Science & Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Searcy, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartley, Brandon E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomasson, J. Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Bioenergy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Searcy, Stephen W</au><au>Hartley, Brandon E</au><au>Thomasson, J. Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Modular System for Low-Cost Transport and Storage of Herbaceous Biomass</atitle><jtitle>Bioenergy research</jtitle><stitle>Bioenerg. Res</stitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>824</spage><epage>832</epage><pages>824-832</pages><issn>1939-1234</issn><eissn>1939-1242</eissn><abstract>A conceptual system adopting features from cotton, silage, and container shipping systems was evaluated between 2008 and 2011. The evaluation included both simulations of the anticipated full-scale system and field trials of forming, transporting, and storing biomass modules containing energy sorghum. The simulations utilized Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis and Logistics (IBSAL) and incorporated the anticipated module forming machine that would operate in partnership with a forage harvester, as well as a machine to load the modules onto a flatbed semi-trailer. When compared to the DOE target for logistics costs of $38.59/Mg, the estimated cost was lower for distances up to 80 km. Field results were promising, with biomass modules of up to 5.2 Mg formed, stored for up to 12 months, loaded on a truck in 2 min or less, and transported for 96 km with no significant change of shape or size. Difficulty in field drying of energy sorghum was consistent over 3 years of harvest, as was the ability to use field drying in windrows without increasing the ash content of the biomass. The manually formed module packages did not maintain an anaerobic environment throughout the storage period, and excessive biomass degradation occurred. In addition, the dry matter density in the modules was approximately 180 kg/m³ rather than the 240 kg/m³ targeted in the simulation. Despite the conceptual evaluation not achieving all the desired features, these studies demonstrated the economic and logistical advantages of a system based upon large packages of chopped biomass.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s12155-014-9427-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1939-1234 |
ispartof | Bioenergy research, 2014-09, Vol.7 (3), p.824-832 |
issn | 1939-1234 1939-1242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671542921 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Analysis ash content Biomass Biomass energy Biomedical and Life Sciences Computer simulation Costs Cotton Crops Dry matter Drying Energy field experimentation forage Harvest Life Sciences Lignocellulose Logistics Magnesium Modules Moisture content Packages Packaging Particle size Plant Breeding/Biotechnology Plant Ecology Plant Genetics and Genomics Plant Sciences Roads & highways Shipping industry Silage Simulation Sorghum storage time Studies transportation Wood Science & Technology |
title | Evaluation of a Modular System for Low-Cost Transport and Storage of Herbaceous Biomass |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A01%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Modular%20System%20for%20Low-Cost%20Transport%20and%20Storage%20of%20Herbaceous%20Biomass&rft.jtitle=Bioenergy%20research&rft.au=Searcy,%20Stephen%20W&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=824&rft.epage=832&rft.pages=824-832&rft.issn=1939-1234&rft.eissn=1939-1242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12155-014-9427-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA712239222%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1555221658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A712239222&rfr_iscdi=true |