E-beam irradiation affects the maximum specific growth rate of Bacillus cereus

Summary When conventional preservative treatments are applied, such as heat or acid, the maximum specific growth rate (μmax) of survivors is the same as that of untreated cells. However, when new nonthermal technology is applied, the effects of it on the kinetics of the microorganism can be unpredic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of food science & technology 2013-02, Vol.48 (2), p.382-386
Hauptverfasser: Aguirre, Juan, Rodríguez, Mª Rosa, González, Rodrigo, García de Fernando, Gonzalo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 386
container_issue 2
container_start_page 382
container_title International journal of food science & technology
container_volume 48
creator Aguirre, Juan
Rodríguez, Mª Rosa
González, Rodrigo
García de Fernando, Gonzalo
description Summary When conventional preservative treatments are applied, such as heat or acid, the maximum specific growth rate (μmax) of survivors is the same as that of untreated cells. However, when new nonthermal technology is applied, the effects of it on the kinetics of the microorganism can be unpredictable. In this sense, Cabeza et al. (2010) reported longer doubling times after irradiating with accelerated electron beam. The aim of this work was to study the effect of electron beam irradiation on the μmax of Bacillus cereus and compare it with a conventional inactivation treatment (heat). To prove this, μmax was estimated in ham at 12 °C and in TSB at 22 °C after 0, 2, 3 or 4 log reduction by irradiation; likewise, μmax was estimated in whole milk at 12 °C and in TSB at 22 °C after the same log reduction using heat treatments. Our findings show that irradiation affected the μmax of survivor cells. Irradiation intensity was inversely proportional to μmax, such that greater intensity was associated with lower μmax. At the same time, growth temperature had an effect on the decrease in μmax: the radiation‐induced reductions in μmax were greater at 12 °C than at 22 °C. In summary, E‐beam irradiation decreases the μmax of B. cereus, while heat treatment does not. This suggests that the shelf life of irradiated foods must be longer than that of heat‐preserved foods after the application of a similar inactivation treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03199.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671521509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3070001601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3399-14594af5b36ee5ab531225f89b202db9fdb990b65b7c6c7c960a05c53b6163af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVtr3DAQhUVoIZtt_4OgBPpiVxdLql4CTcitLNuWbmnfhrEiJdrY641kk82_r90N-9CBYQbm4zCcQwjlrORjfVqXXGpVCC14KRgXJZPc2nJ3RGaHwxsyY1axQlVCHpOTnNeMMSFNNSPLy6L22NKYEt5F7GO3oRiCd32m_YOnLe5iO7Q0b72LITp6n7rn_oEm7D3tAj1HF5tmyNT55If8jrwN2GT__nXOya-ry9XFTbH4dn178WVRRCmtLXilbIVB1VJ7r7BWkguhwmdbCybuahvGtqzWqjZOO-OsZsiUU7LWXEsMck4-7nW3qXsafO6hjdn5psGN74YMXBuuBFfMjuiH_9B1N6TN-B3wavTKCK35SJ2-UpgdNiHhxsUM2xRbTC8gtLGmGj2bk7M99xwb_3K4cwZTGrCGyXSYTIcpDfiXBuzg9uvVz2kdBYq9QMy93x0EMD2CNtIo-L28hj-r1febH0sGC_kXztCN9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1431972661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>E-beam irradiation affects the maximum specific growth rate of Bacillus cereus</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Aguirre, Juan ; Rodríguez, Mª Rosa ; González, Rodrigo ; García de Fernando, Gonzalo</creator><creatorcontrib>Aguirre, Juan ; Rodríguez, Mª Rosa ; González, Rodrigo ; García de Fernando, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><description>Summary When conventional preservative treatments are applied, such as heat or acid, the maximum specific growth rate (μmax) of survivors is the same as that of untreated cells. However, when new nonthermal technology is applied, the effects of it on the kinetics of the microorganism can be unpredictable. In this sense, Cabeza et al. (2010) reported longer doubling times after irradiating with accelerated electron beam. The aim of this work was to study the effect of electron beam irradiation on the μmax of Bacillus cereus and compare it with a conventional inactivation treatment (heat). To prove this, μmax was estimated in ham at 12 °C and in TSB at 22 °C after 0, 2, 3 or 4 log reduction by irradiation; likewise, μmax was estimated in whole milk at 12 °C and in TSB at 22 °C after the same log reduction using heat treatments. Our findings show that irradiation affected the μmax of survivor cells. Irradiation intensity was inversely proportional to μmax, such that greater intensity was associated with lower μmax. At the same time, growth temperature had an effect on the decrease in μmax: the radiation‐induced reductions in μmax were greater at 12 °C than at 22 °C. In summary, E‐beam irradiation decreases the μmax of B. cereus, while heat treatment does not. This suggests that the shelf life of irradiated foods must be longer than that of heat‐preserved foods after the application of a similar inactivation treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-5423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03199.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJFTEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacillus cereus ; Biological and medical sciences ; Electron beam irradiation ; Electron beams ; Food industries ; Food irradiation ; Food microbiology ; Food preservation ; Food science ; Foods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Growth rate ; heat ; Heat treatment ; Inactivation ; intensity ; Irradiation ; Kinetics ; log reduction ; Preservatives ; Reduction ; survivors</subject><ispartof>International journal of food science &amp; technology, 2013-02, Vol.48 (2), p.382-386</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. International Journal of Food Science and Technology © 2012 Institute of Food Science and Technology</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>International Journal of Food Science and Technology © 2013 Institute of Food Science and Technology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2621.2012.03199.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2621.2012.03199.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26797402$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aguirre, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Mª Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García de Fernando, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><title>E-beam irradiation affects the maximum specific growth rate of Bacillus cereus</title><title>International journal of food science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Int J Food Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Summary When conventional preservative treatments are applied, such as heat or acid, the maximum specific growth rate (μmax) of survivors is the same as that of untreated cells. However, when new nonthermal technology is applied, the effects of it on the kinetics of the microorganism can be unpredictable. In this sense, Cabeza et al. (2010) reported longer doubling times after irradiating with accelerated electron beam. The aim of this work was to study the effect of electron beam irradiation on the μmax of Bacillus cereus and compare it with a conventional inactivation treatment (heat). To prove this, μmax was estimated in ham at 12 °C and in TSB at 22 °C after 0, 2, 3 or 4 log reduction by irradiation; likewise, μmax was estimated in whole milk at 12 °C and in TSB at 22 °C after the same log reduction using heat treatments. Our findings show that irradiation affected the μmax of survivor cells. Irradiation intensity was inversely proportional to μmax, such that greater intensity was associated with lower μmax. At the same time, growth temperature had an effect on the decrease in μmax: the radiation‐induced reductions in μmax were greater at 12 °C than at 22 °C. In summary, E‐beam irradiation decreases the μmax of B. cereus, while heat treatment does not. This suggests that the shelf life of irradiated foods must be longer than that of heat‐preserved foods after the application of a similar inactivation treatment.</description><subject>Bacillus cereus</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Electron beam irradiation</subject><subject>Electron beams</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food irradiation</subject><subject>Food microbiology</subject><subject>Food preservation</subject><subject>Food science</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>Heat treatment</subject><subject>Inactivation</subject><subject>intensity</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>log reduction</subject><subject>Preservatives</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>survivors</subject><issn>0950-5423</issn><issn>1365-2621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkVtr3DAQhUVoIZtt_4OgBPpiVxdLql4CTcitLNuWbmnfhrEiJdrY641kk82_r90N-9CBYQbm4zCcQwjlrORjfVqXXGpVCC14KRgXJZPc2nJ3RGaHwxsyY1axQlVCHpOTnNeMMSFNNSPLy6L22NKYEt5F7GO3oRiCd32m_YOnLe5iO7Q0b72LITp6n7rn_oEm7D3tAj1HF5tmyNT55If8jrwN2GT__nXOya-ry9XFTbH4dn178WVRRCmtLXilbIVB1VJ7r7BWkguhwmdbCybuahvGtqzWqjZOO-OsZsiUU7LWXEsMck4-7nW3qXsafO6hjdn5psGN74YMXBuuBFfMjuiH_9B1N6TN-B3wavTKCK35SJ2-UpgdNiHhxsUM2xRbTC8gtLGmGj2bk7M99xwb_3K4cwZTGrCGyXSYTIcpDfiXBuzg9uvVz2kdBYq9QMy93x0EMD2CNtIo-L28hj-r1febH0sGC_kXztCN9g</recordid><startdate>201302</startdate><enddate>201302</enddate><creator>Aguirre, Juan</creator><creator>Rodríguez, Mª Rosa</creator><creator>González, Rodrigo</creator><creator>García de Fernando, Gonzalo</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201302</creationdate><title>E-beam irradiation affects the maximum specific growth rate of Bacillus cereus</title><author>Aguirre, Juan ; Rodríguez, Mª Rosa ; González, Rodrigo ; García de Fernando, Gonzalo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3399-14594af5b36ee5ab531225f89b202db9fdb990b65b7c6c7c960a05c53b6163af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bacillus cereus</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Electron beam irradiation</topic><topic>Electron beams</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food irradiation</topic><topic>Food microbiology</topic><topic>Food preservation</topic><topic>Food science</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>Heat treatment</topic><topic>Inactivation</topic><topic>intensity</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>log reduction</topic><topic>Preservatives</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>survivors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aguirre, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Mª Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García de Fernando, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of food science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aguirre, Juan</au><au>Rodríguez, Mª Rosa</au><au>González, Rodrigo</au><au>García de Fernando, Gonzalo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>E-beam irradiation affects the maximum specific growth rate of Bacillus cereus</atitle><jtitle>International journal of food science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Food Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2013-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>382</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>382-386</pages><issn>0950-5423</issn><eissn>1365-2621</eissn><coden>IJFTEZ</coden><abstract>Summary When conventional preservative treatments are applied, such as heat or acid, the maximum specific growth rate (μmax) of survivors is the same as that of untreated cells. However, when new nonthermal technology is applied, the effects of it on the kinetics of the microorganism can be unpredictable. In this sense, Cabeza et al. (2010) reported longer doubling times after irradiating with accelerated electron beam. The aim of this work was to study the effect of electron beam irradiation on the μmax of Bacillus cereus and compare it with a conventional inactivation treatment (heat). To prove this, μmax was estimated in ham at 12 °C and in TSB at 22 °C after 0, 2, 3 or 4 log reduction by irradiation; likewise, μmax was estimated in whole milk at 12 °C and in TSB at 22 °C after the same log reduction using heat treatments. Our findings show that irradiation affected the μmax of survivor cells. Irradiation intensity was inversely proportional to μmax, such that greater intensity was associated with lower μmax. At the same time, growth temperature had an effect on the decrease in μmax: the radiation‐induced reductions in μmax were greater at 12 °C than at 22 °C. In summary, E‐beam irradiation decreases the μmax of B. cereus, while heat treatment does not. This suggests that the shelf life of irradiated foods must be longer than that of heat‐preserved foods after the application of a similar inactivation treatment.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03199.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-5423
ispartof International journal of food science & technology, 2013-02, Vol.48 (2), p.382-386
issn 0950-5423
1365-2621
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671521509
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Bacillus cereus
Biological and medical sciences
Electron beam irradiation
Electron beams
Food industries
Food irradiation
Food microbiology
Food preservation
Food science
Foods
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Growth rate
heat
Heat treatment
Inactivation
intensity
Irradiation
Kinetics
log reduction
Preservatives
Reduction
survivors
title E-beam irradiation affects the maximum specific growth rate of Bacillus cereus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=E-beam%20irradiation%20affects%20the%20maximum%20specific%20growth%20rate%20of%20Bacillus%20cereus&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20food%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Aguirre,%20Juan&rft.date=2013-02&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=382-386&rft.issn=0950-5423&rft.eissn=1365-2621&rft.coden=IJFTEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03199.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E3070001601%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1431972661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true