Performance analysis of absorption heat transformer cycles using ionic liquids based on imidazolium cation as absorbents with 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol as refrigerant

•TFE+[emim][BF4] (or [bmim][BF4]) absorption heat transformer cycles are studied.•Influence of various operating conditions on cycle’s performance is investigated.•Performance comparisons with H2O+LiBr and TFE+TEGDME cycles are done.•Enthalpy data for TFE+[emim][BF4] (or [bmim][BF4]) liquid mixtures...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy conversion and management 2014-08, Vol.84, p.512-523
Hauptverfasser: Ayou, Dereje S., Currás, Moisés R., Salavera, Daniel, García, Josefa, Bruno, Joan C., Coronas, Alberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•TFE+[emim][BF4] (or [bmim][BF4]) absorption heat transformer cycles are studied.•Influence of various operating conditions on cycle’s performance is investigated.•Performance comparisons with H2O+LiBr and TFE+TEGDME cycles are done.•Enthalpy data for TFE+[emim][BF4] (or [bmim][BF4]) liquid mixtures are calculated.•TFE+[emim][BF4] (or [bmim][BF4]) cycles have higher gross temperature lift (GTL). A detailed thermodynamic performance analysis of a single-stage absorption heat transformer and double absorption heat transformer cycles using new working pairs composed of ionic liquids (1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([emim][BF4]) and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([bmim][BF4])) as absorbent and 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) as refrigerant has been studied. Several performance indicators were used to evaluate and compare the performance of the cycles using the TFE+[emim][BF4] and TFE+[bmim][BF4] working pairs with the conventional H2O+LiBr and organic TFE+TEGDME working pairs. The obtained results show that the ionic liquid based working pairs are suitable candidates to replace the conventional H2O+LiBr working pairs in order to avoid the disadvantages associated with it mainly crystallization and corrosion and also they perform better (higher gross temperature lift) than TFE+TEGDME working pair at several operating conditions considered in this work.
ISSN:0196-8904
1879-2227
DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.077