Demand response in liberalized electricity markets: Analysis of aggregated load participation in the German balancing mechanism
Power systems are in the midst of radical changes as a result of steadily rising demand, advanced technology integration and increasing penetration levels of renewable energy sources. Such developments have brought about increasing recognition of consumer behavior and the provision of DR (demand res...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Energy (Oxford) 2014-07, Vol.71, p.245-254 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 254 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 245 |
| container_title | Energy (Oxford) |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Koliou, Elta Eid, Cherrelle Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo Hakvoort, Rudi A. |
| description | Power systems are in the midst of radical changes as a result of steadily rising demand, advanced technology integration and increasing penetration levels of renewable energy sources. Such developments have brought about increasing recognition of consumer behavior and the provision of DR (demand response). The aggregation of small loads as a DR flexibility resource allows end-users to participate in electricity markets and aid in maintaining dynamic system stability. An analysis of the German balancing mechanism illustrates that DR is undermined by three mechanism design aspects: minimum bidding volume, minimum bid duration and binding up and down bids.
•More renewables call for a parallel rise in balance management by System Operators.•Aggregated DR (demand response) from end-users is viable for balance management.•Mechanism design hinders the participation of smaller loads in balance management.•Specifics for balance responsibility, service provision and settlement undermine DR.•Hindering bid aspects include up and down bids, minimum bid volume and duration. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.067 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671506027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544214004800</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671506027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-2c45011618c6117f797f48491f926cd65854a4c41ab270befa1ddf621735c3c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxX1oIWnab9CDLoFedivJ-mP3UAhpmhYCuSRnMSuPHG1k2ZWUwvaSrx6ZDT22MDCX37w3vNc0HxndMsrU5_0WI6bxsOWUiS2to_Sb5pS2im6kEPykeZfznlIqu74_bZ6_4QRxIAnzMseMxEcS_A4TBP8HB4IBbUne-nIgE6RHLPkLuYgQDtlnMjsC45hwhFLZMMNAFkil4gsUP8dVrTwgucZUXcgOAkTr40gmtA8QfZ7eN28dhIwfXvdZc__96u7yx-bm9vrn5cXNxgrVlQ23QlLGFOusYkw73WsnOtEz13NlByU7KUBYwWDHNd2hAzYMTnGmW2lbK9uz5tNRd0nzryfMxUw-Wwz1IZyfsmFKM0kV5fr_qFRc6Vb0qqLiiNo055zQmSX5GtPBMGrWOszeHOswax2G1lGrw_mrA2QLwaU1lfz3lneSSy545b4eOazJ_PaYTLYeo8XBp1qLGWb_b6MX1sGlvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562673496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Demand response in liberalized electricity markets: Analysis of aggregated load participation in the German balancing mechanism</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Koliou, Elta ; Eid, Cherrelle ; Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo ; Hakvoort, Rudi A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koliou, Elta ; Eid, Cherrelle ; Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo ; Hakvoort, Rudi A.</creatorcontrib><description>Power systems are in the midst of radical changes as a result of steadily rising demand, advanced technology integration and increasing penetration levels of renewable energy sources. Such developments have brought about increasing recognition of consumer behavior and the provision of DR (demand response). The aggregation of small loads as a DR flexibility resource allows end-users to participate in electricity markets and aid in maintaining dynamic system stability. An analysis of the German balancing mechanism illustrates that DR is undermined by three mechanism design aspects: minimum bidding volume, minimum bid duration and binding up and down bids.
•More renewables call for a parallel rise in balance management by System Operators.•Aggregated DR (demand response) from end-users is viable for balance management.•Mechanism design hinders the participation of smaller loads in balance management.•Specifics for balance responsibility, service provision and settlement undermine DR.•Hindering bid aspects include up and down bids, minimum bid volume and duration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.067</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENEYDS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aggregation ; Applied sciences ; Balancing ; Binding ; Demand response ; Dynamical systems ; Electricity ; Energy ; Energy management ; Exact sciences and technology ; Loads (forces) ; Markets ; Policy ; Systems stability</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2014-07, Vol.71, p.245-254</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-2c45011618c6117f797f48491f926cd65854a4c41ab270befa1ddf621735c3c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-2c45011618c6117f797f48491f926cd65854a4c41ab270befa1ddf621735c3c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28525242$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koliou, Elta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eid, Cherrelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakvoort, Rudi A.</creatorcontrib><title>Demand response in liberalized electricity markets: Analysis of aggregated load participation in the German balancing mechanism</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>Power systems are in the midst of radical changes as a result of steadily rising demand, advanced technology integration and increasing penetration levels of renewable energy sources. Such developments have brought about increasing recognition of consumer behavior and the provision of DR (demand response). The aggregation of small loads as a DR flexibility resource allows end-users to participate in electricity markets and aid in maintaining dynamic system stability. An analysis of the German balancing mechanism illustrates that DR is undermined by three mechanism design aspects: minimum bidding volume, minimum bid duration and binding up and down bids.
•More renewables call for a parallel rise in balance management by System Operators.•Aggregated DR (demand response) from end-users is viable for balance management.•Mechanism design hinders the participation of smaller loads in balance management.•Specifics for balance responsibility, service provision and settlement undermine DR.•Hindering bid aspects include up and down bids, minimum bid volume and duration.</description><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Balancing</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Demand response</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Systems stability</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxX1oIWnab9CDLoFedivJ-mP3UAhpmhYCuSRnMSuPHG1k2ZWUwvaSrx6ZDT22MDCX37w3vNc0HxndMsrU5_0WI6bxsOWUiS2to_Sb5pS2im6kEPykeZfznlIqu74_bZ6_4QRxIAnzMseMxEcS_A4TBP8HB4IBbUne-nIgE6RHLPkLuYgQDtlnMjsC45hwhFLZMMNAFkil4gsUP8dVrTwgucZUXcgOAkTr40gmtA8QfZ7eN28dhIwfXvdZc__96u7yx-bm9vrn5cXNxgrVlQ23QlLGFOusYkw73WsnOtEz13NlByU7KUBYwWDHNd2hAzYMTnGmW2lbK9uz5tNRd0nzryfMxUw-Wwz1IZyfsmFKM0kV5fr_qFRc6Vb0qqLiiNo055zQmSX5GtPBMGrWOszeHOswax2G1lGrw_mrA2QLwaU1lfz3lneSSy545b4eOazJ_PaYTLYeo8XBp1qLGWb_b6MX1sGlvA</recordid><startdate>20140715</startdate><enddate>20140715</enddate><creator>Koliou, Elta</creator><creator>Eid, Cherrelle</creator><creator>Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo</creator><creator>Hakvoort, Rudi A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140715</creationdate><title>Demand response in liberalized electricity markets: Analysis of aggregated load participation in the German balancing mechanism</title><author>Koliou, Elta ; Eid, Cherrelle ; Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo ; Hakvoort, Rudi A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-2c45011618c6117f797f48491f926cd65854a4c41ab270befa1ddf621735c3c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Balancing</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Demand response</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Systems stability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koliou, Elta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eid, Cherrelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakvoort, Rudi A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koliou, Elta</au><au>Eid, Cherrelle</au><au>Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo</au><au>Hakvoort, Rudi A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Demand response in liberalized electricity markets: Analysis of aggregated load participation in the German balancing mechanism</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2014-07-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>245</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>245-254</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><coden>ENEYDS</coden><abstract>Power systems are in the midst of radical changes as a result of steadily rising demand, advanced technology integration and increasing penetration levels of renewable energy sources. Such developments have brought about increasing recognition of consumer behavior and the provision of DR (demand response). The aggregation of small loads as a DR flexibility resource allows end-users to participate in electricity markets and aid in maintaining dynamic system stability. An analysis of the German balancing mechanism illustrates that DR is undermined by three mechanism design aspects: minimum bidding volume, minimum bid duration and binding up and down bids.
•More renewables call for a parallel rise in balance management by System Operators.•Aggregated DR (demand response) from end-users is viable for balance management.•Mechanism design hinders the participation of smaller loads in balance management.•Specifics for balance responsibility, service provision and settlement undermine DR.•Hindering bid aspects include up and down bids, minimum bid volume and duration.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.067</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0360-5442 |
| ispartof | Energy (Oxford), 2014-07, Vol.71, p.245-254 |
| issn | 0360-5442 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671506027 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Aggregation Applied sciences Balancing Binding Demand response Dynamical systems Electricity Energy Energy management Exact sciences and technology Loads (forces) Markets Policy Systems stability |
| title | Demand response in liberalized electricity markets: Analysis of aggregated load participation in the German balancing mechanism |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A23%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Demand%20response%20in%20liberalized%20electricity%20markets:%20Analysis%20of%20aggregated%20load%20participation%20in%20the%20German%20balancing%20mechanism&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Koliou,%20Elta&rft.date=2014-07-15&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=245-254&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.coden=ENEYDS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671506027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562673496&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360544214004800&rfr_iscdi=true |