Optimal chest compression in cardiopulmonary resuscitation depends upon thoracic and back support stiffness

A biomechanical analysis of the constant peak displacement and constant peak force methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has revealed that optimal CC performance strongly depends on back support stiffness, CC rate, and the thoracic stiffness of the patient being resuscitated. Clinically the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical & biological engineering & computing 2012-12, Vol.50 (12), p.1269-1278
Hauptverfasser: Dellimore, Kiran H., Scheffer, Cornie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1278
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1269
container_title Medical & biological engineering & computing
container_volume 50
creator Dellimore, Kiran H.
Scheffer, Cornie
description A biomechanical analysis of the constant peak displacement and constant peak force methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has revealed that optimal CC performance strongly depends on back support stiffness, CC rate, and the thoracic stiffness of the patient being resuscitated. Clinically the results presented in this study suggest that the stiffness of the back support surfaces found in many hospitals may be sub-optimal and that a backboard or a concrete floor can be used to enhance CC effectiveness. In addition, the choice of optimal CC rate and maximum sternal force applied by clinicians during peak force CPR is ought to be based on a general assessment of the patient’s thoracic stiffness, taking into account the patient’s age, gender, and physical condition; which is consistent with current clinical practice. In addition, it is important for clinicians to note that very high peak sternal forces, exceeding the limit above which severe chest wall trauma and abdominal injury occurs, may be required for optimal CC during peak force CPR on patients with very stiff chests. In these cases an alternative CPR technique may be more appropriate.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11517-012-0963-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671494975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671494975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d1ae4c2afe25e2bf5b84a4b82ee70bdce8b75164f3c064c09239d0a07bb33f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVFL3jAUhsNwzG9uP2A3I-CNN91OktOmvRTRORC88T4kaTqrbRKT9kJ_vSmfG0MQr0J4n_Mmh4eQbwx-MAD5MzNWM1kB4xV0jaiePpAdk8gqQMQDsgOGUFLWHpLPOd8BcFZz_EQOuYAaRQs7cn8dl3HWE7W3Li_Uhjkml_MYPB09tTr1Y4jrNAev0yMt0ZrtuOhlA3oXne8zXWO5LLchaTtaqn1Pjbb3NK8xhrTQvIzD4EvpF_Jx0FN2X1_OI3JzcX5zdlldXf_6fXZ6Vdnyp6XqmXZouR4crx03Q21a1Gha7pwE01vXGlmzBgdhoUELHRddDxqkMUIMUhyRk31tTOFhLVupeczWTZP2LqxZsUYy7LCT9fsoCoSNh_dRzgUK4IIX9PgVehfW5MvKhWqa4ga7rZDtKZtCzskNKqZiIj0qBmrTq_Z6VdGrNr3qqcx8f2lezez6fxN_fRaA74FcIv_Hpf-efrP1GZnHsag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1266444490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal chest compression in cardiopulmonary resuscitation depends upon thoracic and back support stiffness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Dellimore, Kiran H. ; Scheffer, Cornie</creator><creatorcontrib>Dellimore, Kiran H. ; Scheffer, Cornie</creatorcontrib><description>A biomechanical analysis of the constant peak displacement and constant peak force methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has revealed that optimal CC performance strongly depends on back support stiffness, CC rate, and the thoracic stiffness of the patient being resuscitated. Clinically the results presented in this study suggest that the stiffness of the back support surfaces found in many hospitals may be sub-optimal and that a backboard or a concrete floor can be used to enhance CC effectiveness. In addition, the choice of optimal CC rate and maximum sternal force applied by clinicians during peak force CPR is ought to be based on a general assessment of the patient’s thoracic stiffness, taking into account the patient’s age, gender, and physical condition; which is consistent with current clinical practice. In addition, it is important for clinicians to note that very high peak sternal forces, exceeding the limit above which severe chest wall trauma and abdominal injury occurs, may be required for optimal CC during peak force CPR on patients with very stiff chests. In these cases an alternative CPR technique may be more appropriate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-0118</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-0444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-0963-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23054380</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology ; Biomechanics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical engineering ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedicine ; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods ; Chest ; Compressing ; Computer Applications ; Control theory ; CPR ; Elasticity ; Female ; Hospitals ; Human Physiology ; Humans ; Imaging ; Least-Squares Analysis ; Lifesaving ; Male ; Mechanics ; Models, Biological ; Optimization ; Original Article ; Patients ; Radiology ; Respiratory Mechanics - physiology ; Resuscitation ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Spine - physiology ; Sternum - physiology ; Stiffness ; Studies ; Thorax - physiology</subject><ispartof>Medical &amp; biological engineering &amp; computing, 2012-12, Vol.50 (12), p.1269-1278</ispartof><rights>International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d1ae4c2afe25e2bf5b84a4b82ee70bdce8b75164f3c064c09239d0a07bb33f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d1ae4c2afe25e2bf5b84a4b82ee70bdce8b75164f3c064c09239d0a07bb33f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11517-012-0963-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11517-012-0963-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23054380$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dellimore, Kiran H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, Cornie</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal chest compression in cardiopulmonary resuscitation depends upon thoracic and back support stiffness</title><title>Medical &amp; biological engineering &amp; computing</title><addtitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</addtitle><addtitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</addtitle><description>A biomechanical analysis of the constant peak displacement and constant peak force methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has revealed that optimal CC performance strongly depends on back support stiffness, CC rate, and the thoracic stiffness of the patient being resuscitated. Clinically the results presented in this study suggest that the stiffness of the back support surfaces found in many hospitals may be sub-optimal and that a backboard or a concrete floor can be used to enhance CC effectiveness. In addition, the choice of optimal CC rate and maximum sternal force applied by clinicians during peak force CPR is ought to be based on a general assessment of the patient’s thoracic stiffness, taking into account the patient’s age, gender, and physical condition; which is consistent with current clinical practice. In addition, it is important for clinicians to note that very high peak sternal forces, exceeding the limit above which severe chest wall trauma and abdominal injury occurs, may be required for optimal CC during peak force CPR on patients with very stiff chests. In these cases an alternative CPR technique may be more appropriate.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical engineering</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</subject><subject>Chest</subject><subject>Compressing</subject><subject>Computer Applications</subject><subject>Control theory</subject><subject>CPR</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human Physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Least-Squares Analysis</subject><subject>Lifesaving</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Respiratory Mechanics - physiology</subject><subject>Resuscitation</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Spine - physiology</subject><subject>Sternum - physiology</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Thorax - physiology</subject><issn>0140-0118</issn><issn>1741-0444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVFL3jAUhsNwzG9uP2A3I-CNN91OktOmvRTRORC88T4kaTqrbRKT9kJ_vSmfG0MQr0J4n_Mmh4eQbwx-MAD5MzNWM1kB4xV0jaiePpAdk8gqQMQDsgOGUFLWHpLPOd8BcFZz_EQOuYAaRQs7cn8dl3HWE7W3Li_Uhjkml_MYPB09tTr1Y4jrNAev0yMt0ZrtuOhlA3oXne8zXWO5LLchaTtaqn1Pjbb3NK8xhrTQvIzD4EvpF_Jx0FN2X1_OI3JzcX5zdlldXf_6fXZ6Vdnyp6XqmXZouR4crx03Q21a1Gha7pwE01vXGlmzBgdhoUELHRddDxqkMUIMUhyRk31tTOFhLVupeczWTZP2LqxZsUYy7LCT9fsoCoSNh_dRzgUK4IIX9PgVehfW5MvKhWqa4ga7rZDtKZtCzskNKqZiIj0qBmrTq_Z6VdGrNr3qqcx8f2lezez6fxN_fRaA74FcIv_Hpf-efrP1GZnHsag</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Dellimore, Kiran H.</creator><creator>Scheffer, Cornie</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Optimal chest compression in cardiopulmonary resuscitation depends upon thoracic and back support stiffness</title><author>Dellimore, Kiran H. ; Scheffer, Cornie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d1ae4c2afe25e2bf5b84a4b82ee70bdce8b75164f3c064c09239d0a07bb33f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical engineering</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</topic><topic>Chest</topic><topic>Compressing</topic><topic>Computer Applications</topic><topic>Control theory</topic><topic>CPR</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human Physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Least-Squares Analysis</topic><topic>Lifesaving</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Respiratory Mechanics - physiology</topic><topic>Resuscitation</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Spine - physiology</topic><topic>Sternum - physiology</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Thorax - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dellimore, Kiran H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, Cornie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Medical &amp; biological engineering &amp; computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dellimore, Kiran H.</au><au>Scheffer, Cornie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal chest compression in cardiopulmonary resuscitation depends upon thoracic and back support stiffness</atitle><jtitle>Medical &amp; biological engineering &amp; computing</jtitle><stitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</stitle><addtitle>Med Biol Eng Comput</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1269</spage><epage>1278</epage><pages>1269-1278</pages><issn>0140-0118</issn><eissn>1741-0444</eissn><abstract>A biomechanical analysis of the constant peak displacement and constant peak force methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has revealed that optimal CC performance strongly depends on back support stiffness, CC rate, and the thoracic stiffness of the patient being resuscitated. Clinically the results presented in this study suggest that the stiffness of the back support surfaces found in many hospitals may be sub-optimal and that a backboard or a concrete floor can be used to enhance CC effectiveness. In addition, the choice of optimal CC rate and maximum sternal force applied by clinicians during peak force CPR is ought to be based on a general assessment of the patient’s thoracic stiffness, taking into account the patient’s age, gender, and physical condition; which is consistent with current clinical practice. In addition, it is important for clinicians to note that very high peak sternal forces, exceeding the limit above which severe chest wall trauma and abdominal injury occurs, may be required for optimal CC during peak force CPR on patients with very stiff chests. In these cases an alternative CPR technique may be more appropriate.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23054380</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11517-012-0963-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-0118
ispartof Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2012-12, Vol.50 (12), p.1269-1278
issn 0140-0118
1741-0444
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671494975
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete
subjects Assessments
Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology
Biomechanics
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedical engineering
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Biomedicine
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods
Chest
Compressing
Computer Applications
Control theory
CPR
Elasticity
Female
Hospitals
Human Physiology
Humans
Imaging
Least-Squares Analysis
Lifesaving
Male
Mechanics
Models, Biological
Optimization
Original Article
Patients
Radiology
Respiratory Mechanics - physiology
Resuscitation
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Spine - physiology
Sternum - physiology
Stiffness
Studies
Thorax - physiology
title Optimal chest compression in cardiopulmonary resuscitation depends upon thoracic and back support stiffness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T07%3A00%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20chest%20compression%20in%20cardiopulmonary%20resuscitation%20depends%20upon%20thoracic%20and%20back%20support%20stiffness&rft.jtitle=Medical%20&%20biological%20engineering%20&%20computing&rft.au=Dellimore,%20Kiran%20H.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1269&rft.epage=1278&rft.pages=1269-1278&rft.issn=0140-0118&rft.eissn=1741-0444&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11517-012-0963-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671494975%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1266444490&rft_id=info:pmid/23054380&rfr_iscdi=true