Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames
•Component-based estimation of response reduction factor (R).•For RC moment framed buildings following Indian standards.•Performance-based limit states at member and structure levels.•Detailed modelling of an RC section’s behaviour.•Comparison of estimated R values with the code-specified value.•Cod...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering structures 2013-11, Vol.56, p.1808-1819 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1819 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1808 |
container_title | Engineering structures |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Mondal, Apurba Ghosh, Siddhartha Reddy, G.R. |
description | •Component-based estimation of response reduction factor (R).•For RC moment framed buildings following Indian standards.•Performance-based limit states at member and structure levels.•Detailed modelling of an RC section’s behaviour.•Comparison of estimated R values with the code-specified value.•Code-based value of R is non-conservative.
Most seismic design codes today include the nonlinear response of a structure implicitly through a ‘response reduction/modification factor’ (R). This factor allows a designer to use a linear elastic force-based design while accounting for nonlinear behaviour and deformation limits. This research focuses on estimating the actual values of this factor for realistic RC moment frame buildings designed and detailed following the Indian standards for seismic and RC designs and for ductile detailing, and comparing these values with the value suggested in the design code. The primary emphases are in a component-wise computation of R, the consideration of performance-based limits at both member and structure levels, a detailed modelling of the RC section behaviour, and the effects of various analysis and design considerations on R. Values of R are obtained for four realistic designs at two performance levels. The results show that the Indian standard recommends a higher than actual value of R, which is potentially dangerous. This paper also provides other significant conclusions and the limitations of this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671493828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029613003623</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671493828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-d92e36337c3fbc914a707bd9d861003aedf4608433ad722972c7d2805db489ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDWSDxCZhbIfYWVYVL6kSiMfacuwJpEriYieV-HscWnXLaqzxvXNnDiGXFDIKtLhZZ9h_hsGPZsgYUJ6ByIDLIzKjUvBUcMaPyQxoTlNgZXFKzkJYAwCTEmbk7QV97Xyne4NppQPaBLe6HfXQuD5xdTJ8YeIxbFwfpoeNMdNPrc3gfBKtyV-rxeR1mdRedxjOyUmt24AX-zonH_d378vHdPX88LRcrFLDhRxSWzLkBefC8LoyJc21AFHZ0sqCAnCNts4LkDnn2grGSsGMsEzCra1yWSLyObnezd149z1iGFTXBINtq3t0Y1C0EDQvuWQySsVOarwLwWOtNr7ptP9RFNSEUa3VAaOaMCoQKmKMzqt9iA5Gt_HC3jThYI_75AUXIuoWOx3Gi7cNehVMg5GqbTzGmdY1_2b9AsALjYE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671493828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mondal, Apurba ; Ghosh, Siddhartha ; Reddy, G.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mondal, Apurba ; Ghosh, Siddhartha ; Reddy, G.R.</creatorcontrib><description>•Component-based estimation of response reduction factor (R).•For RC moment framed buildings following Indian standards.•Performance-based limit states at member and structure levels.•Detailed modelling of an RC section’s behaviour.•Comparison of estimated R values with the code-specified value.•Code-based value of R is non-conservative.
Most seismic design codes today include the nonlinear response of a structure implicitly through a ‘response reduction/modification factor’ (R). This factor allows a designer to use a linear elastic force-based design while accounting for nonlinear behaviour and deformation limits. This research focuses on estimating the actual values of this factor for realistic RC moment frame buildings designed and detailed following the Indian standards for seismic and RC designs and for ductile detailing, and comparing these values with the value suggested in the design code. The primary emphases are in a component-wise computation of R, the consideration of performance-based limits at both member and structure levels, a detailed modelling of the RC section behaviour, and the effects of various analysis and design considerations on R. Values of R are obtained for four realistic designs at two performance levels. The results show that the Indian standard recommends a higher than actual value of R, which is potentially dangerous. This paper also provides other significant conclusions and the limitations of this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.038</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENSTDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Behaviour factor ; Building codes ; Building structure ; Buildings. Public works ; Construction (buildings and works) ; Design engineering ; Ductile detailing ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geotechnics ; Glass transition temperature ; Mathematical models ; Nonlinearity ; Performance-based evaluation ; Plastic rotation capacity ; Reduction ; Reinforced concrete structure ; Response modification factor ; Response reduction factor ; Seismic design ; Stresses. Safety ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; Structure-soil interaction</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2013-11, Vol.56, p.1808-1819</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-d92e36337c3fbc914a707bd9d861003aedf4608433ad722972c7d2805db489ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-d92e36337c3fbc914a707bd9d861003aedf4608433ad722972c7d2805db489ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28046377$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mondal, Apurba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Siddhartha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, G.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•Component-based estimation of response reduction factor (R).•For RC moment framed buildings following Indian standards.•Performance-based limit states at member and structure levels.•Detailed modelling of an RC section’s behaviour.•Comparison of estimated R values with the code-specified value.•Code-based value of R is non-conservative.
Most seismic design codes today include the nonlinear response of a structure implicitly through a ‘response reduction/modification factor’ (R). This factor allows a designer to use a linear elastic force-based design while accounting for nonlinear behaviour and deformation limits. This research focuses on estimating the actual values of this factor for realistic RC moment frame buildings designed and detailed following the Indian standards for seismic and RC designs and for ductile detailing, and comparing these values with the value suggested in the design code. The primary emphases are in a component-wise computation of R, the consideration of performance-based limits at both member and structure levels, a detailed modelling of the RC section behaviour, and the effects of various analysis and design considerations on R. Values of R are obtained for four realistic designs at two performance levels. The results show that the Indian standard recommends a higher than actual value of R, which is potentially dangerous. This paper also provides other significant conclusions and the limitations of this study.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Behaviour factor</subject><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Building structure</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Construction (buildings and works)</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Ductile detailing</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><subject>Glass transition temperature</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Performance-based evaluation</subject><subject>Plastic rotation capacity</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete structure</subject><subject>Response modification factor</subject><subject>Response reduction factor</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Stresses. Safety</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>Structure-soil interaction</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDWSDxCZhbIfYWVYVL6kSiMfacuwJpEriYieV-HscWnXLaqzxvXNnDiGXFDIKtLhZZ9h_hsGPZsgYUJ6ByIDLIzKjUvBUcMaPyQxoTlNgZXFKzkJYAwCTEmbk7QV97Xyne4NppQPaBLe6HfXQuD5xdTJ8YeIxbFwfpoeNMdNPrc3gfBKtyV-rxeR1mdRedxjOyUmt24AX-zonH_d378vHdPX88LRcrFLDhRxSWzLkBefC8LoyJc21AFHZ0sqCAnCNts4LkDnn2grGSsGMsEzCra1yWSLyObnezd149z1iGFTXBINtq3t0Y1C0EDQvuWQySsVOarwLwWOtNr7ptP9RFNSEUa3VAaOaMCoQKmKMzqt9iA5Gt_HC3jThYI_75AUXIuoWOx3Gi7cNehVMg5GqbTzGmdY1_2b9AsALjYE</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Mondal, Apurba</creator><creator>Ghosh, Siddhartha</creator><creator>Reddy, G.R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames</title><author>Mondal, Apurba ; Ghosh, Siddhartha ; Reddy, G.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-d92e36337c3fbc914a707bd9d861003aedf4608433ad722972c7d2805db489ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Behaviour factor</topic><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Building structure</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Construction (buildings and works)</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Ductile detailing</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><topic>Glass transition temperature</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Performance-based evaluation</topic><topic>Plastic rotation capacity</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete structure</topic><topic>Response modification factor</topic><topic>Response reduction factor</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Stresses. Safety</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>Structure-soil interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mondal, Apurba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Siddhartha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, G.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mondal, Apurba</au><au>Ghosh, Siddhartha</au><au>Reddy, G.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>56</volume><spage>1808</spage><epage>1819</epage><pages>1808-1819</pages><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><coden>ENSTDF</coden><abstract>•Component-based estimation of response reduction factor (R).•For RC moment framed buildings following Indian standards.•Performance-based limit states at member and structure levels.•Detailed modelling of an RC section’s behaviour.•Comparison of estimated R values with the code-specified value.•Code-based value of R is non-conservative.
Most seismic design codes today include the nonlinear response of a structure implicitly through a ‘response reduction/modification factor’ (R). This factor allows a designer to use a linear elastic force-based design while accounting for nonlinear behaviour and deformation limits. This research focuses on estimating the actual values of this factor for realistic RC moment frame buildings designed and detailed following the Indian standards for seismic and RC designs and for ductile detailing, and comparing these values with the value suggested in the design code. The primary emphases are in a component-wise computation of R, the consideration of performance-based limits at both member and structure levels, a detailed modelling of the RC section behaviour, and the effects of various analysis and design considerations on R. Values of R are obtained for four realistic designs at two performance levels. The results show that the Indian standard recommends a higher than actual value of R, which is potentially dangerous. This paper also provides other significant conclusions and the limitations of this study.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.038</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-0296 |
ispartof | Engineering structures, 2013-11, Vol.56, p.1808-1819 |
issn | 0141-0296 1873-7323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671493828 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Applied sciences Behaviour factor Building codes Building structure Buildings. Public works Construction (buildings and works) Design engineering Ductile detailing Exact sciences and technology Geotechnics Glass transition temperature Mathematical models Nonlinearity Performance-based evaluation Plastic rotation capacity Reduction Reinforced concrete structure Response modification factor Response reduction factor Seismic design Stresses. Safety Structural analysis. Stresses Structure-soil interaction |
title | Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A55%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance-based%20evaluation%20of%20the%20response%20reduction%20factor%20for%20ductile%20RC%20frames&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Mondal,%20Apurba&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=56&rft.spage=1808&rft.epage=1819&rft.pages=1808-1819&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft.coden=ENSTDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671493828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671493828&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0141029613003623&rfr_iscdi=true |