Investigation of Ghosting Recovery Mechanisms in Selenium X-ray Detector Structures for Mammography

The ghosting recovery mechanisms in multilayer selenium X-ray detector structures for mammography are experimentally and theoretically investigated. The experiments have been carried out under low positive applied electric field . A ghost removal technique is investigated by reversing the bias polar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on nuclear science 2012-06, Vol.59 (3), p.597-604
Hauptverfasser: Mahmood, S. A., Kabir, M. Z., Tousignant, O., Greenspan, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 604
container_issue 3
container_start_page 597
container_title IEEE transactions on nuclear science
container_volume 59
creator Mahmood, S. A.
Kabir, M. Z.
Tousignant, O.
Greenspan, J.
description The ghosting recovery mechanisms in multilayer selenium X-ray detector structures for mammography are experimentally and theoretically investigated. The experiments have been carried out under low positive applied electric field . A ghost removal technique is investigated by reversing the bias polarity during the natural recovery process. The theoretical model considers accumulated trapped charges and their effects (trap filling, recombination, detrapping, structural relaxation and electric field dependent electron-hole pair creation), and effects of charge injection from the metal contacts. Carrier trapping in both charged and neutral defect states has been considered in the model. It has been found that the X-ray induced deep trap centers are charged defects. A faster sensitivity recovery is found by reversing the bias during the natural recovery process. During the reverse bias, a huge number of carriers are injected from the metal contacts, and fill the existing trap centers. This results in an abrupt recovery of the relative sensitivity. However, the relative sensitivity slightly decreases with time after this abrupt recovery due to the release of the trapped electrons as well as the long recovery time of the induced trap centers. The theoretical model shows a very good agreement with the experimental results.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TNS.2012.2193899
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671468188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6197736</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2776712821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-e85fcaec17927c5c2edf01363a13658412fdb133407d1a95036a5edab7db91ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3wUvAi5fOvKZpk6NMnYNNwU3wVrL0detYm5m0g_33Zmx48PIeH_y-x_s-Qm6BDQCYepy_zwYxg3gQg-JSqTPSAyFkBCKT56THGMhIJUpdkivv10EmgokeMeNmh76tlrqtbENtSUcrG3SzpJ9o7A7dnk7RrHRT-drTqqEz3GBTdTX9jpze02ds0bTW0VnrOtN2Dj0tg5zqurZLp7er_TW5KPXG481p98nX68t8-BZNPkbj4dMkMjxO2gilKI1GA5mKMyNMjEXJgKdchyFkAnFZLIDzhGUFaCUYT7XAQi-yYqFAI--Th-PdrbM_XUiV15U3uNnoBm3nc0gzSFIJUgb0_h-6tp1rwnc5sEAkPI1ZoNiRMs5677DMt66qtdsHKD-0nofW80Pr-an1YLk7WipE_MNTUFkWkvwCXll-sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1081843620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of Ghosting Recovery Mechanisms in Selenium X-ray Detector Structures for Mammography</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Mahmood, S. A. ; Kabir, M. Z. ; Tousignant, O. ; Greenspan, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahmood, S. A. ; Kabir, M. Z. ; Tousignant, O. ; Greenspan, J.</creatorcontrib><description>The ghosting recovery mechanisms in multilayer selenium X-ray detector structures for mammography are experimentally and theoretically investigated. The experiments have been carried out under low positive applied electric field . A ghost removal technique is investigated by reversing the bias polarity during the natural recovery process. The theoretical model considers accumulated trapped charges and their effects (trap filling, recombination, detrapping, structural relaxation and electric field dependent electron-hole pair creation), and effects of charge injection from the metal contacts. Carrier trapping in both charged and neutral defect states has been considered in the model. It has been found that the X-ray induced deep trap centers are charged defects. A faster sensitivity recovery is found by reversing the bias during the natural recovery process. During the reverse bias, a huge number of carriers are injected from the metal contacts, and fill the existing trap centers. This results in an abrupt recovery of the relative sensitivity. However, the relative sensitivity slightly decreases with time after this abrupt recovery due to the release of the trapped electrons as well as the long recovery time of the induced trap centers. The theoretical model shows a very good agreement with the experimental results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2012.2193899</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETNAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Amorphous selenium ; Bias ; Carriers ; Charging ; dark current ; Detectors ; Electric fields ; Electron traps ; ghosting ; mammography ; Metals ; Probes ; Recovery ; Selenium ; Sensitivity ; Studies ; X-ray image detector ; X-ray imaging ; X-ray sensitivity ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 2012-06, Vol.59 (3), p.597-604</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-e85fcaec17927c5c2edf01363a13658412fdb133407d1a95036a5edab7db91ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-e85fcaec17927c5c2edf01363a13658412fdb133407d1a95036a5edab7db91ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6197736$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6197736$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahmood, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir, M. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tousignant, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenspan, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of Ghosting Recovery Mechanisms in Selenium X-ray Detector Structures for Mammography</title><title>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</title><addtitle>TNS</addtitle><description>The ghosting recovery mechanisms in multilayer selenium X-ray detector structures for mammography are experimentally and theoretically investigated. The experiments have been carried out under low positive applied electric field . A ghost removal technique is investigated by reversing the bias polarity during the natural recovery process. The theoretical model considers accumulated trapped charges and their effects (trap filling, recombination, detrapping, structural relaxation and electric field dependent electron-hole pair creation), and effects of charge injection from the metal contacts. Carrier trapping in both charged and neutral defect states has been considered in the model. It has been found that the X-ray induced deep trap centers are charged defects. A faster sensitivity recovery is found by reversing the bias during the natural recovery process. During the reverse bias, a huge number of carriers are injected from the metal contacts, and fill the existing trap centers. This results in an abrupt recovery of the relative sensitivity. However, the relative sensitivity slightly decreases with time after this abrupt recovery due to the release of the trapped electrons as well as the long recovery time of the induced trap centers. The theoretical model shows a very good agreement with the experimental results.</description><subject>Amorphous selenium</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Carriers</subject><subject>Charging</subject><subject>dark current</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electron traps</subject><subject>ghosting</subject><subject>mammography</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Probes</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Selenium</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>X-ray image detector</subject><subject>X-ray imaging</subject><subject>X-ray sensitivity</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>0018-9499</issn><issn>1558-1578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3wUvAi5fOvKZpk6NMnYNNwU3wVrL0detYm5m0g_33Zmx48PIeH_y-x_s-Qm6BDQCYepy_zwYxg3gQg-JSqTPSAyFkBCKT56THGMhIJUpdkivv10EmgokeMeNmh76tlrqtbENtSUcrG3SzpJ9o7A7dnk7RrHRT-drTqqEz3GBTdTX9jpze02ds0bTW0VnrOtN2Dj0tg5zqurZLp7er_TW5KPXG481p98nX68t8-BZNPkbj4dMkMjxO2gilKI1GA5mKMyNMjEXJgKdchyFkAnFZLIDzhGUFaCUYT7XAQi-yYqFAI--Th-PdrbM_XUiV15U3uNnoBm3nc0gzSFIJUgb0_h-6tp1rwnc5sEAkPI1ZoNiRMs5677DMt66qtdsHKD-0nofW80Pr-an1YLk7WipE_MNTUFkWkvwCXll-sg</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Mahmood, S. A.</creator><creator>Kabir, M. Z.</creator><creator>Tousignant, O.</creator><creator>Greenspan, J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Investigation of Ghosting Recovery Mechanisms in Selenium X-ray Detector Structures for Mammography</title><author>Mahmood, S. A. ; Kabir, M. Z. ; Tousignant, O. ; Greenspan, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-e85fcaec17927c5c2edf01363a13658412fdb133407d1a95036a5edab7db91ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Amorphous selenium</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Carriers</topic><topic>Charging</topic><topic>dark current</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electron traps</topic><topic>ghosting</topic><topic>mammography</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Probes</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Selenium</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>X-ray image detector</topic><topic>X-ray imaging</topic><topic>X-ray sensitivity</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahmood, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir, M. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tousignant, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenspan, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahmood, S. A.</au><au>Kabir, M. Z.</au><au>Tousignant, O.</au><au>Greenspan, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of Ghosting Recovery Mechanisms in Selenium X-ray Detector Structures for Mammography</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle><stitle>TNS</stitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>597</spage><epage>604</epage><pages>597-604</pages><issn>0018-9499</issn><eissn>1558-1578</eissn><coden>IETNAE</coden><abstract>The ghosting recovery mechanisms in multilayer selenium X-ray detector structures for mammography are experimentally and theoretically investigated. The experiments have been carried out under low positive applied electric field . A ghost removal technique is investigated by reversing the bias polarity during the natural recovery process. The theoretical model considers accumulated trapped charges and their effects (trap filling, recombination, detrapping, structural relaxation and electric field dependent electron-hole pair creation), and effects of charge injection from the metal contacts. Carrier trapping in both charged and neutral defect states has been considered in the model. It has been found that the X-ray induced deep trap centers are charged defects. A faster sensitivity recovery is found by reversing the bias during the natural recovery process. During the reverse bias, a huge number of carriers are injected from the metal contacts, and fill the existing trap centers. This results in an abrupt recovery of the relative sensitivity. However, the relative sensitivity slightly decreases with time after this abrupt recovery due to the release of the trapped electrons as well as the long recovery time of the induced trap centers. The theoretical model shows a very good agreement with the experimental results.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TNS.2012.2193899</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0018-9499
ispartof IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 2012-06, Vol.59 (3), p.597-604
issn 0018-9499
1558-1578
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671468188
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Amorphous selenium
Bias
Carriers
Charging
dark current
Detectors
Electric fields
Electron traps
ghosting
mammography
Metals
Probes
Recovery
Selenium
Sensitivity
Studies
X-ray image detector
X-ray imaging
X-ray sensitivity
X-rays
title Investigation of Ghosting Recovery Mechanisms in Selenium X-ray Detector Structures for Mammography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A15%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20Ghosting%20Recovery%20Mechanisms%20in%20Selenium%20X-ray%20Detector%20Structures%20for%20Mammography&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20nuclear%20science&rft.au=Mahmood,%20S.%20A.&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=597&rft.epage=604&rft.pages=597-604&rft.issn=0018-9499&rft.eissn=1558-1578&rft.coden=IETNAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TNS.2012.2193899&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2776712821%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1081843620&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6197736&rfr_iscdi=true