Integration of the life of field seismic data with the reservoir model at the Valhall Field

ABSTRACT The frequent time‐lapse observations from the life of field seismic system across the Valhall field provide a wealth of information. The responses from the production and injection wells can be observed through time‐shift and amplitude changes. These observations can be compared to modelled...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical Prospecting 2011-07, Vol.59 (4), p.673-681
Hauptverfasser: van Gestel, Jean-Paul, Best, Kevin D., Barkved, Olav I., Kommedal, Jan H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 681
container_issue 4
container_start_page 673
container_title Geophysical Prospecting
container_volume 59
creator van Gestel, Jean-Paul
Best, Kevin D.
Barkved, Olav I.
Kommedal, Jan H.
description ABSTRACT The frequent time‐lapse observations from the life of field seismic system across the Valhall field provide a wealth of information. The responses from the production and injection wells can be observed through time‐shift and amplitude changes. These observations can be compared to modelled synthetic seismic responses from a reservoir simulation model of the Valhall Field. The observed differences between the observations and the modelling are used to update and improve the history match of the reservoir model. The uncertainty of the resulting model is reduced and a more confident prediction of future reservoir performance is provided. A workflow is presented to convert the reservoir model to a synthetic seismic response and compare the results to the observed time‐lapse responses for any time range and area of interest. Correlation based match quality factors are calculated to quantify the visual differences. This match quality factor allows us to quantitatively compare alternative reservoir models to help identify the parameters that best match the seismic observations. Three different case studies are shown where this workflow has helped to reduce the uncertainty range associated with specific reservoir parameters. By updating various reservoir model parameters we have been able to improve the match to the observations and thereby improve the overall reservoir model predictability. The examples show positive results in a range of different reservoir modelling issues, which indicates the flexibility of this workflow and the ability to have an impact in most reservoir modelling challenges.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00946.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671461886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671461886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4366-f17db229b536e7ccea88128d3357a4309e78b90e5bc546901718d2588fcc2c4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PGzEQhi3USqS0_8EXpF526297pV5QWlIQAoSASu3B8npniYOTBXuB8O_ZTVDO-OLRzPPMSC9CmJKSDu_HoqRcyYIJbUpGKC0JqYQq13tosht8QhNCqCoMYXIffcl5QQgnUooJ-n-y6uEuuT50K9y1uJ8DjqGFsW4DxAZnCHkZPG5c7_BL6OcbJkGG9NyFhJddAxG7ftO-dXHuYsTHo_oVfW5dzPDt_T9AN8e_r6d_irOL2cn06KxwgitVtFQ3NWNVLbkC7T04YygzDedSDwSpQJu6IiBrL4WqCNXUNEwa03rPvKj5Afq-3fuQuscnyL1dhuwhRreC7ilbqjQVihqjBtRsUZ-6nBO09iGFpUuvlhI75mkXdozNjrHZMU-7ydOuB_Xw_YrL3sU2uZUPeeczwbiRwgzczy33EiK8fni_nV1eDcWgF1s95B7WO92le6s019L-PZ9Z9u90dvVrempv-Rvd25bY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671461886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integration of the life of field seismic data with the reservoir model at the Valhall Field</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>van Gestel, Jean-Paul ; Best, Kevin D. ; Barkved, Olav I. ; Kommedal, Jan H.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Gestel, Jean-Paul ; Best, Kevin D. ; Barkved, Olav I. ; Kommedal, Jan H.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT The frequent time‐lapse observations from the life of field seismic system across the Valhall field provide a wealth of information. The responses from the production and injection wells can be observed through time‐shift and amplitude changes. These observations can be compared to modelled synthetic seismic responses from a reservoir simulation model of the Valhall Field. The observed differences between the observations and the modelling are used to update and improve the history match of the reservoir model. The uncertainty of the resulting model is reduced and a more confident prediction of future reservoir performance is provided. A workflow is presented to convert the reservoir model to a synthetic seismic response and compare the results to the observed time‐lapse responses for any time range and area of interest. Correlation based match quality factors are calculated to quantify the visual differences. This match quality factor allows us to quantitatively compare alternative reservoir models to help identify the parameters that best match the seismic observations. Three different case studies are shown where this workflow has helped to reduce the uncertainty range associated with specific reservoir parameters. By updating various reservoir model parameters we have been able to improve the match to the observations and thereby improve the overall reservoir model predictability. The examples show positive results in a range of different reservoir modelling issues, which indicates the flexibility of this workflow and the ability to have an impact in most reservoir modelling challenges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-8025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00946.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GPPRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied geophysics ; Compaction ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Internal geophysics ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Reservoir modelling ; Reservoirs ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic phenomena ; Seismic response ; Time-lapse ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Geophysical Prospecting, 2011-07, Vol.59 (4), p.673-681</ispartof><rights>2011 European Association of Geoscientists &amp; Engineers</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4366-f17db229b536e7ccea88128d3357a4309e78b90e5bc546901718d2588fcc2c4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4366-f17db229b536e7ccea88128d3357a4309e78b90e5bc546901718d2588fcc2c4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2478.2011.00946.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2478.2011.00946.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24238548$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Gestel, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Best, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkved, Olav I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kommedal, Jan H.</creatorcontrib><title>Integration of the life of field seismic data with the reservoir model at the Valhall Field</title><title>Geophysical Prospecting</title><description>ABSTRACT The frequent time‐lapse observations from the life of field seismic system across the Valhall field provide a wealth of information. The responses from the production and injection wells can be observed through time‐shift and amplitude changes. These observations can be compared to modelled synthetic seismic responses from a reservoir simulation model of the Valhall Field. The observed differences between the observations and the modelling are used to update and improve the history match of the reservoir model. The uncertainty of the resulting model is reduced and a more confident prediction of future reservoir performance is provided. A workflow is presented to convert the reservoir model to a synthetic seismic response and compare the results to the observed time‐lapse responses for any time range and area of interest. Correlation based match quality factors are calculated to quantify the visual differences. This match quality factor allows us to quantitatively compare alternative reservoir models to help identify the parameters that best match the seismic observations. Three different case studies are shown where this workflow has helped to reduce the uncertainty range associated with specific reservoir parameters. By updating various reservoir model parameters we have been able to improve the match to the observations and thereby improve the overall reservoir model predictability. The examples show positive results in a range of different reservoir modelling issues, which indicates the flexibility of this workflow and the ability to have an impact in most reservoir modelling challenges.</description><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Compaction</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Reservoir modelling</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Time-lapse</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>0016-8025</issn><issn>1365-2478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PGzEQhi3USqS0_8EXpF526297pV5QWlIQAoSASu3B8npniYOTBXuB8O_ZTVDO-OLRzPPMSC9CmJKSDu_HoqRcyYIJbUpGKC0JqYQq13tosht8QhNCqCoMYXIffcl5QQgnUooJ-n-y6uEuuT50K9y1uJ8DjqGFsW4DxAZnCHkZPG5c7_BL6OcbJkGG9NyFhJddAxG7ftO-dXHuYsTHo_oVfW5dzPDt_T9AN8e_r6d_irOL2cn06KxwgitVtFQ3NWNVLbkC7T04YygzDedSDwSpQJu6IiBrL4WqCNXUNEwa03rPvKj5Afq-3fuQuscnyL1dhuwhRreC7ilbqjQVihqjBtRsUZ-6nBO09iGFpUuvlhI75mkXdozNjrHZMU-7ydOuB_Xw_YrL3sU2uZUPeeczwbiRwgzczy33EiK8fni_nV1eDcWgF1s95B7WO92le6s019L-PZ9Z9u90dvVrempv-Rvd25bY</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>van Gestel, Jean-Paul</creator><creator>Best, Kevin D.</creator><creator>Barkved, Olav I.</creator><creator>Kommedal, Jan H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Integration of the life of field seismic data with the reservoir model at the Valhall Field</title><author>van Gestel, Jean-Paul ; Best, Kevin D. ; Barkved, Olav I. ; Kommedal, Jan H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4366-f17db229b536e7ccea88128d3357a4309e78b90e5bc546901718d2588fcc2c4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Compaction</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Reservoir modelling</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Time-lapse</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Gestel, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Best, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkved, Olav I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kommedal, Jan H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Gestel, Jean-Paul</au><au>Best, Kevin D.</au><au>Barkved, Olav I.</au><au>Kommedal, Jan H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integration of the life of field seismic data with the reservoir model at the Valhall Field</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</jtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>673</spage><epage>681</epage><pages>673-681</pages><issn>0016-8025</issn><eissn>1365-2478</eissn><coden>GPPRAR</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT The frequent time‐lapse observations from the life of field seismic system across the Valhall field provide a wealth of information. The responses from the production and injection wells can be observed through time‐shift and amplitude changes. These observations can be compared to modelled synthetic seismic responses from a reservoir simulation model of the Valhall Field. The observed differences between the observations and the modelling are used to update and improve the history match of the reservoir model. The uncertainty of the resulting model is reduced and a more confident prediction of future reservoir performance is provided. A workflow is presented to convert the reservoir model to a synthetic seismic response and compare the results to the observed time‐lapse responses for any time range and area of interest. Correlation based match quality factors are calculated to quantify the visual differences. This match quality factor allows us to quantitatively compare alternative reservoir models to help identify the parameters that best match the seismic observations. Three different case studies are shown where this workflow has helped to reduce the uncertainty range associated with specific reservoir parameters. By updating various reservoir model parameters we have been able to improve the match to the observations and thereby improve the overall reservoir model predictability. The examples show positive results in a range of different reservoir modelling issues, which indicates the flexibility of this workflow and the ability to have an impact in most reservoir modelling challenges.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00946.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-8025
ispartof Geophysical Prospecting, 2011-07, Vol.59 (4), p.673-681
issn 0016-8025
1365-2478
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671461886
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Applied geophysics
Compaction
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Internal geophysics
Mathematical models
Modelling
Reservoir modelling
Reservoirs
Seismic engineering
Seismic phenomena
Seismic response
Time-lapse
Workflow
title Integration of the life of field seismic data with the reservoir model at the Valhall Field
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A17%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integration%20of%20the%20life%20of%20field%20seismic%20data%20with%20the%20reservoir%20model%20at%20the%20Valhall%20Field&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20Prospecting&rft.au=van%20Gestel,%20Jean-Paul&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=673&rft.epage=681&rft.pages=673-681&rft.issn=0016-8025&rft.eissn=1365-2478&rft.coden=GPPRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00946.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671461886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671461886&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true