Scale for classifying organizations as explorers, exploiters or ambidextrous
► Here I present a scale developed to classify organizations as being exploiters, explorers, ambidextrous or with no defined orientation. ► Exploration and exploitation may be classified into six practical dimensions: organizational knowledge practices, innovative practices, competition, strategic o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of information management 2012-02, Vol.32 (1), p.75-87 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 87 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 75 |
| container_title | International journal of information management |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Popadiuk, Silvio |
| description | ► Here I present a scale developed to classify organizations as being exploiters, explorers, ambidextrous or with no defined orientation. ► Exploration and exploitation may be classified into six practical dimensions: organizational knowledge practices, innovative practices, competition, strategic orientation, organizational efficiency and partnerships. ► The scale allows the identification of links to other theoretical currents addressing organizational strategies and learning processes. ► Applying the scale in the company, may establish a set of actions designed to strengthen exploitation, or exploration, or even both of them simultaneously.
This paper presents a scale developed to classify organizations through cluster analysis as being exploiters, explores, ambidextrous or with no defined orientation. The theoretical framework helps identify that the concepts associated with exploration and exploitation may be classified into six practical dimensions: organizational knowledge practices, innovative practices, competition, strategic orientation, organizational efficiency and partnerships. After stripping the data, the scale was underpinned by 45 attributes related to these dimensions. Convergent and divergent validity statistics are presented resulting from a questionnaire being applied to 249 respondents from companies located in Brazil. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.07.001 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671411771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0268401211000958</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671411771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-ab34340307c7d0c579305518adcc159a03ee1465f873105ce2abbbb456e48a303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVpoNtNPkNNIdBD7cxYkiUfl5D-gYUempyFVh4vMl5rI3lLkk8fLbvk0Evmojn85s3TG8a-IFQI2NwMlR_81Ifddq5qQKxAVQD4gS1QK14KBeojW0Dd6FIA1p_Y55SGDCiQ9YKt_zo7UtGHWLjRpuT7Zz9tixC3dvIvdvZhSoVNBT3txxAppu-n1s-5z1hhdxvf0dMcwyFdsovejomuzu-SPfy4u7_9Va7__Px9u1qXTnA9l3bDBRfAQTnVgZOq5SAlats5h7K1wIlQNLLP_hGko9pucgnZkNCWA1-ybyfdfQyPB0qz2fnkaBztRNmGwUahQFQK30cBdfaiNM_o1__QIRzilD9iWlQtatnqDKkT5GJIKVJv9tHvbHzOSkexxgzm7R7meA8DyuS48-T1Wd6mnHkf7eR8ehuvpWhqlEcbqxNHOcF_nqJJztPkqPOR3Gy64N_d9QoBM6Rj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>917918598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scale for classifying organizations as explorers, exploiters or ambidextrous</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Popadiuk, Silvio</creator><creatorcontrib>Popadiuk, Silvio</creatorcontrib><description>► Here I present a scale developed to classify organizations as being exploiters, explorers, ambidextrous or with no defined orientation. ► Exploration and exploitation may be classified into six practical dimensions: organizational knowledge practices, innovative practices, competition, strategic orientation, organizational efficiency and partnerships. ► The scale allows the identification of links to other theoretical currents addressing organizational strategies and learning processes. ► Applying the scale in the company, may establish a set of actions designed to strengthen exploitation, or exploration, or even both of them simultaneously.
This paper presents a scale developed to classify organizations through cluster analysis as being exploiters, explores, ambidextrous or with no defined orientation. The theoretical framework helps identify that the concepts associated with exploration and exploitation may be classified into six practical dimensions: organizational knowledge practices, innovative practices, competition, strategic orientation, organizational efficiency and partnerships. After stripping the data, the scale was underpinned by 45 attributes related to these dimensions. Convergent and divergent validity statistics are presented resulting from a questionnaire being applied to 249 respondents from companies located in Brazil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-4012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.07.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJMAED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambidextrous organizations ; Bibliometrics. Scientometrics ; Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation ; Brazil ; Classification ; Cluster analysis ; Competition ; Exact sciences and technology ; Exploitation ; Exploration ; Information and communication sciences ; Information policy ; Information science. Documentation ; Innovations ; Knowledge management ; Library and information science. General aspects ; Measurement ; Organizations ; Orientation ; Partnership ; Partnerships ; Scale ; Sciences and techniques of general use ; Statistics ; Strategic management ; Stripping ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of information management, 2012-02, Vol.32 (1), p.75-87</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-ab34340307c7d0c579305518adcc159a03ee1465f873105ce2abbbb456e48a303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-ab34340307c7d0c579305518adcc159a03ee1465f873105ce2abbbb456e48a303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401211000958$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27842,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25462153$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Popadiuk, Silvio</creatorcontrib><title>Scale for classifying organizations as explorers, exploiters or ambidextrous</title><title>International journal of information management</title><description>► Here I present a scale developed to classify organizations as being exploiters, explorers, ambidextrous or with no defined orientation. ► Exploration and exploitation may be classified into six practical dimensions: organizational knowledge practices, innovative practices, competition, strategic orientation, organizational efficiency and partnerships. ► The scale allows the identification of links to other theoretical currents addressing organizational strategies and learning processes. ► Applying the scale in the company, may establish a set of actions designed to strengthen exploitation, or exploration, or even both of them simultaneously.
This paper presents a scale developed to classify organizations through cluster analysis as being exploiters, explores, ambidextrous or with no defined orientation. The theoretical framework helps identify that the concepts associated with exploration and exploitation may be classified into six practical dimensions: organizational knowledge practices, innovative practices, competition, strategic orientation, organizational efficiency and partnerships. After stripping the data, the scale was underpinned by 45 attributes related to these dimensions. Convergent and divergent validity statistics are presented resulting from a questionnaire being applied to 249 respondents from companies located in Brazil.</description><subject>Ambidextrous organizations</subject><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics</subject><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Exploration</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information policy</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Library and information science. General aspects</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Partnership</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Scale</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Stripping</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0268-4012</issn><issn>1873-4707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVpoNtNPkNNIdBD7cxYkiUfl5D-gYUempyFVh4vMl5rI3lLkk8fLbvk0Evmojn85s3TG8a-IFQI2NwMlR_81Ifddq5qQKxAVQD4gS1QK14KBeojW0Dd6FIA1p_Y55SGDCiQ9YKt_zo7UtGHWLjRpuT7Zz9tixC3dvIvdvZhSoVNBT3txxAppu-n1s-5z1hhdxvf0dMcwyFdsovejomuzu-SPfy4u7_9Va7__Px9u1qXTnA9l3bDBRfAQTnVgZOq5SAlats5h7K1wIlQNLLP_hGko9pucgnZkNCWA1-ybyfdfQyPB0qz2fnkaBztRNmGwUahQFQK30cBdfaiNM_o1__QIRzilD9iWlQtatnqDKkT5GJIKVJv9tHvbHzOSkexxgzm7R7meA8DyuS48-T1Wd6mnHkf7eR8ehuvpWhqlEcbqxNHOcF_nqJJztPkqPOR3Gy64N_d9QoBM6Rj</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Popadiuk, Silvio</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Scale for classifying organizations as explorers, exploiters or ambidextrous</title><author>Popadiuk, Silvio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-ab34340307c7d0c579305518adcc159a03ee1465f873105ce2abbbb456e48a303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Ambidextrous organizations</topic><topic>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics</topic><topic>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Exploration</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information policy</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Library and information science. General aspects</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Partnership</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Scale</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Stripping</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Popadiuk, Silvio</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of information management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Popadiuk, Silvio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scale for classifying organizations as explorers, exploiters or ambidextrous</atitle><jtitle>International journal of information management</jtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>75-87</pages><issn>0268-4012</issn><eissn>1873-4707</eissn><coden>IJMAED</coden><abstract>► Here I present a scale developed to classify organizations as being exploiters, explorers, ambidextrous or with no defined orientation. ► Exploration and exploitation may be classified into six practical dimensions: organizational knowledge practices, innovative practices, competition, strategic orientation, organizational efficiency and partnerships. ► The scale allows the identification of links to other theoretical currents addressing organizational strategies and learning processes. ► Applying the scale in the company, may establish a set of actions designed to strengthen exploitation, or exploration, or even both of them simultaneously.
This paper presents a scale developed to classify organizations through cluster analysis as being exploiters, explores, ambidextrous or with no defined orientation. The theoretical framework helps identify that the concepts associated with exploration and exploitation may be classified into six practical dimensions: organizational knowledge practices, innovative practices, competition, strategic orientation, organizational efficiency and partnerships. After stripping the data, the scale was underpinned by 45 attributes related to these dimensions. Convergent and divergent validity statistics are presented resulting from a questionnaire being applied to 249 respondents from companies located in Brazil.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.07.001</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0268-4012 |
| ispartof | International journal of information management, 2012-02, Vol.32 (1), p.75-87 |
| issn | 0268-4012 1873-4707 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671411771 |
| source | PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Ambidextrous organizations Bibliometrics. Scientometrics Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation Brazil Classification Cluster analysis Competition Exact sciences and technology Exploitation Exploration Information and communication sciences Information policy Information science. Documentation Innovations Knowledge management Library and information science. General aspects Measurement Organizations Orientation Partnership Partnerships Scale Sciences and techniques of general use Statistics Strategic management Stripping Studies |
| title | Scale for classifying organizations as explorers, exploiters or ambidextrous |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T05%3A05%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scale%20for%20classifying%20organizations%20as%20explorers,%20exploiters%20or%20ambidextrous&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20information%20management&rft.au=Popadiuk,%20Silvio&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=75-87&rft.issn=0268-4012&rft.eissn=1873-4707&rft.coden=IJMAED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671411771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=917918598&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0268401211000958&rfr_iscdi=true |