Thermodynamic modelling and evaluation of a two-stage thermal process for waste gasification

► This paper compares single and multiple stages gasification technologies. ► A model is developed to predict efficiency and gas composition at each stage. ► The model is validated with experimental data taken from a demonstration plant. ► Carbon conversion and syngas yield are enhanced when using a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fuel (Guildford) 2013-06, Vol.108, p.356-369
Hauptverfasser: Materazzi, Massimiliano, Lettieri, Paola, Mazzei, Luca, Taylor, Richard, Chapman, Chris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 369
container_issue
container_start_page 356
container_title Fuel (Guildford)
container_volume 108
creator Materazzi, Massimiliano
Lettieri, Paola
Mazzei, Luca
Taylor, Richard
Chapman, Chris
description ► This paper compares single and multiple stages gasification technologies. ► A model is developed to predict efficiency and gas composition at each stage. ► The model is validated with experimental data taken from a demonstration plant. ► Carbon conversion and syngas yield are enhanced when using a two-stage process. ► Optimal oxidants ratio and energy demand depend on the aims of different projects. Tar generation and ash disposal represent the strongest barrier for use of fluid bed gasification for waste treatment, whereas sufficing for both is only possible with expensive cleaning systems and further processing. The use of plasma within an advanced two-stage thermal process is able to achieve efficient cracking of the complex organics to the primary syngas constituents whilst limiting the electric power demand. This study focused on the thermodynamic assets of using a two-stage thermal process over the conventional single-stage approach. These include, for example, the fact that the primary thermal waste decomposition is performed in conditions of optimal stoichiometric ratio for the gasification reactants. Furthermore, staging the oxidant injection in two separate intakes significantly improves the efficiency of the system, reducing the plasma power consumption. A flexible model capable of providing reliable quantitative predictions of product yield and composition after the two-stage process has been developed. The method has a systematic structure that embraces atom conservation principles and equilibrium calculation routines, considering all the conversion stages that lead from the initial waste feed to final products. The model was also validated with experimental data from a demonstration plant. The study effectively demonstrated that the two-stage gasification system significantly improves the gas yield of the system and the carbon conversion efficiency, which are crucial in other single stage systems, whilst maintaining high energy performances.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671405135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016236113001397</els_id><sourcerecordid>1365117025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-f6bf11acb65606adb22ec068101248bc059b2b41ae6072fa264206300929c6f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS1EJZbSL9CTL0hcEsbj2M5KXFBFAakSl3KrZE0ce_EqGxc726rfHoetONLTzOH33vx5jF0KaAUI_XHfhqOfWgQhW8AWpHnFNqI3sjFCyddsA5VqUGrxhr0tZQ8Aplfdht3d_vL5kManmQ7R8dr5aYrzjtM8cv9A05GWmGaeAie-PKamLLTzfFlVNPH7nJwvhYeU-SOVxfMdlRii-6t6x84CTcVfPNdz9vP6y-3Vt-bmx9fvV59vGqcELE3QQxCC3KCVBk3jgOgd6L5ehl0_OFDbAYdOkNdgMBDqDkFLgC1unQ5GnrMPJ9-6zu-jL4s9xOLqITT7dCxWaCM6UEKql1EFSna9rvCLqKyUMICrK55Ql1Mp2Qd7n-OB8pMVYNeA7N6uAdk1IAtoa0BV9P7Zn4qjKWSaXSz_lGiwQ9xC5T6dOF9f-BB9tsVFPzs_xuzdYscU_zfmDwG7pYE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1365117025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermodynamic modelling and evaluation of a two-stage thermal process for waste gasification</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Materazzi, Massimiliano ; Lettieri, Paola ; Mazzei, Luca ; Taylor, Richard ; Chapman, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Materazzi, Massimiliano ; Lettieri, Paola ; Mazzei, Luca ; Taylor, Richard ; Chapman, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>► This paper compares single and multiple stages gasification technologies. ► A model is developed to predict efficiency and gas composition at each stage. ► The model is validated with experimental data taken from a demonstration plant. ► Carbon conversion and syngas yield are enhanced when using a two-stage process. ► Optimal oxidants ratio and energy demand depend on the aims of different projects. Tar generation and ash disposal represent the strongest barrier for use of fluid bed gasification for waste treatment, whereas sufficing for both is only possible with expensive cleaning systems and further processing. The use of plasma within an advanced two-stage thermal process is able to achieve efficient cracking of the complex organics to the primary syngas constituents whilst limiting the electric power demand. This study focused on the thermodynamic assets of using a two-stage thermal process over the conventional single-stage approach. These include, for example, the fact that the primary thermal waste decomposition is performed in conditions of optimal stoichiometric ratio for the gasification reactants. Furthermore, staging the oxidant injection in two separate intakes significantly improves the efficiency of the system, reducing the plasma power consumption. A flexible model capable of providing reliable quantitative predictions of product yield and composition after the two-stage process has been developed. The method has a systematic structure that embraces atom conservation principles and equilibrium calculation routines, considering all the conversion stages that lead from the initial waste feed to final products. The model was also validated with experimental data from a demonstration plant. The study effectively demonstrated that the two-stage gasification system significantly improves the gas yield of the system and the carbon conversion efficiency, which are crucial in other single stage systems, whilst maintaining high energy performances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Ashes ; Computational efficiency ; Computing time ; Conversion ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Equilibrium model ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluidized bed ; Fuels ; Gasification ; Mathematical models ; Plasma ; Thermodynamics ; Waste ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 2013-06, Vol.108, p.356-369</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-f6bf11acb65606adb22ec068101248bc059b2b41ae6072fa264206300929c6f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-f6bf11acb65606adb22ec068101248bc059b2b41ae6072fa264206300929c6f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.037$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27242290$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Materazzi, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lettieri, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzei, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Thermodynamic modelling and evaluation of a two-stage thermal process for waste gasification</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>► This paper compares single and multiple stages gasification technologies. ► A model is developed to predict efficiency and gas composition at each stage. ► The model is validated with experimental data taken from a demonstration plant. ► Carbon conversion and syngas yield are enhanced when using a two-stage process. ► Optimal oxidants ratio and energy demand depend on the aims of different projects. Tar generation and ash disposal represent the strongest barrier for use of fluid bed gasification for waste treatment, whereas sufficing for both is only possible with expensive cleaning systems and further processing. The use of plasma within an advanced two-stage thermal process is able to achieve efficient cracking of the complex organics to the primary syngas constituents whilst limiting the electric power demand. This study focused on the thermodynamic assets of using a two-stage thermal process over the conventional single-stage approach. These include, for example, the fact that the primary thermal waste decomposition is performed in conditions of optimal stoichiometric ratio for the gasification reactants. Furthermore, staging the oxidant injection in two separate intakes significantly improves the efficiency of the system, reducing the plasma power consumption. A flexible model capable of providing reliable quantitative predictions of product yield and composition after the two-stage process has been developed. The method has a systematic structure that embraces atom conservation principles and equilibrium calculation routines, considering all the conversion stages that lead from the initial waste feed to final products. The model was also validated with experimental data from a demonstration plant. The study effectively demonstrated that the two-stage gasification system significantly improves the gas yield of the system and the carbon conversion efficiency, which are crucial in other single stage systems, whilst maintaining high energy performances.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>Computational efficiency</subject><subject>Computing time</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Equilibrium model</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluidized bed</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Gasification</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Waste</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS1EJZbSL9CTL0hcEsbj2M5KXFBFAakSl3KrZE0ce_EqGxc726rfHoetONLTzOH33vx5jF0KaAUI_XHfhqOfWgQhW8AWpHnFNqI3sjFCyddsA5VqUGrxhr0tZQ8Aplfdht3d_vL5kManmQ7R8dr5aYrzjtM8cv9A05GWmGaeAie-PKamLLTzfFlVNPH7nJwvhYeU-SOVxfMdlRii-6t6x84CTcVfPNdz9vP6y-3Vt-bmx9fvV59vGqcELE3QQxCC3KCVBk3jgOgd6L5ehl0_OFDbAYdOkNdgMBDqDkFLgC1unQ5GnrMPJ9-6zu-jL4s9xOLqITT7dCxWaCM6UEKql1EFSna9rvCLqKyUMICrK55Ql1Mp2Qd7n-OB8pMVYNeA7N6uAdk1IAtoa0BV9P7Zn4qjKWSaXSz_lGiwQ9xC5T6dOF9f-BB9tsVFPzs_xuzdYscU_zfmDwG7pYE</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Materazzi, Massimiliano</creator><creator>Lettieri, Paola</creator><creator>Mazzei, Luca</creator><creator>Taylor, Richard</creator><creator>Chapman, Chris</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Thermodynamic modelling and evaluation of a two-stage thermal process for waste gasification</title><author>Materazzi, Massimiliano ; Lettieri, Paola ; Mazzei, Luca ; Taylor, Richard ; Chapman, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-f6bf11acb65606adb22ec068101248bc059b2b41ae6072fa264206300929c6f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>Computational efficiency</topic><topic>Computing time</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Equilibrium model</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluidized bed</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Gasification</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Waste</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Materazzi, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lettieri, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzei, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Materazzi, Massimiliano</au><au>Lettieri, Paola</au><au>Mazzei, Luca</au><au>Taylor, Richard</au><au>Chapman, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermodynamic modelling and evaluation of a two-stage thermal process for waste gasification</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>108</volume><spage>356</spage><epage>369</epage><pages>356-369</pages><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>► This paper compares single and multiple stages gasification technologies. ► A model is developed to predict efficiency and gas composition at each stage. ► The model is validated with experimental data taken from a demonstration plant. ► Carbon conversion and syngas yield are enhanced when using a two-stage process. ► Optimal oxidants ratio and energy demand depend on the aims of different projects. Tar generation and ash disposal represent the strongest barrier for use of fluid bed gasification for waste treatment, whereas sufficing for both is only possible with expensive cleaning systems and further processing. The use of plasma within an advanced two-stage thermal process is able to achieve efficient cracking of the complex organics to the primary syngas constituents whilst limiting the electric power demand. This study focused on the thermodynamic assets of using a two-stage thermal process over the conventional single-stage approach. These include, for example, the fact that the primary thermal waste decomposition is performed in conditions of optimal stoichiometric ratio for the gasification reactants. Furthermore, staging the oxidant injection in two separate intakes significantly improves the efficiency of the system, reducing the plasma power consumption. A flexible model capable of providing reliable quantitative predictions of product yield and composition after the two-stage process has been developed. The method has a systematic structure that embraces atom conservation principles and equilibrium calculation routines, considering all the conversion stages that lead from the initial waste feed to final products. The model was also validated with experimental data from a demonstration plant. The study effectively demonstrated that the two-stage gasification system significantly improves the gas yield of the system and the carbon conversion efficiency, which are crucial in other single stage systems, whilst maintaining high energy performances.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.037</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-2361
ispartof Fuel (Guildford), 2013-06, Vol.108, p.356-369
issn 0016-2361
1873-7153
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671405135
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Applied sciences
Ashes
Computational efficiency
Computing time
Conversion
Energy
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Equilibrium model
Exact sciences and technology
Fluidized bed
Fuels
Gasification
Mathematical models
Plasma
Thermodynamics
Waste
Wastes
title Thermodynamic modelling and evaluation of a two-stage thermal process for waste gasification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A29%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermodynamic%20modelling%20and%20evaluation%20of%20a%20two-stage%20thermal%20process%20for%20waste%20gasification&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Materazzi,%20Massimiliano&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=108&rft.spage=356&rft.epage=369&rft.pages=356-369&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1365117025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1365117025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016236113001397&rfr_iscdi=true