Spin-echo fMRI: The poor relation?
Spin-echo fMRI offers a potentially better intrinsic functional spatial resolution than its gradient echo counterpart, as well as the elimination of signal dropouts in the image. This comes at the price of a significant loss in sensitivity. In this article the main methods for measuring spin-echo fM...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2012-08, Vol.62 (2), p.1109-1115 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1115 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1109 |
container_title | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Norris, David G. |
description | Spin-echo fMRI offers a potentially better intrinsic functional spatial resolution than its gradient echo counterpart, as well as the elimination of signal dropouts in the image. This comes at the price of a significant loss in sensitivity. In this article the main methods for measuring spin-echo fMRI are presented: HASTE, SSFP, RASER and most importantly spin-echo EPI. Their relative merits and limitations are discussed. The BOLD contrast mechanisms responsible for spin echo fMRI are summarised, and the spatial origin of the signal within the neocortex discussed. The major publications concerning the use of spin echo fMRI are examined. At present the most promising application for this methodology would appear to be in the examination of cortical layers and columns. The balance of experimental and theoretical evidence accumulated to date leads the author to propose that: (i) There is little point in conducting spin-echo fMRI at main magnetic field strengths of 3T and below; (ii) There are fundamental limitations to acquiring spin-echo BOLD data at 7T and above; (iii) Whole brain coverage with SE-BOLD at very high static magnetic field strengths could prove valuable; and (iv) SE-BOLD is probably better suited to study cortical columns than cortical layers. Recently gradient-echo approaches for high spatial resolution fMRI have been demonstrated that employ special techniques to avoid the effects of larger post capillary vessels. The coming years will show whether spin-echo techniques can remain the method of choice for high spatial resolution studies, and whether they can extend their range of application at 7T and above. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671395892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811912000067</els_id><sourcerecordid>1023295397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-aff0190f026b3443baf8e257eb408e9c0867c9eba928c0b7c8211e1ef454625e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0E4v0LKIINm4QZO05sNggqHpVASFDWVuJOIFUbF7tB4u9xVR4SG1iNF2fu1fgwliBkCFicTLKOeu_aWfVMGQfkGWAGINbYNoKWqZYlX1--pUgVot5iOyFMAEBjrjbZFuc8l0LiNjt8nLddSvbFJc3dw_A0Gb1QMnfOJ56m1aJ13dke22iqaaD9z7nLnq4uR4Ob9Pb-ejg4v02tRLVIq6YB1NAAL2qR56KuGkVcllTnoEhbUEVpNdWV5spCXVrFEQmpyWVecElilx2vcufevfYUFmbWBkvTadWR64PBokShpdL8bxSEKiAvQf8D5YJrKXQZ0aNf6MT1vos3x-5CgS64WAaqFWW9C8FTY-Y-ivDvMcos7ZiJ-bFjlnYMoIl24urBZ0Ffz2j8vfilIwIXK4DiP7-15E2wLXWWxq0nuzBj1_7d8gErVKES</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1668096239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spin-echo fMRI: The poor relation?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Norris, David G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Norris, David G.</creatorcontrib><description>Spin-echo fMRI offers a potentially better intrinsic functional spatial resolution than its gradient echo counterpart, as well as the elimination of signal dropouts in the image. This comes at the price of a significant loss in sensitivity. In this article the main methods for measuring spin-echo fMRI are presented: HASTE, SSFP, RASER and most importantly spin-echo EPI. Their relative merits and limitations are discussed. The BOLD contrast mechanisms responsible for spin echo fMRI are summarised, and the spatial origin of the signal within the neocortex discussed. The major publications concerning the use of spin echo fMRI are examined. At present the most promising application for this methodology would appear to be in the examination of cortical layers and columns. The balance of experimental and theoretical evidence accumulated to date leads the author to propose that: (i) There is little point in conducting spin-echo fMRI at main magnetic field strengths of 3T and below; (ii) There are fundamental limitations to acquiring spin-echo BOLD data at 7T and above; (iii) Whole brain coverage with SE-BOLD at very high static magnetic field strengths could prove valuable; and (iv) SE-BOLD is probably better suited to study cortical columns than cortical layers. Recently gradient-echo approaches for high spatial resolution fMRI have been demonstrated that employ special techniques to avoid the effects of larger post capillary vessels. The coming years will show whether spin-echo techniques can remain the method of choice for high spatial resolution studies, and whether they can extend their range of application at 7T and above.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22245351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Brain ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping - history ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Capillarity ; Conduction ; Fourier transforms ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - history ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - history ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Measurement techniques ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Origins ; Radio frequency ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spatial resolution ; Strength ; Studies</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-08, Vol.62 (2), p.1109-1115</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 15, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-aff0190f026b3443baf8e257eb408e9c0867c9eba928c0b7c8211e1ef454625e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-aff0190f026b3443baf8e257eb408e9c0867c9eba928c0b7c8211e1ef454625e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1668096239?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982,64370,64372,64374,72226</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22245351$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Norris, David G.</creatorcontrib><title>Spin-echo fMRI: The poor relation?</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Spin-echo fMRI offers a potentially better intrinsic functional spatial resolution than its gradient echo counterpart, as well as the elimination of signal dropouts in the image. This comes at the price of a significant loss in sensitivity. In this article the main methods for measuring spin-echo fMRI are presented: HASTE, SSFP, RASER and most importantly spin-echo EPI. Their relative merits and limitations are discussed. The BOLD contrast mechanisms responsible for spin echo fMRI are summarised, and the spatial origin of the signal within the neocortex discussed. The major publications concerning the use of spin echo fMRI are examined. At present the most promising application for this methodology would appear to be in the examination of cortical layers and columns. The balance of experimental and theoretical evidence accumulated to date leads the author to propose that: (i) There is little point in conducting spin-echo fMRI at main magnetic field strengths of 3T and below; (ii) There are fundamental limitations to acquiring spin-echo BOLD data at 7T and above; (iii) Whole brain coverage with SE-BOLD at very high static magnetic field strengths could prove valuable; and (iv) SE-BOLD is probably better suited to study cortical columns than cortical layers. Recently gradient-echo approaches for high spatial resolution fMRI have been demonstrated that employ special techniques to avoid the effects of larger post capillary vessels. The coming years will show whether spin-echo techniques can remain the method of choice for high spatial resolution studies, and whether they can extend their range of application at 7T and above.</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - history</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Capillarity</subject><subject>Conduction</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - history</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - history</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Origins</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0E4v0LKIINm4QZO05sNggqHpVASFDWVuJOIFUbF7tB4u9xVR4SG1iNF2fu1fgwliBkCFicTLKOeu_aWfVMGQfkGWAGINbYNoKWqZYlX1--pUgVot5iOyFMAEBjrjbZFuc8l0LiNjt8nLddSvbFJc3dw_A0Gb1QMnfOJ56m1aJ13dke22iqaaD9z7nLnq4uR4Ob9Pb-ejg4v02tRLVIq6YB1NAAL2qR56KuGkVcllTnoEhbUEVpNdWV5spCXVrFEQmpyWVecElilx2vcufevfYUFmbWBkvTadWR64PBokShpdL8bxSEKiAvQf8D5YJrKXQZ0aNf6MT1vos3x-5CgS64WAaqFWW9C8FTY-Y-ivDvMcos7ZiJ-bFjlnYMoIl24urBZ0Ffz2j8vfilIwIXK4DiP7-15E2wLXWWxq0nuzBj1_7d8gErVKES</recordid><startdate>20120815</startdate><enddate>20120815</enddate><creator>Norris, David G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120815</creationdate><title>Spin-echo fMRI: The poor relation?</title><author>Norris, David G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-aff0190f026b3443baf8e257eb408e9c0867c9eba928c0b7c8211e1ef454625e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - history</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Capillarity</topic><topic>Conduction</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - history</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - history</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Origins</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Norris, David G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Norris, David G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spin-echo fMRI: The poor relation?</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2012-08-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1109</spage><epage>1115</epage><pages>1109-1115</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Spin-echo fMRI offers a potentially better intrinsic functional spatial resolution than its gradient echo counterpart, as well as the elimination of signal dropouts in the image. This comes at the price of a significant loss in sensitivity. In this article the main methods for measuring spin-echo fMRI are presented: HASTE, SSFP, RASER and most importantly spin-echo EPI. Their relative merits and limitations are discussed. The BOLD contrast mechanisms responsible for spin echo fMRI are summarised, and the spatial origin of the signal within the neocortex discussed. The major publications concerning the use of spin echo fMRI are examined. At present the most promising application for this methodology would appear to be in the examination of cortical layers and columns. The balance of experimental and theoretical evidence accumulated to date leads the author to propose that: (i) There is little point in conducting spin-echo fMRI at main magnetic field strengths of 3T and below; (ii) There are fundamental limitations to acquiring spin-echo BOLD data at 7T and above; (iii) Whole brain coverage with SE-BOLD at very high static magnetic field strengths could prove valuable; and (iv) SE-BOLD is probably better suited to study cortical columns than cortical layers. Recently gradient-echo approaches for high spatial resolution fMRI have been demonstrated that employ special techniques to avoid the effects of larger post capillary vessels. The coming years will show whether spin-echo techniques can remain the method of choice for high spatial resolution studies, and whether they can extend their range of application at 7T and above.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22245351</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8119 |
ispartof | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-08, Vol.62 (2), p.1109-1115 |
issn | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671395892 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Brain Brain - physiology Brain Mapping - history Brain Mapping - methods Capillarity Conduction Fourier transforms History, 20th Century History, 21st Century Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - history Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Magnetic fields Magnetic Resonance Imaging - history Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Measurement techniques NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Origins Radio frequency Sensitivity and Specificity Spatial resolution Strength Studies |
title | Spin-echo fMRI: The poor relation? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A13%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spin-echo%20fMRI:%20The%20poor%20relation?&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Norris,%20David%20G.&rft.date=2012-08-15&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1109&rft.epage=1115&rft.pages=1109-1115&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1023295397%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1668096239&rft_id=info:pmid/22245351&rft_els_id=S1053811912000067&rfr_iscdi=true |