How the subject can improve fingerprint image quality

Traditionally, the biometric field has viewed the subject as a passive source of the biometric sample rather than as an interactive component of the biometric system. But fingerprint image quality is highly dependent on the human-computer interaction and usability considerations of the acquisition s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electronic imaging 2008-01, Vol.17 (1), p.011007-0110010
Hauptverfasser: Theofanos, Mary Frances, Micheals, Ross J, Orandi, Shahram, Stanton, Brian, Zhang, Nien Fan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 0110010
container_issue 1
container_start_page 011007
container_title Journal of electronic imaging
container_volume 17
creator Theofanos, Mary Frances
Micheals, Ross J
Orandi, Shahram
Stanton, Brian
Zhang, Nien Fan
description Traditionally, the biometric field has viewed the subject as a passive source of the biometric sample rather than as an interactive component of the biometric system. But fingerprint image quality is highly dependent on the human-computer interaction and usability considerations of the acquisition system. Those factors impacting the acquisition of high-quality images must be identified, and real-time feedback for subjects to ensure acceptable quality images must be integrated into fingerprint capture systems. We report on a usability study that examined the influence of instructional materials on the user (subject) performance of a 10-print slap acquisition process. In addition, we also investigated the relationship of pressure and image quality as a mechanism to provide real-time feedback to the subject. The usability study included 300 participants who received instructions and interacted with the scanner. How information is provided to the subject on interacting with the fingerprint device does indeed affect image quality. The pressure findings are less conclusive; there was no clear relationship between image quality and pressure that could be exploited for feedback to the subject. However, a minimum pressure was required to initiate our capture process.
doi_str_mv 10.1117/1.2892681
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671383949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671383949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-7b139068f32f57578da7102a932c500455ae47f1e234c18b3d995c34e584f8483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEURYMoWKsL_8EsdTH1vXxMkqWU2lYqbhTchTRN6pTpTDuZUfrvjba4upfH4XE5hNwijBBRPuCIKk0LhWdkgKKAnFL9cZ46oMy1Bn1JrmLcACAqjgMiZs131n36LPbLjXdd5mydldtd23z5LJT12re7tqy7dLNrn-17W5Xd4ZpcBFtFf3PKIXl_mryNZ_nidTofPy5yRwvR5XKJTEOhAqNBSCHVykoEajWjTgBwIaznMqCnjDtUS7bSWjjGvVA8KK7YkNwd_6Y9-97HzmzL6HxV2do3fTRYSGSKaa4Ten9EXdvE2Ppg0u6tbQ8GwfyqMWhOahJLj2zclf6fe57MXyZpVnIj4S-SJIBTZz8auGFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671383949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How the subject can improve fingerprint image quality</title><source>SPIE Digital Library (Journals)</source><creator>Theofanos, Mary Frances ; Micheals, Ross J ; Orandi, Shahram ; Stanton, Brian ; Zhang, Nien Fan</creator><creatorcontrib>Theofanos, Mary Frances ; Micheals, Ross J ; Orandi, Shahram ; Stanton, Brian ; Zhang, Nien Fan</creatorcontrib><description>Traditionally, the biometric field has viewed the subject as a passive source of the biometric sample rather than as an interactive component of the biometric system. But fingerprint image quality is highly dependent on the human-computer interaction and usability considerations of the acquisition system. Those factors impacting the acquisition of high-quality images must be identified, and real-time feedback for subjects to ensure acceptable quality images must be integrated into fingerprint capture systems. We report on a usability study that examined the influence of instructional materials on the user (subject) performance of a 10-print slap acquisition process. In addition, we also investigated the relationship of pressure and image quality as a mechanism to provide real-time feedback to the subject. The usability study included 300 participants who received instructions and interacted with the scanner. How information is provided to the subject on interacting with the fingerprint device does indeed affect image quality. The pressure findings are less conclusive; there was no clear relationship between image quality and pressure that could be exploited for feedback to the subject. However, a minimum pressure was required to initiate our capture process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1017-9909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1560-229X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1117/1.2892681</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEIME5</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Acquisitions ; Biometrics ; Feedback ; Fingerprints ; Image quality ; Marketing ; Real time</subject><ispartof>Journal of electronic imaging, 2008-01, Vol.17 (1), p.011007-0110010</ispartof><rights>2008 SPIE and IS&amp;T</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-7b139068f32f57578da7102a932c500455ae47f1e234c18b3d995c34e584f8483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journalArticle/Download?urlId=10.1117/1.2892681$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspie$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2892681$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspie$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,18965,27924,27925,55386,55387</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Theofanos, Mary Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micheals, Ross J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orandi, Shahram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Nien Fan</creatorcontrib><title>How the subject can improve fingerprint image quality</title><title>Journal of electronic imaging</title><description>Traditionally, the biometric field has viewed the subject as a passive source of the biometric sample rather than as an interactive component of the biometric system. But fingerprint image quality is highly dependent on the human-computer interaction and usability considerations of the acquisition system. Those factors impacting the acquisition of high-quality images must be identified, and real-time feedback for subjects to ensure acceptable quality images must be integrated into fingerprint capture systems. We report on a usability study that examined the influence of instructional materials on the user (subject) performance of a 10-print slap acquisition process. In addition, we also investigated the relationship of pressure and image quality as a mechanism to provide real-time feedback to the subject. The usability study included 300 participants who received instructions and interacted with the scanner. How information is provided to the subject on interacting with the fingerprint device does indeed affect image quality. The pressure findings are less conclusive; there was no clear relationship between image quality and pressure that could be exploited for feedback to the subject. However, a minimum pressure was required to initiate our capture process.</description><subject>Acquisitions</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Fingerprints</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Real time</subject><issn>1017-9909</issn><issn>1560-229X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEURYMoWKsL_8EsdTH1vXxMkqWU2lYqbhTchTRN6pTpTDuZUfrvjba4upfH4XE5hNwijBBRPuCIKk0LhWdkgKKAnFL9cZ46oMy1Bn1JrmLcACAqjgMiZs131n36LPbLjXdd5mydldtd23z5LJT12re7tqy7dLNrn-17W5Xd4ZpcBFtFf3PKIXl_mryNZ_nidTofPy5yRwvR5XKJTEOhAqNBSCHVykoEajWjTgBwIaznMqCnjDtUS7bSWjjGvVA8KK7YkNwd_6Y9-97HzmzL6HxV2do3fTRYSGSKaa4Ten9EXdvE2Ppg0u6tbQ8GwfyqMWhOahJLj2zclf6fe57MXyZpVnIj4S-SJIBTZz8auGFg</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Theofanos, Mary Frances</creator><creator>Micheals, Ross J</creator><creator>Orandi, Shahram</creator><creator>Stanton, Brian</creator><creator>Zhang, Nien Fan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>How the subject can improve fingerprint image quality</title><author>Theofanos, Mary Frances ; Micheals, Ross J ; Orandi, Shahram ; Stanton, Brian ; Zhang, Nien Fan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-7b139068f32f57578da7102a932c500455ae47f1e234c18b3d995c34e584f8483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Fingerprints</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Real time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Theofanos, Mary Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micheals, Ross J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orandi, Shahram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Nien Fan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of electronic imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Theofanos, Mary Frances</au><au>Micheals, Ross J</au><au>Orandi, Shahram</au><au>Stanton, Brian</au><au>Zhang, Nien Fan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How the subject can improve fingerprint image quality</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electronic imaging</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>011007</spage><epage>0110010</epage><pages>011007-0110010</pages><issn>1017-9909</issn><eissn>1560-229X</eissn><coden>JEIME5</coden><abstract>Traditionally, the biometric field has viewed the subject as a passive source of the biometric sample rather than as an interactive component of the biometric system. But fingerprint image quality is highly dependent on the human-computer interaction and usability considerations of the acquisition system. Those factors impacting the acquisition of high-quality images must be identified, and real-time feedback for subjects to ensure acceptable quality images must be integrated into fingerprint capture systems. We report on a usability study that examined the influence of instructional materials on the user (subject) performance of a 10-print slap acquisition process. In addition, we also investigated the relationship of pressure and image quality as a mechanism to provide real-time feedback to the subject. The usability study included 300 participants who received instructions and interacted with the scanner. How information is provided to the subject on interacting with the fingerprint device does indeed affect image quality. The pressure findings are less conclusive; there was no clear relationship between image quality and pressure that could be exploited for feedback to the subject. However, a minimum pressure was required to initiate our capture process.</abstract><doi>10.1117/1.2892681</doi><tpages>99004</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1017-9909
ispartof Journal of electronic imaging, 2008-01, Vol.17 (1), p.011007-0110010
issn 1017-9909
1560-229X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671383949
source SPIE Digital Library (Journals)
subjects Acquisitions
Biometrics
Feedback
Fingerprints
Image quality
Marketing
Real time
title How the subject can improve fingerprint image quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A53%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20the%20subject%20can%20improve%20fingerprint%20image%20quality&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electronic%20imaging&rft.au=Theofanos,%20Mary%20Frances&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=011007&rft.epage=0110010&rft.pages=011007-0110010&rft.issn=1017-9909&rft.eissn=1560-229X&rft.coden=JEIME5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1117/1.2892681&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671383949%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671383949&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true